Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

AGCEEP on WATK map?

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
can somebody give me names for these "numbers" ?
owned = { province = 1953 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 477 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 358 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 359 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 360 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 478 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 1958 data = -1 }
 
Blaster said:
can somebody give me names for these "numbers" ?
Click to expand...
You can check that yourself in the province.csv file in the \ExtraWATK\db folder. Open it up in notepad and turn off word wrap (in the View menu), then scroll down the list. It's in order of province IDs.
 
Smzik - would just like to say I've been having a blast playing the latest version of ExtraWATK, its great to have most the AGCEEP events (plus some differences, I realise) on the WATK map. Have had most fun playing Poland in the 1419 scenario - am playing on VH/Weakling and my main aims are to try to stay in the Latin techgroup and to take all the Polish/Ruthenian and eventually Baltic provinces and hopefully to get a small colonial empires too whilst funding off the Russian hordes and the Big White Blob in Europe. Am doing okay so far, its 1489 and the whole of Silesia is now Polish (and Polish Culture), along with Kustrin and Pomerania, which I think should allow me to keep Latin tech when I inherit Lithuania... I also have Danzig and Warmia, the former has retained Polish culture, but has no CoT - couldn't figure out how to get both, so decided to grab it early and keep Polish culture. Oh and I've also swapped maps with Norway and Portugal and got Iceland off Norway in time to turn it to Polish culture, thought this might be a useful stepping stone to North America...

Am going to carry on with my Poland game, but think Venice could be fun in ExtraWATK too, so may give that a go next or in parallel...

Anyway, keep up the good work, hope you keep on updating it! :)
 
pgroves said:
I also have Danzig and Warmia, the former has retained Polish culture, but has no CoT - couldn't figure out how to get both, so decided to grab it early and keep Polish culture.
Click to expand...
To get a CoT in Danzig along with Polish culture avoiding awful events, you have to wait until Teutons gain CoT there, then wait till mid-17th to get Polish culture again. Just a little trick, from AGCEEP iirc. ;)

Anyway, keep up the good work, hope you keep on updating it! :)
Click to expand...

Too much rl for now :(
 
szmik said:
To get a CoT in Danzig along with Polish culture avoiding awful events,
Click to expand...

Yes I noticed that it was possible if you accept the hideous events that happen to Poland if you have high aristocracy and low centralisation... not a wise path to follow though, I think! :)

szmik said:
you have to wait until Teutons gain CoT there, then wait till mid-17th to get Polish culture again. Just a little trick, from AGCEEP iirc. ;)
Click to expand...

Oh I didn't realise it could eventually come back to Polish culture, will check the Polish event file again...
 
pgroves said:
Oh I didn't realise it could eventually come back to Polish culture, will check the Polish event file again...
Click to expand...

Hmmm... I can't find an event that returns Danzig to Polish culture, there's no Polish Dominance in Danzig event or anything similar, as far as I can tell...
 
pgroves said:
Hmmm... I can't find an event that returns Danzig to Polish culture, there's no Polish Dominance in Danzig event or anything similar, as far as I can tell...
Click to expand...

Iirc it's in province specific file.
 
szmik said:
Iirc it's in province specific file.
Click to expand...

Indeed, you're correct, I never thought to look for events here, that's a mighty big offset value (3000) though I don't know what that really means in practice?:

Code: 
#(1419-1772) Recovery of Danzig
#by zdlugasz
#Should only happen to Poland or Masovia
event = {
	id = 338195
	trigger = {
		OR = {
			owned = { province = 301 data = MIN }
			owned = { province = 301 data = POL }
		}
		NOT = { provinceculture = { prov = 301 data = polish } }
	}
	random = no
	province = 301 #Danzig
	name = "EVENTNAME338195" #Recovery of Danzig
	desc = "EVENTHIST338195"
	#-#Danzig (Gdansk) was lost by Poland at the beginning of the 14th century and it's recovery was always one of main Polish kings' priorities. Major defeat of Teutonic Order at Grunwald in 1410 was never properly exploited, but finally after Thirteen Years War (1454-1466) Danzig has been recovered.

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1455 }
	offset = 3000
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1772 } #date of the first partitioning of Poland

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME338195A" #Great!
		command = { type = provinceculture which = 301 value = polish }
		command = { type = vp value = 5 }
	}
}
 
This event in the same file also looks useful for Poland/Lithuania (NB: province 462 is Zaporozhe):

Code: 
#(1540-1620) Colonization of Wild Steppes
#Should only happen to Poland or Lithuania
event = {
	id = 338213
	random = no
	trigger = {
		OR = {
			owned = { province = 462 data = POL }
			owned = { province = 462 data = LIT }
		}
	}
	province = 462 
	name = "EVENTNAME338213" #Colonization of Wild Steppes
	desc = "EVENTHIST338213"
	#-#During second half of XVIth century and at the beginning of XVIIth century Ukraine was intensively colonized by magnates. They offered peasants land in exchange for small rent, organizing defense against Tatars and not onerous dutes. However, these terms were offered for e.g. 20 years only. After this time has passed, many peasanst had been turned into serfs. This was an underlie of unrest and one of reasons why Khmelnitsky uprising had so huge initial successes.

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1540 }
	offset = 100
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1620 }

	action_a = {
		name = "OK"
		command = { type = population which = 462 value = 750 } 
		command = { type = provinceculture which = 462 value = ruthenian } 
	}
}
 
pgroves said:
Indeed, you're correct, I never thought to look for events here, that's a mighty big offset value (3000) though I don't know what that really means in practice?
Click to expand...
It is the number of days in between each check of the conditions for the event (I think, 90% sure). 3000 is a massive number, and probably means to (in this case) simulate that Poland has to own the province for quite a while.
 
And it fires too soon anyway, unless someone plays 200 years per session. ;)
 
Just dl this ExtraWatk, and started playing as Serbia. Loved it so far, congrats on your work.If I may just add few suggestions (feel free to ignore them, if you don't like them):

Zeta should be independent in 1419, it was inherited by Serbia in 1421 and Venice took it in 1435. I also added few leaders to serbian file, can post them if interested.

Edit: Also, can this mode be converted to Vicky?
 
Last edited:
BigBadWolf said:
Zeta should be independent in 1419, it was inherited by Serbia in 1421 and Venice took it in 1435.
Click to expand...

Too much of a burden for such short period.

I also added few leaders to serbian file, can post them if interested.
Click to expand...

I'd appreciate that. If you could come up with Serbian leaders after Ottoman conquest it should be plausible... for Serbians at the least. :)
 
I love OPM´s

Hi szmik,

really appreciate your work. But it´s a pity you edited the OPM´s out so much.
Are there tags left to put them back in and did you remove them from all the events where they might have been in?

paw
 
Blaster said:
can somebody give me names for these "numbers" ?
owned = { province = 1953 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 477 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 358 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 359 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 360 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 478 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 1958 data = -1 }
Click to expand...
go to "province" cvs file (open with excel) in the "Db" subfolder
"F" the number and there you have it.
 
Peasant-at-war said:
Hi szmik,

really appreciate your work. But it´s a pity you edited the OPM´s out so much.
Click to expand...
what is OPM? :confused:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back