• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Surely everyone will, after the dust has settled in the UK, try to get back onto the agreement again, or something similar ish? Mind you, that could take a long time, and there's no end of crisises coming up after this one finally gets resolved...and as you say, any delay is going to fuck Paris like it hasn't been fucked since...pick your favourite sacking here.
The main value of the agreement was to get France through the short term transition without massive problems, so if the problems have already happened the OTL agreement is pretty pointless.

That said a Franco-American agreement might happen, the US needs a stable Franc far more desperately than the UK so might just bite the bullet and cover all the costs. Or France could follow the German example and foresake international trade in favour of basically barter agreements at a govt to govt level, make it part of a concerted effort to stitch together a stronger Eastern European alliance - blueprints and arms to Poland in exchange for Polish coal to replace UK imports, that sort of thing.
One would hope this would destroy the attempt at restoring the gold standard consensus but if anything, it might make people dig their heels in harder ("Well, it would have worked if...")?
Goldbugs are incredibly resistant to any attempt to destroy them, so I wouldn't get your hopes up. What was post-war Bretton Woods but an indirect gold standard?
 
Or France could follow the German example and foresake international trade in favour of basically barter agreements at a govt to govt level, make it part of a concerted effort to stitch together a stronger Eastern European alliance - blueprints and arms to Poland in exchange for Polish coal to replace UK imports, that sort of thing.
If they really want an Eastern Europe alliance and have them be strong enough to do anything, they're going to have to do a lot of bartering, or rather gifting, to get them into a deal and then up to speed against Germany.

Not much point in having Poland, Czechslovakia, yuguslavia etc in an alliance only for Germany to kill them instantly. Sure it buys time for France, cynically speaking, but it also makes them look pathetic and evil, whilst making the nazis much stronger looking and more desperately needed resources.
 
I therefore conclude that while France, unshackled from British direction, would start to use her influence, this would be faltering and incremental - at best.
This rings true enough to me. I think this altiverse is in for an even more abject and horrible period than OTL was at this time.

A more general question: once the main crisis is played through, do you intend to take the whole war through to its game conclusion? If so, would you keep things at their current pace and (very impressive) depth of characterisation, or start to march through them in quicker time? I’m happy whichever path you take, just curious.
 
This rings true enough to me. I think this altiverse is in for an even more abject and horrible period than OTL was at this time.

A more general question: once the main crisis is played through, do you intend to take the whole war through to its game conclusion? If so, would you keep things at their current pace and (very impressive) depth of characterisation, or start to march through them in quicker time? I’m happy whichever path you take, just curious.
Of course we carry on. We must put napoleon back on the throne of France, after all
 
  • 2Haha
Reactions:
If they really want an Eastern Europe alliance and have them be strong enough to do anything, they're going to have to do a lot of bartering, or rather gifting, to get them into a deal and then up to speed against Germany.

Not much point in having Poland, Czechslovakia, yuguslavia etc in an alliance only for Germany to kill them instantly.
Ahh the constant tension between what happens in HOI4 (Germany beats everyone, instantly) and what would actually happen if there were such an alliance. If all parties were committed and if it was followed through then Germany faces either backing down at alt-Munich Crisis (and the Germany economy then imploding) or a war on 2-and-half fronts. Sure you can cover the Yugoslav border fairly easily, but the Sudeten defences are strong and doing the OTL of going through Belgium will drag Britain out of it's apathy and into the war. So try the OTL plan of hitting the Poles first, but you are doing it without all the shiny kit of OTL (no Panzer III or IV, no decent Me-109s, etc). Indeed I'm fairly sure the German amphetimine factories weren't ready at that point, so no 'lightning war' as the troops won't be marching on Speed. On the Polish side if they are getting legal blueprints from France they may actually build some modern weapons, after all in OTL they spent more on cavalry training than tanks and aircraft combined so there is budget and potential there.

Maybe the French will be too apathetic to do much in the opening phases, but the Czechs won't. They know that once Poland falls their north flank is wide open, so they will counter-attack into the Reich and take Vienna. Hitler will, of course, go mad at this and demand troops be sent there, but the only reserve is on the French border - OTL German war plans for a '38 Czech invasion had 12 divisions on the border, but 6 were freshly raised and with equipment 'in transit. Once the best of them get stripped away surely there will come a point where the border forces are so weak that even the French Army will have to do something.

Plus of course the Soviet wildcard, without Britain getting in the way a Franco-Soviet deal to contain Germany becomes much more likely, particularly with the Popular Front in the driving seat. Even if it just stops the Soviets stabbing Poland in the back and supplying resources to Germany it will be worth it.
 
Echoes of a Royal Prerogative, anyone?
No doubt the preferable option to A Royal Tomorrow

Oh, it's apparently me. The problem is that I'll go mad if I have two narrative AARs on the go, I don't really (intentionally!) 'bring the funny', and any history book AAR would be a poor substitute for your work.
Never fear, Le J, I was only volunteering you in jest. Not that I wouldn’t love to see you do it, of course, but I appreciate your attention is fully diverted here.

As to the French situation, it is of course fascinating, terrifying and deeply necessary to consider how the British Implosion has impacted things on the Continent. If it forces France to sit up and work out an alternate counter to the Germans, then things could yet be alright. But seeing as this is both a) HOI4 and b) a horrible world of political negligence I won’t be holding out hope for that eventuality.
 
1.png


Chapter 58, Stamford Street, South Bank, London, 12 October 1936

1625178175718.png


“Of course I realised that it was,” the young MP said caustically, rather angrily. “But I’m not the only one that this has happened to. Between you and me we’re all getting ‘carrot and stick’ hereabouts.”

“So,” Butler said carefully, “the lunch, was it a lunch?” There was the briefest of nods. “Thanks. The lunch with Halifax was the carrot, what was the stick?”

The MP, Cartland, looked sheepishly into his pint. “I’d rather not…”

“…material of a personal nature,” Butler finished, gently, having a reasonably certain opinion what they ‘had’ on him. The well-placed guess earned a nod of confirmation. “Who knows? The Whips?”

“They must, Margesson runs a tight ship, and some others.”

“The Whips, again,” Butler said to himself. “Anything else?”

“I’ve had about three calls with Eden in the last few weeks. Well, during each one,” he looked down to his glass again, “it sounds silly but…”

“…you would not believe some of the stuff we’ve heard,” Butler offered supportively.

Cartland nodded. “I could have sworn that there was someone else, listening in.”

Butler supressed the flicker of excitement and adopted the old detective trait, of offering ‘a way out’. “Keyes? He is helping Eden.”

“No, that’s just it, Eden always tells us if Roger is there.”

“The 'hello girl'?”

“Well yes, but after connecting the call she probably went off and did something else. No, this was something else. They half wanted us to be aware, to be suspicious. I distinctly remember, on the second call, a heavy breathing sound. Sounds mad, I know, but you said you wanted everything.”

“You’ve been very helpful Mr Cartland,” Kathleen Milne said cheerily.

Butler wasn’t quite finished and played his next card very, very, carefully. “Have you ever experienced that before?” He saw the almost electric ‘jump’ as Cartland struggled to join the dots and so, as per the script in his head, added a slight explanation. “Because of course, if you have it rather makes you more credible.”

Cartland though, passed the test. “The funny thing is, and I really hadn’t thought of it, and I cannot imagine it is really normal. I think I knew what it was like because something like it happened when I was called by the King’s people. I have been toying with His Majesty’s cause, as some newspapers speculate I too wonder if the marriage tastes of a forty odd year old are really a hindrance to his ceremonial role,” he rushed this last bit, “I’m certain that it happened there, too.”

“Who was the call with?”

“Monckton, the King’s lawyer,” Cartland said immediately.

Butler was treading lightly as a cat. “I don’t suppose you know where the call was made from, do you? Just my idle curiosity, in case Mrs Simpson was listening in?” He offered a hearty smile, which Cartland, in his anxious state, barely acknowledged.

Cartland shrugged at the remarks and then took a very literal line. “I think he vaguely mentioned that he had made the call straight from an audience with HM. So, I suppose it might have been in HM’s study,” Cartland said, unsure. “But at the time I thought it was done to impress me that he was in Belvedere House in the inner sanctum.” He finally confirmed which of the King’s residences was the source of the call.

“Well that’s all, Mr Cartland, thanks again,” Butler said lightly. “Well,” he said to Milne with a sigh as the MP darted from the small pub that they had taken refuge in.

“Same as the rest,” she said flatly.

Which was pretty fair. Having met with a few select MPs and civil servants Butler and Milne had heard the same story reported. Pressure from the Tory Whips, initially very chummy with lunches and dinner invitations but turning darker if the MP or civil servant stood his ground. And often with a vague notion, from those talking to the Palaces or Belvedere, or perhaps also the smaller Tory leadership campaigns, of being listened to, or of confidential information being widely known, or the subjects of conversations being understood by people who weren’t parties to that conversation. But nothing solid, in his assessment; they had a lot of information, and even some intelligence, but no coherent evidence of who or what was behind this.

“We should talk about Spain,” Milne said gently, snapping him out of his thoughts. “That is officially our job.”

====
1625178191616.png


He knew that he was being followed; it was inconceivable that their pursuer had any real training, he was too overt, too conspicuous. Butler gave a lot of thought to what it was that had alerted him and then came to a firm conclusion; it was the man’s lack of a hat. In a city in which virtually every adult, male and female, working or professional class, wore a hat (indeed the type of hat worn was a good indicator as to the class of the wearer) a youngish man, dressed in a vaguely professional manner but not wearing a hat (probably a bowler) stood out. He was half decent, Butler allowed; when he and Kathleen had tried to lose him among the chaos of Waterloo Station had managed to stick with them, guessing, rightly, that their making for the cab rank was a ruse. But now, as they passed under the railway arches, making a vague route for the London County Hall, it was decision time; to lose him finally or to confront.

Butler asked Kathleen to stop for a light and to check her appearance. She gave him a reasonable readout on their follower’s build and dress and so deciding that between them they could take him if required, they prepared the trap. It was simple fieldcraft. Butler would give something to Kathleen (it was actually nothing more than Calvacade magazine, rolled up) in a furtive way and then hurry as if to try and get across Waterloo Bridge. She would fumble and make a poor attempt at vanishing into the maze of rather dowdy buildings next to the station. Butler could then circle back and surprise the pursuer as he was surprising Kathleen.

It worked like a dream; the man took the bait and as Butler scurried off, Kathleen, her utterly unsuitable heels click-clacking down the cobbles, wobbled through the hubbub of Waterloo. Butler had used this part of London before, indeed for this very purpose, during the awful mission he had worked on with the spycatchers. And so, as he completed his arc, he saw the man very forcibly pull Kathleen to one side.

“C’mon chum, the game’s up,” Butler said in his most menacing voice. “Time for a chat, I think.”

====
It turned out that the man was a mere scribbler, a reporter. Butler’s professional pride was immediately hurt and he thus wanted to know more as they gathered in yet another dingy pub. “What I am flabbergasted by is how you came to know about us.”

“That,” Fenn said without meeting their gaze, “wasn’t me. I was given a tip off, not about you,” he gestured to Butler, “but about you,” this was said with a nod to Milne.

“Me?”

“Yes. From my man in the Home Office. Something about a chap that had tried to recruit you for his club,” Fenn shook his head sourly, “bloody English with making everything a dammed game. His organisation, which I’m guessing is foreign, back at Oxford but was pretty sure that our security lot had scooped you up. Said something else, too,” there was an inflection at the sentence that seemed to promise intrigue.

“Oh yes, go on then,” Butler said with a sick feeling in his stomach.

“He boasted,” this was blurted out as ‘bossteed’, Butler suspected that this sudden surge in Scottishness was a sign of nervousness, “about how he had asked for a check and his man, he called it that, ‘his man’ on the inside has confirmed,” this was said with a heavy burr, “that someone high up was snooping around and that you were his agent.”

Butler had expected this; you couldn’t go asking questions of high profile people without other high profile people becoming vaguely aware that something was amiss. Whitehall was just too leaky for that. He was intrigued, though, that the focus seemed heavily on Milne. She had been recruited by the Security Service, streamed for the Secret Intelligence Service, but unceremoniously dumped back on ‘the Security lot’. Butler felt that this, and the lack of awareness of Vansittart’s (or even, until now, Butler’s) involvement meant that the SIS / Foreign Office connection was not yet understood. He decided to risk irritating Fenn even further.

“So just how on Earth are you involved?”

Fenn nodded, expecting this question. “My paper is a Beaverbrook paper. He supports the King and the roasters now running the country. I was asked to see if anyone was digging up dirt on the King, as well as finding out if the Tories are up to anything that we could publish.”

“Just in case?”

“No,” he looked glum. “We’ll publish. I know all about the Duke of York and the Archbishop, secret meetings and taking tea with the MPs,” he said this sullenly. “And of course, the Tory grandees,” in his lowland lilt the words rolled wonderfully, “all sucking up to the younger MPs. There’ll be stories about that.”

“We call that ‘the carrot’,” Butler said, deciding to reveal some of his hand. “What we’re lacking clarity on is 'the stick'.”

“You know the other bit, then?” He looked seriously at Butler.

Butler sighed. “We think that someone in the Home Office or its stablemates is watching and listening to the MPs who are wobbly and the Palace.” He sighed again. “I know, but neither you or I have anything tangible that we can use.”

“I think you’re wrong there,” he said, carefully. “If I gave you this, what would you say?” A brown envelope was pushed toward Butler. He took it out, read it, and placed the contents back in the envelope.

“Simon did it then,” Butler said finally after reading for a few minutes. “Well, there we are. What will you do?”

“I have to report it back up to my editor, and then it’ll probably go up,” Fenn said heavily. “What I will not do is stop you. To be frank I don’t have enough; I don’t even know who your benefactor is.”

“Thank you,” Butler said.

“Don’t thank me, I am going to reveal the rest of the story, so it’s going to get harder for you,” he said with a lack of emotion. “I will wish you luck; you may be end up being the only honest man in this mess. Let’s keep talking,” Fenn said as he made to depart carefully, before stopping to add. “It can’t just be the Palace and junior MPs?”

“It’s not,” Butler said with a sigh, “but unless you are prepared to throw stones…”

“I’m not,” Fenn said warily, “but my proprietor might.” He departed with an unshowy nod of acknowledgement.

“I’m so confused,” Milne said when he had left the pub. “Why have we just given a newspaper the story?”

Butler didn’t think about it for a second. “Vansittart,” he replied gently. “This way his knowledge about involvement will be limited to us.”

“But the reporter knows…”

“…he knows that a senior Government figure is alarmed. He already has the proof that Sir John Simon tapped the King when he was Home Secretary, which means the Government knows. That journalist has used us to check his theory, he can go back and say that there is evidence of wrongdoing, either Whitehall does something or it doesn’t. But we keep Vansittart and the Secret Intelligence Service out of this mess.”

“But not the Security Service,” Milne said gently.

“They’re in trouble,” Butler confirmed.

====
1625178210189.png


It was much later. Lloyd George had just finished a ‘wooing mission’ to try and gain another unhappy Labour MP to their cause (unsuccessfully, leading him to again worry that Morrison had overvalued his support) and was reading yet another ‘what are you guys playing at’ message from one of the Dominions when a knock at the door sounded the arrival of Hugh Dalton and Lord Beaverbrook.

“Hugh,” (as ever pronounced ‘Hoo’) Lloyd George said, not really registering Beaverbrook, “you can tell Herbert bloody Morrison that he was dead wrong about Willie Whitely.”

Dalton frowned. “I thought if we could promise a favourable lean towards the Unions…”

“…he’s clinging to Attlee as the party best equipped to represent the working man’s voice,” Lloyd George said huffily. “He’s not going to join us, unless we can show that His bloody Majesty is on their side.” He glared at the unusual sight of the Press magnate and socialist stood side by side. “Well it must be bad if you two are here together.”

Dalton went first, to Lloyd George’s surprise. “You need to read this.” He offered some typed sheets.

“You’ve seen it?” Lloyd George asked this of Beaverbrook, who nodded. “So you two summarise it.” He gestured to the pile of papers strewn across his desk.

“We have evidence that the Security Service is actively spying on His Majesty and the Conservative campaigns,” Dalton said bluntly.

“And probably us, may they suffer in purgatory a fate…”

“…thank you,” Lloyd George snapped, not in the mood for one of Beaverbrook’s religious lessons. He rolled his eyes and read from Dalton’s notes, looking up and back and forth between the two men. “You say that someone in Westminster has already investigated this themselves?” The Welshman now had a knowing, superior air to him and was finally focussed on the task at hand.

“Yes Prime Minister,” Dalton said warily.

“Who do we think commissioned them? Attlee?”

Dalton shook his head. “No. According to Max’s reporter these were professionals. Attlee cannot call upon the State.”

Lloyd George had a malevolent grin. “So who can?” He said this sweetly.

“Ministers, a PUS if it’s vaguely official,” Dalton began.

“And we must not rule out the Dominions, so the same over there,” Beaverbrook, the Canadian, said with a jut of his head.

Lloyd George ignored him, looking at Dalton. “Your guess?”

“I’m stumped. It can’t be my team, or Hoare’s. The Army?”

Lloyd George sat back and his closed his eyes. After a pause he lifted up the papers, rereading the more salacious parts. “How many people have seen this? All of this?”

“Just us, in toto,” Beaverbrook said with a pompous air. “Some of my editors are aware of my boy’s work, and then there’s the Home Department.”

“Ah yes,” Lloyd George said with a satisfied sigh. “The Home Office.” He waved at Dalton to open the door; as expected Sir Maurice Hankey entered.

“Prime Minister?”

“There is a very clear way of nipping this in the bud,” Lloyd George said to Beaverbrook and Dalton before turning to Hankey. “Get Kell over here, now.”

“But Prime Minister, it’s gone eleven!”

“Get him,” Lloyd George half sang this as the Cabinet Secretary retreated.

“You knew, you damn well knew,” Dalton said suspiciously. Beaverbrook, offended at the blasphemy, glowered.

“I suspected,” Lloyd George confirmed, “but this note from Sir John bloody Simon was useful.”

“Is there much to find?” Beaverbrook now looked horrified, and jumped as Hankey returned. He suddenly remembered all of his conversations with the King.

“Oh there is, Max,” Lloyd George said with a triumphant shout, “oh there is! Isn’t there, Sir Maurice?”

Hankey looked warily at his Prime Minister.

“The joy, the sole joy if we’re honest,” Lloyd George said chattily, “of having those tedious Tory outcasts Hoare and Duff Cooper around is that they sat in the last Cabinet and they like to talk.” He turned to Hankey. “Who are they? What phones are you monitoring?”

Hankey nodded sadly. “It was supposed to be cancelled on the resignation, I understood,” he looked defeated. “It goes on, I presume?” Dalton and Beaverbrook were stunned.

“But, but,” Dalton gabbled, “I am the Home Secretary!”

“That you are,” Lloyd George said in mocking reassurance. “Duffy suspects that Simon had ordered the tapping of the King, and probably York, but who else, I wonder?” He turned eyes wide with mock innocence at the Cabinet Secretary.

“Those were the only operations that I remember being discussed, and then not in full Cabinet,” Hankey said stiffly, carefully.

Dalton was very, very tense. “This other group, though, in addition to the Beaver’s man,” despite the tension he enjoyed Beaverbrook’s grumpy reaction at the use of the nickname. “They have this. What if they reveal it?”

“We wait, Hugh. We wait until that awful man is doing well and we are not. And then we hit him and his bloody friends. They were in Cabinet, they bugged our King. We make arrests, Max here has enough exclusive articles on Baldwin’s corruption that we bury his chosen successor.”

Dalton was not convinced. “But the other investigation?”

“Aye, that’s the danger. But I think that whoever this is, they have to come to us. Me, you, or even Max’s reporter. If it’s Whitehall, Civil Service, they have to be very careful. If it’s another politician, well, he shrugged. “My guess is the same. And if they do go public…”

“…it won’t look like a plot to keep you in power,” Beaverbrook finished, Lloyd George noting the distance between them implied by the use of ‘you’ rather than ‘we’.

Lloyd George suddenly looked less confident. “If it were to break now, as it were, it might increase calls for Parliament to return from its recess,” he frowned. “Time to play a trick on that,” he said brightly. He was prevented by saying more by a knock at the door. Colonel Vernon Kell, head of the Security Service, was rather awkwardly shown in.

“Prime Minister,” he began, warily.

Lloyd George had a terrifying smile, at once of warmth and menace. “Well, well, Vernon,” Lloyd George said happily, the predator stalking his target. “Take a seat, please. Not often we have you come to call,” he waved the man to a chair, placing Dalton and Beaverbrook at either side (where they towered over Kell’s slighter frame) while Hankey was banished to a corner. It had been neatly done and now no support was visible to Dalton. “You know,” Lloyd George began, with extravagantly emphasised Welshness, “that it’s been a while since I last sat here,” Kell nodded sheepishly, “when you and I were both learning our jobs. Yours as the man to catch the naughty spies, me as, well,” he waved a hand theatrically around the room, “this. If I remember rightly, if your boys wanted to be a bit canny, a bit sneaky, they had to go to the Home Secretary,” he paused to let Kell reply.

“As it always has been and always will be, Prime Minister,” Kell said warily, awkwardly, but not unlike someone intoning liturgy.

“So I have a really easy question. Who was it going to? If it wasn’t me or his nibs here,” Lloyd George pointed at the horror-stricken Hankey, “then where was it going to? Who is getting all of this?”

Kell was doomed, and knew it. After a panicked turn to face Hankey, which was abandoned when it became obvious just how obvious a gesture that would be, he looked down at his shoes.

“Prime Minister!” Hankey yelped, trying, belatedly, to intervene.

“Oh you’ll get your moment in the sun too, Boyo, don’t worry,” Lloyd George said with utter contempt. “Let me guess. You and your friends in the Civil Service,” Kell didn’t respond so Lloyd George kept on, “Chamberlain and Halifax and their little gang.”

Kell looked up, “actually.”

“Actually nothing,” the Prime Minister finally snapped. “You are under arrest. You are arrested,” he waved airily, ignoring the confused expressions of Dalton, Beaverbrook and Hankey, who all doubted his power to do that, “and you are dismissed from your position as Head of the Security Service. Someone picked by Hugh here will review the Service and see if it is fit to remain,” he said this with spite, enjoying the power. “Hugh here,” he pointed at Dalton, now clearly no more than a lieutenant of Lloyd George’s caprice, “will listen as you call a deputy and get him over here.”

“Where do I…”

“…go? Hugh, ask a barracks to hide him somewhere. You will remain out of contact until Hugh has finished his report. Go,” he snapped, waving Kell away. Hankey went to follow. “Not you.”

“Now Prime Minister,” Hankey began, but he lacked conviction.

“You won’t resign, I cannot have a scandal. You’re taking sick leave to the same barracks as your little chum Kell,” Lloyd George said with force. “When this is over, you’ll no doubt get your bloody peerage, but you won’t now, not from me,” he said spitefully.

“You cannot merely click your fingers and…”

“…lock you up? Try me. I can sack Vernon Kell, your note on the Prerogative makes it clear that it doesn’t have any statutory existence. As for you taking a rest, I’m being a considerate Prime Minister,” he said with a chuckle. “Now go,” he pointed at the door.

Dalton waited until Hankey had left. “Shouldn’t we…”

“He can do whatever he bloody likes,” Lloyd George said, relaxing into his armchair. “We’ve won against him.”

“You’re not really going to lock him up, are you? There is that habeas corpus…”

“…he can go and take some leave somewhere, preferably abroad and without a telephone,” Lloyd George said with a dismissive wave. “That felt good,” he said with a chuckle.

“And now what,” Beaverbrook asked, not unreasonably.

“Hugh, you stop the taps. Get someone utterly dull but scrupulous to do a thorough job, show you and your team how they did it. And then reinstate the taps on Belvedere and Buckingham Palace.” Beaverbrook was smiling, enjoying his involvement in the conspiracy. “Just in case the drunkard isn’t telling us everything.”

Dalton frowned. “Is that all?”

“And make sure you get an independent in to look at MI5. Someone thorough, earnest. We’ll need a new chief, someone not connected to Hankey and Fisher and that crowd. Max,” Lloyd George said, looking at Beaverbrook, “prepare as many stories as you like about this. Make it a small cartel in Whitehall trying to pick who should be running things.”

Dalton frowned again, “isn’t that what we’re…”

“…and,” Lloyd George cut across Dalton, “play up on the Duke of York angle. If the stammering idiot isn’t angered by this, and Chamberlain’s support for this, then I’m Stanley bloody Baldwin.”

====
GAME NOTES

I know, I know Butler running around London again. But I needed to tie up, at least in part, an element of the intelligence stuff that I launched a while ago and he’s back in London after the Lisbon adventure, so it is he and Milne (last seen at Oxford thirty or so chapters ago) that Vansittart turns to after the Eden suspicions a few chapters ago. Of course, this being ARP nothing is straightforward and the circle is closed, not on Chamberlain’s efforts, (more on that in a moment) but on the Baldwin Government’s decision to bug the Palace(s) and some Government buildings. Hilariously, this chapter, based on decisions actually made OTL by Baldwin and his Home Secretary, Sir John Simon, is actually therefore more plausible than having Butler and Milne unearth the Tory internal stuff (they sort of have, but have linked it to MI5 and the Home Office in error) if you are not with me on the lengths to which Chamberlain and his advisors would go to get their man into Downing Street. FWIW I remain convinced that the ‘carrot and stick’ approach would absolutely be taken (it was OTL over getting MPs to support appeasement) and wobbly Tories wooed with lunches and / or threatened with scandal. Chamberlain, who looms large over this update without actually featuring, has lived to fight another day.

Ronald Cartland was indeed a Conservative MP (as well as the brother of Barbara Cartland, the writer) and I have put him as a waverer due to his rather interventionist views. He was also a homosexual in an age where it was illegal; there were careful rules as to how this was to be ‘managed’ and it is an effective if contemptible weapon to wield at the young MP. Cartland was an economic moderniser, wildly opposed to the policies of Baldwin and Chamberlain, and later become a vocal anti-appeaser. A famous speech in which he predicted the onset of war and the risk of death was eerily prescient; as a junior officer he died at Dunkirk, brave to the last.

This a chapter about closure; the ending of a line of investigation, the end of the careers of two important (and overlooked) figures in 20th Century British History, of the curtailing of the power of that senior Civil Service group that has occasionally popped up (and of which Vansittart is a part – so he has, effectively, harmed himself with his own investigation) and of that ‘honeymoon period’ for the new administration (although to be fair it is more that everyone else is busy or in shock). There is a bit of law in here as well, the British spy agencies the Secret Intelligence Service and its fellow the Security Service had a truly murky, British genesis and essentially fell out of the Committee of Imperial Defence. That, as we have commented in an earlier update, kept the services on a level of ‘plausible deniability’ by keeping them away from Parliament and any official scrutiny. The secretary of the Committee of Imperial Defence at the birth of the spy agencies? Yep, one Maurice Hankey. It is therefore mildly ironic that it is one of his works that has resulted in his downfall. Lloyd George has quite a lot of power here, as he wields his authority in an area which officially doesn’t exist and which has no means of oversight (beyond a couple of secretive committees). It is also worth noting that Kell was in his 60s by 1936 and so retiring / dismissing him is probably easy enough to do, but will impact that Service’s ability to prepare for what is coming up. I have a notion of who would lead the review, and I have two candidates for the next leader of the Security Service, but this will be covered when we get there. Habeas corpus, of course, is the oft-quoted legal order that states that a person in prison must appear before and be judged by a court of law before he or she can be forced by law to stay in prison (it is often held to mean more than that, such as offering a right to a fair trial, but it doesn’t).

I’ve tried, desperately in this update, to not portray anyone as a superman (or woman in Kathleen Milne’s case). These are fallible people in an extraordinary situation. Cartland might bend to Chamberlain’s whim; Fenn didn’t protect Butler and Milne; Butler let what is arguably a criminal offence get handed over to a reporter; Kell and Hankey lacked the motive / courage / inclination to remind DLG and Dalton of the taps; DLG behaves like a spoiled child; Beaverbrook is slightly out of his depth here…the list goes on. I am very aware of the seduction offered by portraying people as cartoonish, and hope that has been avoided (or at least mitigated). I am also aware that I have given the DLG mess another success (after Palestine – although I would qualify that with @El Pip's canny assessment that it is the ‘least bad’ plan) before the real political fighting starts. Bear with me, because having played the first tricks (hurt the senior Civil Servants and stop the bugging – and I am convinced that DLG would know / be able to guess about them) the next, a biggy, must now be deployed.

France is, all at the same time, glad to be independent, terrified of being alone, desperate for allies, resentful of 'help' and in general fervently wishing they could sit back and criticize leadership instead of having to provide it.

That, my dear @Director, says in a sentence what I took a bloody chapter to write.

For the first time in a long while, a prompt for the list.

Yes! It needs to see the light of day for the first time in a while!

I do feel a bit sorry for Sir George, the French embassy was never supposed to be a taxing position and he is in many ways trying to defend the indefensible about actions back home. I'm also unsure what exactly you expected anyone to do differently in Paris, I don't think it was a lack of communication between London and Paris that caused the Entente problems in the inter-war. Could someone else have done the same things with a bit more flair, perhaps, but would it have made the slightest bit of difference, I struggle to see it. But as you say you are a connoisseur of ambassadorship so perhaps there is a subtlety I am missing.

So what do I expect? A fair question; I think that Clerk lacked sufficient / any real initiative, and that is where he must be judged. So much of the job of an ambassador is to filter, to help the natives to understand what Whitehall actually means (and the other way back up to Whitehall!). He just didn't do that: a clever, smarter man, someone younger, with a bit of flair, could do more. Clerk has merely acted as a communications node. So while that element of this terms of reference has been faithfully performed, he has not shown that skill that separates adequate from excellent.

Well as you know, HOI4 is a deeply immersive and serious historical simulator. Thus, there are many more ways to establish various different monarchies in the French Republic than in any actual preexisting monarchy in the game.

The UK for example has three monarchs set, but one is going to die very quickly, one is standard and only one actually has any event chains around him (George V, VI, and Edward respectively).

France meanwhile, aside from the basically elected monarchy that is the presidency system, has options for a bourbon, hapsborg, carlist, napoleonic etc restoration.

No doubt even more are coming. I'm actually rather surprised there is no option to make De Gaulle Prince of France or something like that...then again that's probably behind the Emperor McArthur expansion on the list.

It is truly awful, isn't it. And this is my frustration with HOI4 - we need some serious gameplay improvements but what do we get? Lashings and lashing of 'more of the same', which means idiotic focus trees.

That said a Franco-American agreement might happen, the US needs a stable Franc far more desperately than the UK so might just bite the bullet and cover all the costs. Or France could follow the German example and foresake international trade in favour of basically barter agreements at a govt to govt level, make it part of a concerted effort to stitch together a stronger Eastern European alliance - blueprints and arms to Poland in exchange for Polish coal to replace UK imports, that sort of thing.

Watch this space, old friend, watch this space! But as ever two very valid points made.

If they really want an Eastern Europe alliance and have them be strong enough to do anything, they're going to have to do a lot of bartering, or rather gifting, to get them into a deal and then up to speed against Germany.

Not much point in having Poland, Czechslovakia, yuguslavia etc in an alliance only for Germany to kill them instantly. Sure it buys time for France, cynically speaking, but it also makes them look pathetic and evil, whilst making the nazis much stronger looking and more desperately needed resources.

I don't think that France, in this TL, has (to be fair to them) enjoyed sufficient time to cobble together something approaching a policy; they're just setting out, and this will be a policy of little changes, lacking, I suspect, and 'endgame', an overarching strategy.

A more general question: once the main crisis is played through, do you intend to take the whole war through to its game conclusion? If so, would you keep things at their current pace and (very impressive) depth of characterisation, or start to march through them in quicker time? I’m happy whichever path you take, just curious.

So my rule at the moment is that I will try and explain the crisis in as much detail that I can. When we eventually get out of this (and we will, eventually!) the TL will speed up. When we get to the war I may slow down again, depending upon how the battle scenes (mixed with the Whitehall management of the war) are received.

Of course we carry on. We must put napoleon back on the throne of France, after all

Ha! And the Ottomans restored, Rome supreme (breaks down in tears)...

Ahh the constant tension between what happens in HOI4 (Germany beats everyone, instantly) and what would actually happen if there were such an alliance. If all parties were committed and if it was followed through then Germany faces either backing down at alt-Munich Crisis (and the Germany economy then imploding) or a war on 2-and-half fronts. Sure you can cover the Yugoslav border fairly easily, but the Sudeten defences are strong and doing the OTL of going through Belgium will drag Britain out of it's apathy and into the war. So try the OTL plan of hitting the Poles first, but you are doing it without all the shiny kit of OTL (no Panzer III or IV, no decent Me-109s, etc). Indeed I'm fairly sure the German amphetimine factories weren't ready at that point, so no 'lightning war' as the troops won't be marching on Speed. On the Polish side if they are getting legal blueprints from France they may actually build some modern weapons, after all in OTL they spent more on cavalry training than tanks and aircraft combined so there is budget and potential there.

Maybe the French will be too apathetic to do much in the opening phases, but the Czechs won't. They know that once Poland falls their north flank is wide open, so they will counter-attack into the Reich and take Vienna. Hitler will, of course, go mad at this and demand troops be sent there, but the only reserve is on the French border - OTL German war plans for a '38 Czech invasion had 12 divisions on the border, but 6 were freshly raised and with equipment 'in transit. Once the best of them get stripped away surely there will come a point where the border forces are so weak that even the French Army will have to do something.

Plus of course the Soviet wildcard, without Britain getting in the way a Franco-Soviet deal to contain Germany becomes much more likely, particularly with the Popular Front in the driving seat. Even if it just stops the Soviets stabbing Poland in the back and supplying resources to Germany it will be worth it.

As to the French situation, it is of course fascinating, terrifying and deeply necessary to consider how the British Implosion has impacted things on the Continent. If it forces France to sit up and work out an alternate counter to the Germans, then things could yet be alright. But seeing as this is both a) HOI4 and b) a horrible world of political negligence I won’t be holding out hope for that eventuality.
So this is the point - even with a 'semi-detached' Britain, Germany can be efficiently and effectively balanced. As I said in my response to @TheButterflyComposer, I do think that the French have fully grasped this yet. It's more "shit, Britain can't be trusted, who else can we get onboard?"
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
You know, the old saying is very true - it is easy to begin a war and desperately difficult to stop one. And as this uncivil, un-shooting war goes on, it becomes easier and easier to grasp for methods that destroy everything they began the war to defend...

I am reminded of the American Civil War (no, I was not alive for that; I was born in 1868 LOL) and the pictures of blasted, fire-ravaged Confederate cities where not a stone lies upon a stone... Everything offered up in sacrifice when every rational person knew in '62 or '63 that the South - even if it could be saved - would be so transformed as to be unrecognizable.

Sadly, I begin to think that LG and Chamberlain (for two) would eagerly pull it all down if it meant they could rule over the ruins.


As I have said, I'm not up-to-speed on HoI4 gameplay, but I do know that 'tween-wars diplomacy runs on cash, trade and arms... and France appears to be short of currency. Mobilizing over one of the various crises such as the Rhineland also requires a large amount of money... so France does gain by not having to co-ordinate diplomacy with a cautious Britain but loses by her lack of the 'necessary'.


“The Southern girl is usually an unsalvageable narcissist by the time she gets to junior high school because she has grasped the charming fact that her body, especially its exclusively female parts, has the power to make strong men weak - and strong governments fall. Toppling a government was an easy thing to dream about when I was a little girl because that famous Maryland lady, the Duchess of Windsor, had actually done it a few years earlier. She had accomplished what we were all taught to do: Cause trouble.

'Isn't she wonderful.' we breathed, 'She just got everybody so upset! Wouldn't it be just the most fun to upset a whole country? She almost caused a war - she must have bumped Edward with her bust. Oh, I'd just love to start a war, wouldn't you?”
― Florence King, Southern Ladies and Gentlemen

'Southern ladies and Gentlemen' opens with the declaration that, 'if you built a fence around the South you'd have one big madhouse' and goes hilariously on from there. Florence King and Molly Ivins are gems - they cut so deep you can bleed to death laughing. Ten stars out of five...
 
Last edited:
It is truly awful, isn't it.
I want more stupid focus trees really. The game is only half-mad, which is hardly optimal one way or another. Its also a game extremely biased against certain countries for some reason. France, Spain and Portugal get all kinds of insane and unlikely power ups from various ridiculous paths they could take, such as the latter restoring the empire with a Portuguese/Brazil axis, and Spain taking that and the whole French empire as well in one of their momarchist routes.

Meanwhile, the UK got man the guns, which makes the navy a bit more realistic, and the option to possibly achieve imperial federation if they play very well. This is clearly biased against us and I'm outraged we aren't allowed more insanity. Where's the free Scotland and have Scotland take over everything button? Or give Churchill control of post war Germany as their new king? Or etc etc
Ha! And the Ottomans restored, Rome supreme (breaks down in tears)...
It's not so bad. Mussolink gets a nice hat, Churchill made friends with an elephant, and Japan and China decided to reenact the entire first world war trench system with live ammunition...

Also Jamaica got sold to the amercians.
 
a knock at the door sounded the arrival of Hugh Dalton and Lord Beaverbrook
The sort of knock on the door that is no doubt accompanied by flashes of lightning and organ music…

At last the extent of the government’s sordidness is exposed, if not to the country (really) then at least to us. DLG comes across as the worst kind of tyrant (I feel like there’s a BAFTA in Anthony Hopkins’ future for whenever they make the ARP film…) And I note there’s no love lost between ‘the drunkard’ and his first minister. Slowly but surely, those in the King’s Party are showing their true colours…
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
The sort of knock on the door that is no doubt accompanied by flashes of lightning and organ music…

At last the extent of the government’s sordidness is exposed, if not to the country (really) then at least to us. DLG comes across as the worst kind of tyrant (I feel like there’s a BAFTA in Anthony Hopkins’ future for whenever they make the ARP film…) And I note there’s no love lost between ‘the drunkard’ and his first minister. Slowly but surely, those in the King’s Party are showing their true colours…
Yes...going to be interesting to see what happens to the King's party. Because in the base game, the only options are the King being in charge (as in, the picture on the head of gov page), or Mosley taking over.

Either way, DLG is going to sink. Either the scheme fails entirely, or he gets replaced by someone else.
 
Seeing Lloyd George still around makes me feel dizzy....
 
Seeing Lloyd George still around makes me feel dizzy....
That's the nausea kicking in, just the standard reaction to the presence of Lloyd George

DLG is absolutely over reaching himself here, which in fairness is absolutely in character - torching the constitution and doing massive damage to the national interest just so he can stay in power a bit longer could be the caption to his career. I await the scene with Churchill's reaction with morbid interest, Winston's growing realisation of just how bad a decision he has made will be sad to see. I just hope he manages to get off before DLG hits rock bottom and asks the King to order the Army to arrest the opposition, his career is over regardless but at least he will be able to live with himself if he gets off before the final implosion.

I can sort of see Kell retiring but he would surely kick up a fuss about being arrested and will have people who will advocate for him and blow the whistle on it, there are papers other than Beaverbrook's and many of them would rush to make sure this blows up in DLG's face and costs him support. Alas I suspect it won't, because the path that DLG is walking is so precarious that all his rivals and opponents must act as complete idiots at all times, even the slightest hint of competent opposition would end the charade so that cannot be allowed, see Hankey just rolling over and so on.
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
await the scene with Churchill's reaction with morbid interest, Winston's growing realisation of just how bad a decision he has made will be sad to see. I just hope he manages to get off before DLG hits rock bottom and asks the King to order the Army to arrest the opposition, his career is over regardless but at least he will be able to live with himself
There is no elephant on earth that can save winnie now...
 
Cartland might bend to Chamberlain’s whim; Fenn didn’t protect Butler and Milne; Butler let what is arguably a criminal offence get handed over to a reporter; Kell and Hankey lacked the motive / courage / inclination to remind DLG and Dalton of the taps; DLG behaves like a spoiled child; Beaverbrook is slightly out of his depth here…the list goes on.
You’ve paid a lot of attention to these different characters and their likely motivations and actions in this queasily tawdry ATL. Bravo. The subtitle for the opus could be “An essay on fallibility, folly and hubris”!

A truly murky, morally dubious and messy episode. All the earlier chapters where there was at least an attempt at honourable (even just legal) behaviour, big issues of national interest and international policy being considered, etc had steadily descended towards the gutter and chaos.
 
Last edited:
So @Le Jones I am only just starting to catch up on this, but I wanted to write that I am sorry to hear you were so knocked flat by covid, and glad I am that you seem to have gotten through it. Hoping to catch up over the next few days. Just finished Ch49, where I do wonder if some people are counting eggs before they hatch. I guess I shall find out.
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
1.png


Chapter 59, Chequers, 16 October 1936

1626472215973.png


Lloyd George had retreated to Chequers. That was his decision, what was left of the Downing Street permanent staff had protested (of course) and argued, with some energy, that the Prime Minister should be in London during this crisis. Lloyd George’s angry riposte was that Parliament wasn’t in session so they should use the time to do whatever could be done to match the King’s desire to marry Mrs Simpson with the outright refusal of Chamberlain / Eden (the Conservatives still seemed completely unable to get on with appointing a leader), Attlee and God knows who else to have anything to do with the King while he flouted Parliament’s intent.

Everything seemed tense, everyone waited for the next move in the little drama. The newspapers, shorn of fresh material, seemed to have exhausted themselves, restless MPs were individually increasing their demands to get Parliament recalled (although the Tory campaigns seemed focussed on their internal matters). Lloyd George, his neighbour in Downing Street a constant and not always welcome factor in his life, had decided to escape the claustrophobic atmosphere of Whitehall for the charm of the country retreat. He had even pared down the list of aides that Hankey had seemed, before his sudden departure, determined to foist upon him.

He was reading quietly, when Sir Rupert Howarth, the Deputy Cabinet Secretary (who had been ordered by Lloyd to ‘stay at his post’ after Hankey’s removal) arrived, looking sullen and with a pair of nervous looking aides in tow. “Prime Minister, I have Mr Sinclair, Mr Sassoon and Mr Noel-Baker to see you, they say that you agreed to talk about Parliament with them,” the inflection in his voice made it clear that the Acting Cabinet Secretary was not sure of this.

Lloyd George rolled his eyes. “I did, you know I did. What a coc oen I am.”

“I’m sorry, Prime Minister?” The tone was sepulchral, “I don’t follow.”

“Nothing, just an old word from home. Show them in, oh, and er, who are these?”

“Ah yes sorry Prime Minister, two new diary and Parliamentary business secretaries joining us, this is Randolph and this is Cairncross.” The young men, prepped for this, offered small nods to the Prime Minister who nodded back. “I would like five minutes later to discuss my future…

“…you’ll stay where you are, you bloody undertaker.”

“I’ll get Mr Sinclair and the others in now. Tea?”

“Aye, I’d better serve them something,” Lloyd George said huffily.

Archie Sinclair walked in and without ceremony flounced onto the sofa. Behind him their acting Chief Whip, Sir Philip Sassoon MP, and the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Philip Noel Baker, fumbled for a while before sitting awkwardly on two nearby small chairs. Noel-Baker seemed particularly on edge. While Sassoon radiated effortless charm and superiority Noel-Baker fumbled with his cigarette. His manner and the fact that he sat alert, not to mention the obvious age difference, made him seem more like a student before a form tutor and less like an important Cabinet minister.

“Philip,” Lloyd George said tiredly. “Bore da. Other Philip, bore da.”

“Prime Minister,” Noel-Baker said carefully.

“David,” Sassoon rasped, his voice rich and husky.

“Even though we were, formally, in three different parties, we’re keeping this meeting in the family,” Sinclair said wryly. Noel-Baker’s marriage was an unhappy one and he was known to be having an affair with Lloyd George’s daughter. The Prime Minister scowled at this.

“Let’s be done with it, then,” Lloyd George muttered grumpily.

“My dear David,” Sassoon said grandly, drawing on his cigarette, “Winston is clear that we stand in the most calamitous danger.” He had a pronounced lisp.

“I know,” Lloyd George said, tiredly.

Sinclair looked earnestly from Sassoon to Lloyd George. “How do we solve this?”

Sassoon turned an immaculate face to Sinclair. “I think, that we must, all of us, be prepared for some clever and probably unpalatable measures.” He looked lazily around the other men.

Lloyd George looked keenly at the three of them. “I take it then, Philip, er, Tory Philip, that you agree.”

“Agree with what?” Noel-Baker immediately regretted the foray.

1626472235222.png


Sassoon looked with intensity at the other Philip. “Parliament, my dear, Parliament. That is the centre, the beating heart of all of this.” As ever the words were silkily, precisely pronounced.

Lloyd George sat silently, composed. Sinclair, looking thoroughly unhappy, now spoke up.

“Well, what are you up to?”

1626472246877.png


Noel-Baker shrugged. “As Winston has said, we’re toast as soon as Parliament gets a vote on anything. The summer recess will serve us for a while…”

“…until when, precisely?” Sinclair was focussed, interested.

“End of October,” Noel-Baker confirmed.

Sassoon had to be even more precise. “The State Opening is planned for the third of November.”

Sinclair now realised what was being proposed. “Prorogation?”

“Just so, Archie,” Lloyd George confirmed, “just so. We were going to prorogue at the end of October, end the Parliamentary session with an address from His Majesty, and then begin anew the following week.”

“But.” Sinclair said, knowing very clearly the arguments that were about to be set out for him.

“But,” Sassoon mirrored, although much more exotically than Sinclair, “we could delay the opening of Parliament for longer than a week.”

“But, David,” Sinclair began an appeal to Lloyd George.

Lloyd George raised a hand. “I’ve heard it, Archie, whatever you’re going to say about democracy, and it is, I’m sure about that, I’ve heard it.”

Noel-Baker waited for a Sinclair response, saw that it was not forthcoming, so began quickly. “You, Dalton and Duff-Cooper have all agreed that the King needs time. Time to win over the Establishment, time to win over the public…”

“…oh dear, mon brave, it would be helpful if you could reach your point,” Sassoon said with a smile to soften the withering scorn.

“Yes yes,” Lloyd George waved away the conversation testily.

Sassoon looked directly at the Prime Minister. “Well David, this is a legally navigable means of prolonging the absence of Parliamentary challenge, and, as we’re among friends, the life of this Government.”

Lloyd George made an unconvincingly innocent expression. “I know not everyone will like it, but for a time, this could be done.”

Noel-Baker, who’d only been in Parliament for a few months, was deep in thought. “Is it legal?”

Sassoon, who wasn’t a lawyer, frowned. “I understand that it is. Prorogation is a prerogative power reserved to the Crown…”

“…on the advice of his Government,” Sinclair added, pointedly.

Lloyd George nodded. “Alright then. It can be done, what will the reaction be?”

Noel-Baker, rightly, realised that this was for Sinclair as the Leader of the Commons. Thankfully the Liberal leader was up to the task. “David,” he began slowly, “it will be divisive. The Commons will be in uproar…”

“…but they won’t be in the Commons, Archie, for there to be any uproar!”

“Quite, David,” Sassoon rasped, “quite. But Archie is right to mention it; there will be a backlash.”

“The Press?”

Sassoon, who was well-acquainted with, well, everyone, spoke up. “Beaverbrook assures me that his papers will, if we approve, begin arguing for it a week before we actually get David – King David to approve it. That way we will look to be responding to the vox populi, rather than acting in a maverick manner.”

“The others will hate it, won’t they? Dawson and The Times and that lot.”

“Yes David, they will hate it.” Sassoon’s silky rasp lost its seductiveness and was now rather harsh.

Lloyd George offered a thin smile. “Do we use Halifax? He’s close to Dawson isn’t he?”

1626472261819.png


Sinclair was baffled. “Why, David, would Edward do that?”

Noel-Baker felt on firm enough ground to contribute. “I have to agree, he despises you.”

Lloyd waved their objections away. “But he’s loyal to England, and to the Crown, and to decency.”

Sassoon shook his head. “Halifax is a man of faith, he is very conventional, really rather bourgeois despite his title. He despises adultery.”

Lloyd George looked far from dissuaded, but didn’t challenge. “If not Halifax, who can we use to keep the newspapers calm?”

Sassoon made a shrewd face. “You want someone well-heeled? With a title, place in society?”

Lloyd George looked with intrigue at the older man. “C’mon then!”

“Athlone,” Sassoon said, his uncertainty clear.

“Why on Earth…”

“…because he was at school with Dawson, because he is dull, because if we get the King to beg him he might just rein in dear Geoffrey.”

“Alright,” Lloyd George said, “I’ll think on it.”

“What about using Kell’s men?” Noel-Baker ventured this hesitantly.

“Outrageous!” Sinclair exploded, and was going to say more, but Lloyd George raised a hand.

“Be careful,” the Prime Minister said, gently, “I’ll come to that in a moment.” Noel-Baker had been briefed on the sacking of the head of the Security Service but to Sassoon and Sinclair it would come as a surprise. “So, as I see it there are three parts to getting this done. One: you, Philip, er, Tory Philip, work your charm with our friends on Fleet Street. Get them to portray this as a good thing, a few dinners at Trent Park or Port Lympne.”

“Done, mon brave,” Sassoon said grandly.

Lloyd George flashed a smile. “Thank you, Philip. Throw in our outriders too, do you think?”

Sassoon took a drag on his cigarette. “Outriders, David?”

“Any of our lads who get the jitters.”

“Rather a tiresome party if we invite them all en masse. But yes, I have my orders,” he said grandly. “Can I enlist Chips in this?”

“Good plan,” Lloyd George said with a grin, “Channon’s parties are the stuff of legend.”

“What would also garner support, David,” Sassoon drawled, “was if we get the star to attend. If I can advertise that he is attending, we’ll get much more in the way of support.”

“Leave it with me,” Lloyd George said with a wink. “I’m off to Belvedere soon and tell ‘im. He’ll do as he’s told. And that might get me a senior Tory to cut a deal with.”

“So,” Sinclair said with a polite cough, “that was ‘one’. And next?”

“Two, Archie, as Tory Philip here works his charm, you and Winston prepare the necessary Parliamentary magic.”

“Why me?”

“Because you and Winston are the only other people in our mad little coalition that could do my job if anything happened to me,” Lloyd George said with real warmth. “And because it needs grandees to carry it off.”

Noel-Baker frowned. “What do we need, to prorogue?”

“His Majesty does it, as a prerogative power,” Sassoon said, repeating his earlier advice. “But the Privy Council element?”

“Oh goodness, yes,” Sinclair said with a jolt.

“I am told, by Monckton,” Lloyd George said happily, that,” he began to read from his notes, “Prorogation is a prerogative act, yes, thanks for that Walter. Blather blather ah yes, 'the Crown, by virtue of Section One of the Prorogation Act eighteen sixty-seven exercises the power to prorogue Parliament on the advice of the Privy Council, however, whether the Crown must follow this advice is contested'.” He looked up from his notes. “Although most of the time it’s whether or not a King or Queen can refuse an application to grant, rather than whether or not the Privy Council not wanting it can be ignored.”

Sassoon looked impassively with his dark sad eyes at Lloyd George. Sinclair didn’t know what to do. Thankfully, Philip Noel-Baker had a question. “Could anyone stop us?”

Lloyd George was momentarily exasperated. “We would have prorogued in any event, Baldwin would have done it at the end of the month for the State Opening the week after. All we’re doing is getting it in now, and moving the King’s bloody speech back a few weeks.”

“A few?” Sinclair asked with a raised eyebrow.

“Do we have to be specific, there is merit in elasticity,” Noel-Baker muttered.

“The prorogation speech specifies the date of next meeting.”

“Which will be as late as I can get our people to agree it,” Lloyd George said.

“I presume,” Sinclair said unhappily, “that you would nobble the Privy Council.”

“I would ensure,” Lloyd George said conspiratorially, “that Lang is away.”

“Percy is briefed on with us?”

“He is, and will do what is necessary.” Lord Percy had been made Lord Privy Seal and was the Leader of the House of Lords. As such he was, with the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Lord Chancellor, as well as senior peers from the other parties, one of the ‘Lords Commissioners’, members of the Privy Council, that would exercise the Prerogative power to prorogue Parliament.

“And the others?” Sassoon was trying to establish where the meeting of Lords Commissioner would get its weight, its credibility.

“Snell will be a ‘no,” Noel-Baker said immediately. “He is too loyal to Clem.

“Crewe will do this,” Sinclair said after a pause. Lord Crewe was the Liberal leader in the Lords, and as the Party had defected virtually en masse to the King’s cause he had an added credibility to maintain his position. “Do we have a Lord Chancellor yet?”

“Of course we don’t,” Lloyd George said caustically. “I had hoped that Sankey might be persuaded to do it, appeal to his honour see,” he quipped quickly, “but he’s wobbly, for some reason.” Lord Sankey had been the Lord Chancellor until Baldwin's election victory in 1935.

“Can’t possibly imagine why,” Sassoon drawled.

“It’s either Sankey or some other fool, a judge perhaps.”

“Donald Somervell?” That was Sinclair.

“Is still an MP,” Sassoon chided, “and is with Chamberlain. “If you are determined, David, to make it a Conservative, might I suggest Sir Terence O'Connor. He was one of the first to join HM, and was Baldwin’s Solicitor-General.”

“Aye, let’s ennoble him, then, and get him as Lord Chancellor.”

“The by-election?”

“Will be kicked down the road, and won’t matter.”

“And if I may, David,” Sassoon said huskily, “That is your point to Terence. Unlike the rest of us, he will be a peer, by doing this he avoids defeat in an election.”

“So,” Lloyd George snapped brightly, “that’s that. We have our Commissioners, we have His Majesty. No one else, I think, will oppose us.”

“The courts, might I presume,” Sassoon said with polite probing.

“Monckton thinks that there is hope there. He argues that the decision to advise the King to prorogue Parliament is separate from the King’s decision to do so. The latter could, constitutionally speaking, be made independently of the former. The courts might, he thinks, entertain something on my decision to advise His bloody Majesty to prorogue Parliament without trespassing on the personal prerogative of the Monarch himself.”

“But how does that give us hope?” Noel-Baker asked.

“Because, my dear, that rather austere man Chamberlain won’t want to limit his own power for when he replaces David.”

Sinclair looked at the floor rather than meet Lloyd George’s gaze, while Noel-Baker wondered how to address the obvious logic of Sassoon’s point. “Point three,” he croaked.

“Ah yes,” Lloyd George said happily. “The scandal.”

“That’s not normally a word designed to elicit happiness,” Sassoon said immediately.

“It is when the Security Service has been spying on King and senior Tories.”

“Amateur,” Sassoon snapped.

“Well,” Lloyd George countered, “that’s not the half of it. On York, as well.”

“Which means any discussions between His Royal Highness,” Sassoon explained to a baffled Noel-Baker, “and his mother, as well as his brothers, would be known to Kell and his men.”

“And Sir John Simon,” Sinclair added, “and presumably Dalton.”

Lloyd George’s eyes twinkled. “Ah no, Archie,” he said with a broad grin, “sadly they forgot to tell Hugh.”

“And yet they didn’t remove the taps, or the, well whatever it is they use.”

“From which,” Sassoon drawled, “we can presume that someone is still amassing this information?”

“That’s what we’ve decided to run with, yes. A right old scandal. The King is bad enough, music to Beaverbrook’s ears it is, but Bertie as well! That dolt Kell! If he had only told us…”

“…David, what are your orders on the timing?” Sassoon frowned as he asked this. “I presume that our half of Fleet Street is going to pursue stories on this, but when?”

1626472287736.png


“We start soon,” Lloyd George confirmed, straightening his moustache with a flourish. “The prorogation will carry us so far but we need to put the boot into Chamberlain. So, let’s dump some manure over Neville. Corruption against the Crown, naughty tactics being used to bring down this Government, which only exists,” he spread his hands widely, as if addressing a crowd, “to give our young King a chance to do something available to all of his subjects. Yes, we’ll start slowly, spread some rumours about Tory activities. Naughty antics being used in Whitehall. Abuse of the spycatchers to further Conservative means. Make the King look a bit besieged in his little palace.”

“Simon was a National Liberal,” Sinclair corrected, “Baldwin used Simon to do this.”

“Even better,” Lloyd George said in his rolling Welsh voice, “let’s drop all talk of Baldwin, let’s focus on Chamberlain. That’ll have them begging for a prorogation!”

“It could work, Prime Minister,” Noel-Baker said to Lloyd George.

“And then, when all is chaos, we suggest that the Tories might want to leave us alone. With the King doing everything he can to sort out his bloody love life, we can get by ‘till Christmas. Ha!”

“The Cabinet?”

“No, Winston might moan, but we need to get by without much Cabinet. They’ll argue as soon I mention anything other than the King.”

====
GAME NOTES

A selection of cross-party members meet with Lloyd George to plan a couple of the “tricks” I’ve been hinting at for a while. One was/is straight out of Parliamentary precedent, proroguing Parliament, the other is to openly publish the details of the Security Service’s bugging of the King, his brother, and a couple of leading politicians. I suppose we could also debate DLG’s tactic of “go ugly, early” by publishing immediately.

To the personalities, then. Lloyd George is by now well known to all of us, and here is as scheming and cunning as ever. Sinclair has popped up a couple of times, largely in the background (apart from one chapter focussing on his speech in support of the King) and here we see him rather torn. Torn between a DLG for whom anything goes to survive, and his respect for Parliament. This chapter originally featured Churchill but I think these discussions would push him to leave the rebel Government (although I also suspect he’d time his return to ingratiate himself on the new Conservative leader).

The two Philips, Noel-Baker and Sassoon, were largely as portrayed; if a liberty has been taken it is probably in making Sassoon more theatrical than he perhaps was. He was certainly not camp, although he was luxuriant, fabulously wealthy, and while his Englishness was more acquired than ancestral he was a natural aristocratic Tory. He was also devoted to King Edward, indeed I struggle to think of a Conservative more naturally supportive of the King without an ulterior motive. Having him joining the rebellion was an easy decision for me and, were it to happen, him. Noel-Baker, the blander of the Philips paraded before you, is another remarkable character; in 1936 he already had an Olympic medal to his name (Silver in the 1500m at the 1920 Games) and would later win the Nobel Peace Prize. Here, as a very newly elected member (he replaced the disgraced Jimmy Thomas from waaaaay back in the story) I have concluded that he might have been open to DLG’s entreaties (or more probably those of his daughter, with whom he was having an affair!) to take a principled stand.

Proroguing Parliament has a rich history, and is legally more or less (in 1936 anyway) as I describe. So what is it, and why is Lloyd George’s using it something of a Parliamentary trick? Well, put simply, it is a constitutional way of ending a Parliamentary session and setting a date for the new session. Parliament is not, currently, sitting, it is in the weirdly named Summer (really late Summer into Autumn) Recess. Now where I admit, freely, to massaging reality. I had to balance the mechanics of HOI with what would have happened in a real crisis of this ilk, based on that need to blend sanity, the game and my whimsy. It is probable that this debate would have happened virtually instantly for DLG to have a chance of survival; Parliaments can and do come back from recesses and the Speaker (largely absent so far) is as important as the Government in this. I wanted to smoothen out the narrative of what is a complicated legal, religious and political crisis and so have delayed the prorogation discussion until now. For the period of prorogation Parliament will not meet and it allows the Government to manage debate – this is what Attlee, Major and latterly Johnson all realised when they used, or tried to use it. And, beautifully, it is part of the Royal Prerogative exercised, on the advice of the Prime Minister, with a couple of requirements (the Lord Commissioners discussed above). This situation is unusual as the King, in this case, agrees with the Government request – most of the controversial moments around the use of the prorogation have occurred when a Monarch has been placed in a difficult, unenviable position, between acquiescing (as he / she apparently must) with His / Her Government and taking a stand over an unpalatable stymying of democracy. With, in essence, both of the key elements ‘in cahoots’ there isn’t a problem. Right? Well, sort of, although I have truncated some of the mechanisms by which Parliament’s return can be delayed, there is not a lot that the (still leaderless) Conservatives or Labour (never mind the Liberals!) can actually do to stop this. The battle, as it did (partly) in 2019, will therefore spill into that of public opinion. I am convinced, FWIW, that this will not end in a court case (which would, in any case, not be heard in the Supreme Court – it doesn’t exist in 1936 and the matter would probably have a tortured progress to the House of Lords exercising its judicial capacity).

DLG’s decision to publish immediately is probably borne out of necessity – there is the danger (see the preceding chapter) of someone else releasing the story, and it may go some way to justifying the prorogation (it really won’t, but DLG’s judgment was always odd).

You know, the old saying is very true - it is easy to begin a war and desperately difficult to stop one. And as this uncivil, un-shooting war goes on, it becomes easier and easier to grasp for methods that destroy everything they began the war to defend...

I am reminded of the American Civil War (no, I was not alive for that; I was born in 1868 LOL) and the pictures of blasted, fire-ravaged Confederate cities where not a stone lies upon a stone... Everything offered up in sacrifice when every rational person knew in '62 or '63 that the South - even if it could be saved - would be so transformed as to be unrecognizable.

'Southern ladies and Gentlemen' opens with the declaration that, 'if you built a fence around the South you'd have one big madhouse' and goes hilariously on from there. Florence King and Molly Ivins are gems - they cut so deep you can bleed to death laughing. Ten stars out of five...

There is a lot of truth in this; unless the King was to die at this stage and Chamberlain enter Downing Street within seconds, a lot is going to change. A lot has changed, particularly in the swathe of MPs who will be expelled (from their parties - the ways of sacking them as MPs are limited to elections and some very specific occasions) and the state of British public life (which even in OTL took a real battering). The road to war for the British will be different in a number of ways from OTL.

I want more stupid focus trees really. The game is only half-mad, which is hardly optimal one way or another. Its also a game extremely biased against certain countries for some reason. France, Spain and Portugal get all kinds of insane and unlikely power ups from various ridiculous paths they could take, such as the latter restoring the empire with a Portuguese/Brazil axis, and Spain taking that and the whole French empire as well in one of their momarchist routes.

Meanwhile, the UK got man the guns, which makes the navy a bit more realistic, and the option to possibly achieve imperial federation if they play very well. This is clearly biased against us and I'm outraged we aren't allowed more insanity. Where's the free Scotland and have Scotland take over everything button? Or give Churchill control of post war Germany as their new king? Or etc etc

It's not so bad. Mussolink gets a nice hat, Churchill made friends with an elephant, and Japan and China decided to reenact the entire first world war trench system with live ammunition...

Also Jamaica got sold to the amercians.

Oh they can be hilarious fun, but I kinda wish they'd invested more in some plausible what ifs. I also hate the lack of coherence between each nation's focus and those of its neighbours. We will see this, actually, when the war begins (and it's Italy, of all countries, that goes mad).

The sort of knock on the door that is no doubt accompanied by flashes of lightning and organ music…

At last the extent of the government’s sordidness is exposed, if not to the country (really) then at least to us. DLG comes across as the worst kind of tyrant (I feel like there’s a BAFTA in Anthony Hopkins’ future for whenever they make the ARP film…) And I note there’s no love lost between ‘the drunkard’ and his first minister. Slowly but surely, those in the King’s Party are showing their true colours…

A film of ARP?! Yes! Good Lord, what a thought.

Yes...going to be interesting to see what happens to the King's party. Because in the base game, the only options are the King being in charge (as in, the picture on the head of gov page), or Mosley taking over.

Either way, DLG is going to sink. Either the scheme fails entirely, or he gets replaced by someone else.

I agree - DLG will fail, we all know that, but when we get to the how expect some gamery to keep a balance between HOI madness and something approaching an @El Pip level of plausibility.

Seeing Lloyd George still around makes me feel dizzy....

It is weird, very 1914, DLG and Churchill kicking around. It is odd that Winnie was in the Cabinet in both 1914 and 1939 (and in the same position). Politicians rarely last that long in our era.

That's the nausea kicking in, just the standard reaction to the presence of Lloyd George

DLG is absolutely over reaching himself here, which in fairness is absolutely in character - torching the constitution and doing massive damage to the national interest just so he can stay in power a bit longer could be the caption to his career. I await the scene with Churchill's reaction with morbid interest, Winston's growing realisation of just how bad a decision he has made will be sad to see. I just hope he manages to get off before DLG hits rock bottom and asks the King to order the Army to arrest the opposition, his career is over regardless but at least he will be able to live with himself if he gets off before the final implosion.

I can sort of see Kell retiring but he would surely kick up a fuss about being arrested and will have people who will advocate for him and blow the whistle on it, there are papers other than Beaverbrook's and many of them would rush to make sure this blows up in DLG's face and costs him support. Alas I suspect it won't, because the path that DLG is walking is so precarious that all his rivals and opponents must act as complete idiots at all times, even the slightest hint of competent opposition would end the charade so that cannot be allowed, see Hankey just rolling over and so on.

I'm not sure about Kell, y'know - DLG knows one of his key strengths is his utter moral bankruptcy, and decent honourable men tend to blink first.

There is no elephant on earth that can save winnie now...

You're right - this is the old lion's last roar. Winston was thought of as a has been after the India Act debacle; alas his great future leading the Empire at war will be a fanciful what if for AAR writers.

You’ve paid a lot of attention to these different characters and their likely motivations and actions in this queasily tawdry ATL. Bravo. The subtitle for the opus could be “An essay on fallibility, folly and hubris”!

A truly murky, morally dubious and messy episode. All the earlier chapters where there was at least an attempt at honourable (even just legal) behaviour, big issues of national interest and international policy being considered, etc had steadily descended towards the gutter and chaos.

Thank you mon brave. The depths can be dredged a bit more, as I have shown in this update.

So @Le Jones I am only just starting to catch up on this, but I wanted to write that I am sorry to hear you were so knocked flat by covid, and glad I am that you seem to have gotten through it. Hoping to catch up over the next few days. Just finished Ch49, where I do wonder if some people are counting eggs before they hatch. I guess I shall find out.

My dear chap! The First Gentleman of AARLand. I hope that your troubles are over my friend, and it is truly great to see you back on AARLand.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
“Even though we were, formally, in three different parties, we’re keeping this meeting in the family,” Sinclair said wryly. Noel-Baker’s marriage was an unhappy one and he was known to be having an affair with Lloyd George’s daughter. The Prime Minister scowled at this.
Rather incestous this, isn't it? And was this a thing of the period, every Mo sleeping around with other MPs families?
Sinclair now realised what was being proposed. “Prorogation?”
Ooo. Okay, tick my first thought of his tricks off. And the one that in the end is going to be used not only to bring down this monarchy but restrict royal prerogative going forwards.
Noel-Baker waited for a Sinclair response, saw that it was not forthcoming, so began quickly. “You, Dalton and Duff-Cooper have all agreed that the King needs time. Time to win over the Establishment, time to win over the public…”
It's not going to happen, you deluded twat burger. Any more than you, DLG, will win over parliament before the final delay device runs out.
“Is it legal?”
Eh...yes but no one other than the sitting government and their most devoted of followers ever thinks it's a good idea.
Sinclair was baffled. “Why, David, would Edward do that?”
Good fucking question.
Lloyd waved their objections away. “But he’s loyal to England, and to the Crown, and to decency.”
Which is why he won't do it, you gibbering imbecile.
ve it with me,” Lloyd George said with a wink. “I’m off to Belvedere soon and tell ‘im. He’ll do as he’s told.
...this whole situation only came about because theking didn't do what he was told.
“Monckton thinks that there is hope there. He argues that the decision to advise the King to prorogue Parliament is separate from the King’s decision to do so. The latter could, constitutionally speaking, be made independently of the former. The courts might, he thinks, entertain something on my decision to advise His bloody Majesty to prorogue Parliament without trespassing on the personal prerogative of the Monarch himself.”
It is separate acts, legally. The fact they are in practice the same thing is not really relevant...
Because, my dear, that rather austere man Chamberlain won’t want to limit his own power for when he replaces David.”
However, there is no way that Chamberlain is getting his hands on the premiership without limiting that bullshit somewhat. Someone just used it to try and pull an attempted coup, for god's sake. No, this won't be going away any time soon. Even if the books aren't changed, there's will be a stigma for a long time over using this particular power. More so than before, anyway.
This situation is unusual as the King, in this case, agrees with the Government request – most of the controversial moments around the use of the prorogation have occurred when a Monarch has been placed in a difficult, unenviable position, between acquiescing (as he / she apparently must) with His / Her Government and taking a stand over an unpalatable stymying of democracy.
It's one of those powers which rather pulls down the curtain and shows how much the democratic system has really been added onto the feadal one, rather than built with the former in mind...that said, it really makes the monarchy look bad and ineffectual, as this specific problem wouldn't happen with an independently elected head of state (who would just tell the government to fuck off if they were obviously abusing the system).

A veto isn't bad idea...but a veto that can't be refused or even wielded except by outside parties is just bizarre.
The battle, as it did (partly) in 2019, will therefore spill into that of public opinion. I am convinced, FWIW, that this will not end in a court case (which would, in any case, not be heard in the Supreme Court – it doesn’t exist in 1936 and the matter would probably have a tortured progress to the House of Lords exercising its judicial capacity).
I doubt the House of Lords will decide that parliament is not sovereign and the perouging wasn't naked abuses of power at the expense of parliament. Especially as the case will probably reach them a year after all this goes down, by which time Edward will be out, DLG will be shot and Winston will have hung himself.
Oh they can be hilarious fun, but I kinda wish they'd invested more in some plausible what ifs. I also hate the lack of coherence between each nation's focus and those of its neighbours. We will see this, actually, when the war begins (and it's Italy, of all countries, that goes mad).
Italy? They really don't have much stimulus to go mad, unless they go it alone and try to build their own axis powers and attempt to poach Hungary from Germany...
It is weird, very 1914, DLG and Churchill kicking around. It is odd that Winnie was in the Cabinet in both 1914 and 1939 (and in the same position). Politicians rarely last that long in our era.
To Churchill's credit and detriment, he was constantly being thrown out of parties and into the wilderness for mistakes and cockups, but survived and worked his way back in, usually just in time to do something else spectacularly awful/amazing. Most these days tend to be kicked upstairs before doing it twice, let alone for thirty years.
You're right - this is the old lion's last roar. Winston was thought of as a has been after the India Act debacle; alas his great future leading the Empire at war will be a fanciful what if for AAR writers.
It's a shame, but also interesting, who is to be the wartime leader now, given that it can't be Chamberkain, DLG or Churchill? Is it Halifax again? Soon he's going to be the only untainted senior Tory left...
 
I have to say, the possibility of Noel-Baker among the plotters is not something I had considered, but I suppose his extracurricular relations with Megan would have some bearing as you suggest. Shame if this is to be the death of his career, mind. He’s an interesting character even if somewhat inoffensive, as you say.

In stark contrast to DLG, of course, who is ratcheting the skullduggery up one hell of a notch with this prorogation talk. Within Westminster all of this seems like a bit of a fait accompli, but I do wonder how this will wash with the public. How many are going to be enthused by their doe-eyed romantic king throwing a massively unconstitutional tantrum so he can get his way? It’s a big gamble – but where else could the cabal feasibly turn?

Lloyd George rolled his eyes. “I did, you know I did. What a coc oen I am.”

“I’m sorry, Prime Minister?” The tone was sepulchral, “I don’t follow.”
I’m sure Sir Rupert can at least guess at what is being suggested here…

“Ah yes sorry Prime Minister, two new diary and Parliamentary business secretaries joining us, this is Randolph and this is Cairncross.”
Is this Cairncross Cairncross?

It's a shame, but also interesting, who is to be the wartime leader now, given that it can't be Chamberkain, DLG or Churchill? Is it Halifax again? Soon he's going to be the only untainted senior Tory left...
Feels like Oliver Stanley’s time to shine…
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Shame if this is to be the death of his career, mind. He’s an interesting character even if somewhat inoffensive, as you say.
Young enough to probably be kicked into the wilderness rather than destroyed. Unless he does something highly illegal.
In stark contrast to DLG, of course, who is ratcheting the skullduggery up one hell of a notch with this prorogation talk. Within Westminster all of this seems like a bit of a fait accompli, but I do wonder how this will wash with the public. How many are going to be enthused by their doe-eyed romantic king throwing a massively unconstitutional tantrum so he can get his way? It’s a big gamble – but
I can't see the public going for it. The religious won't, for obvious reasons. The democratic ones won't, again for obvious reasons. Which leaves the working classes who do like the King (do they like him enough to tolerate this?) and...I don't know...the upper classes who have affairs and want it to be OK? Not very many people.

They're going to have to pull some major shill about the spying and the establishment trying to destroy the king/monarchy. How much that washes depends on Edward (I am not expecting much, no matter what DLG says).