The entire point of this thread is pointing out how hopeless and little it changes for anyone using these methods. The community is overrun with extremely reactionary people who are extremely misogynistic, transphobic, and (often) racist. Reporting people one by one is not productive and mentally draining on the people they go after. It is ridiculous to expect this to actually produce results at this point. Moderation needs to come in from the top at this point and be pro-active. The fundamental point is that Paradox does very little to help people in this regard. I would argue appeals to "well we just cannot do anything it's just too dang too hard" are not enough. There's not even a slur filter on multiplayer game lobbies. It's clear it's never and will never be a priority for Paradox.
As I said, private reporting mechanisms should be tried first before airing them out in public but I believe there are ways to report more than one people at a time... perhaps there is a contact form somewhere on their website. Emails might also work. I recommend taking screenshots and attach them. I don't believe in the impossible and you should not feel deterred by any obstacles you come across. I think there should be some strategies in how to deal with this. And I think Paradox staff here could make some suggestions, maybe better than mine, as to how to resolve each obstacle like one-by-one reporting thing you mentioned. I do think each company have an obligation to make reporting more easier to do, especially for larger cases.
I also suggest taking a step back and arrange reporting by weeks or something like that. You don't need to report each and every offense right away. Space them out, to avoid it becoming mentally draining. I think they will accept reporting of an offense that occurred more than a day earlier. I suggest keeping notes and screenshots. And then batch report them via contact form or something like that.
For the problem of one-by-one reporting, for now, I also suggest prioritizing reporting the most worst offenders... everyone else is small potatoes compared to these. I also suggest considering their level of influence on the community... anyone who is most influential in the community but have committed any cases of bigotry should be prioritized for reporting.
Honestly, not every platform are same so it will require different strategies. I think Steam have contact form for reporting abuses that you can use to report more than one individuals, instead of need to report them via their profiles individually. If they don't have this, maybe Paradox could ask them to set up something like that?
It's great you don't think my existence is inherently offensive and a corrupting influence, but people need to go a step further and speak up and out against bigotry when we see it. Otherwise it's just going to continue to fester (which is the point we're trying to drive across to Paradox). We cannot literally just sit around and say "well it's bad some people are bigots but there's nothing to be done about the effects it has on people in our community it's just too hard."
I do not have any problems with speaking up/out against bigotry but my concerns is whether you are blowing it out of proportion. Yes, Paradox, as any other companies, may not always successfully resolve all problems. But I think practically accusing Paradox Interactive of not actually caring about this and that without convincing evidence (that is, anything other than anecdotes and hearsay) is not going to help your case here and I suspect this is partly why people here are not taking your case seriously. Here is one idea.... I recommend taking screenshots but posted here with names redacted. And then if they persist after a while, take screenshots again. In both cases, I recommend using some kind of ID in place of their redacted names, especially if they are same people in both screenshots. If timestamps are shown in these chats, it can show whether actions, particularly bans, had been taken against them or not, to illustrate the problem that you described. I recommend ShareX software for quick screenshots that will be saved to same folder (by default, they are saved to folders automatically created with names in YYYY-MM format (e.g. /Documents/ShareX/Screenshots/2022-02 right now)).
Basically, I think you need to be creative in how to convince Paradox and the community that this problem is much bigger than they assumed. I am not saying you are lying or anything but I think you need to give bigger credits to the people here and in Paradox... they will have higher standards to expect in accepting your arguments and be convinced by them. Granted, this is not legal court and the standard of proof is much lower here than they are in legal courts but nevertheless, they are still substantially higher than any of us might like. I think it is fair to say that this level of standard is inherent to our human nature.
Respect is earned. As a trans person I have little to no patience for people who don't even know what term to use to describe gender identity and seems confused on why being trans could ever come up in a game where people are going to have 20+ hours of interactions with you just to play it. I'm not going to listen to people call me he/him and not use a feminine name for me for all those hours that's just insane.
Honestly, and this might be a bit controversial, I would still have a respect for everyone but strongly express my disappointment in those misbehaving people for their behavior. Personally, I will not stoop down to their level and disrespect them as they would to me. I would rather set an example for them to see. I think the whole idea of expecting people to earn your respect is... a bit problematic on that account.
Moreover, asking others to earn your respect is part of the problem, I feel, that have plagued the human history throughout. French Revolution might be a best example that illustrated this... it was expected that the revolution have respect from everyone with absolutely no dissent and anyone who objected to *any* aspects of the revolution are immediately suspect, liable to be executed. And this I find especially detestable, as someone who is strongly anti-death penalty. It is a slippery slope with dangerous implications.
I prefer convincing people to change their behavior, and not just by setting an example, over forcing it upon them, latter of which can generate a strong deal of resentment and leaving a bitter legacy that will be prolonged. Of course, that approach will not always work for everyone but I prefer to try that approach as much as possible and as a first course of action.
Maybe I am just idealist.... but it can't hurt to be an idealist sometimes.
