I made this name first, but it would not fit in the spot given for vnet, so I used cannon fodder 
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Pibe, HG, and CF should be able to vouch for me. I don't know if Drake blames me for Bombardment dissolving, if not he can vouch for me too
I don't know my course schedule yet, and won't likely know until early September - so my participation is tentative, but enthusiastic!
I don't know my course schedule yet, and won't likely know until early September - so my participation is tentative, but enthusiastic!
fraese said:Pibe, HG, and CF should be able to vouch for me. I don't know if Drake blames me for Bombardment dissolving, if not he can vouch for me too
I don't know my course schedule yet, and won't likely know until early September - so my participation is tentative, but enthusiastic!
"yells at frease for killing bombardement"
Can we at least establish some times first before we start talking about what countries to play. Ideally it would have to start no earlier than 1930 CET (although I could do 1915 CET at a stretch).
aww shucks.. mondays can't do (unless this game takes a few[4-5] weeks yet to get started )
(ie. certainly interested, but unlikely to be able to)
)(ie. certainly interested, but unlikely to be able to)
ForzaA said:aww shucks.. mondays can't do (unless this game takes a few[4-5] weeks yet to get started
(ie. certainly interested, but unlikely to be able to)
We'l probably need a Netherlands anyway, so you could have them when they form.
It's a bit late indeed, i was hoping for 18.00 CET and end around 22.00 CET because i know people dont want to play much longer cause of school/work.PJL said:
If we go with 19.15 at latest we will end around 23.00 CET.
This is something that the majority of the players will decied either way.
It's more likely that we will have the first session sometimes in September, so it shouldnt be that hopeless for yaForzaA said:aww shucks.. mondays can't do (unless this game takes a few[4-5] weeks yet to get started
(ie. certainly interested, but unlikely to be able to)
Indeed, or get a sub the first session or two.PJL said:
Last edited:
hehe, dont worry. That's what i have in mind.Tonioz said:
I prefer that someone else GM in game, and i focus more on mid-session things. Being a host and GM at the same time is not healthy to start with.
Besides i want to get some time over for my own nation
then 1900-2300 cet (not later, earlier is preferred) is okay for me.
Busy days: Sunday (should be over soon), Wendesday. Saturday is not able too because of RL.
Preferred countries:
next to Damocles ? kidding, just the popular slot.
I wouldn`t like naval one, coz it`s boring. Continental fighter is wished, though even Venice or Scandinavia are okay.
Preferred scen: 1453
Busy days: Sunday (should be over soon), Wendesday. Saturday is not able too because of RL.
Preferred countries:
next to Damocles ? kidding, just the popular slot.
I wouldn`t like naval one, coz it`s boring. Continental fighter is wished, though even Venice or Scandinavia are okay.
Preferred scen: 1453
Last edited:
Damocles said:Yay for the hog! Now all I need is Hive to show up in my general vicinity.
The Hive has retired from EU2, so you'll have to settle for the Hogged one.
Tonioz said:
There, I fixed your post for you Tonio.
As for your GM problems, why don't you ask FAL? He loves to GM like a caring father, and he recently lost his only child: Destiny. Such a sad story...
that was Hive mistake
AoI is good to play, not meaning awful gfx, which i cut down and lack of 1453 scen. I think you know i like more to start earlier than later, that`s why i asked.
The bad thing is that AoI designed as the historical scenario, while game balance is more important, because we play the game more than history.
Basically i think it is shame that noone tryed EEP MP game as well, which gives a lot of new.
P.S. I`m reading some historical books, which gives thinks very closely (i hate typical history which gives you overview, judjed marks and one-sided point of view). I`ve already have a question for you why there is no Scharnhorst leader in AoI. And i need to check better how you played with Bismark and Klauzewitz doctrine. Gonna read Sweden history (think i found quite good book) to understand if that Paradox chest boosted sweden leaderships or it was for real Quick look at good book about XVI century gives some doubts about some dates.
If you would kick your own funny proud and continue EU2, you can develop AoI in both dimensions - historical and balance by using options like ****** did (and now Bocaj in 1453 as far as i understand), i suppose i`d have some suggestions as correction for you, my love
AoI is good to play, not meaning awful gfx, which i cut down and lack of 1453 scen. I think you know i like more to start earlier than later, that`s why i asked.
The bad thing is that AoI designed as the historical scenario, while game balance is more important, because we play the game more than history.
Basically i think it is shame that noone tryed EEP MP game as well, which gives a lot of new.
P.S. I`m reading some historical books, which gives thinks very closely (i hate typical history which gives you overview, judjed marks and one-sided point of view). I`ve already have a question for you why there is no Scharnhorst leader in AoI. And i need to check better how you played with Bismark and Klauzewitz doctrine. Gonna read Sweden history (think i found quite good book) to understand if that Paradox chest boosted sweden leaderships or it was for real
Quick look at good book about XVI century gives some doubts about some dates.If you would kick your own funny proud and continue EU2, you can develop AoI in both dimensions - historical and balance by using options like ****** did (and now Bocaj in 1453 as far as i understand), i suppose i`d have some suggestions as correction for you, my love
Tonioz said:that was Hive mistake
AoI is good to play, not meaning awful gfx, which i cut down and lack of 1453 scen. I think you know i like more to start earlier than later, that`s why i asked.
The bad thing is that AoI designed as the historical scenario, while game balance is more important, because we play the game more than history.
Basically i think it is shame that noone tryed EEP MP game as well, which gives a lot of new.
P.S. I`m reading some historical books, which gives thinks very closely (i hate typical history which gives you overview, judjed marks and one-sided point of view). I`ve already have a question for you why there is no Scharnhorst leader in AoI. And i need to check better how you played with Bismark and Klauzewitz doctrine. Gonna read Sweden history (think i found quite good book) to understand if that Paradox chest boosted sweden leaderships or it was for real
If you would kick your own funny proud and continue EU2, you can develop AoI in both dimensions - historical and balance by using options like ****** did (and now Bocaj in 1453 as far as i understand), i suppose i`d have some suggestions as correction for you, my love
First of all, my mod has a 1453 scenario as well - so there!
Secondly, you claim about AoI being too historical - but you wouldn't mind playing EEP? lol
And as to using options... well... they are evil! Pure evil! So no options.
Hive said:
But it is good to know you are still among us Hive!
Regarding options: is it not great to give the players an opportunity to adjust the game how they want?
Or is it so great Hive, that it is only you who understands how the settings shall be in your scenarios and thus there is no need to give the players an opportunity to alter those settings, since any alteration from what is prefect by definition results in an inferior game?
Hive said:First of all, my mod has a 1453 scenario as well - so there!
If you had spent more than a few hours on making your 1453 just different enough to pass off as not being a blatant rip off of mine, then it might be an option.
Daniel A said:
No. They must play the game how *I* want them to.
Or is it so great Hive, that it is only you who understands how the settings shall be in your scenarios and thus there is no need to give the players an opportunity to alter those settings, since any alteration from what is prefect by definition results in an inferior game?
You understand it all so well.
Bocaj said:If you had spent more than a few hours on making your 1453 just different enough to pass off as not being a blatant rip off of mine, then it might be an option.
Well I never hid the fact that my 1453 scenario was for the large part based on yours - and I got your permission, if I'm not mistaken.
However, there are significant differences if you compare them...
I also advocated for options in Hive's mod, but noooo he wanted to be a mini-dictator again
As for timeslots, I can play any weekday evening except wednesday. However, mondays suits me the best.
I would prefer ending no later than 23:00 CET.
As for timeslots, I can play any weekday evening except wednesday. However, mondays suits me the best.
I would prefer ending no later than 23:00 CET.