Taurica Part II : Middle Ages (450 AD - 1300 AD)

[kakom]

The Known World (Part I) - 800 AD

North Africa – 800 AD​

The reborn Carthaginian Empire, also known as Neo-Carthage, had its roots in the Kingdom of Massaesylia, which by 600 AD had united most of the North African Punic states. The kingdoms of Kirob and Arambys, historical rivals of Massaesylia, were conquered and annexed, allowing Massaesylia to transform into a new, powerful state called Carthage. Neo-Carthage was a syncretic state, blending elements of traditional Punic culture with Berber and Hellenistic influences. The Punic language remained the language of administration and the elite, though Berber dialects began to dominate in the south. The center of the new empire was the renewed Carthage, which once again became a powerful city, full of magnificent temples, palaces, and markets, rebuilt thanks to the wealth from new conquests. Under the rule of strong leaders, Neo-Carthage turned its attention to further expanding its borders. In the 7th century AD, the Carthaginians fought a series of wars with the Kingdom of Atlas. After prolonged and bloody campaigns, Carthage defeated Atlas, annexing its territories. This victory gave Carthage control over the entire northwestern African coast, enabling further expansion to the south.

One of Neo-Carthage’s most ambitious undertakings was the exploration and colonization of the Sahara and the slow reach into sub-Saharan Africa. Using both caravans and advanced irrigation techniques, the Carthaginians created a network of oases and trading forts that connected their empire with southern regions. Trade in gold, salt, slaves, and exotic goods from sub-Saharan Africa became one of Neo-Carthage’s main sources of income, strengthening its position in the region. Despite its successes in expansion, Carthage faced serious internal problems. By the end of the 7th century AD, rebellions broke out among the Christian inhabitants of Sardinia and Corsica, who rejected Punic rule and declared independence. These rebellions were supported by neighboring Christian kingdoms, which saw Carthage as a pagan empire. As a result of these events, Carthage lost control of Sardinia and Corsica, a severe blow to its prestige and influence in the western Mediterranean.

Iberian Peninsula – 800 AD​

The Iberian Peninsula between 600 and 800 AD was a place of intense wars, political, and social transformations. Conflicts between the northern Ibero-Celtic kingdoms and the post-Carthaginian state of Baestania, as well as subsequent external invasions and internal strife, led to the emergence of new political structures on the peninsula. At the beginning of the 7th century, the kingdoms of Tritium and Tapolia, located in the northern Iberian Peninsula, began a series of wars with Baestania, a post-Carthaginian kingdom controlling the southern areas of the peninsula. Baestania, with a history dating back to the mid-4th century AD, was a powerful state that managed to survive and dominate the southern part of the peninsula. These wars were the result of rivalry for influence on the Iberian Peninsula and control over strategic trade routes and natural resources. The prolonged wars depleted the resources of Tritium, Tapolia, and Baestania, weakening their positions. As a result of these exhausting conflicts, the power of the kings weakened, leading to splits and the rise of new, independent political entities. Between 720 and 740 AD, the Duchy of Counei emerged on the western coast, and the Kingdom of Asturias in the northwestern part of the peninsula.

In the late 6th century, the Alameann Empire entered the Iberian Peninsula, and after a series of successful military campaigns, it subjugated the northwestern part of the region. During the early 7th century and throughout the 8th century, the Alameann Empire conducted a series of campaigns that led to the conquest of the Kingdom of Constetania. However, the Alameann rule on the Iberian Peninsula did not last long. Internal succession struggles and increasing resistance from local elites led the Alameann Empire to lose control over its possessions. Between 770 and 800 AD, the Kingdom of Urbiaca and the Kingdom of Tarraconessis emerged in the former Constetania, resulting from the collapse of Alameann control and local uprisings. Although these kingdoms were young, they quickly established themselves in the region, becoming new centers of power on the Iberian Peninsula.

British Isles – 800 AD​

Between 600 and 800 AD, the British Isles experienced the consolidation of Celtic kingdoms. Through a series of wars, alliances, and dynastic reshuffles, strong political structures re-emerged. In Hibernia, the first half of the 7th century was marked by continuous wars between local kingdoms. At the beginning of this period, dominance was divided among several strong kingdoms, such as Ulaid, Connacht, and Mumu. The kings of these lands fought incessantly for influence, leading to the destabilization of the island. The turning point was the war between 670 and 690 AD, known as the War of the Two Crowns, which erupted between Connacht and Mumu. Both kingdoms fought for control over the central part of the island. The conflict ended with the decisive Battle of Mag Tuired (around 688 AD), where the King of Connacht achieved a crushing victory. This victory gave Connacht a significant advantage and began the process of consolidating the island. By 750 AD, the High Kingdom of Ivernia was proclaimed, covering most of the island’s territory.

In northern Britain, in Caledonia, the early 7th century was characterized by the decline of central power and the fragmentation of power among local chieftains. The Kingdom of Bremenium, which emerged from the ruins of earlier tribal structures, became the strongest state in the region after 650 AD. However, due to succession and dynastic disputes, Bremenium was divided at the turn of the 8th century. After the death of King Domnall Brecc in 780 AD, the kingdom was divided among his sons. The elder son, Eochaid mac Domnall, took the throne of the High Kingdom of Bremenium, while the younger son, Nechtan mac Domnall, received the title of King of Pictland, which became a subordinate but formally independent kingdom.

In the south, in the lands inhabited by the Britons, a series of conflicts and alliances led to the formation of two powerful kingdoms. The High Kingdom of Pritania emerged from a marriage in 710 AD. The union of two powerful houses gave rise to a new dynasty, which began the process of consolidating the central British lands. Pritania became the strongest state in the south. Thanks to an alliance with Levobrinta, Pritania gained stability.

Gaul, Germania, Italy – 800 AD​

The Alameann Empire was one of the most powerful states in Europe between 600 and 800 AD. Formed from the remnants of former Germanic and Roman kingdoms, the Empire extended its rule from the northern reaches of the Iberian Peninsula, across all of Gaul, to the northern regions of the Italian Peninsula and parts of Germania. Despite its impressive territorial and military expansion, internal problems and political decisions led to its fragmentation and decentralization.

In the 7th century, the Alameann Empire reached the height of its power. Its rulers, hailing from the dynasty of Magnosi pursued an aggressive expansionist policy, conquering new territories and consolidating their power over Gaul, northern Italy, and parts of Germania. Through military and diplomatic prowess, the Alameann emperors managed to unite diverse ethnic groups and tribes under one banner, creating a mighty empire. The conquests in the Iberian Peninsula were one of the key achievements of this period. The occupation of the northern Iberian regions provided the Empire with new sources of revenue and strategic control points, strengthening its position in Western Europe.

Additionally, the conquest of all of Gaul and the establishment of control over southern Germania and northern Italy gave the Alameann Empire dominance in the western part of the continent. By the mid-7th century, the Alameann Empire was at the peak of its power, both militarily and economically. However, by the late 7th century, the first signs of crisis began to emerge. The complexity of governing such a vast territory, the ethnic and cultural diversity of its subjects, and internal political tensions began to undermine the stability of the empire. A crucial moment in the empire's history was Gerbold III's decision in 745 AD to divide the state among his four sons. This decision was intended to ensure stability and avoid succession wars, but in practice, it led to the division and decentralization of power. Gerbold III's sons received different parts of the empire, laying the groundwork for fragmentation. By the early 8th century, the empire had practically ceased to exist as a unified state. The Alameann Kingdom was divided into three parts: South Alameann, East Alameann, and the core Alameann. Each of these parts was ruled by one of Gerbold III's sons, who competed for dominance in the region.

Scandinavia, Baltic Coast – 800 AD​

From the early 7th century AD, the Scandinavian regions were fragmented into numerous small kingdoms and tribes. Each of these states sought to dominate the others, leading to continuous wars and alliances, as well as rapid changes in borders. Despite the lack of unification, these small kingdoms developed their culture, building wealth based on trade, fishing, and agriculture. The Vikings, though not yet fully organized as a force, began honing their navigational and combat skills, which would later make them a power to be reckoned with. In the second half of the 8th century AD, a significant event occurred in Scandinavian history – the unification of Norway under one ruler for the first time. The Norwegian Kingdom, unified by a charismatic and strong leader, managed to subjugate numerous, previously independent kingdoms. The unification process was not easy, requiring the defeat of many local chieftains and gaining the support of the most powerful clans. After the unification of Norway, the newly formed kingdom immediately turned its attention to its greatest rival – the Kingdom of Jutland. Conflicts between these two states were inevitable, as both competed for dominance over the region's trade routes and control over strategic points along the Baltic coast. These wars were brutal and often led to devastating raids and battles.

On the shores of the Baltic Sea, inhabited by various Baltic tribes, significant political changes occurred. In the 7th century AD, a powerful empire known as Aestuia emerged, uniting most of the Baltic tribes under one banner. The Aestuian Empire, thanks to its military power and shrewd policies, managed to dominate the region and control key trade routes along the Baltic coast. Aestuia was a well-organized state that managed to impose its hegemony over smaller tribes, demanding tribute and submission. However, by the late 7th century AD, the Aestuian Empire lost control over its western neighbor, the Kingdom of Venedia. Venedia, inhabited by Slavic-Baltic tribes that were initially under Aestuian rule, managed to break free from their domination.

