However iirc German tanks had good optics for the gunner but poor situational awareness. I think he only saw a very narrow field of view? So target aquisition was really for the tank commanders to determine as they could see. Don't quote me as it could be another tank.
Well, it looks like the unit cards are still work in process and I also truly hope so. They look ugly, too small, hard to read and too little information in them. At least the rate of fire and the actual speed (km/h) should be there but they are not.Is there a way to look at more detailed stats than "bad" and "fast"?
B) Is somewhat incorrect. American optics had such a feature, too. Just because the two optics look different, doesn't mean they don't have similar properties.That was discussed already in the topic tank combat.
As a general statement:
A) German optics had a far better Field of View than their US-Counterparts in the same magnification ranges with the only exception being the Sherman 76mm.
B) German gunnery optics had a unique reticule allowing to calculate distance to the target without shooting.
C) The lacking situational awarness of the gunner within the Panther(!) is compensated by the better situational awareness of the commander and his better capability to guide the gunner on target.
There is no problem when the Panther may have a bit longer aim-time than the Sherman, but his accuracy is gnerally higher on all models.
Don't forget, 'Butterfly.'I love these Streams but the lack of historical knowledge from these guys is like nails down a blackboard for me.... I cringe at calling 'Brens' rifles, 'PIATs' as AT Rifles and Tank guns, as cannons!
PLEASE NO MORE!![]()
TIGERS?
WHERE TIGER?
ARE THERE TIGERS?
I WANNA SEE TIGERS.
ARE THERE GONNA BE TIGERS IN THE GAME?
DON'T FORGET THE TIGERS GUYS.
TIGER IS MY FAVORITE TANK EVER.
KRUPP STEEL.
Don't forget, 'Butterfly.'
I'm sure these guys are great people, but they don't exactly present the game well. Their awkward stammering over one another, borderline flirting between each other, and absolute lack of knowledge of the subject matter has made the two streams that we've seen so far frustratingly uninformative. In order to get any useful information, I had to watch both streams several times on my own to look at what was happening on screen, with them muted.
Was pretty insipid. No, this is just the campaign where the most infamous German Tiger ace died. I'm sure Eugen forgot Tigers.
The Firefly was famous for his inaccuracy (especially with APDS) but the biggest problem was the dust from the blast which caused the gunner being unable to spot where his shot was going (short, wide,...).
To this comes the fact of the German reticules which are AFAIK unique during the war and grant a high chance of a first-shot-hit.
B) Is somewhat incorrect. American optics had such a feature, too. Just because the two optics look different, doesn't mean they don't have similar properties.
C) Is silly. Panzerbros have recently taken to disparaging the M4 as being 'blind' where as the Panther tank commander has the eye of Sauron mounted on the back of his tank. This is just untrue; and is largely an artifact of Panzerbros going out of their way to muddle the issue by comparing first generation Sherman optics and fire control with the most up-to-date German solutions.
The stats cards worry me, too. So much information seems to be left out, even stuff that surely must still be in the game, like how well a unit detects stealthy units.Is there a way to look at more detailed stats than "bad" and "fast"?