Not sure i understand what you meano
Nitpicking. Splitting hairs. Using semantics. Arguing that something is different when, in the end, there is no real difference.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Nitpicking. Splitting hairs. Using semantics. Arguing that something is different when, in the end, there is no real difference.
Nitpicking. Splitting hairs. Using semantics. Arguing that something is different when, in the end, there is no real difference.
Oh... ok
Well, in this case, the difference is big enough for me. Though i know Steam gets a share, given what i see, i only want to buy from Gamersgate
Question to Paradox : if the HoI online card game works, are you thinking about porting it to your other strategy games ? if yes, which one would come first ?
I'd love to make a game based off Magicka. Ever played Munchkin? kinda like that.
/s
/s
Munchkin gets a bit stale after playing it two dozen times, though.
After that it relies solely on its social aspect (having a silly game with friends).
Yep. Perfect for a quick bit of fun if you're waiting for your next RPG group to start on a con, but nothing "serious".
Doesn't matter which one - they will all be owned by Doomtroopers!
By the way gigau, congratulations on blabbering enough to scrape together 10K posts!
By the way gigau, congratulations on blabbering enough to scrape together 10K posts!
Thanks... tough to follow the fine line in increasing the post count without ending up spamming
Has Paradox ever thought of making online, browser based strategy games? Something like Supremacy?
Since we have started making online browser based games, I guess we should make a strategy one too. That's not says it's in the plans, but it just seems really fitting.
- Jul 23, 2007
- 12.812
- 38.541
if he promised to wear blue face paint and kilt ABSOLUTELY
Me, Tegus, Brother Bean and some other people were actually working on a "Paradox Forum" card game for a while after friday beer that we planned to give out on the forum. Sadly we never finished it because we got busy with actually working, but here are a few of the rules that I can remember:
- You had developer cards that you had to try and get to accept your feature cards (balkan border disputes, multicore support, redo map in 2D etc)
- each developer could only do so much in each game phase (alpha, beta, release, patch)
- whoever had most of their features implemented after first patch won
- one of the player could become a forum troll and would get points for blocking other features and wasting development time
Do it!
And have Enewald in there too!
"Enewald: Forum Troll. HP: 15000
Attacks: Spam (100 damage)
Special Rules: For each AAR in play increase Enewald's HP by 50 points."
I am almost certain somebody in OT came up with a forum card game years ago, but I don't remember any details.
Last edited:
That looks like a great game... i hope you get a chance to put it back on track and make it work
As I recall, Paradox and GamersGate are based in the same building. Does that mean when a new Paradox title is ready to be published on GG, you get an intern to burn it onto a disc and head down the hall to deliver it?
Do it!
And have Enewald in there too!
"Enewald: Forum Troll. HP: 15000
Attacks: Spam (100 damage)
Special Rules: For each AAR in play increase Enewald's HP by 50 points."
It better be two times over nine thousand.
And what do you have against me? I read your AARs!
Who is authorized developer of map projection that used all paradox games, except Victoria II?
No, gg does what everyone else does, just download it from out ftp. (It's not even down the hall actually, we can wave at them.)