Balkans – 800 AD​

At the beginning of the 6th century AD, the Balkans became the target of mass migrations by Baltic and Slavic peoples, who were moving south and west, fleeing from the pressure of other tribes and seeking new lands to settle. This migration process caused significant political and social changes in the region. Slavic tribes, such as the Oraji, Antean, and Kolochia, settled in areas previously controlled by various Hunnic groups and local kingdoms such as Dacia, Illyria, and Praevalitana. The influx of new settlers weakened existing power structures, leading to the collapse of the Hunnic khanates in Pannonia and their eventual assimilation with the new arrivals. From the 6th to the mid-8th century AD, the Balkans became a battleground for continuous wars between newly established Slavic kingdoms and the long-standing states in the region.

The kingdoms of Oraji, Antean, and Kolochia, after settling, sought to consolidate their power and extend their influence over new territories. As a result, conflicts arose with local kingdoms like Dacia, Illyria, and Praevalitana, which tried to defend their territories and maintain their independence. These wars were brutal and devastating, leading to significant population losses and a reduction in the military strength of the warring parties.

The kingdoms of Dacia and Illyria were particularly vulnerable, as they were at the center of these conflicts, weakening their ability to effectively defend themselves. By the late 8th century AD, the situation in the Balkans began to stabilize after centuries of continuous fighting. The migrating Slavic states, such as Oraji, Antean, and Kolochia, which initially seemed powerful, gradually succumbed to internal divisions and external pressures, leading to their decline.

In their place, new kingdoms emerged: Pannonia and Karpatia. Pannonia, located on the fertile lowlands of the Danube valley, became an important political and commercial center. Karpatia, situated in more mountainous regions, managed to survive thanks to its strategic location and strong defenses. These new states had more stable power structures and managed to establish alliances with neighboring kingdoms, helping them to survive in challenging geopolitical conditions.

Anatolia, Greece – 800 AD​

In the year 600 AD, the Macedonian Empire controlled strategic areas of Greece, Epirus, Crete, Cyprus, and Anatolia. This state had a rich history, with a heritage dating back to the time of Alexander the Great. In the 7th century AD, the Macedonian Empire faced a series of crises that had a lasting impact on its stability and territorial extent. The problems began with internal conflicts within the royal family, which escalated into civil wars between various factions vying for power.

These internal conflicts were so devastating that the empire began to lose control over key regions. The civil wars weakened the structures of central power, which in turn led to the rise of influence among local nobles in Anatolia. These local rulers, taking advantage of the weakened central authority, began to seek independence. As a result, by the early 8th century AD, Anatolia was no longer part of the Macedonian Empire. In the areas of Anatolia that were previously under Macedonian control, two new kingdoms emerged: Bithynia and Asia.

The Kingdom of Bithynia, located in the northwest of Anatolia, capitalized on its strategic position near the Bosphorus, which allowed it to develop trade and strengthen its position. Bithynia, although smaller, managed to build a strong army and forge alliances with neighboring kingdoms, enabling it to survive and consolidate its power in the region.

The Kingdom of Asia, which encompassed the central and southern parts of Anatolia, was a much larger state. This kingdom sought to continue Hellenistic traditions, blending them with local Anatolian cultures. As a result, Asia became a cultural and intellectual center that attracted scholars and artists from across the region. After losing control over Anatolia, the Macedonian Empire ultimately ceased to be the regional hegemon. Nonetheless, the empire managed to retain its territories in Greece, Epirus, Crete, and Cyprus.

Although weakened, the rulers of Macedonia focused their efforts on consolidating power in these regions. In Greece, the empire was able to maintain a degree of stability by leveraging its authority as the heir to Hellenistic culture. Crete and Cyprus, although isolated, remained loyal to Macedonia, providing the empire with key naval bases and access to eastern trade.

 

[TheButterflyComposer]

Taurica has generally been a middling power, which is very interesting to watch.

Carthage might cling on to be an early colonial power, but probably loses out in the industrial era due to resources.

Macedon managing to cling on is nice. Wonder if they'll make it to 1945?

 

[Midnite Duke]

World Views are Wonderful. Thanks

 

[Nikolai]

World Views are Wonderful. Thanks

Agreed. It's fascinating reading.

 

[kakom]

The Known World (Part II) - 800 AD

Egypt – 800 AD​

In 600 AD, the Egyptian Empire was one of the most powerful states in the Eastern world. Its territory stretched from Assyria and Syria in the north, through Palestine, to the core Egyptian lands along the Nile and further south into Nubia. The empire was culturally and religiously diverse, and its rulers had ambitions of dominating the entire eastern coast of the Mediterranean. However, beginning in the 7th century AD, Egypt began experiencing significant internal problems. A key destabilizing factor was a religious schism. Christianity, which had previously gained popularity in Egypt, split into two distinct branches. The most prominent were the Orthodox Coptic Church and the followers of Nestorianism, who dominated Syria, Palestine, and Assyria.

These religious differences contributed to increasing tensions and weakening the unity of the state. The rise of Nestorian influence in the empire’s northern provinces led to growing separation of these areas from the central power in Egypt. The Egyptian rulers, preoccupied with internal power struggles within their own dynasty, found it increasingly difficult to maintain control over such a vast empire. As internal problems escalated, dynastic struggles intensified in Egypt. The Egyptian rulers were forced to fight for power not only against external enemies but also against internal factions and claimants to the throne. These struggles weakened the empire's ability to defend its borders and maintain state unity.

By the mid-7th century AD, the situation in Syria, Palestine, and Assyria had become so unstable that these regions began striving for independence. Eventually, in the early 8th century AD, as a result of local rebellions and Nestorian support, Assyria, Syria, and Palestine gained full independence, forming separate kingdoms. These new states, dominated by Nestorian elites, became rivals of Egypt and ultimately ended its dominance in the Middle East. Nubia, which had been under Egyptian control for centuries, also took advantage of Egypt’s weakening. In the mid-7th century AD, amid the turmoil in Egypt, Nubia declared its independence. The newly established Nubian kingdom managed to maintain its autonomy, benefiting from geographical isolation and Egypt’s difficulties in conducting military operations on its southern borders.

Persia – 800 AD​

At the beginning of the 7th century, Persia was ruled by the Ariu-Barzanan dynasty, which continued the traditions of the ancient Persian empires. However, their reign was interrupted by the expansion of the Islamic Caliphate, which arose on the Arabian Peninsula. Through a series of battles and military campaigns, the Islamic invaders gradually weakened the power of the Ariu-Barzanan, until their empire eventually fell. After the death of the Prophet Muhammad in 627 AD, which triggered a 30-year period of strife and unrest in the Muslim world, a political and military resurgence occurred in Media.

A new dynasty, the Afrasiabid, emerged as rulers of the region. Taking advantage of the turmoil in the Caliphate, the Afrasiabids began consolidating their power in central Media. Through strategic alliances and military prowess, the Afrasiabids quickly became a major force in the region. The war between the Tauric Emperor Theophilos II "The Worthy" and the Islamic Caliphate, which took place in the second half of the 7th century, significantly weakened the Caliphate. Theophilos II, recognized as one of the most powerful rulers of the Tauric Empire, managed to defeat the Caliphate in several key battles, leading to its disintegration. As a result of this war, the Caliphate lost a significant portion of its territory and influence, opening the door for other regional powers, including the Afrasiabids, who began expanding their influence into eastern Persia and Central Asia.

In the 8th century, the Afrasiabids, maintaining friendly relations with the Tauric Empire, began their eastward expansion. Taking advantage of the weakening of Islam, they took control of eastern Persia and large areas of Central Asia. This expansion was partly possible due to strategic support from the Tauric Empire. The Afrasiabids built a powerful empire that drew inspiration from both ancient Persian traditions and Hellenistic models. The new dynasty successfully integrated diverse regions and ethnic groups within its empire. By the 8th century, Persia had become an important trade and cultural center, linking East and West. The Afrasiabid Empire, although different from its predecessors, became a symbol of the revival of Persian power.

Arabian Peninsula – 800 AD​

At the beginning of the 7th century, the Arabian Peninsula was a divided region. In 610 AD, Muhammad, the prophet of a new monotheistic religious and political movement, began preaching his teachings in Mecca. His message, combining spiritual and political elements, quickly gained popularity among various Arab tribes. By 623 AD, Muhammad and his followers managed to unite most of the Arabian Peninsula under the new state – the Islamic Caliphate. This process involved both diplomacy and military conquests that gradually subdued independent tribes and cities. Muhammad succeeded in creating a new empire that not only united the Arabs but also established Islam as the dominant religion in the region.

In 627 AD, just a few years after the unification of Arabia, Muhammad was assassinated, shaking the newly established Caliphate. His death led to power struggles among different factions of his followers. These conflicts were both religious and political, as various groups vied for control over the Caliphate and the interpretation of the prophet's teachings. This period, lasting 30 years, was a time of chaos and fragmentation that severely weakened the unity of Islam. By the end of the 7th century, the Islamic Caliphate faced a powerful opponent – the Tauric Empire under the rule of Theophilos II "The Worthy". This war was a devastating conflict that exposed the internal weaknesses of the Caliphate, which had already been weakened by years of internal strife.

The Tauric Empire, exploiting these weaknesses, dealt decisive blows to the Caliphate, leading to its collapse and loss of control over significant territories. The fall of the first Caliphate marked the end of the unity of the Islamic world and the beginning of a period of fragmentation and internal conflicts. After the fall of the first Caliphate, the Arabian Peninsula and the territories conquered by Islam entered a period of political and religious fragmentation.

Local dynasties and tribal leaders competed for power, creating numerous smaller states and emirates. In the second half of the 8th century, there was a revival of Islam under a new dynasty – the Zafrid. Abdallah ibn Ahmad, the leader of this new dynasty, managed to unite the fragmented Arab states and restore the Caliphate, which gained significance and stability. The Zafrid dynasty introduced new reforms and consolidated power, allowing for the rebuilding and expansion of the Caliphate. Through skillful politics and a strong army, the new Caliphate under the Zafrids became a significant force in the Middle East, reclaiming some of the territories lost by the first Caliphs and restoring Islam's former position in the region.

Nubia and the Horn of Africa – 800 AD​

From the beginning of the 7th century AD, Nubia, a region with a rich history dating back to classical antiquity, was dominated by the Kingdom of Syrbotia. Syrbotia, one of the oldest kingdoms in the region, adopted Coptic Christianity, strengthening its ties with Egypt and the Kingdom of Punt. The introduction of Christianity brought not only religious but also cultural transformations, reshaping society and reinforcing the position of the Coptic Church as a key political player in the region. The cooperation between Syrbotia and Punt was crucial in their defense against raids and attacks from the southern pagan kingdoms.

These conflicts, though constant, usually ended in a stalemate, with neither side able to gain a decisive advantage. The Christian kingdoms, such as Syrbotia and Punt, employed defensive tactics that allowed them to survive through these challenging centuries. Changes in the region began to accelerate at the beginning of the 8th century with the emergence of Islam. The fragmented Arab Emirates, following the fall of the first Caliphate, began seeking new territories for expansion. One of the natural directions for this expansion was the Horn of Africa and Nubia, which were located close to Arabia.

The first Muslim expeditions across the Red Sea took place in the early 8th century. At this time, Islamic leaders, seeking new opportunities to extend their influence, established trade and political contacts with local rulers. However, some of these expeditions were military in nature, leading to the first clashes between Islamic invaders and the pagan kingdoms of the Horn of Africa.

By the end of the 8th century, the Zafrid dynasty, which had succeeded in uniting the Islamic world after a period of fragmentation and internal strife, focused on southern expansion. Taking advantage of the chaos and fragmentation among local rulers, the Islamic Caliphates launched widespread military campaigns that quickly brought significant areas of the Horn of Africa under their control. By 800 AD, much of the Horn of Africa was under the control of the Zafrid Caliphate. This expansion of Islam into new territories not only altered the political landscape of the region but also initiated the process of Islamization of local societies, which gradually adopted new religious and cultural patterns.

Indian Peninsula - 800 AD​

At the beginning of the 7th century, the Indian Peninsula was divided into many independent kingdoms, each striving for dominance over the region. The political mosaic of the subcontinent was characterized by continuous conflicts, alliances, and rivalries among local dynasties. The kingdoms competed for control over strategic lands, important trade routes, and sacred sites, leading to constant wars and shifting borders.

One of the most significant states to emerge during this period was the Kingdom of Taraxano, which arose in the Indus Valley after the fall of the Great Hephthalite Khanate. Initially a small state, Taraxano began to systematically expand its influence eastward, conducting military campaigns against smaller kingdoms and acquiring more and more territories. Over time, Taraxano grew into a powerful empire that dominated northern India. Its rulers, taking advantage of the weakened neighboring states, managed to unite most of the northern part of the subcontinent under their rule.

As a result, by the 8th century, Taraxano became one of the two dominant empires in the region, rivaling the growing power of the Goshwami. A similar process of consolidation and expansion took place in the Bengal region, where the Goshwami dynasty managed to create a strong state in the east. This dynasty, known for its efficient administration and military successes, began expanding southward and westward, uniting many smaller kingdoms and tribes under its control.

By 800 AD, the Goshwami Empire controlled a significant portion of eastern India, becoming one of the main rivals of Taraxano. The borders of these two empires, although constantly shifting due to conflicts, marked a clear division between the two dominant powers in the northern subcontinent. While northern India was the arena of rivalry between these two powerful empires, the southern part of the peninsula remained divided into three independent kingdoms: Maharashtra, Trilinga, and Tamilakam.

Tibet, Fergana – 800 AD​

At the beginning of the 7th century AD, the most powerful state in the Tibet and Fergana region was the Hellenistic Tayuan Empire. This empire controlled vast territories stretching from Fergana in the north to the Tibetan Plateau in the south. In the early period of its existence, Tayuan demonstrated significant military and administrative capabilities, which allowed it to conquer the entire Tibetan Plateau, uniting diverse peoples and cultures under one rule. In the second half of the 7th century, the Tayuan Empire began to experience internal tensions and problems related to managing such a vast territory.

The high costs of maintaining the army and difficulties in controlling diverse and distant regions led to the gradual weakening of central power. In the 8th century AD, the situation in the region further deteriorated. Growing dissatisfaction among local elites and communities led to a series of uprisings and rebellions that gradually gained strength. Local leaders, taking advantage of Tayuan's weakness, began organizing resistance and striving for independence. The most significant of these uprisings took place in the Tibetan Plateau, where local cultures and traditions increasingly distanced themselves from Hellenistic influences.

As a result of these events, the Tayuan Empire lost control over much of its conquests on the Tibetan Plateau. In the territories previously controlled by the empire, new, independent Tibetan kingdoms emerged and gained prominence in the 8th century. The most important of these kingdoms were Tsang, Amdo, Golog, and Malho. Each of these kingdoms developed its own culture and traditions, based on a Tibetan identity that gained strength after the decline of Hellenistic influence.

The most significant event of this period was the work of the prophet Yasen, who was born in the mid-6th century AD in the Tayuan Empire. Fascinated by Eastern teachings such as Buddhism and Hinduism, Yasen began traveling throughout the region, studying both local and distant philosophies and religions. His teachings, which were a syncretic blend of Hellenistic beliefs and ideas related to reincarnation and spiritual rebirth, gained popularity throughout the region. Yasen taught about the possibility of the soul's journey and spiritual rebirth, which could manifest in existing individuals. An important aspect of his teachings was also astrology, which played a key role in interpreting the fate and future of people. After Yasen's death at the end of the 6th century AD, his teachings quickly spread throughout the Tayuan Empire, gaining numerous followers. The religious-philosophical movement started by Yasen became the foundation of a new religion known as Yasenism, which played a key role in shaping the region's identity in the following centuries.

 

[Nikolai]

Fascinating as allways. This Yasenism, is it an ingame alt history religion or is it based on RL?

 

[kakom]

Fascinating as allways. This Yasenism, is it an ingame alt history religion or is it based on RL?

Yasenism, is a religion created by me mainly because Hellenistic paganism was strongly present in this area but there was also a lot of Buddhism and and Hinduism. So I came to the conclusion that it would make more sense to create some kind of syncretic religion.

Taurica has generally been a middling power, which is very interesting to watch.

Carthage might cling on to be an early colonial power, but probably loses out in the industrial era due to resources.

Macedon managing to cling on is nice. Wonder if they'll make it to 1945?

Carthage is pagan and the Pope is nearby and will probably be the first target of the Crusades.
As for Macedonia, I have no idea how it will go.

For now, I have stopped at 909 AD, and I am waiting for the DLC, we will see if everything crashes.

 

[Midnite Duke]

Another wonderful world view. Thanks

 

[TrocaNero]

I'm guessing you polished the borders? Cause there's no way they would be that clean if it was just the AI at work.

 

[kakom]

The Known World (Part III) - 800 AD

Sub-Saharan Africa - 800 AD​

In the year 800 AD, Sub-Saharan Africa was a region diverse in political, cultural, and ethnic aspects. South of the vast Sahara, near the desert's edge, three powerful kingdoms existed: Ghana, Songhay, and Kanem, which dominated the region and controlled key trade routes. In Central Africa, there was the Kingdom of Sao, encompassing the lands of Darfur, while further south, fragmented tribal states prevailed, with few exceptions in the form of more developed political structures, such as the Kingdoms of Borgu and Igbo-Benue.

The Kingdom of Ghana, located in West Africa, was one of the most powerful states in the region. Known as the "Land of Gold," Ghana controlled vast areas south of the Sahara. Its capital was an important trade center where caravan routes from north to south and east to west intersected. The kingdom drew its wealth primarily from the trade of gold, salt, and slaves. Its rulers were known for their military strength and ability to manage the multi-ethnic society that inhabited these lands.

East of Ghana, along the Niger River, lay the Kingdom of Songhay. Songhay was also a significant trade and cultural center. Its capital was an important stop on caravan routes, linking North Africa with regions south of the Sahara. Songhay profited from the trade of salt, gold, and copper, as well as agriculture developed in the fertile valleys of the Niger. The rulers of Songhay, like those of Ghana, were capable administrators who maintained stability and development in their kingdom despite challenging geographical conditions.

East of Songhay, in the region of Lake Chad, the Kingdom of Kanem had developed. It was one of the oldest and most stable states in the region, with strong military and administrative traditions. Kanem controlled important trade routes that connected North Africa with the central and eastern parts of the continent. The kingdom was known for its strong army and ability to defend against invaders, as well as its effective management of the diverse population living in its territory. Kanem maintained close trade and cultural contacts with neighboring regions, contributing to its development and influence over surrounding lands.

The Kingdom of Sao, located in the Darfur region, was another important center in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sao was known for its developed material culture, including ceramics and metallurgy production, as well as advanced agriculture. The kingdom maintained close trade relations with neighboring regions, and its rulers were known for their ability to manage and defend their territory against external threats. Sao was also a center of cultural exchange, where the influences of various peoples inhabiting Central Africa mingled. It was also the first kingdom in the region to abandon its old religious practices and adopt Christianity in its Coptic form.

South of these strong kingdoms, in the central and southern parts of Sub-Saharan Africa, fragmented tribal states dominated. There were no larger political organizations, and power structures were dominated by local tribal chiefs. These regions were diverse in linguistic and cultural terms, and their inhabitants primarily lived from agriculture, hunting, and gathering. Although there were no strong kingdoms here, some tribal communities maintained active trade contacts with more developed regions in the north.

Among the fragmented tribal structures in the south, two kingdoms stood out: Borgu and Igbo-Benue. The Kingdom of Borgu, located in West Africa, was known for its strong military and trade traditions. Borgu controlled important trade routes linking West Africa with the central regions of the continent, contributing to its economic and political development.

The Kingdom of Igbo-Benue, located in the Benue River Valley, was known for its developed culture and crafts, especially in textile and ceramics production. Igbo-Benue maintained close trade relations with neighboring tribes and kingdoms, which allowed it to develop and maintain its independence in the region.

Central Asia and Siberia - 800 AD​

In 800 AD, Central Asia and Siberia were regions dominated by nomadic tribes and khanates that played significant roles in trade, politics, and warfare. These areas were characterized by vast, expansive steppes and a harsh climate that favored a nomadic culture, with interactions between various khanates and kingdoms forming a complex network of alliances, conflicts, and trade exchanges.

To the west, near the eastern borders of the fragmented Tauric Empire, there were two powerful Magyar khanates:

Yuryuz: This khanate, located close to the Tauric frontier, was a significant power in the region. The Magyar clans of Yuryuz were known for their horsemanship and cavalry combat skills, making them valuable allies and formidable opponents to neighboring peoples.

Orunqut: The second Magyar khanate controlled territories further east. The Orunqut served as intermediaries in trade between the West and the nomadic peoples of Central Asia, benefiting from controlling important trade routes.

In the central part of Asia, the territories were divided among five nomadic Turkic and Central Asian khanates:

Namdar Khanate: Situated on the northern fringes of the region, Namdar bordered other nomadic peoples and was known for its frequent raids to the south and west.

Tuhsi: Located east of Namdar, Tuhsi was one of the more developed khanates, engaging in trade with its neighbors to the south and east.

Burnali: Positioned north of Tuhsi, Burnali bordered the Syberi Empire, allowing it to participate in trade between Central Asia and China. Burnali maintained relative peace with its neighbors, thriving on trade and cultural exchange.

Qocho: One of the most powerful khanates in the region, Qocho was known for its strong military organization. Along with Burnali, Qocho dominated trade routes, controlling key caravan paths.

Aslid Khanate: Located to the east, Aslid bordered Mongol tribes and was involved in numerous border conflicts. Aslid waged wars with both its Mongol neighbors and the Tayuan Empire.

To the north, beyond the Central Asian steppes, lay the Syberi Empire, formed by united Ugric tribes. Evolving from the former Kingdom of Ob, the Syberi Empire managed to unify the Ugric tribes inhabiting the vast northern Siberian territories.

Kingdom of Ob: Initially the political center of the region, the Kingdom of Ob developed into the Syberi Empire through skillful alliances and conquests. The rulers of Syberi were capable warriors, and their armies, composed of experienced archers and cavalry, were a formidable force.

Syberi: This empire controlled northern territories from the Ob River valley to the eastern borders of Siberia. Their dominance over these lands allowed them to strengthen trade relations with the nomadic peoples to the south and profit from natural resources such as furs and timber.

Further east, on the steppes of Eastern Asia, Mongol nomadic tribes organized into several khanates:

Urungu Khanate: One of the more politically active states on the eastern steppes, Urungu frequently engaged in conflicts with neighboring Mongol and Turkic khanates, and its territorial expansion was often a source of tension.

Sono Khanate: Located north of Urungu, Sono was a strong khanate with a large and well-organized army, making it a serious rival to neighboring tribes.

Qsar-Qurug Khanate: Dominating the eastern part of the steppes, Qsar-Qurug controlled trade routes leading to China and East Asia. Qsar-Qurug was involved in numerous wars with neighboring khanates and China, leading to the development of a strong warrior culture.

Ovorkhsngai Khanate: The easternmost khanate had loose ties with other Mongol tribes, and its rulers focused primarily on expanding eastward towards the Pacific coast.

China - 800 AD​

In the year 800 AD, the area of China was dominated by the powerful Zhou Kingdom, which controlled most of central China. Besides Zhou, there were three other significant kingdoms: Zhao in the north, and Shu and Xia in the west. This period was characterized by rivalry among these states for dominance in the region, as well as the development of culture, science, and art.

The Kingdom of Zhou was the most powerful state in the region, controlling central China, including the Yellow River Valley, the cradle of Chinese civilization. Zhou rose from the ruins of the earlier Tang Empire and managed to consolidate its power in central China through strong administration, a powerful army, and developed infrastructure. The capital of Zhou, strategically located, was the cultural and political center of the region, and Zhou's rulers drew from Confucian traditions, which strengthened their authority. Zhou was also known for its patronage of art and science, contributing to the flourishing of literature, philosophy, and technology.

In northern China, the Kingdom of Zhao was the main rival of Zhou. Zhao was a military state that developed its power through a strong cavalry and defensive skills. Zhao's rulers maintained close contacts with nomadic peoples, allowing them to effectively manage their northern borders and repel invasions. Zhao was also known for its developed system of fortresses and defensive walls that protected its borders.

The Kingdom of Shu, located in western China, was known for its mountainous terrain and fertile valleys, which naturally fortified the region, giving Shu a strategic defensive advantage. Shu was also one of the main centers of Buddhism in China, and its capital was known for its numerous temples and monasteries. Shu engaged in intensive trade with other kingdoms and regions further west, contributing to its wealth and influence.

Also located in the west, the Kingdom of Xia was known for its difficult geographical conditions but also for its developed trade routes that connected China with Central Asia. By controlling these routes, Xia was able to benefit from trade and maintain a stable economy. The rulers of Xia, like those of Shu, often competed with Zhou for influence in the region and also defended themselves against external expansion.

Indochina - 800 AD​

In 800 AD, the Indochina region was a complex mosaic of independent kingdoms, each with its unique cultural, religious, and political characteristics. Located at the crossroads of Indian, Chinese, and local traditions, this area saw the development of various civilizations. Indochina was divided into three main zones: western, northern, and southern, each dominated by several powerful kingdoms.

Western Indochina: Mayanmar was one of the oldest kingdoms in western Indochina. Its rulers were of local origin, and the kingdom was known for the development of Buddhist culture, with roots in India. Theravada Buddhism began to penetrate and influence local traditions, making Mayanmar an important center of religious and pilgrimage activities.

Tagaung, located north of Mayanmar, was a kingdom influenced by both Indian and Chinese cultures. Its strategic location in the Irrawaddy River valley made Tagaung a key player in trade between India and China. The kingdom was known for its strong royal power and advanced agricultural culture.

Sriksetra was another important kingdom in western Indochina, noted for its rich artistic and architectural heritage. Like Mayanmar, Sriksetra embraced Theravada Buddhism, which significantly influenced its cultural development. Sriksetra was also a major trading hub, attracting merchants from various parts of Southeast Asia.

Northern Indochina: Nan Chao, located in the northwest, was the most powerful kingdom in northern Indochina. It maintained strong ties with China while expanding southward, conquering smaller kingdoms. Its culture was a blend of Chinese, Indian, and local influences.

Luodiang, a smaller kingdom to the east of Nan Chao, was known for its isolation and strong local traditions. Despite being smaller than its neighbors, Luodiang managed to maintain its independence due to its rugged mountainous terrain and the defensive skills of its inhabitants.

The Kingdom of Laos, located further south, was heavily influenced by Indian culture. Laos was a Buddhist kingdom that developed culturally and economically thanks to its position on trade routes connecting Indochina with China and India. It had a relatively loose power structure, with numerous local chieftains enjoying considerable autonomy.

Southern Indochina: Champa, located along the coast, was a maritime kingdom known for its sea trade and strong Hindu influences. Champa was culturally diverse, where Hinduism intermingled with local beliefs, creating a unique culture. The kingdom was known for constructing monumental temples and developing intricate sculpture.

Isana was a smaller kingdom located in the central part of the peninsula. This kingdom was dominated by Hinduism, and its rulers sought to emulate the model of power and social structures known from India. Isana was also known for building temples and religious sites dedicated to Hindu gods.

Kambuja was the most powerful kingdom in southern Indochina. Kambuja became a center of Hinduism and later Buddhism, with its rulers constructing magnificent temples such as Angkor Wat. Kambuja was known for its strong political and military organization, allowing it to extend its influence over neighboring territories.

Haripunchai was a Buddhist kingdom known for its developed temple architecture and literature. It was a cultural and religious center in the region, attracting monks and scholars from across Southeast Asia.

Sadhuim was a kingdom located in the northern part of the Malay Peninsula. Like other kingdoms in the region, Sadhuim was influenced by Indian culture, particularly in religion and art. This kingdom was also involved in maritime trade, which played a crucial role in its economy.

Indonesia - 800 AD​

In 800 AD, the Indonesian archipelago was a region of diverse political and cultural development. The dominant state was the powerful Pahang monarchy, which controlled strategic territories including the southern part of the Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, and the western part of Borneo. This region was crucial for maritime trade, connecting East Asia with India and the Middle East.

Pahang was the most significant state in the region, with a strong influence on trade and politics in Indonesia. Due to its location, Pahang controlled important trade routes, allowing it to accumulate wealth and influence. Its capital, likely located in Sumatra, was one of the key administrative and cultural centers of the region.

The Kingdom of Pahang developed a complex administrative structure with an extensive bureaucracy, enabling the management of a vast territory. Through trade contacts with India and the Middle East, Hinduism and Buddhism began to permeate Pahang, coexisting with local animistic beliefs.

On Borneo, aside from the western part controlled by Pahang, there were two independent kingdoms: Tarakan and Banjar. Tarakan, located on the northeastern coast of Borneo, was known for its trade in spices and wood. This kingdom maintained trade contacts with China and India, contributing to its economic and cultural development.

Banjar, situated on the southern coast of Borneo, was a center of iron production and agriculture. Banjar also engaged in maritime trade, and its rulers forged alliances with other kingdoms in the region, strengthening their political position.

Java was united under the rule of a single kingdom that controlled the entire island. The Kingdom of Java, benefiting from fertile lands and a well-developed irrigation network, was one of the main agricultural centers in the region. Rice cultivation was the economic foundation, and surplus production allowed for the growth of cities and culture.

The Kingdom of Java also developed art, architecture, and religion, including Hinduism and Buddhism, which were imported from India by merchants and missionaries. The rulers of Java built temples and palaces that became centers of religious and cultural life.

The remaining islands of the Indonesian archipelago, such as Sulawesi, the Moluccas, and New Guinea, were inhabited by primitive tribes that functioned in loose, tribal social structures. These communities were largely isolated from external influences and retained traditional animistic beliefs and customs.

These tribal communities were primarily engaged in agriculture, fishing, and gathering, with sporadic contact with more developed kingdoms. However, in the Moluccas, known for their rich spice resources, trade structures began to form, later playing a crucial role in the region's history.

Manchuria, Korea, and Japan - 800 AD​

In 800 AD, the regions of Manchuria, Korea, and Japan were dominated by various political forces, including nomadic khanates, unified kingdoms, and tribal structures on the periphery. This region was a site of intense interactions between different cultures, with varying levels of political and military development.

Manchuria, stretching east from Mongolia to the Pacific coast, was divided among several significant khanates:

Omnogobi Khanate: Located in western Manchuria, Omnogobi was one of the most powerful khanates in the region. It directly bordered the Mongol khanates to the west and frequently engaged in conflicts with them. This khanate controlled strategic mountain passes, making it a key player in the region's trade and warfare.

Dukha Khanate: To the north of Omnogobi, Dukha also bordered Mongolia. It was known for its horsemanship and military might, enabling it to effectively defend its territories from attacks both from the west and east.

Uul Khanate: Located in southern Manchuria, Uul bordered the Chinese kingdom of Zhao and Korea. This khanate was heavily militarized due to the need to face both Chinese and Korean forces. It was often involved in conflicts with the Haedong Kingdom.

Sen Khanate: Positioned north of Uul, the Sen Khanate was less politically significant but controlled important territories in eastern Manchuria. Its proximity to the Pacific coast allowed it to control certain trade routes.

Eastern Manchuria, stretching to the Pacific coast, was inhabited by scattered tribes that did not form larger state structures. These were primarily communities based on fishing and hunting, with limited contact with more developed states to the west and south.

In 800 AD, the entire Korean Peninsula was unified under the powerful Haedong dynasty, which ruled with an iron hand, creating a strong and centralized kingdom. The Haedong dynasty had taken control of all of Korea, effectively eliminating local resistance and unifying the diverse regions of the peninsula into a single state structure.

The Haedong dynasty pursued an active policy of expansion and maintaining alliances with neighboring states, including Chinese kingdoms. This kingdom developed not only militarily but also culturally and economically, benefiting from Korea's rich resources and trade with China and Japan.

In Japan, the dominant force was the Yamato Kingdom, which had managed to unify most of the Japanese islands under a single rule. Yamato extended its influence across the archipelago, simultaneously building strong administrative and military structures that allowed it to control the diverse tribes and clans inhabiting the islands.

The Yamato Kingdom was culturally advanced, with a strong influence of Buddhism and a developing art and literature scene. Its rulers pursued a policy of expansion to neighboring islands and the continent, often engaging in conflicts with Koreans and Manchurian Khanates. Yamato also maintained trade relations with China and Korea, contributing to the kingdom's economic development.

 

[kakom]

I'm guessing you polished the borders? Cause there's no way they would be that clean if it was just the AI at work.

Yes it's true, now it will be the third time I changed the main mod and each time I corrected the country borders to make them more pleasing to the eye.

 

[Midnite Duke]

Wonderful! Loved seeing areas not usual to CK like East Asia and Indonesia! Thanks

 

[kakom]

Great Houses of the Warring States Era - 800 AD

House Tyrasian​

The Tyrasian Clan traces its origins back to the Alexadris dynasty, founded by Alexadros I. Tyrasius, the illegitimate son of Alexadros I, became the founder of the Tyrasian house. During the reign of Alexadros I, a dramatic event occurred that would significantly influence the fate of the future Tyrasian house. Dengizich, a Hunnic vassal of the Tauric Empire, attempted to assassinate Alexadros I. In response, the Tauric Emperor decided to confiscate the lands of the Hunnic vassals and redistribute them among his loyal rulers. Among these was Tyrasius, who was granted the County of Tyras in Lesser Scythia. This territory was strategically located, rich in natural resources, and important trade routes, providing a solid foundation for the future development of the house.

Over the following decades, the Tyrasian house remained loyal vassals of the great princes of Lesser Scythia. Under various rulers from the Alexadris dynasty, the Tyrasians developed their county, investing in infrastructure, trade, and cultural growth. Despite the limitations of vassalage, the Tyrasian house managed to maintain their position and influence while being part of a larger feudal structure.

The name "Tyrasian" derives partially from its founder, Tyrasius, and the County of Tyras, which he received from Emperor Alexadros I as a reward for his loyalty. The clan's name was formed by combining the name of its founder, Tyrasius, with the name of the county that became their ancestral seat. This way, the Tyrasian house shaped its identity, blending a legacy of personal heroism with territorial ambitions for further growth and expansion.

The situation significantly changed during the reign of Hieronymos III, who took the helm of the Tauric Empire in the mid-6th century AD. The civil war that erupted at the beginning of Hieronymos III's reign elevated the Tyrasian house to the rank of great princes of Lesser Scythia after the conflict. Thanks to the grant by Hieronymos III, the Tyrasian house became the owners of a Grand Duchy, greatly increasing their prestige and influence in Lesser Scythia. Receiving these new lands allowed the Tyrasians to expand economically and militarily, enabling them to take on a more significant role in regional politics.

The rebellion of Duchess Dentuscky and the civil war during the reign of Emperor Theophilos II posed one of the greatest challenges for the Tyrasian house. Duchess Dentuscky, who was a direct vassal of the Tyrasians, decided to defy imperial authority and led a rebellion that quickly escalated into a larger internal conflict within the empire.

The civil war that ensued from this rebellion put the Tyrasian house in a difficult position. They were forced to choose between loyalty to their vassal and obedience to the emperor. In the end, they decided to support Theophilos II, realizing that loyalty to the emperor could bring them greater benefits and strengthen their position within the empire.

​

The conflict ended with the victory of Theophilos II, who brutally suppressed the rebellion and sentenced Duchess Dentuscky to death. As a reward for their loyalty, the emperor granted the Tyrasian house the lands of the rebellious duchess. Thus, the Tyrasians not only survived the tumultuous period of the civil war but also significantly expanded their territories, solidifying their position as one of the most important house in the empire.

By the late 8th century AD, the Tauric Empire faced numerous internal crises, which ultimately led to its collapse. The Tyrasian house, having significantly strengthened its position in previous decades, played a key role in these events. In the face of chaos and the fall of imperial power, Antigonos I, the then leader of the house, decided to seize the opportunity to cast off dependency on the throne. He declared independence from the emperor, establishing a new sovereign state where the Tyrasian clan assumed full control.

House Olbian​

The Olbian House is one of the oldest and most powerful houses, descended from the illegitimate children of Alexadros I, the legendary founder of the Alexadris dynasty. The history of this house dates back to when Alexadros I, consolidating his influence, granted lands to his descendants on the borders of the Tauric Empire to ensure stability and loyalty in regions far from the main center of power.

The founder of the Olbian house was Hyparchos, an illegitimate son of Alexadros I, who was granted lands around the city of Olbia on the shores of the Black Sea by his father. This was a strategic location, allowing control over trade routes and influence in a region that was crucial to the empire at the time.

Initially, Hyparchos ruled as the house of Olbia, loyal to his father and the imperial throne. He displayed remarkable skill in managing and developing the region's economy, quickly gaining recognition and trust at the imperial court. Under his rule, Olbia became an important trade center, attracting merchants and craftsmen from across the region, significantly raising the prestige of the Olbian house.

Over time, due to their achievements and loyalty to the throne, the Olbian house was elevated to the rank of princes. The Principality of Olbia became a crucial element in the structure of the Tauric Empire, and the Olbian house gained significant influence, allowing them to play a key role in imperial politics.

After the civil war during the reign of Hieronymos III, the Olbian house significantly increased its importance. During this period, the house supported the emperor, siding with the legitimate ruler, which proved decisive for the house 's future. In reward for their loyalty and dedication to the emperor's cause, the Olbian house was granted the title of Great Princes of Scythia, a vast and wealthy region that strategically controlled key territories on the western frontier of the empire.

Similar to previous conflicts, the Olbian house played a significant role in the next civil war that took place during the reign of Theophilos II. During this war, the Olbian house once again sided with the emperor, which brought them further recognition and the expansion of their possessions. As a reward for their loyalty and military support, the Olbian house was granted the Principality of Budini, further strengthening their position as one of the most powerful clans in the empire.

​

With the beginning of the 9th century, as the Tauric Empire began to disintegrate under the weight of internal conflicts and external pressures, the Olbian house, like other great house’s, declared their independence from the imperial throne. By 800 AD, the house was led by Artemidoros, who successfully carried out the process of separating from the collapsing empire, securing the house 's position as an independent dynasty ruling over their vast possessions.

Under the leadership of Artemidoros, the Olbian house transformed into an independent dynasty, controlling key territories in the west of the former Tauric Empire. Their influence and wealth, amassed through centuries of loyal service to the emperors, now served to consolidate their own power and position in the new, decentralized political order.

House Tanaisi​

The House of Tanaisi, the last of the four great houses descended from the bastards of Alexander I, has its history closely tied to the city of Tanais, which became their seat and the foundation of their power. The founder of this house was Dikaios, an illegitimate son of Alexander I, who was granted the county of Tanais by his father, including its wealthy and strategically located city.

For several centuries, the House of Tanaisi remained a loyal but relatively insignificant vassal to the Tauric emperors. Their power was mostly confined to local affairs within the county, and the house did not play a significant role in the grand political and military events of the Empire. However, the city of Tanais, being a commercial center and strategic port, provided them with stable income and influence in the region.

A turning point in the history of the House of Tanaisi occurred during the civil war under the reign of Theophilos II. In this turbulent period, the House of Tanaisi played a significant role on the political stage for the first time, siding with the emperor and supporting his fight for the throne. The loyalty and support the house provided to Theophilos II were rewarded after the conflict ended.

In recognition of their contribution to the emperor's victory, the House of Tanaisi was granted the title of Grand Dukes of Sarmatia, significantly raising their status and influence in the Empire. This promotion allowed the House of Tanaisi to transition from local vassals to one of the most powerful houses in the state, becoming a key player on the political stage.

With the title of Grand Dukes of Sarmatia, the House of Tanaisi embarked on a new era in their history, where their influence extended far beyond the borders of Tanais. Their role in the Empire grew, and their loyalty to the throne brought them new lands and opportunities for development.

Like other great houses of the Empire, the House of Tanaisi decided to exploit the chaos and weakening of the imperial central authority at the end of the 8th and beginning of the 9th centuries to declare their independence from the imperial throne. The collapse of the Tauric Empire provided an excellent opportunity for ambitious houses like Tanaisi to consolidate their position and establish independent states.

​

In 800 AD, the dynasty is led by Candramukhe, who took power at a crucial moment in the house's history. Under his leadership, the House of Tanaisi ultimately rejected imperial overlordship, declaring the sovereignty of their duchy. Candramukhe exploited the political turmoil and internal struggles within the Empire to secure the independence of their lands and unite the territories of Sarmatia under his rule.

As the ruler of an independent duchy, Candramukhe focused on consolidating power, strengthening the defenses of his state, and expanding administrative and military structures. His reign marked the beginning of a new period in the history of the House of Tanaisi, which transformed from loyal imperial vassals into powerful, independent rulers.

House Aorsia​

The House of Aorsia traces its roots to Hippocrates, a bastard sired by Kephisodotos VI. Hippocrates, the founder of the dynasty, was granted a piece of land in the Duchy of Aorsia by his father, from which the house took its name. For many decades, the House of Aorsia remained a relatively insignificant vassal, playing little role in the politics of the Empire.

However, the situation of the house drastically changed during the reign of Theophilos II when the princes of Aorsia and Thyssagetia decided to support Duchess Dentuscky’s rebellion against the emperor. After the civil war, the House of Aorsia was elevated to a higher rank as princes of Aorsia and Thyssagetia, significantly enhancing their prestige and influence.

Like other great houses of the Empire, the House of Aorsia took advantage of the chaos at the end of the 8th century to declare their independence from the imperial throne. In 800 AD, the house is led by Hippostratos I, who, like other rulers of this period, seized the opportunity presented by the weakening of central authority to strengthen the sovereignty of his state.

​

As the ruler of the Duchy of Aorsia and Thyssagetia, Hippostratos I focused his efforts on fortifying borders, developing administration, and increasing the influence of his house. His reign marked a new chapter in the history of Aorsia, transforming the house from former imperial vassals into independent princes capable of governing their lands and conducting independent policies.

House Pekman​

The House of Pekman originates from the reign of Hieronymos III and has its roots in the imperial family. The founder of the house was Sophia Alexadris, daughter of Emperor Hieronymos III, who married one of her vassals named Pekman. The house took its name from him.

Over the centuries, the House of Pekman loyally served the Empire, earning trust and numerous rewards. For their services, particularly during difficult times, the house was elevated to the rank of Grand Dukes of Oarus by Alexander III, making them one of the most important houses in the Empire.

At the end of the 8th century, during a period of chaos and turmoil as the Empire began to fragment, the House of Pekman, like other great houses, decided to take advantage of the weakening central power. Under the leadership of Shechey I, the house renounced its allegiance to the imperial throne and declared its independence.

​

Shechey I, driven by ambitions and the desire to strengthen his house's power, began consolidating lands and influence that previously belonged to the Empire. As a result, the House of Pekman gained prominence, becoming a powerful, independent player in the region. In 800 AD, under the leadership of Shechey I, the House of Pekman continues its independent policy, strengthening its position and preparing for potential challenges that might threaten their newly gained sovereignty.

House of Teteriv​

The House of Teteriv was founded by Dropidas, a bastard of Kephisodotos VI. Their position and significance grew during the reign of Theophilos II when the emperor, after defeating the kingdom of the Slaveni, granted Dropidas the lands of the County of Teteriv. The house took its name from this land, and in recognition of their battlefield achievements and loyalty to the throne, the family was elevated to the rank of Grand Dukes of the newly created Grand Duchy of Borystheni.

Throughout the 8th century, the House of Teteriv significantly strengthened its position through strategic marriages. The most important of these allowed them to acquire the lands of the Duchy of Vladimir, previously belonging to the Grand Duchy of Oaursa. This expansion increased the house’s territories and influence, making it one of the most powerful houses in the region.

At the end of the 8th century, as chaos and turmoil engulfed the Empire, the House of Teteriv, like other great houses, decided to take advantage of the weakening central authority and declared their independence from the imperial throne. In 800 AD, the house is led by Stilpon I, who, by pursuing an independent policy, strengthened his house’s position. His reign was characterized by a focus on consolidating power and securing borders against potential enemies. The House of Teteriv became one of the most important players in the politics of this period, influencing the fate of the region.

House of Smol​

The House of Smol traces its origins to the turbulent period of the Slavic-Baltic great migration, which occurred in the early 5th century AD. The dynasty's founder was the legendary Smol, who, according to family tradition, settled in the lands that later became the Kingdom of Smol. Although these accounts are largely legendary, the first historical mentions of the house appear in the records of the Tauric Empire only in the late 5th century AD.

Initially, the House of Smol operated as an independent force in the region, maintaining control over its lands on the northern frontiers. When the Tauric Empire began expanding into these territories, the House of Smol had to confront this new and more powerful authority. Under the rule of Theophilos II, the lands of the House of Smol were incorporated into the empire, effectively ending their full independence.

However, through political and military skill, the House of Smol not only maintained its position but also grew in significance. In later years, the Tauric emperors recognized the loyalty and achievements of the house by granting them the status of Grand Dukes of Vain, a region that encompassed the historic lands of Smol.

Over time, the House of Smol integrated into the aristocracy of the empire, becoming one of its more influential families. However, by the late 8th century, as the empire weakened and chaos engulfed its borders, the House of Smol, like other great houses, sought to regain full independence.

​

The Grand Duke, Minbutas, played a pivotal role in the tumultuous events of the late 8th century AD. He was one of the staunchest opponents of Regent Gorgippos, who seized power after the fall of the previous dynasty in the Tauric Empire. Minbutas not only opposed the new ruler but was also the first among the grand dukes to openly renounce allegiance to the newly reigning dynasty.

Under his leadership, the House of Smol gained prominence, becoming a symbol of resistance against central authority. Minbutas' decision to renounce loyalty was not just an act of defiance against Gorgippos II, but also a signal to other houses that the era of absolute imperial dominance over its vassals was coming to an end. His actions inspired other great houses to take similar steps, ultimately leading to the disintegration of the Tauric Empire and the emergence of independent principalities on its former territories.

Thanks to his determination and leadership skills, Minbutas became one of the key architects of the new order in the region, and the House of Smol, under his command, achieved full independence. In the year 800 AD, the House of Smol, as the Grand Dukes of Vain, began a new chapter in their history, ruling their lands independently, free from the imperial throne.

House of Taninas​

The House of Taninas has its origins during the reign of Alexandros III when one of his most loyal military commanders founded this dynasty. As a reward for his faithful service, this commander was granted lands in the newly conquered territories, which became part of the newly established Grand Duchy of Vistuli. These lands were strategically important, and the House of Taninas gained prominence as loyal vassals of the Grand Dukes of Vistuli, descended from the House of Alexadris.

Over the following decades, the House of Taninas enjoyed stability and growing influence, loyally serving the Grand Dukes of Vistuli. However, in the late 8th and early 9th centuries AD, the Tauric Empire plunged into internal chaos that shook the foundations of the state. The death of Zenon IV Alexadris without heirs led to the collapse of the Grand Duchy of Vistuli.

​

During this turbulent period, Prince Taurion Taninas decided to seize the opportunity and declare independence from both the imperial authority and the domination of the Grand Dukes of Vistuli. The House of Taninas cast off imperial suzerainty and declared their independence, becoming the sovereign rulers of the former lands of Vistuli.

Taurion's decision was a pivotal moment in the history of the House of Taninas, marking the beginning of a new chapter as an independent dynasty, continuing to wield power autonomously.

House of Styr​

The House of Styr, like the House of Taninas, originated during the conquests of Alexandros III. The founder of this dynasty was Pantordanos, a bastard son of Alexandros III, who was granted lands in the newly established Grand Duchy of Vistuli. The territories granted by the emperor included the former vassal Kingdom of Styr, which once existed on these lands. It is from this name that the house took its name.

For the next few decades, the House of Styr remained relatively insignificant in the politics and history of the empire, loyally serving the Grand Dukes of Vistuli, with whom they were associated as vassals. The family did not distinguish itself with any extraordinary achievements or influence, remaining in the shadow of more prominent houses.

However, the situation changed in the late 8th century, when the chaos at the end of the 8th century led to the disintegration of the Tauric Empire. In the face of these events, the House of Styr, under the leadership of Mistislav, seized the opportunity to declare their independence. Mistislav decided not only to break away from imperial suzerainty but also from the Grand Dukes of Vistuli, which was an act of courage and aspiration for independent rule.

​

In the year 800 AD, the House of Styr, under the leadership of Mistislav, entered a new era, attempting to build their independent position in a region that had long been under the strong influence of both the Tauric emperors and the Grand Dukes of Vistuli. It was a time of uncertainty but also of great opportunity, and the House of Styr sought to capitalize on these circumstances to strengthen their position on the political map of the region.

House of Plock​

The House of Plock traces its roots to the time of the great migrations of the Slavs and Balts, which took place in the late antiquity and early medieval periods. Legend has it that the mythical founder of the house, Lestem of Plock, settled in the vicinity of the town of Plock in the late 5th century AD, giving rise to a dynasty that eventually became one of the local houses.

The first historical mentions of this family appear in imperial chronicles only in the late 6th century AD. At that time, the House of Plock was one of many houses occupying lands on the frontier of the empire. These lands were incorporated into the structures of the Tauric Empire only in the mid-7th century AD, as a result of the conquests carried out by Emperor Alexandros III. It was at this time that the Plock family came under imperial rule, becoming vassals of the Grand Dukes of Vistuli, a powerful house descended from the dynasty of Alexadris.

For the next several decades, the House of Plock remained relatively insignificant, loyally serving their sovereign. Their position in the empire was modest, and their influence was limited to local affairs. However, the situation began to change in the late 8th century AD, when the childless death of Zenon IV, the last of the Alexadris house ruling the Grand Duchy of Vistuli, led to chaos in the region.

​

The fall of central imperial authority and the collapse of the Grand Duchy of Vistuli created a power vacuum that the House of Plock decided to exploit. Under the leadership of the local leader Zenon, the family fought for independence, taking control of the western lands of the former Grand Duchy of Vistuli. Taking advantage of the empire's weakening and the lack of unity among other houses, the House of Plock became one of the new, independent players on the political map of the region.

 

[StrategyGameEnthusiast]

Gorgippos really was the downfall of the Empire, seeing as the cadet branches of the Alexadris dynasty retained loyalty to the Empire until he seized power.

 

[TrocaNero]

The House of Plock has the most ridiculous CoA I've ever seen in CK3.

 

[Nikolai]

North of the vast Sahara, near the desert's edge, three powerful kingdoms existed: Ghana, Songhay, and Kanem, which dominated the region and controlled key trade routes

Has the Sahara moved in this timeline?

 

[kakom]

The House of Plock has the most ridiculous CoA I've ever seen in CK3.

Patrum Scuta, great heraldry mod.

Has the Sahara moved in this timeline?

My mistake has been corrected.



Info: I will probably finish describing the period from 800 to 909 AD by the end of next week. Until the DLC is released and depending on whether the save starts or crashes. I will enter hiatus period, for how long I do not know probably until mid-October. It is also an opportunity for rest for me dealing with AAR every day can be tiring. Instead I'm thinking about translating my old mega campaign which included ck2 and eu4 and was not finished due to the closure of my old forum in 2018.

 

[kakom]

Hyrcanos I (800 AD – 842 AD)

​

Hyrcanos I, son of Gorgippos II, ascended to the throne of the Tauric Kingdom in 800 AD after his father's death. Hyrcanos I was a complex figure, whose character and abilities reflected his early experiences and ambitions. He was diligent, ambitious, and calm, but also driven by a desire for power and control. In his youth, Hyrcanos received a thorough education, much like his father, and from an early age, he gained experience in court intrigues, which shaped his political nature.

One of the key stages of his career was his service as his father's spymaster during Gorgippos II's tenure as Grand Duke of Hypani. In this role, Hyrcanos honed his skills in espionage, intelligence, and court manipulation, making him adept at political games and power struggles. His position at his father's court gave him a deep understanding of the mechanisms of power and the importance of information, which later greatly influenced his reign as emperor.

His personality was a blend of caution and cunning. Ambition and pragmatism led him to make decisions aimed at strengthening his rule, both internally and on the international stage. During the early years of his reign, from 800 AD, he focused on stabilizing the internal situation on the Tauric Peninsula.

Aware of the precarious situation the empire found itself in, the new ruler decided to concentrate his efforts on consolidating power and stabilizing the internal affairs of the Tauric Peninsula. The first years of his reign, until 805 AD, were marked by intense reforms and actions aimed at strengthening the administrative and military structures of the empire.

During this period, Hyrcanos I also sought the support of the aristocracy and clergy by pursuing a policy of compromise and forging alliances to ensure the loyalty of the key families on the peninsula. His goal was to create a stable power base that would enable him to embark on further actions to rebuild the empire. Despite difficulties, Hyrcanos I achieved relative stability on the Tauric Peninsula, allowing him to pursue more ambitious political and military plans in the later years of his reign.

One of the most significant undertakings of this period was Hyrcanos I's decision to strengthen the legitimacy of his dynasty by commissioning a detailed chronicle of the Hyrcanis family. He entrusted this task to Skjaldvor Skal, a distinguished scholar and historian associated with the University of Pantikapaion. Skjaldvor Skal was renowned for her deep understanding of history and genealogy, making her the perfect choice for the project.

Under her leadership, a detailed chronicle was produced that not only recounted the history of the Hyrcanis family but also included a comprehensive family tree tracing back to Alexadros I. In this chronicle, Skjaldvor Skal meticulously examined the origins of the family, presenting the genealogy of the rulers of the Tauric Empire and linking it to earlier dynasties, with the aim of enhancing the authority of Hyrcanos I.

The most important assertions in this chronicle was the claim that Alexadros I, founder of the Alexadris dynasty, was the illegitimate son of Molon II, a ruler of the Taurides dynasty, which reigned from 245 AD to 450 AD. This established a direct connection between the Hyrcanis family and the former rulers of the empire, which had great political and symbolic significance.

Skjaldvor Skal also demonstrated that the Taurides dynasty was related to the even older Helioklides-Spartokides family, which ruled the empire from 16 AD to 245 AD. This family, according to Skjaldvor's research, traced its origins to the legendary Spartokid family, founders of the Tauric state. Thus, the chronicle not only bolstered Hyrcanos I's claim to the throne but also established a historical continuity linking his family to the mythical beginnings of the empire.

This chronicle became a key document that not only emphasized Hyrcanos I's right to the throne but also fostered a sense of unity and identity among the aristocracy and subjects in times of chaos and uncertainty.

​

In late 805 AD, Hyrcanos I embarked on his first military campaign aimed at unifying the fragmented lands of the empire. His ambitions were primarily directed at the Grand Duchy of Aorsia, ruled by Hippostratos I, known for his independence and resistance to central imperial authority. The war, which began in 805 AD, was intense and brutal, lasting two years until 807 AD. Hyrcanos I, aware of the need for strong leadership, entrusted the campaign to his trusted general, Aratos, who was not only an experienced strategist but also a loyal servant of the Hyrcanis family.

During the campaign, Hyrcanos' forces faced difficulties due to the challenging terrain and the well-prepared enemy. Despite Hippostratos I's heroic defense, his forces gradually weakened under the pressure of Hyrcanos' well-organized and disciplined troops. The key battle of the war was the Battle of Thyssagetia, where Aratos employed advanced tactical maneuvers, leading to the encirclement and destruction of Aorsia's main forces. After this defeat, Hippostratos I was forced to surrender, and his duchy was incorporated into the Tauric Empire.

As a result of this war, Hyrcanos I not only expanded his territory but also solidified his position as a ruler capable of successfully leading military campaigns and uniting the divided empire. The victory over Aorsia was an important step towards the restoration of the Tauric Empire's former glory, and Hyrcanos I gained a reputation as a strong and determined leader committed to restoring the empire's past power.

​

From 808 to 810 AD, Hyrcanos I undertook another significant military campaign, this time against the Grand Duchy of Sarmatia. The goal of this two-year war was to reintegrate Sarmatian lands into the Tauric Empire, which had become independent under the rule of Grand Duke Candrumkhe I after the chaos of the late 8th century AD.

Hyrcanos, continuing his policy of reuniting the former Tauric Empire's lands, demonstrated both determination and strategic prowess. He carefully planned the war, fully aware of Sarmatia's military potential, which could mount a strong resistance. He prepared his army for a long conflict, involving both the imperial armed forces and relying on the experience of his trusted general Aratos, who had also led the previous campaign against Aorsia.

The war proved successful for Hyrcanos. After two years of fighting, thanks to well-organized campaigns and effective battlefield tactics, Tauric forces defeated Candrumkhe I's army. The Grand Duke of Sarmatia, recognizing Hyrcanos I's military superiority, had no choice but to acknowledge his suzerainty.

This success further strengthened Hyrcanos' position as a ruler capable of rebuilding the empire, and Sarmatia, as one of the larger and more significant duchies, became a key element in his efforts to restore the Tauric Empire's former glory.

​

In 812 AD, as Hyrcanos I was preparing for another military campaign against the Grand Duchy of Scythia, his plans were suddenly disrupted by an unexpected Varangian invasion. Around 8,000 Scandinavian invaders, known for their brutality and expertise in naval warfare, landed on the shores of the Tauric Peninsula near the strategically located city of Kalos Lime.

The Varangians, likely drawn by the region's wealth and the weakness caused by previous wars within the empire, immediately began the siege of the city. Kalos Lime, situated on a vital trade route, was key to controlling the peninsula, and its fall could threaten the stability of the entire region.

Despite his preparations for war against Scythia, Hyrcanos had to respond swiftly to this crisis, which tested his abilities as a commander and ruler. Instead of continuing his preparations against Scythia, he decided to quickly mobilize his army to repel the invaders.

​

Although the Varangians were well-organized, they did not expect such a rapid response from Hyrcanos. His forces, supported by local defenders, engaged the invaders. The Battle of Kalos Lime, fought on November 13, 812 AD, marked the first time the heir to the throne, young Hyrcanos, commanded the imperial forces in the field. The prince, leading a 13,000-strong army, faced the Scandinavian invaders.

Hyrcanos' army, composed of skilled infantry and mounted archers, aimed to break the siege of Kalos Lime, which had been ongoing for several months. Though the Varangians were renowned for their valor and battle experience, they were caught off guard by the tactical prowess of the young commander. Hyrcanos employed classic flanking maneuvers, combining swift cavalry attacks with precise archer volleys, effectively breaking the enemy's lines.

The battle ended in a decisive victory for the imperial army, with Hyrcanos proving his leadership skills and earning great respect from both soldiers and the court. This was the first of many victories for the young prince, who would soon play a key role in the further expansion and defense of the empire.

From 814 to 817 AD, the imperial armies, led by the young Hyrcanos, conducted a well-planned campaign against the Grand Duchy of Scythia, focusing on annexing the Duchy of Olbia. Hyrcanos I, taking advantage of a favorable geopolitical situation, decided to strike while Scythia was weakened by a defensive war with the Grand Duchy of Vistulia.

During this war, Prince Hyrcanos demonstrated his exceptional strategic acumen, capable of leading swift and effective military campaigns. The imperial forces, using the element of surprise and capitalizing on the dispersed Scythian forces, easily crossed the borders of the Duchy of Olbia. The siege of key cities, including Olbia's capital, was successful, forcing the Grand Duke of Scythia, Artemidoros I, into desperate defense attempts. Fighting on two fronts—against Vistulia in the west and Taurica in the south—strained Scythia's resources. As a result, the war ended in 817 with the total capitulation of the Grand Duke of Scythia and the annexation of the Duchy of Olbia by the Tauric Empire.

​

In 819 AD, a significant political event took place—the marriage between the heir to the throne, Prince Hyrcanos, and Duchess Ikrat Theodosia, a vassal of Taurica. This marriage aimed to strengthen internal bonds of power within the empire and secure loyalty among the subordinate dukes.

Duchess Ikrat Theodosia was an influential ruler whose lands were strategically important for the empire's stability. The marriage to the future emperor was intended not only to tighten the alliance between their families but also to further consolidate Hyrcanos I's influence in the region. This union had significant political and dynastic importance, laying the groundwork for the future reign of Hyrcanos II, who, through this alliance, ensured additional support among the aristocracy.

From 821 to 825 AD, a four-year military campaign took place, during which Tauric armies, led by Prince Hyrcanos, fought against the Grand Duchy of Lesser Scythia. This was an ambitious attempt to further extend the influence and power of the Hyrcanis family under Hyrcanos I's rule.

The campaign was difficult and challenging, with battles waged over four years, but the Tauric forces, thanks to Hyrcanos' effective leadership, managed to defeat the forces of Lesser Scythia. After a series of key battles, the imperial armies gained the upper hand, and the Grand Duke of Lesser Scythia was forced to acknowledge Hyrcanos I's supremacy.

This victory not only expanded the empire's domains but also solidified the young Hyrcanos' reputation as a capable leader and future ruler, demonstrating his competence both on the battlefield and in political maneuvers.

​

In 827 AD, Hyrcanos I officially inaugurated his reign as the new emperor of Taurica, cementing his power and uniting the key lands of the empire. This event marked the culmination of his efforts to restore the empire's strength after years of chaos and conflict. Hyrcanos I had succeeded in reuniting most of the lands considered the core territories of the Tauric Empire, strengthening his position as the most important ruler in the region.

However, his coronation immediately triggered a reaction from other powerful families, particularly the Grand Dukes of Vistulia and Borysthenia. In response to Hyrcanos I's declaration as emperor, the dukes of these two regions also crowned themselves emperors, leading to political tension and competition for the title and influence. These parallel coronations foreshadowed future conflicts between the three competing empires for regional hegemony.

​

In 830 AD, the Tauric Empire once again faced a threat from the Varangians, who, after a few years since their last invasion, turned their attention back to the wealth of the Tauric Peninsula. This time, their target was the strategically important city of Taphros, one of the key trading ports in the region.

The Varangian invasion, like the previous one, aimed at looting and acquiring the wealth of the empire, known for its prosperity. The Scandinavians, with their fleet and expertise in amphibious operations, landed near Taphros, quickly beginning the siege of the city. Although well-fortified, the city found itself in a difficult situation, particularly in the face of the brutal and well-organized attacks of the invaders.

​

The Battle of Taphros, fought on April 13, 830 AD, was a significant moment in the defense of the Tauric Empire against another Varangian invasion. An 11,000-strong army, led by Prince Hyrcanos, faced a 6,000-strong Scandinavian invader force.

The Varangians, despite their smaller numbers, were known for their brutal and effective military tactics. However, in this battle, their experience advantage did not play a major role. Hyrcanos, using his excellent leadership skills, organized a strategic defense and counterattack that quickly disorganized the enemy forces. The battle ended with the total destruction of the Scandinavian army. The invaders, cut off from their fleet and deprived of a retreat, were almost entirely wiped out. This defeat of the Scandinavians, sometimes referred to as the "Varangian massacre," ultimately put an end to their plundering ambitions on the Tauric Peninsula during this period.

​

From 834 to 840, Hyrcanos I focused on consolidating his power by reinforcing recently recovered territories. During this time, he carried out significant reshuffles among the local elites, stripping titles from vassals who had been insufficiently loyal or weakened their positions during previous conflicts. These lands, particularly those belonging to the houses of Aorsia, Tyrasia, and Tanaisi, were confiscated and then redistributed among members of the imperial family.

Hyrcanos' grandson, a young prince, received the Duchy of Aorsia, a key region that had once been the stronghold of one of the oldest families. Meanwhile, the emperor's granddaughter, Bilistiche, was granted the Duchy of Zeridava in Lesser Scythia, aimed at strengthening imperial control over the eastern borders of the empire. These actions not only reinforced internal control within the empire but also ensured that the most important territories were placed in the hands of the imperial family.

​

In 841 AD, a catastrophic fire broke out in Kalos Limen, one of the oldest and most historic cities of the Tauric Empire. The fire consumed almost the entire city, turning it to ashes in just a few days. Kalos Limen, which for centuries had served as an important trade and cultural center, lost its previous status and significance.

Hyrcanos I, realizing the importance of this place, attempted to rebuild the city. However, despite his efforts and the substantial resources he allocated to the task, the reconstruction did not yield the desired results. The city never regained its former glory, and its role in the empire was reduced to symbolic importance. Many of its residents, merchants, and craftsmen left Kalos Limen in search of better prospects in other parts of the empire, further weakening its position.

The fall of Kalos Limen symbolized not only the fragility of cities within the empire but also the challenges Hyrcanos I faced in trying to maintain stability during a period of rebuilding and consolidation after numerous wars and invasions.

​

In 842 AD, after suddenly falling ill, Emperor Hyrcanos I died at the age of 67. He had united key lands of the Tauric Empire and strengthened his rule after many wars and campaigns. His death marked the end of one of the most important figures of the Hyrcanos dynasty, who had ruled the empire for nearly four decades, restoring the power of the Tauric Empire.

After Hyrcanos I's death, the throne was taken by his eldest son, Hyrcanos II, who continued the dynasty. Hyrcanos II faced the challenge of maintaining stability in the empire after his father's long reign, as well as dealing with the ambitions of two rivals who still had aspirations for power.

Taurica – 842 AD​

 

[StrategyGameEnthusiast]

Rip Hyrcanos, you nearly rebuilt the Empire your father destroyed.

 

[TheButterflyComposer]

As long as the west and north are called taurica, there's opportunity to annex then.