• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I definitely gravely underproduced mountaineers for the number of heavy fighting I was going to be doing in mountainous terrain - both Algeria and Southern Spain are completely dominated by it and it is playing a big role in delaying our advances. We do have some heavy tank brigades attached to our infantry - who back a serious punch to them. As for nuclear weaponary - well let us say that American scientists haven't been sitting on their hands since they saw other powers develop nukes in the past year ...



I agree that we really needed Gibraltar to be able to have full freedom of action in the Western Med - which was one of my big reasonings for choosing Southern Spain as our 2nd attempt at a European landing. If we can just hold on to the enclave we have - we will be in a stronger position, never mind if it can be expanded from here. The big issue will be if everything gets sucked into the void of a war of attrition in Andalusia, but let us not worry just yet!
My theory is that the importance of Andalusia mainly lies in its ports. The force presence in Andalusia is to give way for the further Mediterranean campaign against France. (the problem then would be how to deal with the tyranny of time and distance). All the forces should be oriented for defending Gibraltar. The goal right now is to freeze the Seville pocket as "economically" as possible according to the economy of force.
Historically speaking Clark's record is Italy is "pretty bad", in this timeline he's fighting in Spain, a country with similar terrain as Italy under similar circumstances. It is my fear he might screw this one up too...

1742071437625.png
The big problem with the Mediterranean strategy is that the tyranny of time and distance would be in full display, and this further restricts the depth of any further attacks. Logistics will be a constant challenge to say at least. An island hopping campaign is necessary for the developments on that front. My theory right now is for a whole army with all the marines to land on Barcelona and aim to Isolate Iberia from the rest of the continent, armored forces could certainly exploit the mobility offered by the plains. 2-5 corps of infantry (mountaineer preferred) could hold the northern corridor while the motorized and tank force drive towards Bilbao before launching a concentric attack on the now isolated Iberian force. The other plan would be to go after Marseille, but the distance would be greater and the landing zone will be exposed to the entire syndicalist power on the plains.
The greatest problem right now is that most forces in Spain and North Africa we are facing right now are local syndicalist regimes, where have the French and Brits gone?
Most of my knowledge of Spanish geography comes from my playthrough of UFCo interventions down there. Diverting a "flying column" into Madrid from the North would be worth it given the enemy hasn't established a line in front of it. The theory is that horizontal escalation for this scenario will be worth the risks (vertical escalation is nuke)
 
Last edited:
1742073291319.png
Estimated force disposition for the next phase of operations. (the ones in Oran are reserves that will be committed after the initial landings.)
The big goal right now is to utterly destroy the enemy rail network, without the rail network their massive force will simply starve themselves out. Unfortunately the enemy in theatre are generally 2nd/3rd tier syndicalist allied troops, the ones from France/Britain are nowhere to be found. Spain is centred around Madrid, taking the capital out should be the first aim of the operation.
 
Last edited:
  • 1Like
Reactions:
View attachment 1266666Estimated force disposition for the next phase of operations. (the ones in Oran are reserves that will be committed after the initial landings.)
The big goal right now is to utterly destroy the enemy rail network, without the rail network their massive force will simply starve themselves out. Unfortunately the enemy in theatre are generally 2nd/3rd tier syndicalist allied troops, the ones from France/Britain are nowhere to be found. Spain is centred around Madrid, taking the capital out should be the first aim of the operation.
Looks a lot like my plan to invade and isolate Draka occupied Iberia after they occupied Europe.
 
Is there a Draka mod? OMG...
There is but it still needs a little work. I did an AAR on it. Slaying the snakes. Once Josh gets that one event ironed out, it should be a good challenge.
 
With Iberia invaded, does the Entente have the men for a second front? Thus dividing the Internationale's focus...
 
In DC, many Conservatives were keen to challenge the limits of Thurmond’s American System, on the grounds of states rights and decentralisation if not for moral reasons
An interesting switch, given states rights is normally a Confederate, Southern talking point.
the House put forward an amendment to an otherwise routine Bill extending material support to the Canadian and Brazilian militaries that provided Congress with the ability to revoke the exceptional War Powers of the President by simple majority vote.
And some shrewd politicking here. Bricker is going straight for the President's powers as Commander in Chief.
The battle for Europe was now met in earnest.
Success or defeat here will have major consequences for the war. Half of America already doesn't want total war. And now the US is faced with a difficult mainland campaign.
 
