• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Conclave Dev Diary #2 Power to the Council

Greetings!

I know last year featured a lot of dev diaries with very little information about new features of the game. The reason for this was the lack of an announcement of the expansion and we had decided not to talk about the expansion before the announcement. All that has changed now and last week @Doomdark gave you an overview of the features we’ve added and the aim of the expansion.

This week we’re going to go a bit deeper into the new council mechanics.

@Groogy has written the following presentation of the council:

So to the meat of this expansion and my favorite part. The empowerment of the council. As we promised we were gonna let the council in on the day to day governing of your realm becoming more than simply a privy council. Now in fact the strongest vassals in your realm will threaten with civil war if they are not given a position where they can become part of your council and in turn giving them influence on the politics of your realm. Having them on the council prevents them from joining factions and as a liege you can use this to stabilize his/her realm. The councillor will adopt a certain position, these are the colorful icons you see, and this position will dictate how they align themselves with the decisions you take but we will cover that in a later dev diary.
1.jpg

Since King Alfonso is a paranoid guy and constantly in hiding, his realm is mostly ruled by his council...

The councillors can choose to either yay, nay or abstain from a vote. You also get a vote (always voting yes when you’re suggesting something) and your own vote decides in the case of a tie. The characters abstaining from a vote are always swayed by the distribution of diplomacy skill between the yay and nay sayers. Meaning that some highly influential members might turn the tide in a vote as they persuade the voters that have no opinion on the matter. If the council has a majority voting yes on an action, you’ll be free to take that action, but if the council votes against the action, you face the choice of either going against the council or do something else. Going against the council will make it discontent as you have broken the contract with them. Such action also incur tyranny and the council members become free to create and join factions again for a limited time.

For conclave we have also changed how regencies work and the old system with a single regent deciding everything is gone. Instead, If you are in a regency, the regent is put on the council and will vote instead of you and you don’t have the option of going against a council vote.

2.jpg



The council also have powers to vote on your laws and even propose that a vote shall be started on something they want by cashing in on a favor they might have with their liege. But we will cover the redone laws in the next dev diary as well.

Next up @Moah, our newest addition to the team, will explain some of the new tools you have to influence your council members and how you as a vassal can make your liege do things for you:

Hello everyone,

I’m @Moah and I joined Paradox and the CK2 team recently. I’m here today to talk about Favors. As you know, in the game relationships to other characters are important, especially family. But family, friendships and rivalries are not the only kind of relationships that exist. Sometimes you just do a favor for someone, and hope that somewhere down the line, they’ll return it.

And since in the CK2 timeline debts, honor and duty had such a huge impact, we’ve modelled that through a mechanic we cleverly called “favors”.


Getting Support on the Council

As a liege (or part of the council), you can call in a favor on a council member to make them vote like you on the council for one year. This can be used to get an ok to revoke that title you want, execute someone you want to see dead and start that war that you’ve longed for, but the killjoys of the council is constantly saying no to, without the hassle of tyranny and factions. If you don’t have a favor to call in, you can request support from a council member in exchange of a favor. They can turn this down, but if they accept they’ll vote just as if you called a favor on them. The difference is that now you owe them a favor. This is one of the basic generators of favors and a way that vassals gain favors on their lieges. As a liege you can often gain a favor by fulfilling the ambition of a vassal and everyone can accept a sum of money in exchange for a favor. When dealing with powerful lords, you can expect their price to be quite high however.

You can only owe someone at most one favor at a time, so if you already owe them, you’ll have to wait in requesting support again until they’ve used that favor to gain something back. Council members can also call favors on each other and a clever vassal can set up scenarios where they control how the council votes.


Forcing Acceptance

Say you’ve accepted to support your liege on the council, or you paid the emperor of the HRE a large sum of money and you want your investment to pay off. With a favor in hand you can make them accept a marriage (some limitations apply) and gain that Non-Aggression pact you’ve been longing for.

Invite to Court, Educate Child and the Embargo interactions can also use favors to force acceptance and as the liege you can use a favor to keep a character out of factions.


Building a Strong Faction

If you have favors from your fellow vassals, you can use those to get them to join your faction (if they are valid to join the faction) and since they’re bound by the favor, they cannot freely leave the faction.


Pressing a Claim

If your liege owes you a favor, you can use that favor to propose a war declaration where he/she presses one of your claims. In order to do this, the council needs to vote in favor of the war declaration. The liege can deny your proposition, but doing so incurs tyranny and makes the council discontent.


There are more uses of favors that will be presented along with their respective features, but these were some of the basic ones.

3.png


4.png



Now @rageair will walk you through another new feature, the Realm Peace and how it will help you bring order to the realm.


Realm Peace

5.jpg


Previously, your level of Crown Authority decided if vassals were allowed to declare war or not. As of Conclave we’ve replaced this system with a more intuitive one - Realm Peace. With Realm Peace the ruler, in accordance with the Council, decide when wars waged between your vassals have to end. Do you need to change your Succession Law but your vassals just won’t stop fighting? Is the precarious balance of power in your realm being shifted by warmongering vassals? Enforce Realm Peace to make them stop!


After pressing the Realm Peace button your vassals have 3 months before the peace takes effect, after which all wars will end with a white peace. The Peace is then enforced for 60 months before your vassals can declare any internal wars. A long cooldown ensures that you’ll only want to use this ability when it’s really important, and when playing as a vassal you won’t ever find yourself in a completely deadlocked position where you’re not able to attack at all any longer!


Favors and Realm Peace

As a vassal, you can use a favor on your liege to interact with realm peace in two ways. First, you can block your liege from using the Realm Peace or stop a pending Realm Peace from taking effect. This makes sure that you actually get time to win the war that you invested all your precious coin to hire those Swiss mercenaries to fight for you and don’t just end up with nothing gained and empty coffers.

Secondly, you can ask your liege to use the Realm Peace for you. This can be pretty handy when you’re working your way to power and your rivals decide it’s time to partition your lands and join those parts into their own lands.
6.png



That’s all for this week. Next week we’ll take a closer look at how council members vote, the new education system and how we’re turning feudal lords into small business owners.
 
  • 221
  • 58
  • 2
Reactions:
I like that, but I dislike that it means removing a permanent solution. I want to be able to stabilize my realm.

Again someone would argue that the whole point of this is to prevent you from permanently stabilizing your realm.
 
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
Again someone would argue that the whole point of this is to prevent you from permanently stabilizing your realm.
But that's silly and moving the game away from a connection with history. Historically, plenty of rulers were able to eliminate fighting within their realms, particulalry towards the end of the period. From a gameplay perspective it also doesn't make sense, as it prevents you from gaining a sense of accomplishment from stabilzing your realm and replaces it with a sense of meh sameness, with each ruler facing the exact same sense of difficulties as his predecessor, weakening the sense of strengthening one's internal position through the strength of a predecessor.
 
  • 6
  • 4
Reactions:
But that's silly and moving the game away from a connection with history. Historically, plenty of rulers were able to eliminate fighting within their realms, particulalry towards the end of the period. From a gameplay perspective it also doesn't make sense, as it prevents you from gaining a sense of accomplishment from stabilzing your realm and replaces it with a sense of meh sameness, with each ruler facing the exact same sense of difficulties as his predecessor, weakening the sense of strengthening one's internal position through the strength of a predecessor.
We still don't know what the "Late" option means.
 
Last edited:
  • 10
Reactions:
But that's silly and moving the game away from a connection with history. Historically, plenty of rulers were able to eliminate fighting within their realms, particulalry towards the end of the period. From a gameplay perspective it also doesn't make sense, as it prevents you from gaining a sense of accomplishment from stabilzing your realm and replaces it with a sense of meh sameness, with each ruler facing the exact same sense of difficulties as his predecessor, weakening the sense of strengthening one's internal position through the strength of a predecessor.

So you basically want to play EUIV in CK2?
 
  • 6
  • 3
Reactions:
Will your vassals care which position on the council they hold, or will they be just be happy to be there?

For example, say I have two vassals, one wishes to be made chancellor, the other marshal, but it turns out that both would be far better suited for the other job.

Will they get pissy at me for placing them in the spot that they are actually best at rather than the specific post they wanted.
 
Will your vassals care which position on the council they hold, or will they be just be happy to be there?

For example, say I have two vassals, one wishes to be made chancellor, the other marshal, but it turns out that both would be far better suited for the other job.

Will they get pissy at me for placing them in the spot that they are actually best at rather than the specific post they wanted.
If you fulfill their ambition though you get a favour with them.
 
If you fulfill their ambition though you get a favour with them.
Yes, I am aware.

In that case let us say that I am already owed favors from both.

Is there any sort of negative opinion modifier attached to not giving a vassal the exact position they would prefer?

Also, related question, how does the 'change council position' interaction function. Can you only use to move someone to an empty position, or can you use it to swap the position of two members?
 
But that's silly and moving the game away from a connection with history. Historically, plenty of rulers were able to eliminate fighting within their realms, particulalry towards the end of the period. From a gameplay perspective it also doesn't make sense, as it prevents you from gaining a sense of accomplishment from stabilzing your realm and replaces it with a sense of meh sameness, with each ruler facing the exact same sense of difficulties as his predecessor, weakening the sense of strengthening one's internal position through the strength of a predecessor.
Please elaborate "historically". It is a vague argument that I would like expanded. Can you enforce your claim with examples, please? I am genuinly curious. :) As others have stated, it does also seem that a "late" administration has been added.
 
Guys, guys, where are your manners?!

I’m @Moah and I joined Paradox and the CK2 team recently.

Let us all give Moah a nice and warm welcome! The upcoming features sound amazing, basically catapulting the actual gameplay depth of CK2 onto another level. The game really needed some DLC of this kind. Its breadth has become wide enough. Conclave lays to rest the creeping fears that CK2's active development is nearing its end.
 
  • 17
Reactions:
And how is the British method spelling more pleasant to read? Many in the Western Hemisphere and East Asia, and not just (natural) English speakers, will argue that it's unnecessarily clunky or superfluous. Neither side is particularly wrong or right, and I think what matters more is that the actual meaning of the sentence is properly communicated.

And either way, it's irrelevant to the Dev Diary.

Actually, it's not irrelevant. For example, I'm OK-ish with BE (even if it'd be wrong) to depict events in the Middle Ages. I'm not OK with AE doing this - even if, as in this instance, favor would fit the time better than favour (as the convention needs to be uniform).
 
  • 5
Reactions:
How moddable is this new feature going to be in general? Can one expand the number of councillors?

Lost in the thread, so repeated. Does anyone know? Will certain traits influence a leading vassal's desire to become a councillor? (Eg shy might prefer to stay at home, but proud would insist on joining, etc.)
 
  • 1
Reactions:
That's already moddable (at least, "free_revoke_on_tiers = { count }" should work just as well as it does for duke, king, etc.) but it might require a council vote with Conclave.

So, "free_revoke_on_tiers = { count }" should work with Imperial Administration?
 
So you basically want to play EUIV in CK2?

No, I want to play CKII in EU4, which is why I keep asking the Devs to fix the damned save converter.
 
  • 6
Reactions:
Lost in the thread, so repeated. Does anyone know? Will certain traits influence a leading vassal's desire to become a councillor? (Eg shy might prefer to stay at home, but proud would insist on joining, etc.)
From what I read in the thread you can mod the number of people on the council, so far it looks like it is only power that makes them want to be on the council more than normal, and you can mod in more interactions that the council can vote on.
 
From what I read in the thread you can mod the number of people on the council, so far it looks like it is only power that makes them want to be on the council more than normal, and you can mod in more interactions that the council can vote on.

Thanks for the swift reply.

Though I do wish they'd make it a little more interesting than just power.
 
Actually, it's not irrelevant. For example, I'm OK-ish with BE (even if it'd be wrong) to depict events in the Middle Ages. I'm not OK with AE doing this - even if, as in this instance, favor would fit the time better than favour (as the convention needs to be uniform).

Ehem... Shouldn't we use Middle English in this case? Favor is absolutelly correct in Middle English.

"From Middle English favour, favor, faver, from Anglo-Norman favour, from mainland Old French favor"
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/favor#English
 
  • 5
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions: