Do people agree that Khanty and Mansi should practice 'Samoyedic Shamanism'?
- 3
- 3
- 2
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
.png){kind=avatar}
Honestly quite disappointed
Cultures are fully incorrect, there is no need to edit "cultural minorities", if the entire map should be redone
Why no Slavic peoples in the Golden Horde?
Why no Chuvash people?
Why Mari and Erzya people live in lands they have been forcefully resettled to by the Russian Empire?
Why no Magyar people?
No need for small changes if the grand image is not correct!! It must be totaly redone before small changes!
Here was great feedback:
- 38
- 15
- 5
- 1
Why is the development of the Golden Horde such as if Tamerlane had already passed through it in 1337? Am I right in understanding that this was the peak of the Golden Horde's power under Khan Uzbek? I don't understand where the cities in the Volga region went?
Attachments
.jpg)
- 34
- 3
- 1
I feel like Lithuania should start as a Kingdom tier country as its ruler was sometimes referred as a King, especially before conversion to Christianity
- 6
- 3
- 1
Karachev has Ukrainian-spelled Riurykovych, while Chernihiv has Russian spelled, pleace, change them. Severian Rurikids should have Severian culture and Ukrainian dialect, while Karachev should have Russian.
- 13
- 5
- 2
The development of the GH does not take into account settled areas along the Dnipro, Don and Volga.
- 21
- 7
- 1
Can you show us what this area looks like with all of Golden Horde's releasable tags independent? I want to know what it looks like when GH falls apart.
Mostly to know if the borders look clean.
Mostly to know if the borders look clean.
- 8
- 2
Also, why have the location names not been changed? There were a lot of proposals, but I still see soviet era cities
Proletarsk literally means Proletariat - soviet social class
Why was it not changed?
- 37
- 9
- 8
- 6
There should be a lot of Greek, Italian and Armenian minorities in Crimea and al the Black sea shore, as well as some Ruthenian.
- 15
- 3
- 2
This is starting to feel like a pattern of disappointing 'feedback' posts that didn't apply or address much if any of the feedback given.
- 42
- 11
- 1
The topography is seemingly unchanged?
- There need to be a lot more wetlands in the Northeast (Qashliq/Surgut areas), and near the mouth of the Wolga river.
- The central part of the Southern Urals has a relatively flat corridor
- the Zhetysu area is significantly elevated and needs several plateau locations.
- Karkaraly is indeed the most rugged location of that area, but considering how small the massifs are compared to the size of the location, 'mountains' is a stretch
link/quote from last time:
- There need to be a lot more wetlands in the Northeast (Qashliq/Surgut areas), and near the mouth of the Wolga river.
- The central part of the Southern Urals has a relatively flat corridor
- the Zhetysu area is significantly elevated and needs several plateau locations.
- Karkaraly is indeed the most rugged location of that area, but considering how small the massifs are compared to the size of the location, 'mountains' is a stretch
| Current state | Previous state | Suggested state (from previous TM - old color scheme) |
| 
| 
|
link/quote from last time:
My long overdue topographical analysis!
Despite my tardiness, there are not that many changes I would suggest.
Summary:
Suggestions
- Southern Urals are not terribly rugged. There are plenty of broad, flat passes from the West towards modern Yekaterinburg, where it's almost flatlands (and actually rolling hills at best in many spots).
- Although not on the location map, Northernmost Ural crossing should need hills/mountains!
- Morkvash location is an interesting, isolated smaller hill massif that should definitely make it on the map imo.
- The Vasyugan Swamp is apparently the largest swamp of the Northern hemisphere, and the largest peatlands in the world.
- This warrants a few more wetlands around the region, as also indicated by other sources
- Northern Kazachstan has a lot of small lakes and ponds, and are not wetlands sensu strictu. I can definitely relate to this indication so I'd keep them.
- The Kazakh Uplandsare not terribly rugged, and a mountain indication for Karkaraly is excessive.
- that said, the whole region is definitely significantly elevated, enough to be considered a plateau in game terms
- Perhaps the locations around Karkaraly could be reshaped a bit to fit the hilly region a bit better?
- (I have no clue on the historical accuracy of my suggested borders though)
- Some other smaller wetland suggestions (i made them blue on my maps as I have difficulty distinguishing the green wetlands from hills)
Current design Suggested design 'Changelog' of suggestions 
Elevation sources
Terrain Ruggedness Index (note that a lot of 'wetlands' in the southern half are located in more arid regions, and thus aren't very wet IRL) DEM with exaggerated colors 
Wetlands
Types of Wetlands according to Global Lakes and Wetlands database. Note that peatlands are greatly exaggerrated here. Abundance of Peatlands in area %, according to PeatML Water depth during 100 year flood events (proxy for flood risk) 
- 38
- 3
- 2
can yall change the big blob of livestock around north of Stalingrad, big blobs of resources looks weird IMO
- 9
- 1
- 1
I find it weird that you omitted the Moksha people entirely. Perhaps add some of them in appropriate regions?
- 16
- 3
The location of Taman was owned by Trebizond, Lusta by Theodoro, at the time, Soldaia was occupied by the Venetians, the Area of Matrega should be renamed to Kuban(as it roughly has the shape of the former oblast and it follows the namesake river) and I think that Theodoro should start as a vassal of Trebizond
Last edited:
- 6
- 2
Areas also upset me
There is so much lost history and divisions
Darugas of Kazan have existed since the Golden Horde, and even the Russian Empire kept those divisions, so why did the game opt for an artificial???
- 19
- 3
- 1