• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Victoria 3 - Dev Diary #13 - Standard of Living

DD13.png


Hello again and welcome to yet another walkthrough of some interrelated systems fundamental to Victoria 3’s economic model: Standard of Living, Wealth, Pop Needs, and Consumption.

All Pops in Victoria 3 have a Standard of Living score between 1 and 99, which represents - by a perfectly scientific and objective metric, don’t @ me - precisely how great their life is. Pops with levels 1-4 are labeled Starving, levels 5-9 are Struggling, and so on through Impoverished, Middling, Secure, Prosperous, Affluent, Wealthy, Lavish, and at levels 60+, Opulent. We don’t really expect a lot of Pops to reach levels 60+ but - knowing you folks - we’ve left plenty of headroom to accommodate your mad economic experiments.

Standard of Living affects two major aspects of the game: birth- and death rate, and Pop loyalty.

Birth rate is simply the percentage of children born to Pops each year, while death rate is the percentage of Pops who die. Both values start out high and decline with increasing Standard of Living, but birth rate declines slower than death rate, leading to a net increase in population growth with increasing Standard of Living. This system models that increasing Standard of Living tends to lead to longer life expectancy but declining natality. Each parameter can be modified independently by a variety of effects.

Scratch your priesthood’s back and they’ll scratch yours. Note that Interest Group Traits can vary between Interest Group variants, so a different religion might provide a different benefit.
fruitful.png


There are side effects to emancipation! But while reduced population growth here initially appears to be a penalty, increasing the proportion of industrial workforce at the same time tends to lead to increasing Standard of Living, which provides a net increase in population growth.
women-workplace.PNG

Pop loyalty is altered whenever their Standard of Living increases or declines from its current value. Martin will get into much more detail on this in next week’s Development Diary on Political Movements.

A Pop’s Wealth attribute forms the foundation for its Standard of Living. Pops can also gain more intangible boosts or penalties to their Standard of Living from any number of sources.

Pops accumulate Wealth over time while their weekly income exceeds their weekly expenses. Conversely, if a Pop’s expenses exceed its income, Wealth will decline. How large their expenses are depends on what and how much they consume, which is also dependent on their Wealth. What this means is that as long as a Pop’s income remains the same, and the cost of the goods and services in their state and market remains the same, that Pop’s Wealth will over time drift towards exactly the level of consumption they can afford to sustain. Of course, as Wealth changes the consumption also changes, which affects the prices of the goods in the market, which might in turn affect their wages, dividends, etcetera.

This weekly shortfall of funds will eventually lead to a reduction in Wealth and thereby consumption, but since the shortfall is only a small fraction of its income it will take several months to have an impact on the Wealth score and thereby the Standard of Living.
peasant-net-income.PNG

Wealth has a number of functions in addition to forming the basis for Standard of Living. A Pop’s raw Political Strength (excluding any such power conferred by the country’s Voting Franchise, which is treated separately) is dependent on their Wealth. Some privately operated Institutions provide benefits to Pops only in relation to their Wealth. Many Professional Qualifications also require Pops to have a certain amount of Wealth.

Each Wealth level is defined by a set of Needs and an amount of “value” that needs to be spent on goods to fulfill that Need. This “value” is defined in goods base prices, such that the Need for Standard Clothing for a Pop of size 10,000 with Wealth level 14 might be fulfilled by buying £87 worth of Clothes, assuming perfectly balanced supply and demand. If the actual price of Clothes where the Pop lives is over-demanded, their cost to fulfill this need will also be higher. As a result, cheaper goods means wealthier, happier Pops.

This Peasant Pop’s Wealth is low (6), so it consumes only the basic necessities.
simple-needs.png

Many Needs can be satisfied by a variety of different goods. For example, the Need for Heating requires Wood, Fabric, Coal, Oil, and/or Electricity. These can be purchased in any combination assuming the total base prices add up to the required value. When given this option Pops will attempt to make a rational purchase decision based on which goods are the most available, satisfying their Need with some mix of these goods or even only one, if that’s the only one available. In this way an inland, isolated state might not consume any Fish at all as long as it has sufficient Grain, Fruit, Meat, or even packaged Groceries to satisfy their Need for food.

A breakdown of how the Peasants in Ceylon spent their heating budget this week.
heating-for-peasants-in-ceylon.png

Goods can also appear in several different Needs categories. Groceries, Meat, and Fruit can fulfil the need for both Basic Food and Luxury Food, but Grain or Fish can only fulfil the need for Basic Food. As a result, maintaining only Millet Farms and Fishing Wharfs to meet your food needs will mostly satisfy your poor Pops, while focusing on Livestock Ranches and Banana Plantations will cause wealthy Pops to inflate the price of the available food supply and further impoverish the poor. Operating productive Food Industries that can turn Grain and Fish into Groceries is good for everyone in your country, and frees up any available supply of Meat and Fruit to be consumed by those with a Need for Luxury Food.

A breakdown of who requires Basic Food and how it can be fulfilled.
basic-food-substitution.png

Lower Wealth levels have only a handful of Needs, such as Simple Clothing, Heating, Basic Food, and Intoxicants. The middle levels introduce more refined Needs like Household Items, Services, Luxury Drinks, and Free Movement. Really wealthy Pops consume increasingly vast quantities of Luxury Goods to impress and outdo their peers. In some cases Needs disappear entirely in favor of more diverse Needs. The Need for Simple Clothing which can be satisfied by both Fabric and Clothes will, as a Pop is raised from abject poverty, be gradually phased out by the Need for Standard Clothing which include only professionally sewn items.

Compared to the Wealth 6 Peasants, these Wealth 17 Bureaucrats are more diverse in their requirements.
middle-needs.png

Introducing new goods into your market will help you diversify your economy and alleviate the demand on crucial industrial goods. Importing Oil - either petroleum from newly discovered deposits or whale oil from the few places in the world that produce it - will cause your Pops to buy some quantity of it for heating instead of Coal or Electricity, which lowers the price of those goods and help make your industries more profitable. Introducing Opium into your market will decrease Pop demand for Liquor and Tobacco... for good or ill.

Some goods are favored over others by default if available. Once Electricity is available to them, due to its convenience Pops will prefer to buy it over Wood or Coal, even if they’re the same price. Some goods can be replaced by other goods entirely, while others will always be required to some bare minimum. Train travel can completely replace the need for having your own Automobile to drive around in, but having an Automobile doesn’t ever completely remove the need for an occasional train ride to see your cousin who lives all the way in Paris.

In addition to these factors cultures can develop Obsessions for certain goods, and some even have Taboos they must abide by. A country can also encourage or discourage the consumption of certain goods using Authority, perhaps in an effort to avoid enriching a hated enemy or entice Pops to buy something that’s heavily taxed over something that is not. This impacts the purchase habits of Pops affected despite this being irrational from a strictly financial perspective.

What if the Bengali were obsessed with the status afforded to them by Luxury Furniture? This could happen due to events, or organically because Luxury Furniture is a really prevalent luxury good in markets where a lot of Bengali Pops live. But even if this habit is developed around their homelands, Bengali Pops that migrate abroad - to the USA or Australia or Japan - will continue preferring Luxury Furniture to other luxury goods, and will suffer financially if the same level of access is not available there.
bengali-obsessions-taboos.png

Let’s close out by considering the difference between this and the consumption model from previous games. In Victoria 2, Pops have different Life, Everyday, and Luxury Needs based on their Type (what we call Profession in Victoria 3), both in types of goods and quantities. Pops in Victoria 2 always strive to get promoted into Types which require more advanced, luxurious goods in larger quantities, but will fail to do so if they cannot afford it. Since certain advanced Types of Pops in Victoria 2 perform their duties objectively better than their less advanced counterparts (e.g. Craftsmen, Clerks) it becomes important to retain access to advanced goods in order to ensure that your workforce is internationally competitive.

In Victoria 3 this formula is turned on its head. An Engineer is not intrinsically better than a Machinist who is not intrinsically better than a Laborer, and there’s no ideal national proportions between them you need to maintain in order to maximize your competitiveness. Different Professions do fulfil different functions, but it’s the Production Methods of the Buildings they work in that determine what function they serve. By choosing what Buildings to construct and which Production Methods to activate, you create the opportunities for these Professions which in turn impose changes to the population. What types of goods you need to ensure access to in order to keep your population satisfied is not driven directly by what professional opportunities you have created, but rather by what Wealth development and Wealth distribution these changes have resulted in.

Professions that are part of the Middle Strata in this state are considerably better off than those in the Lower Strata, and not far off from the Upper Strata. It’s very likely this state hasn’t started industrializing yet, since Shopkeepers - who run the pre-industrial economy - are Middle Strata, and Upper Strata Aristocrats aren’t always particularly wealthy if their income originates from exploiting the Peasantry on Subsistence Farms. Since the Middle Strata is already wealthy enough to demand Transportation, construction of Railways in this state is likely to be both profitable and beneficial for population growth and general happiness.
sol-breakdown.PNG

As a result, Pops in Victoria 3 won’t always strive to ascend to a higher social strata, nor will an Aristocrat always have a higher income or goods consumption Needs compared to a Clerk. All of this is driven by market forces - a qualifying Clerk would gladly become an Aristocrat on available land if that comes with a higher income than remaining a Clerk, and this increased income will gradually result in an increase in their Wealth and consumption demand. Conversely, Aristocrats don’t demote to Laborers because they can't acquire enough goods to sustain their lifestyle - they would only turn to such desperate measures if they become landless (unemployed) and are trying to avoid starvation, or if by some miracle taking on a relatively well-paid Laborer job in a particularly profitable factory would actually yield a greater paycheck than their failing farm provides them with.

In practice this means that it's important in both games to secure your populations’ basic needs to prevent starvation and dissent, followed by appeasing their desire for ever more advanced or exotic goods in larger and larger quantities to increase the size of your economy and power on the world stage. But while reaching this commonly pursued end goal in Victoria 2 often meant pursuing a certain optimal population distribution no matter what else happened throughout the game, the Professions of the Pops you end up with could be vastly different between games in Victoria 3! If you build a colonial plantation economy, your Aristocrats might remain as dominant by endgame as they were at start. If you're a manufacturing powerhouse on the cutting edge of technological progress, your middle strata Pops might come to rival the Capitalist class in wealth and power. If your high taxes are reinvested in vast Institutions your power base might be dominated by Bureaucrats and Academics. If your workers own the means of production, your Laborers might even be wealthier - and consume more luxuries - than your neighbor's Aristocrats.

These possibilities for diverse Pop distributions also result in very different political tendencies in your population, which lead to demand for different kinds of Laws. While in Victoria 2 it’s primarily the rising Consciousness of a greater ratio of more advanced and literate types of Pops that drives a desire for reform in a liberal direction, Victoria 3’s more open-ended consumption model and the diversity of Professions it can create could result in your population having very different political desires by endgame depending on the path you’ve taken. This requires your political machinery to be working in tandem with your economic engine, both to create the right conditions for your Pops and to satisfy their changing desires.

Next week, we will learn more about these desires as Martin introduces us to Political Movements, which themselves are strongly connected to Standard of Living. Until then!
 
  • 242Like
  • 156Love
  • 18
  • 5
Reactions:
Amazing as always guys.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions:
Looking at the needs, there seems one major need, major part of the budget, major industry, major employer and a major consumer of material that looks totally missing - housing and construction. Like, even in the absence of state consumption, there should be a consumption of lumber and tools and cement and (perhaps depending on wealth) glass and steel that's used for fulfilling pop needs if they can afford to.
 
  • 6
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Cheers for the DD Iachek, and the extra info Wizzington - a wealth of information, and yet another clear step up from Vicky 2 (and I'm a big fan of Vicky 2) - you and the team are doing a sensational job :) I look forward to attempting to get the achievement for having a pop at 99 wealth ;)

For a naval-themed 'wealth' pic, here are some Victorian-era sailors - a low-wealth group, with a strong interest in intoxicants!


1630627384967.png
 
  • 5Like
  • 4Haha
  • 1
Reactions:
If you don't replace it with anything else then all it would happen is pops in hotter climates would on average be richer, which feels weird. Even if it is not a one to one replacement, if you make distinction of need for heating based on geography you need to do for all kind of goods, which is a pain and I understand why it is not a priority.
They would be slightly richer on average based on pure needs, yes, but I feel like the solution here would be to balance the standard of living outside the need system (eg. through medicine), not add some extra need elsewhere to account for the lack of Heating.

But this is just theorycrafting, I could easily be wrong.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
However, you could also, say, increase the need for good medical services to represent the tendency of hot climates to have more diseases and pests around. But even if that's more tied to the states in the hotter regions and not temperature itself, it feels kludgy and is probably a pain to balance.

This reminds me. Years ago, I read Braudel's Mediterranean. I remember he went on and on and on for pages about how the Mediterranean climate was inhospitable. It is funny because "Mediterranean climate", at least where I live (California) is considered the epitome of perfect weather. But anyway, before modern technology, Braudel explained that mountainous geography was a challenge, seasonal rain was a challenge (too dry and it kills crops, too wet and it floods), and there were large marshes along the coast with mosquitos that spread malaria, which was devastating to the local population.

That kind of blew my mind. I would have thought warmer climate meant easier life. Not in this case, at least.
 
  • 4
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Hold on, so, pops generate money from nothing with subsistence, and then they spend money buying goods, and if they earn extra money it just bumps them up into the next needs tier so they spend more money and if they earn a net negative then it bumps them down?
Did... did you somehow turn money into a form of mana?
To everyone who ever complained about mana, this is what you created.
 
  • 7
  • 1Haha
  • 1
Reactions:
Will excess money be saved only as wealth level, not savings like victoria 2? Also how would a landowner and shareholder system work? Would clerks buy small bit of shares as an investment and be able to earn dividends from a publically traded building in a capitalist society?
 
Last edited:
I will send this nonsese to my friends living in Barranquilla , so that they can laugh.
Dude from Barranquilla here. And no I didn't laugh.
That aside, the other people came up with reasonable points. It is not a big deal enough so it is necessary to rebalance the system, take into account what we have seen from markets and goods price preview, just so one specific region will spend in drinking and medicine just as people in cold areas spend in heating without any difference overall.
It is not apologist to understand the devs have a deadline and a priority list. In fact I love the devs being transparent about what they will be adding into release. Have you seen the disappointments that come from games announcing this kind of not really relevant details? At least here they are being honest and telling they will be updating it later.
 
  • 12Like
  • 3
  • 2Haha
Reactions:
Dude from Barranquilla here. And no I didn't laugh.
That aside, the other people came up with reasonable points. It is not a big deal enough so it is necessary to rebalance the system, take into account what we have seen from markets and goods price preview, just so one specific region will spend in drinking and medicine just as people in cold areas spend in heating without any difference overall.
It is not apologist to understand the devs have a deadline and a priority list. In fact I love the devs being transparent about what they will be adding into release. Have you seen the disappointments that come from games announcing this kind of not really relevant details? At least here they are being honest and telling they will be updating it later.
there is a simple solution with modding tools. balance is not an issue for mods, and it could be part of the original post. Somehing like a joke about the absurdity of Ceylan people having heat needs followed by the possible solutions, 1 possible solution being the mod option as in victoria 2. But there was silence... I mean, if I was the dev, then heater needs was not a priotity for me. Swedish people is used to the snow, and people in hot climate is used to sweat all day. It's expected to ignore what one don't know.

But here is the trick, there is no balance pain, there is no balance problem, Paradox for a few years have developed tools to allow a cascade of simulations, so that they can balance the German attack in the URSS. Balance is a bad excuse, it doesn't take a huge amount of human time, maybe computing time.

Victoria 2 also had different variables for hot climates. the oversight now feels wrong.
 
  • 15
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
Jolly good update.
 
Do high wealth pops get "priority" over goods, and so swoop up luxury clothes, leaving poorer pops to then buy the now much cheaper (due to reduced demand) normal clothes?
Prices aren't recalculated as they're bought, so the effects of this tick's purchases are felt in the next tick's prices. (Or the next day's or week's or however often they run goods.) It would be way too complicated math-wise otherwise.

I like this. I do hope at least some people witl sign up for jobs like clergy or officers even if they don’t pay well.
If they aren't staffed, buildings will try to raise wages in order to get workers. If they can't (because they don't make enough money to support those wages) you can subsidize them.

But I don't know why clergy or officers wouldn't pay well in the first place.
 
there is a simple solution with modding tools. balance is not an issue for mods, and it could be part of the original post. Somehing like a joke about the absurdity of Ceylan people having heat needs followed by the possible solutions, 1 possible solution being the mod option as in victoria 2. But there was silence... I mean, if I was the dev, then heater needs was not a priotity for me. Swedish people is used to the snow, and people in hot climate is used to sweat all day. It's expected to ignore what one don't know.

But here is the trick, there is no balance pain, there is no balance problem, Paradox for a few years have developed tools to allow a cascade of simulations, so that they can balance the German attack in the URSS. Balance is a bad excuse, it doesn't take a huge amount of human time, maybe computing time.

Victoria 2 also had different variables for hot climates. the oversight now feels wrong.
I don't think the personal experience from anyone on the mod team makes weight on how they design the game, I know perfectly people in other latitudes use way more resources in heating, there are plenty of history and facts to know this, whether they are from Sweden or somewhere else.
The thing is making it work for a videogame. Yes, I know from experience some places have less heating needs, but think of this: I'm no programmer but imagine balancing the game so that 1 pop group living in a tropical zone spends the same amount of money, or at least a value close enough to not feel unbalanced, in Services (I'd imagine this means water), Medicine, Drinks, than 1 pop group in an artic zone spends on coal, fuel, whale fat (cool if they used this for heating, too). Sounds like if I were the pop I would need 1 coal but 5 drinks, and the other pop 1 drink but 5 coal, something like that.
The game works differently from Victoria 2 and we don't know the values behind, but this detail is way too insignificant to be an issue really, I will play Victoria 3 for bigger things.
Now, your opinion and proposal is good, in fact I liked the water consumption thing and hope they use that idea. But it was the delivery that sparked a long discussion, it was not constructive at all...
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
I don't think the personal experience from anyone on the mod team makes weight on how they design the game, I know perfectly people in other latitudes use way more resources in heating, there are plenty of history and facts to know this, whether they are from Sweden or somewhere else.
The thing is making it work for a videogame. Yes, I know from experience some places have less heating needs, but think of this: I'm no programmer but imagine balancing the game so that 1 pop group living in a tropical zone spends the same amount of money, or at least a value close enough to not feel unbalanced, in Services (I'd imagine this means water), Medicine, Drinks, than 1 pop group in an artic zone spends on coal, fuel, whale fat (cool if they used this for heating, too). Sounds like if I were the pop I would need 1 coal but 5 drinks, and the other pop 1 drink but 5 coal, something like that.
The game works differently from Victoria 2 and we don't know the values behind, but this detail is way too insignificant to be an issue really, I will play Victoria 3 for bigger things.
Now, your opinion and proposal is good, in fact I liked the water consumption thing and hope they use that idea. But it was the delivery that sparked a long discussion, it was not constructive at all...
just thinking about wasting coal for heating in Santa Marta when it can be used in the industry is really painful.

But now I see a really easy solution, to make a mod where heat needs are all zero everywhere. So that there is no balance, no local modifiers, not even coding.
 
  • 11
Reactions:
If I understood correctly, PoPs only save in order to smooth out consumption and if things are completely stable, wealth remains unchanged.

I assume capitalist PoPs work differently? Presumably some PoP has to be saving in order to invest, or is it some different system in play here?
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Will excess money be saved only as wealth level, not savings like victoria 2? Also how would a landowner and shareholder system work? Would clerks buy small bit of shares as an investment and be able to earn dividends from a publically traded building in a capitalist society?
As far as I've understood, just like Vic2, there is no PoP-specific "ownership" of factories, so there are no shares or dividends to speak of.
 
Last edited:
  • 2
Reactions: