• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Hello everyone and welcome to the last development diary for 1.12/Common Sense. This of course does not mean there won't be a new dev diary next week as we're committed to posting dev diaries every week regardless of whether an expansion is announced or not, it just means that next week we'll be talking about something else. We may even be talking about YOU.

Probably not though.

Either way, today you get a wrap-up dev diary, where we go over the map changes, new countries and some important mechanics changes that will be coming in 1.12.


Technology
Technology levels have been tweaked somewhat in 1.12, mostly to match the new building system. Buildings now unlock consistently on certain levels (4, 6, 8, 11, 14, 17, 19 and 22) with the exception of the Castle (the lowest level fort) which unlocks at tech 1. Since 4 is now a building level, and because we wanted to slow down certain countries' starting exploration, the first idea group unlock was moved to Administrative Tech level 5.

Furthermore, there have been changes to Administrative Efficiency. Administrative Efficiency now only goes up to 50% (down from 75%) but also affects the cost of creating cores. A new technological effect called Development Efficiency was also introduced, which reduces Development Cost and unlocks at roughly the same time as Administrative Efficiency. Finally, Force March was changed. It now unlocks at Administrative Technology 15 instead of 9.

qhWlM3H.png



Gold Mines
Now that you can improve your gold mines with diplomatic power, we felt that we needed a way to prevent the player from simply sinking all that power into building the world's largest pile of gold. As such, each gold mine with a base production higher than 10 has a monthly chance to deplete. This chance starts extremely low, but exponentially increases the more you improve the mine. A gold mine that depletes will have its base production halved. We've also made it so that the Merchant Republic bonus to locally produced goods does not apply to gold mines.

2hbmdZi.png



Independent Economics
If you've ever tried your hand at Raja of the Rajput Reich, you may know that playing a one province minor with a single crappy province isn't too much fun. Your economy can barely support a regiment or two, and you're almost completely dependent on allies to accomplish anything. During development we discovered that this problem was further compounded by the new fort system as minor countries simply didn't have enough troops to besiege an enemy's fort, and decided to make a few tweaks.

All independent nations now have a base tax income of 1 ducat/month regardless of the value of their territories. Independent nations also get a hefty +6 bonus to their land and naval forcelimits, allowing them to support enough of an army to at least make a go at their neighbour's castles. This tax bonus replaces the old tax income bonus on capital provinces. Subject nations get a lesser version of this bonus more along the lines of pre-1.12 minors, getting 0.25 ducats/month base income and +2 to their forcelimits.

Goky0sF.png



Fort System Changes
I also wanted to go over how the fort system in 1.12 has changed during development. The fort system was the topic of the April 9th dev diary, but since then we've been iterating on and improving the design according to the feedback we got from QA, beta testers and fans. One thing that was very quickly evident was that the larger garrisons did not quite work out - forts able to sortie 20k armies could result in unwinnable wars and minors simply could not muster the troops needed to beat such numbers. As such, the garrison was reduced back to 1k per fort level, but we added an additional requirement that you must have at least 3000 men per fort level to effectively besiege a fort, so a level 2 fort needs 6k soldiers to besiege.

In the final 1.12 version, we have 4 fort buildings starting at the level 2 fort 'Castle' and ending at the level 8 fort 'Fortress'. When you unlock a new type of fort, you will also unlock new techniques for laying siege. What this means is that if you are besieging a fort that is of an older model than the best one you can construct, you get +1 to your siege and breach rolls for each level of 'age' the fort is behind your technology. This provides an additional incentive to upgrade old forts to the newer, more expensive models and means that late-game armies will quickly breach and capture medieval castles. As before, capital provinces add an additional fort level that is not connected to buildings, so a capital with a Castle with have 3 fort levels with a Zone of Control and a capital without any fort will have 1 fort level and no Zone of Control.

Furthermore, we've also improved the visualization of the Zones of Control. When a unit is selected, the map will now display the Zones of Control of your forts (displayed as walls with blue circles) and the forts of those you are at war with (displayed as walls with yellow circles). When hovering over a province in a hostile Zone of Control, the ZoC icon will change to show you to tell whether movement to the province is blocked or not (in addition, a tooltip will always show up for provinces that are blocked whether they are in a ZoC or not).

jzHxn1d.png



Finally, I turn the word over to Trin Tragula, our scripter, to talk about map changes in 1.12.


Map Changes

For the most part EU4 inherited its map of Europe from its predecessor. Initially this meant that it was one of the most detailed regions in the world though this was significantly less true for specific parts of the continent. For instance Eastern and northern Germany have didn't have the level of detail comparable to the areas along the Rhine.

As patch 1.8 came to bring the rest of the world to a much more detailed state the European inconsistencies became a lot more apparent and with the 1.12 patch that accompanies Common Sense we have therefore taken the opportunity to increase the level of detail of the areas the new expansion touches. Germany and Italy in particular has received attention but given the new fort and development mechanics having provinces of comparable size has in general been deemed more desirable and adjustments have been made in a few more regions as well. The opportunity was also taken to harmonize development levels with those of the rest of the world a bit more.

Germany:

H1vnfPL.jpg


In Germany the map overhaul has meant re-balancing the base development values (they are generally lower than they where before) and adding a fair bit of provinces to split overly large ones and make the region more consistent. This has resulted in added strategic depth especially for the medium powers that previously had larger provinces simply because they where less fragmented.
The changes are a bit too spread out to comment in full but here are a few highlights:
  • We can now show the full extent of the areas under the control of Brandenburg, as we have split Altmark from Magdeburg and Sternberg from Neumark.
  • The Kingdom of Bohemia and their Silesian vassals have gotten new provinces to better reflect their strength in their home area. Bohemia should now prove much more resilient to outside aggression. The shape and position has also been brought more in line with the historical reality.
  • Bavaria has been split up a bit to give them more strategic depth and to be able to portray the economical strength of the area a bit better with the loss of the Free City of Memmingen and Nuremberg (added in the patch before this).
  • While Swabia has not had any larger changes to provinces two new Free City tags have been introduced here to better reflect the myriad of Free Cities in this area historically, something the game up to this point hasn't really covered.
  • The Baltic coastline has also been made much more detailed with additional ports given to both Pommerania and Mecklenburg to bring the area on par with the western coast of Germany and better reflect the realities of the northern German coastline.
  • While the low countries themselves are fairly detailed compared to most of the map the directly adjacent area in modern Germany was not. Kleve and Berg have now been split apart and the Bishopric of Münster has also been given an extra province. The new Loon province will also now allow for the Bishopric of Liege to be split apart should the political realities demand it.

New Tags:
1. Memmingen (Free City)
2. Ravensburg (Free City)
3. Nassau
4. Verden (replaces the old Archbishopric of Bremen tag in the Stade province)
5. Bremen (republican revolter in the Hanseatic Bremen province)

Italy:

lxYUa4J.jpg


Unlike Germany the development levels of Italy has actually been increased a fair bit as has the number of provinces throughout the Peninsula. Northern Italy in this era was famously both rich and divided and we felt the EU4 setup in the area up to this point hasn't managed to capture this as well as it could. A number of new provinces has been added as well as two additional tags. The cultural setup was also balkanized to further show the diversity of the region and the difficulty for an outside power to efficiently conquer the entire peninsula.
Highlights:
  • In the north the Milan province has been split and the Marquisate of Montferrat has been introduced. Changes here aim to create better room for maneuver, to strengthen Milan and in general to further complicate a region that saw some of the most iconic wars of the EU4 era.
  • The Tuscan region has seen the introduction of a new tag for the republic of Lucca as well as an additional province for Tuscany to better show the size and strength of that state.
  • The Papal States have been further diversified and strengthened by splitting Ancona from Urbino and Umbria from Roma.
  • Southern Italy while much poorer than the north previously had much bigger provinces than the neighboring Italian areas or even the Maghreb. While the south is still poorer than the North its wealth has been increased. The Kingdom of Naples has had a number of its provinces split to allow for greater diversity and room to maneuver. The rich island of Sicily has also gotten an additional province.
  • Provence in the adjacent region has also been split in two. The upland part of the province is now separate.
  • The island of Sardinia has been split into two provinces.

New Tags:
1. Montferrat, in 1444 a vassal of Savoy ruled by Giovanni Giacomo of the Paleologi dynasty.
2. The City of Lucca. A new republic between Tuscany/Florence and Genoa.

New Italian culture group:
1. Piedmontese
2. Ligurian
3. Lombard*
4. Venetian
5. Tuscan
6. Umbrian*
7. Neapolitan*
8. Sicilian*
9. Sardinian

(* = culture existed prior to 1.12)

Poland & Prussia:

vMnraqh.jpg


The new patch aims to improve this area in more than one way. Apart from adding provinces to this region care has been taken to ensure that their location and shape better follow the historical realities. While the main goal of the added provinces and border changes in this area has been to strengthen the eastern players and allow for better military maneuvers it should now also be possible to represent the historical borders of later start dates to a much higher degree.
The entire region of East Prussia has therefore been moved to the south west and, should the game turn out that way, Ducal and Royal Prussia can now have borders more similar to their historical counterparts. Similar changes have been made in Poland though these are perhaps less immediately evident, the aim here has been to both reasonably portray Polish administrative divisions and allow for the borders of the various Polish partitions.

Furthermore development levels in Poland, the Ukraine and Prussia has been increased to better show the economic strength of the region.

Spain:
8HlJHj3.jpg

Much like many areas of western Europe outside of Italy the Iberian peninsula has had its development levels decreased to be more consistent across the map. The area has however also has provinces added to eastern Iberia which previously lacked the detail of the central parts. The Kingdom of Aragon now has both more strategic depth and economic strength (especially when you include their Italian possessions). The changes will also allow for more interesting warfare between France and Spain when/if the peninsula unifies.

Southeastern Europe and the Kingdom of Hungary:
ni6FQ9x.jpg

While not the main focus of the overhaul South-Eastern Europe has had its development strengthened to better conform with other regions and to better show the actual strength of the states in the area.
Additionally provinces have been added to a few areas where the level of detail was previously lacking such as Wallachia, Serbia, Bosnia, modern Slovakia and Northern Macedonia.

Seazones & New Islands:

YAfLuDI.jpg

gnxNZ0B.jpg


In order to make things a bit more interesting there has been a number of adjustments to seazones to allow for more competition over certain areas. More islands will now allow you to fabricate claims on the mainland and vice versa. Most notably the seazones around Crete and the Baleares have been removed to encourage the mainland powers to compete over the islands.
Four new island provinces have also been enlarged and made proper provinces:
1: The (future) Pirate Haven of Djerba in northern Africa. Controlled by Tunis at the start of the game but historically the starting point of Ottoman Ambitions in the western Mediterranean and the site of some iconic battles and sieges over the course of the EU4 period.
2: The African island of Sao Tome has been split from the Gabon province and is now another colonizable port for those looking to explore down the coast of Western Africa.
3: The islands of Qeshm and Hormuz has been enlarged and split from the old Hormuz province. The new province now houses the Kingdom of Hormuz which had historically relocated it's capital to the island of Hormuz to avoid the turmoil on the mainland before the start of the game.
As Qeshm and Hormuz are so close to eachother and Hormuz so much smaller the result has been one large island but given that Qeshm was an integral part of the kingdom this approximation was thought preferable to a very small island right next to it.
4. Lastly the island of Euboea is now it's own province under Venetian control in 1444.


That's all for today! We'll be posting the 1.12 patch notes and a detailed overview of new national idea groups sometime before release
 
Last edited:
Engine update won't really be evident ro user except as bugfixes and optimizations. It did fix the global warming bug on mac & linux.
Hooray! Thanks for looking out for your non-Windows customers. That bug was rather annoying. Remind me to buy an extra unit pack or two in appreciation...:)
 
  • 2
Reactions:
I am still sad that Thuringia got shafted in the "increase province count"-expansion in Germany as it was not near as unified as the map wants to suggest or even as small as it appears on it. I would have preferred it to be splitted into three parts to at least reflect the most important divisions between Eisenach in the west and Altenburg or Weimar in the east as Wettin possessions and Erfurt in between as free city territory. It would also help as transition to Victoria because there is simply no way the starting situation of Victoria could be mirrowed even if I transfer a game from January 1820 without any change.

Eisenach were Luther translated the bible, Erfurt which spotted a population of 20.000 in the 15th century and was a major tradecenter as well as housing the biggest University north of the Alpes - and would fit into the Imperial Free City feature well -, Altenburg (home of the German game of Skat) or Weimar (capital of Saxe-Weimar as the largest Ernestine duchy) are all good region names fitting to be equal the likes of the division of Saxony instead of being crammed together as Thuringia.

I agree that splitting Thurnigia to better depict the Saxon Duchies would be nice.

But given their history, dividing it up into not-tiny provinces that would reasonably represent the region throughout the period would be difficult. Only Saxe-Weimar really existed fully through the period; all the others got shuffled around, with one city being the capital of a duchy at one point, and then being subordinate at other times. Coburg was about the only other one consistently the capital of a duchy, and even then there are significant gaps. But then again, the division between Weimar and Coburg was the most important early division, in 1572 (The Division of Erfurt), and those two duchies have the highest "name recognition", so a Thuringia divided between those two would seem reasonable, perhaps with an independent Erfurt between them. But dividing it into more than 2 or 3 provinces would likely make the provinces too small to be workable, and attempting to create provinces that could even remotely trace the development of the duchies through the period - well, that way would lie madness...
 
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
imo
- provinces with no fort shouldn't be insta-occupied: instead the base siege chance should just start with Walls Breached and 0lvl fort - so with enough artillery and leader siege you will have a chance to take it in 1 siege cycle, or you can assault (since the walls are breached by default).
- you should be able to move anywhere you want, but if going into enemy fort's ZoC you should get additional arrival attrition.

western europe is excessively detailed now, another european bias :p... look at poor hungary and anything in the east now xD
 
Last edited:
I really like the map changes, but the area close to home is inexplicably weird again..

First, the capital of Mecklenburg has been in Schwerin since the 14th century, never was in Rostock (though Rostock is the most important city). The western part should be named Schwerin, not Wismar.
Then, there is the Brandenburgian border.. The province name there unfortunately is illegible on the screenshot, it seems to be Uckermark/Ueckermark, however.
I have two issues with this: (1) Uckermark is actually an area further east, bordering the Oder river. (see right map, it was actually the march bordering Pomerania) The screenshot province is actually most of the the Strelitz area of Mecklenburg (that was always a part of Mecklenburg during the timeframe)
(2) Proper historical borders are not really possible with the screenshot-borders. If MKL does conquer the eastern province, it will have an odd protusion that has no basis in reality. That protusion doesn't help gameplay either, as the border between Berlin and Greifswald provinces is slightly obscured.

d4su3RG.png

I see two ways to solve this without adding provinces:
(left map) Uckermark is renamed to Strelitz and becomes part of Mecklenburg, borders are adjusted accordingly (southern parts of Rostock province can be used to enlarge Strelitz, if needed)
(right map) Uckermark is moved to its proper position, Berlin loses its border with Greifswald, Uckermark gains border with Neumark, borders of Rostock are expended to cover eastern Mecklenburg/Strelitz
alternatively, both could be done, but that leaves rather small provinces.
Wismar should be renamed to Schwerin and become capital of Mecklenburg in any case.

You could probably make an argument for Rostock being renamed to Gustrow as well, since that was the second partition of Mecklenburg after Mecklenburg-Schwerin. Mecklenburg-Strelitz was broken off of Mecklenburg-Gustrow, IIRC. Although Rostock is fairly significant as a Hanseatic port, so perhaps that deserves its own coastal province (Gustrow is decently inland). I think the real reason Paradox opted for Wismar is that it was a Swedish possession for some time.
 
  • 2
Reactions:
  • 1
Reactions:
You could probably make an argument for Rostock being renamed to Gustrow as well, since that was the second partition of Mecklenburg after Mecklenburg-Schwerin. Mecklenburg-Strelitz was broken off of Mecklenburg-Gustrow, IIRC. Although Rostock is fairly significant as a Hanseatic port, so perhaps that deserves its own coastal province (Gustrow is decently inland). I think the real reason Paradox opted for Wismar is that it was a Swedish possession for some time.
Mecklenburg-Güstrow died off in 1695 and a dispute over the heritage followed, settled in 1701. Mecklenburg-Strelitz was mostly parts of M-Güstrow, but also M-Schwerin (like Ratzeburg). Splitting off Rostock ends up with too small a province, even though it is somewhat justified. An alternative province name could be Werle (principality which included around two thirds of the current Rostock province), I do prefer Rostock, however.
Yes, Wismar was Swedish for a while, but not much more than the city proper and a few minor territories, not half the country. Wismar also was the capital before the 14th century.

To really model the area, one would need to split the two provinces (Wismar/Schwerin, Rostock/Werle, but that is ridiculous detail for an area that didn't change borders that much.
 
Just a question, is there in english, or dutch for that matter, a differenciation between the landscape and the country?
In norwegian we would say Nederland (Singularis, indefinite) when talking about the country, and Nederlendene (Pluralis, definite) when talking about the landscape, as in the spanish netherlands (De spanske Nederlendene)
The netherlands (plural) is mostly used to describe all of the low countries including belgium and luxembourg, and our country is officialy called the kingdom of the netherlands, but usually we use a singular name: Nederland (Netherland)
 
The netherlands (plural) is mostly used to describe all of the low countries including belgium and luxembourg, and our country is officialy called the kingdom of the netherlands, but usually we use a singular name: Nederland (Netherland)
Not quite correct. There's the geographic area of the 'low countries', the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and 'Nederland'. Nederland is legally one of the countries within the Kingdom of the Netherlands (alongside Aruba, Curacao and Sint Maarten in the Caribbean), they're not interchangeable in a legal sense. Although colloquially no-one bothers with that.
 
Short question Wiz, what sea zones border the island of Crete now that you've deleted their sea zone?

EDIT: Nevermind, one of the map teasers more or less shows the area.
 
Last edited:
But really ... all this confusion exists only because nobody wants to offend anyone else in their political beliefs. :p
Agree with all of it, though the claim that Frisian is might "linguistically not be part of the Netherlands" is (in my eyes at least) very dubious. I understand what you meas as we (I'm Frisian) have our own language and more of a pre-Netherlands history. But that does not we are in any way less part of the Netherlands/Lowlands just as Scotland and Wales and England are all British.
We are of course not "Hollands" ;)
 
  • 1
Reactions:
As I've said repeatedly: Sure, as soon as we come up with a better alternative that isn't far too overcomplicated. None have presented themselves yet.
have you considered introducing another type of strait which would work the same as a regular strait except for the home continent calculations? such a strait (let's call it a deepwater strait for now) could additionally increase attition to crossing units, or behave differently in winter and summer weather. it would obviously need to be represented in another color on the map.

possible candidates are:
Gibraltar.
the strait between Hormuz and Oman (as opposed to the one between Hormuz and Persia).
La Manche.
Åland straits.
the strait between Ireland and Scotland.
straits between the Caribbean islands.
(for most of them, aside of Gibraltar, the home continent factor doesn't really matter, but things like attition possibly could).
 
  • 4
Reactions:
It was called the ukraine well into soviet times. Having "the" in front is a bit archaic and uncommon, but it is certainly not wrong. Still happens today. I sometimes use it, because I think it sounds better. You can try to be a grammar nazi about it, but you need to realise languages are not as strict and organised as you think they are. They are organic.

OK, next time i'll use "the Sweden" or "the Russia", for example. Thanks for clarification.
 
Last edited:
  • 7
  • 1
Reactions: