• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Tinto Maps #9 - 5th of July 2024 - Carpathia and the Balkans

Greetings, and welcome to another Tinto Maps! This week we will be taking a look at Carpathia and the Balkans! It will most likely be an interesting region to take a look at, with a lot of passion involved… So I’ll just make an initial friendly reminder to keep a civil discussion, as in the latest Tinto Maps, as that’s the easiest way for us to read and gather your feedback, and improve the region in a future iteration. And now, let’s start with the maps!

Countries:
Countries.png

Carpathia and the Balkans start in a very interesting situation. The Kingdom of Hungary probably stands as the most powerful country in 1337, but that only happened after the recovery of the royal power enforced by Charles I Robert of the House of Anjou, who reined in the powerful Hungarian nobility. To the south, the power that is on the rise is the Kingdom of Serbia, ruled by Stefan Uroš IV Dušan, who has set his eyes on his neighbors to expand his power. The Byzantine Empire, meanwhile, is in a difficult position, as internal struggles ended in Andronikos III being crowned sole emperor, at the cost of dividing the realm; both Serbia and Bulgaria have in the past pressed over the bordering lands, while the Ottomans have very recently conquered Nicomedia. The control over the Southern Balkans is also very fractioned, with a branch of the Anjou ruling over Albania, the Despotate of Epirus under the nominal rule of Byzantium as a vassal, Athens, Neopatria and Salona as vassals of the Aragonese Kings of Sicily, Anjou protectorates over Achaia and Naxos, and only nominal Byzantine control over Southern Morea. It’s also noticeable the presence of the Republics of Venice and Genoa, which control several outposts over the Adriatic and Aegean Seas. A final note: in previous maps, Moldavia was shown in the map, but we’ve removed it from it, and it will most likely spawn through a chain of events in the 1340s.

Dynasties:
Dynasties.png

The House of Anjou rules over Naples, Hungary, Albania, Achaia, and Cephalonia; they’re truly invested in their push for supremacy over the region. Apart from that, each country is ruled by different dynasties, except for Athens and Neopatria, ruled by the House of Aragón-Barcelona.

Locations:
Locations 1.png

Locations 2.png

Locations 3.png

Locations 4.png
This week we’re posting the general map of the region, along with some more detailed maps, that can be seen if you click on the spoiler button. A starting comment is that the location density of Hungary is noticeably not very high; the reason is that it was one of the first European maps that we made, and we based it upon the historical counties. Therefore, I’m already saying in advance that this will be an area that we want to give more density when we do the review of the region; any help regarding that is welcome. Apart from that, you may notice on the more detailed maps that Crete appears in one, while not being present in the previous one; because of the zooming, the island will appear next week along with Cyprus, but I wanted to make an early sneak peek of the locations, given that is possible with this closer zoom level. Apart from that, I’m also saying in advance that we will make an important review of the Aegean Islands, so do not take them as a reference for anything, please.

Provinces:
Provinces.png

Provinces! Nothing outstanding to be commented on here; as usual, we’re open to any feedback regarding them.

Terrain:
Climate.png

Topography.png

Vegetation.png

Terrain! The climate of the region is mostly divided between Continental and Mediterranean, with some warmer and some colder regions. Regarding the topography, the Carpathian mountains are famously important and strategic, while the Balkans are a quite hilly and mountainous region, which is also greatly covered by woods and forests.

Cultures:
Cultures.png

Here comes the fun part of the DD: The cultural division of the Balkans! A few comments:
  1. Hungary is full of different minorities. Transylvania, especially, is an interesting place: there we have a mix of ‘Hungarians’, ‘Transylvanians’ (which are the Romanian-speaking inhabitants of the region), ‘Transylvanian Germans’, and ‘Szekely’ people.
  2. We have divided the Southern Slavic-speaking region into their dialectal families of Slovene, Croatian, Bosnian, and Serbian.
  3. The Southern Balkans are mostly divided among Bulgarian, Albanian, and Greek cultures.
  4. We’re also portraying plenty of other cultures, such as Dalmatians, Aromanians, Sclavenes, Arvanites, Cumans, Jasz, or Ashkenazi and Romanyoti Jews.

Religions:
Religion.png

This one is also interesting. Apart from the divide between Western Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, we have the Krstjani in Bosnia, Bogomils (the pink stripes both in Bosnia and Macedonia), and Paulicians in Thrace. The Jewish populations do not pass the threshold percentage to appear on the map, but there are plenty of communities across the region.

Raw Materials:
Raw Materials.png

The materials of the region. Something very noticeable is the richness of minerals, with plenty of Iron, Copper, Tin, Lead, Gold, and Silver. Specifically, Slovakia is very rich, and you definitely want more settlers to migrate to the region, and exploit its resources. The region is also very rich in agricultural resources, as you can see.

Markets:
Markets.png

The region is mostly divided among four markets: Venice, Pest, Ragusa and Constantinople.

Country and Location population:
Population 1.png

Population 2.png

Population 3.png

Population 4.png
Country and location population (which I’ve also sub-divided, and is under the Spoiler button).

And that’s all of today! I hope that you find the region interesting; we certainly think that it is. Next week we will go further south, and we will take a look at the Syrian Levant and Egypt. Cheers!
 
  • 192Like
  • 69Love
  • 7
  • 4
  • 3
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
I feel like serbian and croatian and bosnian should start as one culture of southern slav and as religious differences and different empires control various regions over time the cultures diverge into their respective parts. Bosnians attribute vast amounts of their differences due to their religion. They aren't muslim yet. Croatians and serbians while having different dialects aren't that different yet either. Their language is closer than french and occitan at this point.
 
  • 24
  • 8Like
Reactions:
Rădvan's At Europe's Borders goes into greater detail regarding the ethnic makeup of various parts of Moldavia in that period. I'll write more about it in a later post but the TLDR is that there were quite a bunch of ethnicities present, and Slavs were only a part of it.
Thank you, I meant that Moldavia was in no way homogenous, especially in 1337
 
  • 5Like
Reactions:
"Budapest" was not a concept until the late 19th century, I suggest a renaming of that province.
Also, I think the other province is supposed to be called "Bácska", not "Bácsa" (though I think a more historically appropriate name would be just "Bács").
Others have also pointed this out, but Transdanubia is by no means flatlands either. There are many hills and even small mountains there, same goes for the region around Eger.
 
  • 14Like
  • 6
Reactions:
You said there is a small number of Jewish population, how is that balanced so that they just don't quickly assimilate and disappear? Especially in regions where changes in culture and religion happen quite a lot. Is there a system of main, accepted, tolerated and excluded cultures and religion?
 
  • 8Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Are gypsie minorities in the byzatine empire represented? Will there be events about gypsie migrations into the balkans and later western Europe?
 
  • 2Like
  • 2
Reactions:
We have planned to add it through an event.
The Duchy/Princedom of Dobruja (Karvuna) should be a playable vassal nation of Bulgaria at the start of the game. A semi-independent orthodox regional metropolitan church was mentioned in documents dating back to 1325. So even as early as the mid-1320s the region was decently autonomous from the Bulgarian church and logically also from the central authority of the Bulgarian state. (Since the church was very much tied to the state and quite subservient to it when it comes to Orthodox Christianity).
Also just because Wikipedia suggest that is was founded in 1340 doesn't mean that this is correct as there is plenty of evidence to suggest the regions autonomy dating back to the mid 1320s.
There should be an ingame event which ties its church closer to Constantinople in 1340 while remaining a Bulgarian vassal and a later event in 1356 which makes it an independent state.
Also it should be called Karvuna as Dobruja as a name for the region almost certainly arose later.
 
  • 6Like
  • 1
Reactions:
My only complaint/desire would be for the impassible mountains to be a bit more prevalent in Greece. Imperator really nailed it when it came to this imo, though Im sure the ability of armies to move through and people to live in these places certainly became easier in the 1600 years between the games, it would still be nice to get a bit more movement hindrances in the game as it was a great part of Imp. :)
 
  • 15
  • 8Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Placeholder for tomorrow, will post feedback with sources here.
Kinda glad you are doing this, the whole "I have the ear of the devs" thing always felt kinda smug. Anticipating your responses from now on.
 
  • 7Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Couple of points after glancing over the map of Transylvania:
1. Koloszvár is spelled Kolozsvár
2. I believe Korosbanya should be Kőrősbánya, unless the accents are only missing because of the zoom level. Korosbanya would mean old hag, while Kőrösbánya means Kőrős mine, named after the Kőrös river.
3. While my heart skipped a beat to see my hometown represented as a location, Kézdivásárhely in the southeastern corner is a bit anachronistic for the time period, it should be named Torjavására and maybe change name through a DHE later.
4. Are the naming inconsistencies between Romanian, Hungarian and German intentional, or would you like input on those too?

Calling the Transylvanian Saxons as Transylvanian Germans feels a bit weird, and calling the Romanian population of Transylvania Transylvanian seems also wrong. I am by no means knowledgeable on the subject, but I don't think there ever was enough difference culturally between Romanians living in Transylvania and Romanians living outside the Carpathian Basin to warrant splitting them into multiple cultures. Not to mention Transylvanian and Transylvanian German/Saxon next to each other of awfully confusing to read on the map too.
 
  • 17Like
  • 2Love
  • 2Haha
  • 2
  • 2
Reactions:
Wonderful DD! Now, the elephant in the room is obviously Transylvanian. Why not just make them Wallachian? There was no real ethnic and cultural difference between Transylvanian and Wallachian Romanians at the time, nor today. Splitting Transylvanian off Romanian would probably only make sense if you split Wallachian into Wallachian and Moldavian, which isn't really justified in the era either.

Other than that, I notice the lack of wetland environment along the Tisza, parts of the Danube and the Drava, and along the Southern shore of Lake Balaton. These areas were marshy, swampy, wetland environments for most of history until their drainage in the 19th century, so you should make at least some of those areas wetlands for additional accuracy/detail.
1. We think that this makes for a bit better cultural divide (and, yes, in that case, it would probably be better to have Moldavian differentiated over time). In any case, we're open to feedback, and reviewing this specific topic.
2. We're aware, but it's a bit tricky; there's a group of people which are already in contact with @SulphurAeron (shot!), to help us portray the Hungarian wetlands on the best possible way.
 
  • 46Like
  • 8
  • 3
  • 1
Reactions:
I'd like to throw in my 2 cents. Much like the Flemish-Dutch split in 1337 was just wrong and anachronistic, a Wallachian-Transylvanian split based on the geographic boundary of the Carpathians is wrong, especially when you group Moldavian in with either of them, like is the case now. Just make it one Romanian culture or make Moldavian its own culture, especially because the Serbocroatian cultures are no smaller than a Wallachian or Moldavian. If you refuse to call a unified culture Romanian because of the Rome connotations and Rhomania being a possible name for the Byzantine Empire, just call it Vlachian instead. It's a arbitrary compromise, but so is Lower Franconian. Speaking of Serbocroatian, I really doubt that this is a split based on dialectal families. I've had to mod the pops of the region in V2, and some Balkaners more versed in the subject helped me with it. If you're basing this on dialects, the northwest of Croatia should be Slovene, basically the entire border area north of Zagreb. It only really became Croatian with the process of the standardization of Croatian and the spread of education and literature in this standardized form of Croatian.
 
  • 25Like
  • 4
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
We have planned to add it through an event.
Why? There's good evidence that it had de-facto independence by 1337, just see my post on page 2. Wouldn't it be so much better to just let people play as Dobruja from the 1337 start instead?
Vidin was not authonomous in 1337. It was authonomous at some point in the late 13th, early 14th century. Then it was declared authonomous by Sratsimir in 1355 after Shishman had been declared heir to the throne. In 1337 there were feudal holdings and appanages, but gamewise, Vidin is totally Bulgarian.
The two sources I cited pretty clearly say otherwise. Also, what do you mean by "totally Bulgarian"? Bulgaria was deep in the throws of feudal fragmentation by the early 14th century, it's impossible to portray the fall of the Bulgarian state if you leave it as unrealistically centralized as it is in Paradox's map.
 
  • 14Like
  • 2
Reactions:
Hello! I have a question... It is not necessarily related to this TM, but rather TM#4, sorry for that.

Since Poland and Baltic region is going to be reviewed for some more time, I wanted to ask, is there a releasable country "Lauenburg and Bütow Land", from the locations of Lębork (Lauenburg) and Bytów (Bütow)? It is holds importance to me, so I wanted to know if it will make an appearance in Project Caesar...
And if it is not implemented yet, can I post some info about it in the TM#4 thread, will it still be relevant?
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
I think Bulgarias colour (along with the culture colour)should be changed to a darker grey or possibly a green as it looks much better (in my opinion) and fits with other paradox games. Also sticking with colour I think a system like CK3 where the colour of a dynasty changes to the colour of the most important realm would be cool.

Also the Greek culture colour looks very dull and way to similar to Turkish which is especially important to not have considering the cultural mixing in border provinces. I think either I light blue or light purple would be good although not entirely certain how to change the Greek culture colour.
Noted. We don't want green, as that may be too close to Ottomans' color, but grey might do the trick; we'll take a look.

I think that blue for Greek culture was a good suggestion, and we may end up checking that, as well.
 
  • 78Like
  • 5Love
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
Reactions:
considering moldavia is gonna spawn in 1340 (only 3 years after game start), i think it's better to have them at the start of the game so that you can start the game playing with moldavia. it would be pretty weird to have to wait 3 years just so that you can play them.
 
  • 11
  • 3Like
  • 3
Reactions:
The area near Torna (Smolnik) was a major copper mine in this time period and was the first European mine to employ cementation (doi: 10.5194/hgss-12-179-2021). I don't think clay was nearly as significant of an industry here.
 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
  • 3
  • 2
Reactions: