• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Vote Rovsea

...

oh, right

Unvote Rovsea
Vote Eternaly_Lost

He voted Rovsea yesterday, and Rovsea was hunted. Coincidence? I think not.
 
But then you quoted it.
It was perfectly readable in the quote. Albeit the colour I quote now was readable too, so perhaps I just have good eyes.
 
So, Rovsea voted for Jacksonian MIssionary. How likely do people feel that Rovsea might have scanned Jacksonian MIssionary as his night 0 scan and that is why he voted for him because he a wolf? I don't see our seer ever voting for the person he scanned if they were a village. He would vote on an unknown. Or maybe throw a vote on his wolf scan on night 0 just in case.

I am half tempted to ask that whoever the night 0 scan was to come forward. There was a single scan, so there is no J-L. Either a scanned villager that Roseva would have contacted, or a wolf that he would not have. If two people step forward claiming it, then we know one of them is a wolf.

It does mean that the wolves are likely to hunt whoever steps forward, but maybe they would hold off on it to try and make the village doubt it was really him. Be nice if the wolves decided to try and fake it and was caught.
 
'Cuz tomorrow is Sunday and I may not be here for deadline.

I might not be here either as well, but we see. Thinking over the players, I decided to throw my vote on hax.

Vote Hax.
 
I don't really have much time today. In fact I need to run now and am not sure I'll be back before deadline.

I appear to be accumulating votes.

Vote Hax
Self preservation.
 
Votecount (3 hrs, 37 min to deadline):

Hax - 2: Eternaly_Lost, Wagonlitz

Wagonlitz - 2: F72Voyager, jeray2000

Capibara - 1: Spockyt

Eternaly_Lost - 1: Arkasas

Not voted - 8
 
E_L's vote seems quite out of nowhere, which would be fine if he didn't imply some deeper thought behind it.

VOTE ETERNALY_LOST


although Arkasas's vote on him is pretty bad
 
And the reason is?

I see you as the most likely person of the players alive to send the order in to hunt Rovsea. It not a lot to go on, but we don't have a lot to go on yet either.
 
I see you as the most likely person of the players alive to send the order in to hunt Rovsea. It not a lot to go on, but we don't have a lot to go on yet either.

I'm not convinced hunt analysis is a particularly fruitful exercise
 
I'm not convinced hunt analysis is a particularly fruitful exercise
It not, but all I have is that and yesterdays voting to go on.
 
I have no real clue how to take in how the day has proceeded so far. We have people voting Wagonlitz for absolutely no reason, same with Hax and they seem to be our leading candidates for some reason. E_L asking the person who got scanned to come forward doesn't make a whole lot of sense, and while vote analysis isn't exactly great (in fact it's really dumb most of the time) he at least is putting in some effort in, which I can't say about the majority of the people here today.

I think I'll vote Arky just because his reasoning for voting E_L is just lazy at best.

Vote Arkasas
 
Vote Hax

There not much to go on today, besides random votes and flimsy excuses. And as much as I like ties, a three-way one is never a good thing.
 
Votecount (18 min to deadline):

Hax - 3: Eternaly_Lost, Wagonlitz, Capibara

Eternaly_Lost - 3: Arkasas, Audren, BlackCrown

Wagonlitz - 2: F72Voyager, jeray2000

Capibara - 1: Spockyt

Arkasas - 1: Jacksonian Missionary

Not voted - 4: @Hax @Tornadoli @Claude LC @alynkio