Here's an example of some legislation that already exists in law, so you have an idea of what I'd like to see. In short, your legislation must have 3 parts. A Title
(referencing the current in-game year, in this case, 2000) a quite "Purpose" section, explaining what it does (generally, this should fill up a single tweet, give or take) and some details, explaining it in greater detail.
Title: Transit Grant Act of 1971
Purpose: To provide grants to those public transit agencies within Germany that purchase German-made transit vehicles.
Details: This bill proposes that any vehicle (Bus, Train, LRT, etc) used for local and regional land-based public transit within Germany will receive a grant from the national government, so long as that vehicle is built within Germany. Note that this does not include air or sea based transportation methods.
Any vehicle that has it's material and labour 75% built within Germany will qualify. As well, final assembly must take place within Germany. Any qualifying vehicle receives a 75% grant from the national government for any municipal or provincial agency wishing to purchase these vehicles for use in public transit. Note that private agencies, such as universities or theme parks, do not qualify for this grant.
The 75% figure is to allow for materials not commonly produced within Germany to be used despite being imported. For example, oil lubrication for engine parts, or, iron ore needed to smelt the steel for the engines itself. The 75% will be calculated based on the Reichsmark value of both the labour and materials combined.
Qualifying vehicles may be purchased at 25% of the listed price. Payments to vehicle manufactures occurs once monthly based on the estimated sales for the next month, minus or plus any difference between the estimated sales for the past months and the real figure.
Funding comes from the Department of Transportation.
DO NOT BE AFRAID OF PROPOSING SOMETHING THAT MIGHT ALREADY BE IN LAW!
In short, anything you propose will be good by me. The only exceptions are things already mentioned (The anti-NAZI laws) or things that every modern first-world multi-party democracy would have without doubt or question. Beyond that I'm presuming a blank slate. Anything you propose thus means that that bill did not yet exist in law.
================================================== ==================================================
A note on Currency. Germany uses the Reichsmark. Most European nations have their own currencies, but a small number do not. Burgundy has never had it's own currency and has used the Reichsmark since it's founding. Denmark adopted the currency during the war and never switched back. Italy suffered a series of economic shocks in 1956, 1958, and 1959, and was "recommended" to use the currency by the German government. Italy fully converted by 1961 and now uses the Reichsmark as it's sole currency.
Since that date, the currency has from time to time been called the "European Reichsmark" or the "Euromark" Following The Fall, the image on the obverse of all coins was changed from a picture of Hitler, to a map of Europe, highlighting the former Holy Roman Empire - all of which area now uses this currency - and the symbol € was added to the map. This is thus the official symbol for the currency.
Note however that some old-school corporations still use RM, R, or even M to indicate the currency. Others, specifically those that do frequent trade with the UK or USA, erroneously use $ and £. In general, anyone using those symbols and not using the official symbol of € are not punished, so long as it's relatively clear that one is speaking about Euromarks and not another currency.
Between 1995 and 2000 the rate of exchange between all 3 currencies has hovered between 0.95 and 1.05. Thus all 3 are seen as interchangeable. This, however, has not always been the case. All 3 governments have unofficially tried to keep the currencies within the same range to ease trade.