• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I made this name first, but it would not fit in the spot given for vnet, so I used cannon fodder ;)
 
Pibe, HG, and CF should be able to vouch for me. I don't know if Drake blames me for Bombardment dissolving, if not he can vouch for me too :rolleyes:

I don't know my course schedule yet, and won't likely know until early September - so my participation is tentative, but enthusiastic!
 
well, if there is another co-GM like Fred promised, i`m willing to join
 
fraese said:
Pibe, HG, and CF should be able to vouch for me. I don't know if Drake blames me for Bombardment dissolving, if not he can vouch for me too :rolleyes:

I don't know my course schedule yet, and won't likely know until early September - so my participation is tentative, but enthusiastic!

"yells at frease for killing bombardement"
 
Can we at least establish some times first before we start talking about what countries to play. Ideally it would have to start no earlier than 1930 CET (although I could do 1915 CET at a stretch).
 
aww shucks.. mondays can't do (unless this game takes a few[4-5] weeks yet to get started :( )

(ie. certainly interested, but unlikely to be able to)
 
ForzaA said:
aww shucks.. mondays can't do (unless this game takes a few[4-5] weeks yet to get started :( )

(ie. certainly interested, but unlikely to be able to)

We'l probably need a Netherlands anyway, so you could have them when they form.
 
PJL said:
Can we at least establish some times first before we start talking about what countries to play. Ideally it would have to start no earlier than 1930 CET (although I could do 1915 CET at a stretch).
It's a bit late indeed, i was hoping for 18.00 CET and end around 22.00 CET because i know people dont want to play much longer cause of school/work.

If we go with 19.15 at latest we will end around 23.00 CET.
This is something that the majority of the players will decied either way. :)
 
ForzaA said:
aww shucks.. mondays can't do (unless this game takes a few[4-5] weeks yet to get started :( )

(ie. certainly interested, but unlikely to be able to)
It's more likely that we will have the first session sometimes in September, so it shouldnt be that hopeless for ya :)

PJL said:
We'l probably need a Netherlands anyway, so you could have them when they form.
Indeed, or get a sub the first session or two. :)
 
Last edited:
Tonioz said:
well, if there is another co-GM like Fred promised, i`m willing to join
hehe, dont worry. That's what i have in mind. :)
I prefer that someone else GM in game, and i focus more on mid-session things. Being a host and GM at the same time is not healthy to start with.
Besides i want to get some time over for my own nation :D
 
then 1900-2300 cet (not later, earlier is preferred) is okay for me.
Busy days: Sunday (should be over soon), Wendesday. Saturday is not able too because of RL.

Preferred countries:
next to Damocles ? kidding, just the popular slot.

I wouldn`t like naval one, coz it`s boring. Continental fighter is wished, though even Venice or Scandinavia are okay.

Preferred scen: 1453
 
Last edited:
Tonioz said:
Preferred scen: Any AoI scenario

There, I fixed your post for you Tonio. :)

As for your GM problems, why don't you ask FAL? He loves to GM like a caring father, and he recently lost his only child: Destiny. Such a sad story... :(
 
that was Hive mistake

AoI is good to play, not meaning awful gfx, which i cut down and lack of 1453 scen. I think you know i like more to start earlier than later, that`s why i asked.

The bad thing is that AoI designed as the historical scenario, while game balance is more important, because we play the game more than history.

Basically i think it is shame that noone tryed EEP MP game as well, which gives a lot of new.

P.S. I`m reading some historical books, which gives thinks very closely (i hate typical history which gives you overview, judjed marks and one-sided point of view). I`ve already have a question for you why there is no Scharnhorst leader in AoI. And i need to check better how you played with Bismark and Klauzewitz doctrine. Gonna read Sweden history (think i found quite good book) to understand if that Paradox chest boosted sweden leaderships or it was for real ;) Quick look at good book about XVI century gives some doubts about some dates.
If you would kick your own funny proud and continue EU2, you can develop AoI in both dimensions - historical and balance by using options like ****** did (and now Bocaj in 1453 as far as i understand), i suppose i`d have some suggestions as correction for you, my love ;)
 
lol, banned Ryo got ****** in my post :rofl:
 
Tonioz said:
that was Hive mistake

AoI is good to play, not meaning awful gfx, which i cut down and lack of 1453 scen. I think you know i like more to start earlier than later, that`s why i asked.

The bad thing is that AoI designed as the historical scenario, while game balance is more important, because we play the game more than history.

Basically i think it is shame that noone tryed EEP MP game as well, which gives a lot of new.

P.S. I`m reading some historical books, which gives thinks very closely (i hate typical history which gives you overview, judjed marks and one-sided point of view). I`ve already have a question for you why there is no Scharnhorst leader in AoI. And i need to check better how you played with Bismark and Klauzewitz doctrine. Gonna read Sweden history (think i found quite good book) to understand if that Paradox chest boosted sweden leaderships or it was for real ;) Quick look at good book about XVI century gives some doubts about some dates.
If you would kick your own funny proud and continue EU2, you can develop AoI in both dimensions - historical and balance by using options like ****** did (and now Bocaj in 1453 as far as i understand), i suppose i`d have some suggestions as correction for you, my love ;)

First of all, my mod has a 1453 scenario as well - so there! :p

Secondly, you claim about AoI being too historical - but you wouldn't mind playing EEP? lol

And as to using options... well... they are evil! Pure evil! So no options.
 
Hive said:
....
And as to using options... well... they are evil! Pure evil! So no options.

But it is good to know you are still among us Hive! :)

Regarding options: is it not great to give the players an opportunity to adjust the game how they want?

Or is it so great Hive, that it is only you who understands how the settings shall be in your scenarios and thus there is no need to give the players an opportunity to alter those settings, since any alteration from what is prefect by definition results in an inferior game? :p
 
Hive said:
First of all, my mod has a 1453 scenario as well - so there! :p

If you had spent more than a few hours on making your 1453 just different enough to pass off as not being a blatant rip off of mine, then it might be an option. :rolleyes: :D
 
Daniel A said:
Regarding options: is it not great to give the players an opportunity to adjust the game how they want?

No. They must play the game how *I* want them to. :p

Or is it so great Hive, that it is only you who understands how the settings shall be in your scenarios and thus there is no need to give the players an opportunity to alter those settings, since any alteration from what is prefect by definition results in an inferior game? :p

You understand it all so well. :D

Bocaj said:
If you had spent more than a few hours on making your 1453 just different enough to pass off as not being a blatant rip off of mine, then it might be an option. :rolleyes: :D

Well I never hid the fact that my 1453 scenario was for the large part based on yours - and I got your permission, if I'm not mistaken. :)

However, there are significant differences if you compare them...
 
I also advocated for options in Hive's mod, but noooo he wanted to be a mini-dictator again :p

As for timeslots, I can play any weekday evening except wednesday. However, mondays suits me the best.

I would prefer ending no later than 23:00 CET.