Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

Automation buildings are weird and should be changed.

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Stellaris 54063 Bug Reports 37368 Console edition 1311 Suggestions 21678 Tech Support 3206 Multiplayer 392 User Mods 4793 Stellaris AAR (After Action Reports)
Falrinn said:
Instead of automating 25/50% of job slots, it just increases job efficiency by a significant amount while decreasing the number of job slots available.
Click to expand...
if that was the intention, it should change 3 things:
  • automated jobs' "efficiency" shouldn't be a flat 100%, but scale with the matching "real" jobs' efficiency, which includes being 0% for unfilled jobs, but keeping the possibility of exceeding 100% for highly skilled pops.
  • upkeep should scale with the actual jobs, and not "districts" which is a poor proxy.
  • if you compare it with other sources of job efficiency, it should probably be toned down a bunch, like 10/25%
but overall, it feels like it should be a policy/edict, not a building.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back