Unfortunately, not a bug. EU4 doesn't have many religions, while Plus does. This means they get mapped over one another.
Not sure having them as custom defined would be any better.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
Unfortunately, not a bug. EU4 doesn't have many religions, while Plus does. This means they get mapped over one another.
Not sure having them as custom defined would be any better.
Not currently, though it might be possible to make it a game rule in the future. I can see why some people might prefer not to have them.
(And in case you are wondering, it's actually a hidden trait that activates the baby portrait overlay. The trait gets assigned and removed via events when the character reaches a certain age, but if you use console commands, that event doesn't fire normally and the hidden trait and portrait remain.)
As a female character with gender equality set to Plus, you can not join the Assassins society, as it says that the gender equality game rule must be set to All. I assume this is not intentional behavior
OOOOH I see!
If I use console on one character, does that influences others aswell???
And also, I would appreciate for the portraits to be an optional game rule. Because I like to role play some times, and I use A LOT of commands for that and the portraits messed it up a bit. Though they have awesome quality and were a good idea.
Thank you for answering!
Hey vukica, in case you didn't see my reply in the other thread, you still need to add the baby portrait fix (for mac and linux users) to the mod. Noxbru's fix is on page 51 of this thread, and requires replacing a file in the interface folder.
I was away, need to verify current version first. Should be out fairly soon™.
In macOS the baby portraits show up as vanilla regardless of whether you have the baby portrait rule on or not. Atleast the portraits are visible now >.<
I noticed that in the new version when i hover over the probability of accepting a favor it is: 1.always a solid No and 2.no reason given
.png){kind=avatar}
If you have a MacOS and like the mod, maybe you can volunteer as beta tester
Portraits should work on new games, however, they won't work on saved games from previous versions. I will reupload a version that should work.
I seem to have run into a consistent crash after winning a crusade for Novgorod. The moment the crusade ends the game just crashes and throws out an exception in the logs. My checksum is WGSP but that's because I'm running tons of other mods. The thing is, none of them should quite interfere with this one specific instance of a won Crusade. I'm uploading my save game, error log and exceptions log. The biggest mod I'm running alongside this is Rex Teutonictorum. My game has been dirty updated for quite a while, and I know I should start a new game (the world is pretty messed up and I'm near a WC, lol) but I'm curious as to what is going on here.
EDIT: It seems the error.log is empty, disregard it.
EDIT: It seems the error.log is empty, disregard it.
Not sure if this is WAI, but when the pope first crowns the emperor of the carolingian emperor i.e.when the empire is first formed, the event that pops up is missing the name of the eastern roman empire so the event text sort of makes no sense...
Is Sawdan supposed to be vassal of the Duke of Benevento in TOG start? But when you start the game, this happens.
I can't find the event. ERE is supposed to change name after that.
let me replay a game quickly and then ill just post a screen shot
The theocracy titles' succession laws bug is still present, at least for Roman religion. In v.4.07.6, when I create a new temple and create a new vassal for the said temple as a Roman ruler, the default succession law is always gavelkind. But, when I do the same thing for already-established temples/churches, the succession law would be the same as the previous holder of that temple (i.e. if I take a Catholic bishopric and create a new vassal as a Roman ruler, the succession law would be investiture. Likewise, if I take an Orthodox or Muslim church, the succession law would be open elective or open, respectively). I've also done this in the previous version, v.4.07.5, and the results were the same, so I'm guessing the new version only fixed the succession law bug for other religions' but not for the Roman religion.
- Status