Sorry, just got back:
Vote Hax
Could Wagon be protecting a packmate? Find out at the deadline.
Vote Hax
Could Wagon be protecting a packmate? Find out at the deadline.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Now I realize that I didn't see BC's vote when I casted mine. However, my vote still stands for the moment.
While it's still only day 2 and it's hard to come up with real cases (or I'm having trouble coming up with real cases 
), we should do our best to at least explain why were doing our votes, even if it's something relatively lame like "I thought the way they phrased that post was wolfish"
So... guess we killed Capage yesterday. Capage can be goofy, and his phrasing is sometimes odd, but he's active and regularly tries to analyze the game. Killing him day 1 is less than ideal. Of course, immediately running up his voters claiming they were trying to save their obvious packmate Capibara is unlikely to succeed; though I am a little (pleasantly) surprised no one has gone for the "Audren broke the tie, let's kill him!" argument yet.
Wagon, Hax, and Claude had attracted a few votes yesterday, but their votes didn't really stick. One of them could be a beneficiary of some of the later Capage voters (or Capi voters for that matter). Voyager and Jeray notably switched their votes to Capi shortly after Claude and Hax picked up their second votes. Could possibly be packmates trying to score alibi votes, but jumping off when their packmate started to attract attention. Claude additionally had sort of a throw-away vote on Voyager. Arky and Torn were early boosters for Capage and could be the packmates pressuring Capage to keep their fellow wolves from taking off in votes. Is any of this strong? I admit that it is not, and a fair portion of the people I named are likely to be villagers.
Lostie's posts have made sense; I don't really understand how Lostie is a leading candidate today. Rovsea did fake-crovax yesterday, and EL couldn't have known he was the seer.
There are (weak) reasons to vote Hax and Wagon, but they really wouldn't be my first choices, and the ease and relative lack of explication with which they have been pushed up is vaguely exonerating. I say we try and take the wolves by surprise with a vote switch!
VOTE ARKY
He was one of the early switchers to Capage. Let's see if he was trying to help a mate!
), we should do our best to at least explain why were doing our votes, even if it's something relatively lame like "I thought the way they phrased that post was wolfish" So... guess we killed Capage yesterday. Capage can be goofy, and his phrasing is sometimes odd, but he's active and regularly tries to analyze the game. Killing him day 1 is less than ideal. Of course, immediately running up his voters claiming they were trying to save their obvious packmate Capibara is unlikely to succeed; though I am a little (pleasantly) surprised no one has gone for the "Audren broke the tie, let's kill him!" argument yet.
Wagon, Hax, and Claude had attracted a few votes yesterday, but their votes didn't really stick. One of them could be a beneficiary of some of the later Capage voters (or Capi voters for that matter). Voyager and Jeray notably switched their votes to Capi shortly after Claude and Hax picked up their second votes. Could possibly be packmates trying to score alibi votes, but jumping off when their packmate started to attract attention. Claude additionally had sort of a throw-away vote on Voyager. Arky and Torn were early boosters for Capage and could be the packmates pressuring Capage to keep their fellow wolves from taking off in votes. Is any of this strong? I admit that it is not, and a fair portion of the people I named are likely to be villagers.
Lostie's posts have made sense; I don't really understand how Lostie is a leading candidate today. Rovsea did fake-crovax yesterday, and EL couldn't have known he was the seer.
There are (weak) reasons to vote Hax and Wagon, but they really wouldn't be my first choices, and the ease and relative lack of explication with which they have been pushed up is vaguely exonerating. I say we try and take the wolves by surprise with a vote switch!
VOTE ARKY
He was one of the early switchers to Capage. Let's see if he was trying to help a mate!
Votecount (8 min to deadline):
Hax - 3: Eternaly_Lost, Tornadoli, Capibara
Arkasas - 3: Jacksonian Missionary, Wagonlitz, alynkio
Eternaly_Lost - 3: Arkasas, Audren, BlackCrown
Wagonlitz - 2: F72Voyager, jeray2000
Capibara - 1: Spockyt
Not voted - 2: @Hax @Claude LC
Hax - 3: Eternaly_Lost, Tornadoli, Capibara
Arkasas - 3: Jacksonian Missionary, Wagonlitz, alynkio
Eternaly_Lost - 3: Arkasas, Audren, BlackCrown
Wagonlitz - 2: F72Voyager, jeray2000
Capibara - 1: Spockyt
Not voted - 2: @Hax @Claude LC
How would that ever work? I was the one bringing Hax to the front. I could just as well have voted EL this mornin and then Hax wouldn't ahve been in danger. I think this is Torn being Torn...
Also we should have a TIE now.
Because EL seems a poorer candidate than Arky Bark. Plus we're not having a TIE on day 2.