-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
No, noone said that. But then again, if someone had said it, following those instructions would be eerily close to a government.
Let’s try to make the TIE even bigger! You know, for lynch equality.
Unvote Graymarch
Vote Yvanoff
Unvote Graymarch
Vote Yvanoff
- 1
- 1
What makes Arkasas a better candidate that the current front-runners?
DEATH TO MATTHEW! for not voting and to shake things up.
UNVOTE fatwombat
VOTE MATTHEW!
UNVOTE fatwombat
VOTE MATTHEW!
Interesting. I don't think any of them have distinguished themselves one way or another just yet. Perhaps Marco is slightly more likely to be a villager than otherwise - relatively early desparation at being a frontrunner maybe indicates not having a pack to save him? Not really sure. Avernite's a solid to very good player in any role, and Claude's annoyance at being an early target makes sense to me but doesn't tell a lot about his role.
Don't particularly mind arky as a choice, but I'm fine with my current vote as well (alynkio is a very solid player as a baddie, and to my mind is slightly less effective as a goodie).
Anyone else giving any reads?
Also, for the current CAWZ voters (the two voters on Matthew - @Witch Agatha and @alynkio ), why Matthew and not Panzer?
EDIT: @EUROO7 as 3rd Matthew voter is also included
EDIT: @EUROO7 as 3rd Matthew voter is also included
Since my vote is also on matthew, I will respond to this: it's more effective to target one than multiple non-voters. Gives the CAWZ teeth.
Disengagement is usually a village tell for Panzer while Matthew is often kinda a zombie regardless of role.
I'm content with trying Panzer, I'm not overly enthused with any of the current candidates.
Unvote Avernite
Vote Panzer.
Unvote Avernite
Vote Panzer.