An interesting switch, given states rights is normally a Confederate, Southern talking point.

And some shrewd politicking here. Bricker is going straight for the President's powers as Commander in Chief.

Success or defeat here will have major consequences for the war. Half of America already doesn't want total war. And now the US is faced with a difficult mainland campaign.
Post war US society will definitely be interesting
 
The next day he backed backed the amendment, securing its passage, while the Senate chamber descended into scuffles as members of the America First caucus denounced Shipstead as a traitor and Judas and attempted to drag him from his chair.
“Pigeons this is Cat, over. I’m going in!” :D
Crucially, Cadiz fell on 20 September after only very light fighting – providing access to one of the largest ports in the region and allowing for the ferrying of large quantities of supplies, heavy equipment and reinforcements across the water from Tangiers.
Important gain and a defensible beachhead but as later remarked, pretty hard after that. The International can apply full force there from the continent.
By the first week of October the two armies facing one another numbered in the many hundreds of thousands
The advantage if England can be invaded is ironically the Channel: if the USN can blockade the island, you might catch much of the British army overseas and make it difficult for the syndies to do the same as in Spain. Easier terrain and some huge prizes, too.
At this stage the Entente as a whole has around 500 divs (around 300 US, 100 Canadian and aprox 100 from everyone else) while the Internationale still has a edge with 600-700 and an advantage in fielded manpower of 8 million Entente vs aprox 10 million syndie.
Still broadly balanced, but of course initiative and local conditions and geography are telling. That said, the war has to stop sometime - this level of loss could not be sustained indefinitely (despite what the game itself may permit).
 
“Pigeons this is Cat, over. I’m going in!” :D

Important gain and a defensible beachhead but as later remarked, pretty hard after that. The International can apply full force there from the continent.

The advantage if England can be invaded is ironically the Channel: if the USN can blockade the island, you might catch much of the British army overseas and make it difficult for the syndies to do the same as in Spain. Easier terrain and some huge prizes, too.

Still broadly balanced, but of course initiative and local conditions and geography are telling. That said, the war has to stop sometime - this level of loss could not be sustained indefinitely (despite what the game itself may permit).
Maintaining a blockade on the channel is going to be problematic. Blockades are extremely resource intensive in terms of naval assets when facing an enemy that still probably have a fleet somewhere.
I'd put low confidence in an Iberia-wide campaign, it will resemble Korea/Italy characterised by high attrition rate and low rate of advance. My theory is to learn from the Inchon landing and establish a Pyrenees corridor to isolate the peninsula. (Still, can we really isolate Iberia from sea entirely?)
After the Iberia campaign, it's either to bring North Africa to a close and go after Italy or attempt a direct landing at Marseille.
Need to look at the equipment ledger for further planning. Also how's the fleet going?
 
Goodbye to Bambino, Hello to Little Boy – October 1951 – January 1952
Goodbye to the Bambino – October 1951 – January 1952

1742580366288.png

October was greeted with the passing of a bona fide American icon as baseball legend Babe Ruth passed away following a short battle with cancer. It is hard to underestimate Babe Ruth’s cultural impact in the first half of the twentieth century, a time when the national pastime of baseball dominated the sporting landscape and a superstar of Ruth’s calibre – winner of seven world series between 1915 and 1931 with the Boston Red Sox and New York Yankees. Retiring from the sport just two years before the nation’s descent into Civil War, he was a living representation of both the more innocent pre-Civil War era; and of the modern industrial society.

Even at a time of war, the news of his passing was deeply felt across the nation – with more than 100,000 attending a memorial at Yankee stadium, while many tens of thousands lined the streets to greet his funeral procession and the President sent his personal condolences. Such an outpouring of grief for a sporting figure had never been seen before.

1742580416615.png

While the Andalusian front was beginning to settle during the first week of October, American armour made a crucial breakthrough just north of Faro and raced through the breach at breakneck base across the land lands of southern Portugal. By 9 October, the American spearheads had reached the coast at Comporta – cutting off more than 90,000 syndicalist troops to the south – while they were continuing to push northwards, with little more than battered Iberian units standing between them and the great prize of Lisbon itself, a city American forces had failed to take during the ill-fated Portuguese campaign of 1949.

Maintaining momentum, through the next week, Clark’s troops secured the surrender of the syndicalists caught in the Beja pocket, a major victory, and pushed into Setubal – leaving them separated from Lisbon only by the wide mouth of the Tagus river. However, this represented the peak of a campaign that was running out of steam. Unable to push on, Clark’s troops paused while the syndicalists rushed in reinforcements and launched a counterattack of their own between 17 and 23 October that pushed the Americans all the way back to the Algarve coast, where they were able to dig in.

1742580701156.png

After the unsatisfying conclusion of the Beja campaign, General Clark remained determined to make inroads deeper in Iberia while Entente forces still had an edge in numbers and troop quality. Nonetheless, the next course of action was far from obvious as the American General faced off against his counterpart, the French Marshal Koenig – who had been given overall responsibility for the leadership of all Internationale forces in Iberia. With the American troops on the Portuguese portion of the front in no fit state for offensive operations, and the syndicalists heavily reinforced in the flat Guadalquivir Valley surrounding Seville, counter-intuitively Clark looked towards the eastern portion of the front and the unforgiving terrain of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. With Koenig believing an Entente offensive through the mountains unlikely, he had left his lightest defences in the sector – despite the crucial logistical hubs of the old Moorish city of Grenada and the port of Almeria being in striking distances of the Entente lines.

1742580822081.png

The resulting Granada-Almeria offensive lasted just six weeks between the end of November and the start of January and saw the largest deployment of Canadian troops of the campaign to date. However, despite some early successes in overwhelming the weak troops Koenig had initially placed in the Entente’s way that allowed them to reach the environs of Grenada and Almeria by early December – the situation soon turned into a bloody quagmire. Losses were obscene, supply lines through the mountains uncertain and the syndicalists’ defence of the two core objectives stubborn. Indeed, although the cities were pounded into rubble by the heavy artillery and rocketry of Entente forces, leaving the stunning Medieval Alhambra Palace in Grenada almost totally destroyed, Entente prospects of success were fading fast by Christmas, with the offensive paused entirely early in the New Year. After this failure, Clark would inform Patton in Morocco that, with the syndicalists continuing to bring more and more troops to the theatre, he could see no more viable routes for offensive action.

1742580659767.png

Far away from the slaughter in Southern Iberia, the small nation of Iceland was falling into a state of turmoil and peril. Although the isolated and forgotten island had enjoyed a sudden up tick in prosperity through much of the 1940s under the auspices of the Third Internationale – with the scale of the Union of Britain’s military investment seeing wages and living standards soar – the 1950s had not been nearly so kind. Indeed, as the US Navy gained the clear upper hand, the British bases that had once been a source of valuable economic stimulus now made the island a key strategic target.

For their part, the American approach to Iceland was to avoid a head-on offensive put to instead blockade the island from receiving any supplies from Scotland to the south – with dozens of US submarines prowling the icy waters surrounding it. While this was damaging enough, in 1951 the Americans changed course from merely targetting supply shipments – with the aim of degraded the syndicalists ability to operate their Icelandic bases – to instead target civilian fishing vessels in a hugely controversial move within the naval leadership. On an island with such limited capacity for agriculture and few other sources of food, this was a matter of life and death. By the winter, famine conditions were taking hold.

1742580621810.png

In late November, after an entire family living in a poor Reykjavik neighbourhood was found starved in their home the city exploded into two days of vicious rioting. Fearing the breakdown of society, elements within the ruling syndicalist clique launched an internal coup – with neutralist elements slaughtering those parts of the elite that remained aligned to the Internationale. The tiny Icelandic military, alongside auxiliary police and militiamen then moved to surround the British at their main military base at Keflavik – placing them under siege. The new ruling group, eager to extricate Iceland from the war, then invited previously banned anti-syndicalist political parties to form a coalition government within them and reached out to the Entente for peace.

While some in the American military leadership were keen to push for occupation of the island, the opportunity to bloodless break the nation away from the syndicalists was enough to win the day – with the Entente agreeing to accept Icelandic neutrality in exchange for an indemnity and the surrender of all Internationale men and materials on the island over to them.

1742580779058.png

While fighting was underway in the Beja campaign in southern Portugal, US forces in North Africa made a second effort to conquer Algeria. Advancing out from Oran, the Americans sent the syndicalists into headlong retreat all the way back to Algiers, where they again made a last stand, just as they had done in the summer, and again ground the Americans to a standstill – inflicting heavy losses while also countering a failed attempt by a second prong of the American attack to outflank the city from the south. After the failure of the second battle of Algiers, the syndicalists did not follow up their victory with another counteroffensive against the tired American troops – and instead used the respite to reduce their commitment to the theatre, withdrawing soldiers back to the harsh battlefields of Iberia.

1742581001450.png

For a time, it appeared that North Africa would remain in stalemate for some time to come, locking up hundreds of thousands of American troops needed elsewhere. However, in the first week of December a crucial breakthrough was made in the passes of the Atlas Mountains, right on the southern border of syndicalist Algeria. Exploiting this narrow gap, fast moving US units raced through and found the syndicalist rear almost entirely open. Despite the efforts of the Internationale to wheel their troops on the frontline near Algiers around to counter the American incursion, by the end of the month the Americans had overwhelmed Tunisia – trapping three syndicalist divisions in the interior around Kairoun and initiating the collapse of the Tunisian syndicalist regime – while isolating the remaining part of the syndicalist army in North Africa between Algiers and the Tunisian border. In the space of a few weeks, the long running North African campaign had been upended and appeared to be approaching a rapid victorious end.

1742580971907.png

Despite the positive news in December from North Africa, by the end of 1951 the US military was facing a serious manpower crisis. The fighting across all fronts had grown more intense than anything seen through the first three years of the war. Iberia in particular was a spiralling hell scape of death, with the sky lit red even at night as rockets, aerial bombardment and artillery fire pounded ceaselessly. Between August 1951 and January 1952, American forces suffered 600,000 casualties – more than doubling the total endured throughout the entire first three years of fighting and a level comparable to the very bitterest phases of the Civil War. Coming at a time when the military was also continuing to expand rapidly in size, fielding whole new divisions on a monthly basis, the manpower shortage was growing acute, carrying significant military and political risks.

At the onset of the war, the nation had implemented a draft that primarily targetted men between the ages of 20 and 33 – with fairly significant exemptions dependent on occupation and personal circumstances, and exclude all non-whites. While this level of conscription had been sufficient to support the rapid expansion of the military through the first three years of war, and replenish losses in campaigns, the sudden upturn in casualties from the autumn of 1951 had seen this equilibrium lost. From late November, General Patton had informed the White House that by the end of the year he would no longer have sufficient numbers of recruits coming through to ensure that all frontline combat units could operate at full strength. The US war machine needed more men.

With little prospect of working through Congress at the necessary pace, President Thurmond would pass through an Executive Order in mid-December – extending the ages for the draft to 18-35, removing many existing exemptions and most notably, and for the first time during the war, expanding the draft to African Americans for the first time – who would operate in fully segregated auxiliary roles in order to free up manpower for the frontline.

With the opposition howling in protest, this extension of further recruitment came at a time when the American public’s willingness to fight on to the end was already being shaken by the terrible casualties being seen in Iberia and North Africa. Coming into a presidential election year, the warhawks knew they had at most months to provide a clear path to victory or else public opinion would force Washington’s into peace negotiations whether the military brass liked it or not.

1742580919862.png

Amid this wavering on the home front, the United States had caught up with the leading superpowers of the world in developing its own atomic capability. Japan had led the way, being the first to successfully test a nuclear weapon as early as 1949 with the Russians following the next year; while the African city of Lagos had witnessed the devastation of the syndicalists’ nuclear efforts – the only occasion to date when an atomic weapon had been used in warfare. For their part, the Internationale had struggled to rebuild their nuclear programme after the loss key infrastructure and knowledge in Lagos; not to mention easy access to key raw materials in West Africa that were far harder to procure in continental Western Europe. Meanwhile, the United States had caught up – successfully testing a weapon deep in the New Mexico desert in the summer of 1951, and shipping out an useable bomb to Morocco by the end of the year.

Now in possession of a super weapon capable of tipping the balance of power in the conflict, questions in the American leadership now turned to weighty questions both moral and practical. The horrifying impact of nuclear weapons had been made clear by the destruction of Lagos – could the United States in good conscious claim moral superiority over the syndicalists if they followed suit? How could the bomb be successfully deployed in the absence of total aerial superiority over the reds? If it was to be used and could be effectively, where would it provide the greatest strategic advantage?
 
  • 4Like
Reactions:
1742580621810.png


with the Entente agreeing to accept Icelandic neutrality in exchange for an indemnity and the surrender of all Internationale men and materials on the island over to them.​
A minor victory, but a necessary one for the warhawks to convince the public that the war will be won by America.
 
With US casualties spiralling towards unacceptable levels, and the first American nuke ready for deployment - we are at an absolutely crucial stage of the conflict. Make the right strategic decision here and we could strike a truly decisive blow. Make the wrong one and a war of attrition that the totalitarian syndicalist regimes are better placed to withstand will roll on.

There's only a year left until the election, Thurmond's got to be looking for a new running mate surely. With the President's situation not being the strongest, do senior AF options sit out the chance to be the new running mate and try to pick up the pieces in 1956, or sign on with the hope of the war continuing to improve for America?...

Shipstead has surely ruled himself out of being on the VP ticket come 1952. We will be starting to look at the different campaigns of the major parties to get their presidential tickets together over the course of the coming updates. Likely checking in with America First to start with ;). It will be a particularly unique primary campaign and general election, certain to be heavily shaped by progress on the front.

My theory is that the importance of Andalusia mainly lies in its ports. The force presence in Andalusia is to give way for the further Mediterranean campaign against France. (the problem then would be how to deal with the tyranny of time and distance). All the forces should be oriented for defending Gibraltar. The goal right now is to freeze the Seville pocket as "economically" as possible according to the economy of force.
Historically speaking Clark's record is Italy is "pretty bad", in this timeline he's fighting in Spain, a country with similar terrain as Italy under similar circumstances. It is my fear he might screw this one up too...

The big problem with the Mediterranean strategy is that the tyranny of time and distance would be in full display, and this further restricts the depth of any further attacks. Logistics will be a constant challenge to say at least. An island hopping campaign is necessary for the developments on that front. My theory right now is for a whole army with all the marines to land on Barcelona and aim to Isolate Iberia from the rest of the continent, armored forces could certainly exploit the mobility offered by the plains. 2-5 corps of infantry (mountaineer preferred) could hold the northern corridor while the motorized and tank force drive towards Bilbao before launching a concentric attack on the now isolated Iberian force. The other plan would be to go after Marseille, but the distance would be greater and the landing zone will be exposed to the entire syndicalist power on the plains.
The greatest problem right now is that most forces in Spain and North Africa we are facing right now are local syndicalist regimes, where have the French and Brits gone?
Most of my knowledge of Spanish geography comes from my playthrough of UFCo interventions down there. Diverting a "flying column" into Madrid from the North would be worth it given the enemy hasn't established a line in front of it. The theory is that horizontal escalation for this scenario will be worth the risks (vertical escalation is nuke)
Estimated force disposition for the next phase of operations. (the ones in Oran are reserves that will be committed after the initial landings.)
The big goal right now is to utterly destroy the enemy rail network, without the rail network their massive force will simply starve themselves out. Unfortunately the enemy in theatre are generally 2nd/3rd tier syndicalist allied troops, the ones from France/Britain are nowhere to be found. Spain is centred around Madrid, taking the capital out should be the first aim of the operation.
They definitely have. Look at the force disposition in Iberia, it's mostly local Spanish units. Same for Algerian front. Trust me, they have a lot more to bring to the fight.

Absolutely, that concentration of port facilities in Andalusia (and of course Gibraltar) is hugely important - and as we saw in the Portugal campaign earlier in the war, its not something shared by every stretch of invadable coast in the region. But Clark has found to his frustration that getting beyond that coastal region is very challenging in an area buttressed by mountains and hills and now teeming with syndies. Realistically, he should have taken a more defensive approach as you outlined and has suffered real losses for attempting to push in deeper. From the player perspective, that Grenada campaign in particular was very frustrating as taking one or both of Almeria and Grenada would have made a major difference to the logistics of both armies.

Even without the North African campaign moving towards a conclusion, we would have had some available troops for use elsewhere - it is now certain that a sizeable force could be deployed for a second front. Where, and whether our new nuclear weapon can be used to support this will be a major question. I won't reveal where we are going to strike just yet, but your reasoning for aiming to snip off Iberia at the Pyrenees is certainly very sound.

As for the British and French troops (the best in the Internationale) - they still have very large numbers of divisions, and you can see some on these fronts, but certainly not as many as there could be. We've not had so many Balkan and syndie minor divisions concentrated together before.

Looks a lot like my plan to invade and isolate Draka occupied Iberia after they occupied Europe.
Is there a Draka mod? OMG...
There is but it still needs a little work. I did an AAR on it. Slaying the snakes. Once Josh gets that one event ironed out, it should be a good challenge.

I will have to look into this one!

With Iberia invaded, does the Entente have the men for a second front? Thus dividing the Internationale's focus...

There's a limit to how many troops our logistics in Andalusia could actually support - so there are some spare divisions sitting in Morocco that haven't been committed anywhere at this stage. With our position so much stronger in North Africa now, we can certainly spare plenty troops from there as well. There are the numbers available for a second front - but with losses piling up, we need to make it a decisive intervention.

An interesting switch, given states rights is normally a Confederate, Southern talking point.

And some shrewd politicking here. Bricker is going straight for the President's powers as Commander in Chief.

Success or defeat here will have major consequences for the war. Half of America already doesn't want total war. And now the US is faced with a difficult mainland campaign.

Yes, I enjoy that alternate flip where you have the logic of states rights supporting the right of individual states to improve civil rights, rather than the OTL logic where that supported their right to maintain segregation. At this point, the Conservatives will surely be smelling blood in the water with how things are going in the war - they will be fancying their chances of reclaiming the White House if Patton's boys haven't dramatically changed the status of the war by November.

And that mainland campaign is not going especially well, with us making no progress in land after several months - but at the cost of terrible losses.

Post war US society will definitely be interesting

I've got big plans for the postwar period - some stories I'm excited to tell! :D

“Pigeons this is Cat, over. I’m going in!” :D

Important gain and a defensible beachhead but as later remarked, pretty hard after that. The International can apply full force there from the continent.

The advantage if England can be invaded is ironically the Channel: if the USN can blockade the island, you might catch much of the British army overseas and make it difficult for the syndies to do the same as in Spain. Easier terrain and some huge prizes, too.

Still broadly balanced, but of course initiative and local conditions and geography are telling. That said, the war has to stop sometime - this level of loss could not be sustained indefinitely (despite what the game itself may permit).

Yes, Andalusia has certainly proven as much a quagmire than a launchpad to victory. Closer to the OTL Allied Italian campaign than Normandy (although, 1943 probably went rather better than this campaign so far!).

With Iceland out of the equation, getting to Britain from where we are now is quite some way harder. Our closest port would be the Azores - realistically we'd need a closer launching pad, even just to secure local naval supremacy never mind from which to deploy our Divs.

And yes, in terms of casualities the game will let millions of Americans die and think that is fine because we have a big population. In story, the more realistic view is that we are on the very brink of public willingness to fight falling off a cliff, and in the middle of a presidential election year no less. If we are in a similar position come November, the Conservatives will surely win the Presidency and move towards a negotiated peace.

Maintaining a blockade on the channel is going to be problematic. Blockades are extremely resource intensive in terms of naval assets when facing an enemy that still probably have a fleet somewhere.
I'd put low confidence in an Iberia-wide campaign, it will resemble Korea/Italy characterised by high attrition rate and low rate of advance. My theory is to learn from the Inchon landing and establish a Pyrenees corridor to isolate the peninsula. (Still, can we really isolate Iberia from sea entirely?)
After the Iberia campaign, it's either to bring North Africa to a close and go after Italy or attempt a direct landing at Marseille.
Need to look at the equipment ledger for further planning. Also how's the fleet going?

Blockading the Channel with our ports being so distant from it would be quite challenging - were we to have control over all or the bulk of Iberia, those calculations change quite significantly. That said - maintaining dominance over both the Western Med, the wider Atlantic and the inland seas around Western Europe will be stretching the USN to its limits.

As for North Africa, that breakthrough that has allowed us to scuttle all the way to Tunisia has the syndies on the ropes in what land they still hold. The Algiers enclave is surrounded on all sides and outnumbered. And worse, we now have the bases to keep out troops in supply.
 
  • 3Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Hard fights at home and abroad are ahead. America needs to ask itself, do they want to fight this war, do they want to commit? This is a world war. Commitment is a necessity. The ballot box will provide some answers.

At least North Africa is wrapping up. But that front is a side show now compared to Iberia. Perhaps more naval invasions can be launched at the peninsula: Barcelona, Galicia, Asturias, etc. That way you'll slowly draw away 3I troops.
 
Another dramatic episode with some success, but none of it easy.
Maintaining momentum, through the next week, Clark’s troops secured the surrender of the syndicalists caught in the Beja pocket, a major victory, and pushed into Setubal
Good enough progress, but too small a pocketing to significantly change the momentum.
However, this represented the peak of a campaign that was running out of steam.
Looks too hard for now, but leaving a strong beachhead at least engages and diverts the 3rd Int.
leaving the stunning Medieval Alhambra Palace in Grenada almost totally destroyed
A war crime! :eek: :(
Clark would inform Patton in Morocco that, with the syndicalists continuing to bring more and more troops to the theatre, he could see no more viable routes for offensive action.
Time for a grand attempt to strike a real blow? Perhaps an amphibious pincer strike, if you think you could manage it. If England is not practical, would landings at both Bordeaux and Marseilles be possible? Either simultaneous or staggered a bit? If 3rd Int comms into Spain could be cut off either side of the Pyrenees maybe the entire lot of them could be bagged. Given they already have a lot of forces committed in Iberia, it might also divide their attention. Then be ready to strike out in the south again if that front is weakened.

A big risk perhaps, but closer to the North African and Iberian forward bases for support. And you could always lob in a nuke or two if some opportune targets arose.
by the end of the month the Americans had overwhelmed Tunisia – trapping three syndicalist divisions in the interior around Kairoun and initiating the collapse of the Tunisian syndicalist regime – while isolating the remaining part of the syndicalist army in North Africa
If North Africa could be wrapped up, the released troops could be used for the amphibious pincer: Operation Hannibal, an historical reference Patton would like ;)
With the opposition howling in protest, this extension of further recruitment came at a time when the American public’s willingness to fight on to the end was already being shaken by the terrible casualties being seen in Iberia and North Africa
Time for a dramatic, do or die effort!
Amid this wavering on the home front, the United States had caught up with the leading superpowers of the world in developing its own atomic capability.
Handy.
could the United States in good conscious claim moral superiority over the syndicalists if they followed suit?
They will use it, with expedient moral arguments deployed.
If it was to be used and could be effectively, where would it provide the greatest strategic advantage?
In Spain, as part of Op Hannibal.
there are some spare divisions sitting in Morocco that haven't been committed anywhere at this stage.
Enough to start Hannibal, with more siphoned off if Algeria can either we wrapped up or quarantined? Keep them contained for now without another bloodbath pocketing elimination if crushing them looks too costly. Let them stew in place.
With Iceland out of the equation, getting to Britain from where we are now is quite some way harder.
Fair enough: hence the alternate suggested plan.
 
Another dramatic episode with some success, but none of it easy.

Good enough progress, but too small a pocketing to significantly change the momentum.

Looks too hard for now, but leaving a strong beachhead at least engages and diverts the 3rd Int.

A war crime! :eek: :(

Time for a grand attempt to strike a real blow? Perhaps an amphibious pincer strike, if you think you could manage it. If England is not practical, would landings at both Bordeaux and Marseilles be possible? Either simultaneous or staggered a bit? If 3rd Int comms into Spain could be cut off either side of the Pyrenees maybe the entire lot of them could be bagged. Given they already have a lot of forces committed in Iberia, it might also divide their attention. Then be ready to strike out in the south again if that front is weakened.

A big risk perhaps, but closer to the North African and Iberian forward bases for support. And you could always lob in a nuke or two if some opportune targets arose.

If North Africa could be wrapped up, the released troops could be used for the amphibious pincer: Operation Hannibal, an historical reference Patton would like ;)

Time for a dramatic, do or die effort!

Handy.

They will use it, with expedient moral arguments deployed.

In Spain, as part of Op Hannibal.

Enough to start Hannibal, with more siphoned off if Algeria can either we wrapped up or quarantined? Keep them contained for now without another bloodbath pocketing elimination if crushing them looks too costly. Let them stew in place.

Fair enough: hence the alternate suggested plan.
I'd say use the nukes to support a landing in Marseille. Or to prevent a disaster if my plan of Barcelona landing went wrong.
 
I bet the use of the Bomb will win out, such is human nature after all…
 
  • 1
Reactions: