• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Mrdie,
Am interested in any of the following:
1) Major cabinet changes
2) Deaths
3) Changes in international relations.
It sounds like all of the suggestions qualify, so go ahead and post. I'll deal with the event numbers. Haxhi Lleshi will be # 32040 for HOS position, start 1942.

As small a nation as Albania is, the treaty with China could be the first step in breaking the isolation of the Peoples Republic of China. Do You think Albania should stay allied to the USSR if the Chinese and Soviets do not have the split?
 
As small a nation as Albania is,
As small as it is, it brought China into the United Nations:

From the 1960s onwards, nations friendly to the PRC, led by the People's Republic of Albania under Enver Hoxha, moved an annual resolution in the General Assembly to transfer China's seat at the UN from the ROC to the PRC. Every year the United States was able to assemble a majority of votes to block this resolution. But the admission of newly independent developing nations in the 1960s gradually turned the General Assembly from being Western-dominated to being dominated by countries sympathetic to Beijing. In addition, the desire of the Nixon administration to improve relations with the de facto government of mainland China to counterbalance the Soviet Union reduced American willingness to support the ROC.

the treaty with China could be the first step in breaking the isolation of the Peoples Republic of China. Do You think Albania should stay allied to the USSR if the Chinese and Soviets do not have the split?
I think that it'd still break off because Khrushchev did not want Hoxha in charge of Albania, he viewed him as unreliable. Hoxha was a nationalist and viewed the Soviets as violating Albanian sovereignty. It'd probably do something similar to what it did in the early 1970's:

The result of decreased Chinese aid to Albania was an increase of trade with countries other than China.131 Between 1972 and 1974, Albania's trade with the industrialized West rose from $39.5 million to $94.2 million. This accounted for 12 percent of Albanian trade in 1972 and 18.2 percent in 1974. In the same period, trade with China did increase from $167 million to $219 million. However, in terms of percentage of trade, trade with China fell from 50.6 percent in 1972 to 42.3 percent in 1974. Trade with Yugoslavia and the COMECON (Council for Mutual Economic Assistance) grew in this period (Albania would not resume trade with the Soviet Union). In 1972, Albania's trade with Yugoslavia amounted to $12 million, or 3.6 percent, or the total Albanian trade. Trade with the COMECON rose from $111.6 million in 1972 to $158.4 million in 1974. However, this amounted to a decrease in percentage share of Albanian trade from 33.8 percent to 30.6 percent. This trend toward diversification of trade continued in terms of the “Third World.” Trade with the “Third World” in 1973 was only $0.5 million (nearly negligible) but it skyrocketed (relatively speaking) to $8.3 million in 1974. The percentage of trade rose from 0.1 percent to 1.6 percent.132

131 This trend continued in diplomatic matters when Albnaia established ties with most West European countries and fifteen “Third World” countries. However, the level of transaction remained low.
132 Elez Biberaj, Albania and China (Boulder: Westview Press, 1986), 98-99.
If Albania breaks off without Chinese support, the USSR would probably encourage Yugoslavia to annex Albania in an act of revenge. (This is the main reason Hoxha was originally hesitant)
 
As small as it is, it brought China into the United Nations:



I think that it'd still break off because Khrushchev did not want Hoxha in charge of Albania, he viewed him as unreliable. Hoxha was a nationalist and viewed the Soviets as violating Albanian sovereignty. It'd probably do something similar to what it did in the early 1970's:

If Albania breaks off without Chinese support, the USSR would probably encourage Yugoslavia to annex Albania in an act of revenge. (This is the main reason Hoxha was originally hesitant)
There you have it folks. Nationalism was, is and forevermore will probably be the main factor determining international relations. My plans are to have the Sino-Soviet split occur UNLESS the 1958 event whereby Kruschev consolidates power turns out ahistorically, and the Molotov faction wins. OR Beria is put in charge by the Stalin death event. In this case Kruschev is out. Others in the Soviet Union viewed Kruschev as being detrimental to Soviet interests which is why he was deposed in 1964. The Sino-Soviet split was one of the reasons. Unfortunately it was too late to get China back into the fold.

Yes, China, even under Mao, underwent a slow transition from being a hardline state bent on world revolution to a state that aligned itself more and more with what could be called a "third world platform". Very revisionist I might add, and likely to disappoint a few would-be revolutionaries.

I guess my question should be this--if Kruschev is NOT in charge in 1960, is there any reason for Albania to break off with the Soviets?
 
Open Society and Central Planning are separate sliders from the Left-Right and Authoritarian-Democratic sliders. System is governed solely by the Left-Right and Authoritarian-Democratic sliders. However, they are related in that Stalinism only permits one move to Free Market and one move toward Open Society. Leninism permits 3 moves to Free Market and two towards Open Society. So according to game mechanics, evidence of two slider moves towards either is evidence that the system MUST BE LENINIST in order to allow that.

As for things like gulags or exterminating minorities I would contend that these are abuses outside the game mechanics, so an absence of these actions is not evidence that a system is not Stalinist or National Socialist. I feel it is possible to be a completely closed and centrally planned society without being abusive.

In order to justify considering the USSR Leninist I need evidence of any of the following
1) TWO steps towards Open Society. Considering the Berlin Wall and the Hungarian and Czech invasions I'm only willing to grant one.
2) TWO steps towards Free Market. The Pepsi contract was certainly worth one. I'm unsure as to whether to assign any reality to the Soviet leader quotes or to simply regard them as public relations propaganda.
3) Evidence of degrees of freedom and/or allowance of private enterprise totaling three or more. More local governance might be evidence of limited freedom.
I think there might be more evidence of business contacts (a right slider move) than of freedom or any semblance of democracy (a democratic move). If you can give me evidence that the USSR was more open to the international business community than I have been led to believe then I'll make the change.

I think the gulag etc. is a good example of an authoritarian practice. Controlling how people act and think through repressive measures is extremely authoritarian. Totalitarian even. I can see reasons for hesitance given the incident in Hungary in 1956 and the Berlin Wall in 1961. Might as well throw in the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. But I just want to remind you to keep timeline in perspective. Khrushchev was ousted in 1964 so Prague Spring took place under Brezhnev, who was a more traditionalist. Many of the other things you mention take place after Khrushchev's fall and so I find them to be irrelevant to a discussion of Khrushchev's ideology. I assume you're allowance for one move towards open society is based on the Thaw? I will probably have to agree with you on that one. I don't think anything else can push it further open than that, especially considering Khruschevite repressions. Question, have we ruled out the possibility that Khrushchev was a step to the right of Stalin on the Left-Right slider? I think Mrdie can probably help answer that, though it'd be most convincing if he used some non-primary sources, because as you mentioned, nomonhan, it could be PR Bullshit. Soviets didn't really need to do PR, but hey, that's that.

Jawa, I stand corrected on one point #2 (see previous post) in which I overstated. Although there was much public information, that was also true under Stalin. I also believe that the things we learned through intelligence work and archives were much more meaningful than what we could learn by reading Soviet newspapers. What I'm really referring to is things like what we've learned from declassified Soviet archives and defecting spies which is a lot--leading to books such as Victor Suvurov's Icebreaker and Jung Chang's Mao the Unknown Story. I especially recommend the latter book as it will shatter a lot of myths. In fact Mao always secretly hated the Soviet Union but simply realized he had to suck up to them in order to get military aid and technology. Once he got what he wanted he let them go. An example of what he did to get the Soviets to help his atomic bomb project included sending food to East Germany and starving his own people.

Without getting into a Mao discussion (I do hope to read that book though, it looks great) let me just say that he took the bomb from them during Khrushchev's period and it was the last bit of cooperation between the two for some time. As far as Western knowledge of the USSR, the general populace knew very little, but diplomats and policy makers knew quite a lot. Some probably from spies (though they had far more numerous and better spies than we) but also from more traditional analysis of actions and motivations. Like I mentioned before, the opening of the archives gave us a great wealth of knowledge that has only barely been tapped (Putin is closing them piecemeal :() but in terms of Soviet Policy they did what they said. Scholars familiar with Pravda were shocked that there were no surprises in terms of Stalin's plans, etc.

Nonetheless I do plan to have the Sino-Soviet split NOT happen if Molotov (an old line revolutionary) wins the power struggle in 58 instead of Kruschev.

That is very encouraging! Are you also modeling the Beria-Malenkov-Molotov actions of '53? That may be in the vanilla game by the event where Stalin dies, but I cannot recall. Beria and Malenkov behaved far more liberally than Khrushchev, initially, and that is why Beria was killed and Malenkov driven from power. What are you thinking of doing for that?
 
I guess my question should be this--if Kruschev is NOT in charge in 1960, is there any reason for Albania to break off with the Soviets?
Not really. Apparently Beria was supportive of Tito though, so Hoxha could have broken off by 1960. If Molotov was in charge though, he apparently liked Hoxha and hated Tito. Molotov would of made a very interesting Soviet leader IRL, and would of been pro-China and pro-Albania (vis-à-vis Yugoslavia). In fact when he was 'exiled' position-wise to being Ambassador to Mongolia, the Soviets withdrew Molotov later on because they felt he was absorbing Maoism while in this position.

Hoxhamolotov.jpg


As a note if you want I can send you long things (too long to post here) on Albania's foreign policy from 1944-1964 via PM.
 
Last edited:
OK,
Following the posts I'd say that the Sino Soviet split occurs
100% of the time with Kruschev
0% of the time with Molotov
50% of the time if any other leader is in charge.

Kruschev's personality was actually part of the issue, and he was blamed for rashness both in dealing with Mao and for his actions during the Cuban Missile Crisis. That's why he was ousted. Also the K-19 incident occurred on his watch.

If the Sino-Soviet split occurs, Albania leaves. This might not be 100% true but I don't want to make things TOO complex.
Mrdie,
Perhaps you can work in a Sino-Soviet split event (a speech or something) and have the Chinese leave the Soviet alliance with it. I can adjust things like probabilities and trigger conditions. If possible it should be AFTER March 28, 1958, which is the date of my last Soviet leadership struggle event of the 1950s. As for the full text you spoke of I prefer you post a link to the file.

As for Kruschev being Leninist or Stalinist that actually makes no gameplay difference (except that if he's Leninist and the USSR does something really unusual and becomes social-democratic he is in charge), and the only real question is whether the Soviet SYSTEM should be Leninist at any time (in order to permit more reforms than are possible under Stalinism). I'll consider whether they should be Leninist AFTER 1970 also, in case the mod in the distant future becomes a "Cold War 2" mod.

Jawa,
Yes, in the absence of spy reports, people often make judgments about a country based on logic, as the Japanese did with respect to American plans at the end of WW2. Good point. Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe that the story of the USSR's secret plans to invade Germany came out only AFTER the fall of the Soviet Union.
As for the power struggle I've expanded on vanilla already, so Kruschev winds up in charge most of the time but not always and if I as a human played the USSR I'd put someone else in. To me the only real chances for the USSR to "win" the Cold War would have been to either 1) land on the moon first or 2) avoid the Sino-Soviet split.
 
Last edited:
It would work better as an event chain. The 20th Party Congress, Tito's visit to Moscow (June 1-23, 1956), etc.

Enver Hoxha led a high-ranking delegation to China for a visit which lasted from September 13 to October 3, 1956. The official reason for this trip was to attend the Eighth Congress of the Chinese Communist Party. Hoxha's true intentions seems to have been to gain support from the Chinese which would have the effect of relieving Soviet pressure upon Albania. Little is known about the exact nature of Enver Hoxha's meetings with Mao Zedong, however, a clear indication that Hoxha met with some degree of success can be seen in Albanian-Chinese trade figures. In 1955 (the year prior to Hoxha's visit to China), Chinese aid to Albania accounted for 4.2 percent of Albania's total passive trade balance; in 1956, this amount increased to 17 percent; in 1957, trade grew to 21.6 percent.68


[....]

An international conference of the ruling Communist Parties convened in Moscow during November 12 to 14, 1957. Josip Broz Tito of Yugoslavia refused to attend and sent Edward Kardelj in his place.70 Yugoslavia also failed to sign the statement (which was signed by all other parties) issued at the end of the conference because it recognized the Soviet Union as the leader of the international Communist movement. These actions severely angered the Soviet Union as well as the rest of the Communist world. China also agreed (at this time) that the Soviet Union should lead the Communist movement. Mao Zedong said:

Our camp must have a head, because even the snake has a head, and imperialism has a head.... I would not agree that China should be called the head of the camp.... because we do not merit this honor and cannot maintain this role, we are still poor.71

[....]

Hoxha's outburst had a profound effect on the Moscow gathering. A few other notable quotes from leaders of the various parties include this one by Wladyslaw Gomulka, the Polish leader, who said that the speech was “a disgusting, shameful, gangsterish, and irresponsible attack on Khrushchev and the Soviet Party.” Luigi Longo, the head of the Italian group described the speech as “not only disloyal but also infantile.” Maurice Thorez, the French Communist leader said:

The members of our delegation listened to [Hoxha's] speech with a feeling of shame. As militant Communists, they had never heard such language either in party meeting or in the meetings of the international Communist movement.... The path followed by the delegation of the Albanian Party was a very dangerous one.86

Enver Hoxha gave a speech entitled “The Dictatorship of the Proletariat in Albania is Alive, Vigilant and Active” which gives a succinct summary of the Albanian position toward Khrushchev and the Soviet Union in this period. Hoxha said:

Khrushchev and Co. probably think that through measures they have taken they will oblige us to pursue another line, to fall on our knees, and to hitch ourselves to their revisionist chariot. This is how they think themselves, because they are revisionists. We speak of our love for the Soviet people and Soviet communists, but at the same time we cannot sit back and not expose Khrushchev and his cronies.87

Mao Zedong's delegate Deng Xiaoping summarized China's position at the Conference of the Eighty-one Communist Parties as this:

...there are neither superior nor inferior parties in the international Communist movement. China would not recognize the Soviet Union or any other party as the leader of the international Communist movement, each party was completely independent.88

The Fourth Congress of the Albanian Party of Labor was held in Tiranë, from February 13 to 20, 1961, which turned out to be the last meeting the Soviet Union or other East European countries attended in Albania. During this congress, Soviet delegates were treated with hostility by their Albanian hosts while the Chinese delegates were treated warmly. Speeches given by Hoxha at this time declared that to follow the advice of Khrushchev and become less dictatorial would be suicidal because it would only lead to unrest which occurred in Hungary and Poland in 1956. Mehmet Shehu, in a speech admitted that he and other high officials of the Albanian Party of Labor were often accused of being tyrants and dogmatists. The reason for this according to Shehu was that unlike other adversaries, the Albanian Communists were true Marxists. Also announced at this congress was the basic outline of the Third Five-Year Plan (1961-1965). This called for the greatest investments in the economy to be put toward industry (China's advice) with little being put into agriculture (this went against Soviet advice).

[....]

Serious notice of the impending rift was given in March 1961, when Albania was not invited to attend the meeting of the Warsaw Pact nations (Albania joined the Warsaw Pact on May 14, 1955). Enver Hoxha had member reference to the problems concerning Albania's membership in the Warsaw Pact during his speech entitled “Reject the Revisionist Theses of the XX Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the Anti-Marxist Stand of Khrushchev's Group! Uphold Marxism-Leninism! Given on November 16, 1960 at the Meeting of the Eighty-one Communist Parties. According to Hoxha, Soviet Marshal Grechko, Commander-in-Chief of the Warsaw Pact said at a Chiefs of Staff of the Warsaw Pact nations meeting in Moscow: “'You are in the Warsaw Treaty only for the time being,' implying that Marshal Grechko seems to have decided to throw us out.”90

On April 25, 1961, all Soviet technicians were withdrawn from Albania and all economic aid was canceled. Also, all Albanian students studying in the Soviet Union were sent home. A further step was taken on May 26, when all Soviet submarines at Sazan were withdrawn.

[....]

Enver Hoxha gave a speech to the Albanian National Assembly on November 7, 1961, in which he called Khrushchev a “revisionist, anti-Marxist, and a defeatist.” The Albanian leader portrayed Stalin as the ideal to be strived for; a true follower of Lenin. Stalin never “compromised” but always struggled for the purity of Marxism-Leninism. This speech is rather reminiscent of Hoxha's comments in his speech at the Moscow Meeting a year earlier. In that speech, Enver Hoxha summarized Albania's “official” position toward Stalin, which was:

The Party of Labor of Albania found itself in a great dilemma [at the Twentieth Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union]. It was not convinced and will never be convinced on the question of condemning Comrade Stalin in that way and in those forms that Comrade Khrushchev did it.

...The Party of Labor of Albania maintained a realistic stand on the question of Stalin. It was correct and grateful towards this glorious Marxist against whom, while he was alive, there was no one among us 'brave enough' to come out and criticize, but when he was dead a great deal of mud was thrown, creating in this way an intolerable situation in which a whole glorious epoch of the Soviet Union...is left without a helmsman, without a leader.99

The speech of November 7, 1961 is most noteworthy because in this speech Hoxha responded to Khrushchev's accusation that Albania would accept “thirty pieces of silver from the imperialists.” Enver Hoxha retorted with one of his most famous sayings (which may have been “borrowed” from another source):

...the Albanian people and their Party of Labor will even live on grass if need be, but thy will never sell themselves 'for 30 pieces of silver', ...They would rather die honourably on their feet than live in shame on their knees.100

The speech given by Hoxha caused the Soviet Union to break relations completely with Albania and the other Communist states of the eastern bloc to withdraw ambassadors on November 11, 1961.

The December 1961, issue of the Moscow-produced journal International Affairs in an article written by S. Sanakoyev gives the position (which can be assumed is the “official” position of the Soviet Union) that:

...The attitude of the present leadership of the Albanian Workers' Party which has set itself against the other countries of the world socialist system and the entire Communist movement is...the result of departing from the principles of proletarian internationalism and slipping into the morass of nationalism.101

Albania was also unofficially excluded (Albania was simply never invited to meetings anymore) from the Warsaw Pact and Council of Mutual Economic Assistance (COMECON). From this point forward, Albania's closest and only ally was China.
It is best IMO for the Sino-Soviet Split and Albanian-Soviet split to be separate but connected events. It wouldn't really be complex, in the end there'd be a trigger wherein both China and Albania are anti-USSR, so they join together. I think that you (or someone else) should create Sino-Soviet split events, then I could make Albanian events. Of course if that isn't possible, then I can make both. (Or have them moved into one event chain)
 
Ok just do your events series for Albania only as you see fit. It looks like the event chain begins in 1956. In this mod there's a 1% chance that Kruschev gets ousted in 55 in which case everything aborts. There's also a 5% chance that Beria will be in charge (HOG) when Stalin dies--this is from vanilla and I kept it. Write what you want, and consider what Albania might do if either 1) Communist China stays loyal to the Soviet Union or 2) Communist China doesn't even exist (there's a chance that Chiang Kai Shek wins the Chinese Civil War) I'll see what you have and will probably make the Mao falling out with the USSR event based on my earlier post. Then I'll see what we both have as the basis for the Chinese-Albanian friendship. Communist China should exist and own Nanjing--that should be an adequate check to be sure that Communist China won the Civil War.

trigger = {
exists = CHC
owned = { province = 1235 data = CHC } #Nanjing
(other trigger conditions)
}
 
32203;Minister of Security;Koçi Xoxe;43;ST;Man of the People;Medium;M32203;x

Should be LWR (like Yugoslavia) instead of ST. (I made that mistake of course :p ) Also, Xoxe would be a good candidate for puppet leader of Albania if Hoxha is ousted by the Yugoslavs, so make another minister'd version of Xoxe, Head of State, Head of Government, appears 1946, LWR, HoG is Insignificant Layman, HoS is Flamboyant Tough Guy.

After that I can go make initial Albanian events.
 
OK, I've made Koçi Xoxe LWR
HOS # 32226
HOG # 32227

Go ahead.
 
In the game (pre-1945/6 start, vanilla and I assume this mod too), what generally happens is that the Soviets move in and when WWII ends release both puppet Yugoslavia and puppet Albania. Problem is, Albania was actually the only East European country that later upheld socialism that didn't rely on the Soviets for their independence. The Albanians liberated themselves with some Yugoslav help, but later on Albania became a Yugoslav puppet and the Yugoslavs were putting increasingly more pressure upon Enver Hoxha, who didn't approve of the idea of greater integration between the two countries (something that could have quite possibly resulted in Albania becoming a Seventh Republic within Yugoslavia).

Probably the biggest question here pre-events is to discuss how to handle this situation. I think it'd require a somewhat complicated (and non-Cold War) series of events concerning Yugoslavia and Albania themselves in the period of 1939-1944, but yeah. If it possible for Yugoslavia to be an initial puppet of the Soviet Union while Albania turns from a Soviet puppet to a Yugoslav puppet, that's alright.

This initial event, the Treaty of Friendship, Coooperation and Mutual Aid between Albania and Yugoslavia, represents the first strong attempts post-Albanian independence by Yugoslavia to influence postwar Albania. The following has been stated in reference to the Treaty:
The pressure which was given under the guise of “strengthening friendly relations,” caused Albania to enter into unfair economic agreements. The agreements were theoretically mutually beneficial but were very much like the one-sided agreements made with Italy in pre-war Albania by King Zog's government.

Under these agreements, the Albanian lek was revalued in terms of the Yugoslav dinar, a customs union was formed, and Albania's economic plan was subordinated to Yugoslavia's.12

Albanian economists, H. Banja and V. Toçi, stated their analysis of Yugoslav intentions:

...Albania didn't need to create its national industry, but should limit her production to agricultural and mineral raw materials, which were to be sent for industrial processing Yugoslavia. In other words, they wanted the Albanian economy to be a mere appendage of the Yugoslav economy.13

[...]

The Deputy Minister of Finance, Abdyl Këllezi (purged by Hoxha in 1975), stated at a meeting of the National Assembly on July 14, 1947 that: “The current valuable assistance of the peoples of Yugoslavia in the amount of 2 billion lekë represents 56.73 percent of our state budget.” The following year the Minister of Finance, Ramadan Çitaku said much of the same thing: “Yugoslavia is granting Albania 3 billion lekë which represent income for the economic development of Albania based on coordinated plans and exchanges of goods, and this amounts to 48.13 percent of the total income of the national budget. Likewise, Yugoslavia gave Albania from 1945 to 1948, 704,791,000 dinars for equipping its army.15 However, despite the generous aid given to Albania by Yugoslavia, the economies were becoming more and more enmeshed—a fact which slowly was ensnaring Albania on its way into becoming the Seventh Republic of Yugoslavia.16

The inter-linking of the economies displeased Hoxha. The major flaws in the Yugoslav aspirations toward Albania were, according to Hoxha:

We [Albania] were expected to produce for the Yugoslavs all the raw materials which they needed. These raw materials were to be exported to the metropolis Yugoslavia to be processed there in Yugoslav factories. The same applied to the production of cotton and other industrial crops, as well as oil, bitumen, asphalt, chrome, etc. Yugoslavia would supply its 'colony', Albania, with exorbitantly priced consumer goods, including even such items as needles and thread, and would provide us with petrol and oil, as well as glass for the lamps in which we burn the fuel extracted from our subsoil, processed in Yugoslavia and sold to us at high prices.... The aim of the Yugoslavs was, therefore, to prevent our country from developing either its industry or its working class, and to make it forever dependent on Yugoslavia.17
So this is the event in which Albania transforms from a Soviet puppet to Yugoslav one, or a fully independent nation (presumably if starting in 1946) to a Yugoslav puppet.

One main issue is what options should be in the event. Yugoslav pressure on Albania was quite large, and had developed in the interwar years when Yugoslav partisans cooperated closely with their Albanian counterparts. IMO the event should start out with the Yugoslav player or AI getting it, and being able to choose what path to take. If the Yugoslav player or AI rejects the Treaty however, then it should be a sign that Yugoslavia will not interfere much in Albania and will become disinterested in the idea of gradually turning it into a Seventh Republic. The ramifications of this would be pretty dramatic on Albanian history, since Hoxha would likely continue to remain fairly friendly to Yugoslavia and perhaps even adopt an 'in between' position during the Soviet-Yugoslav break of 1948. In this case you'd need to have some triggers for special events firing if the Treaty is never advocated by Yugoslavia, such as an event relating to Albania's position on the Soviet-Yugoslav Split (as opposed to the planned First Congress of the Albanian Labour Party event, which deals with Albania's stance on Yugoslavia) among other possible events.

The event # and triggers are up to you.
Code:
#############################################
###### Treaty of Friendship, Coooperation and Mutual Aid with Albania # 
#############################################
event = {
        id = 0
        random = no
        country = YUG
        trigger = {
                exists = ALB

        }
 
        name = "Treaty of Friendship, Coooperation and Mutual Aid with Albania"
        desc = "The Treaty of Friendship, Coooperation and Mutual Aid was signed on 9 July 1946 

between the nations of Yugoslavia and Albania. During World War II, Albanian and Yugoslav 

Communist partisans had worked closely together, with the Yugoslavs providing help in the fields 

of organization and arms for their Albanian counterparts. Postwar, Yugoslavia sought to influence 

the future of Albania, and hoped to do this with the Treaty."
        style = 0
 
        date = { day = 9 month = july year = 1946 }
 
        action_a = {
                name = "It is signed"
                command = { type = make_puppet which = ALB }
                command = { type = relation which = ALB value = 100 }
                command = { type = relation which = SOV value = -10 }
                ai_chance = 95
        }
        action_b = {
                name = "It is not necessary"
                ai_chance = 5
                command = { }
        }

}
Thoughts?

Edit: I was thinking, if we start pre-1946, how can we enforce the historical 1946 cabinet coming to power?
 
Last edited:
BTW, i don't know if it's going to help this mod, but i made a small map modification for the CW mod just to include a province for Guantanamo base.

If you want it, you can use it, just take a look at the departure version.
 
Thanks, Kretoxian, I'll take a look at that again. What did you take away to give Guantanamo or did you use one of the 6 free provinces at the end? Even though it was very real I'm not sure it's really needed for the game since the US already has Puerto Rico and it might make it too easy for the USA to invade Cuba. I already made a map mod to give an administrator nation and a sea passage from Egypt to Sinai bypassing the Suez Canal so I'd need to add it if I decided to use it. And I'll take a look at your ministers.

Mrdie,
The scenario starts on Sept 2, 1945, and Albania actually starts off as a puppet of Yugoslavia. This was original Paradox design. Is this wrong? According to Paradox the leaders in 1945 are:
headofstate = { type = 9 id = 32050 }#Sejfulla Malëshova
headofgovernment = { type = 9 id = 32062 }#Enver Hoxha
foreignminister = { type = 9 id = 32078 }#Essad Pacha the one we removed because he died in 1920
armamentminister = { type = 9 id = 32099 }#Sejfulla Malëshova
ministerofsecurity = { type = 9 id = 32123 }#Hajrë Fetahu
ministerofintelligence = { type = 9 id = 32142 }#Nano Xhana
chiefofstaff = { type = 9 id = 32156 }#Prenk Pervizi
chiefofarmy = { type = 9 id = 32172 }#Aziz Sulejmani
chiefofnavy = { type = 9 id = 32185 }#Halil Nergutti
chiefofair = { type = 9 id = 32201 }#Zuhdi Shabani

So recommend please the starting cabinet in 1945 and if this changes in 1946 then the first event should be a simple cabinet change. Your PM was a 1946 cabinet.

TO EVERYONE:
Am now working on an Indonesian War for Independence series. Comments and suggestions are welcome. Next release 0.21 ETA 1-2 weeks.
 
Last edited:
Mrdie,
The scenario starts on Sept 2, 1945, and Albania actually starts off as a puppet of Yugoslavia. This was original Paradox design. Is this wrong? According to Paradox the leaders in 1945 are:
headofstate = { type = 9 id = 32050 }#Sejfulla Malëshova
headofgovernment = { type = 9 id = 32062 }#Enver Hoxha
foreignminister = { type = 9 id = 32078 }#Essad Pacha the one we removed because he died in 1920
armamentminister = { type = 9 id = 32099 }#Sejfulla Malëshova
ministerofsecurity = { type = 9 id = 32123 }#Hajrë Fetahu
ministerofintelligence = { type = 9 id = 32142 }#Nano Xhana
chiefofstaff = { type = 9 id = 32156 }#Prenk Pervizi
chiefofarmy = { type = 9 id = 32172 }#Aziz Sulejmani
chiefofnavy = { type = 9 id = 32185 }#Halil Nergutti
chiefofair = { type = 9 id = 32201 }#Zuhdi Shabani

So recommend please the starting cabinet in 1945 and if this changes in 1946 then the first event should be a simple cabinet change. Your PM was a 1946 cabinet.
If it starts off as a puppet of Yugoslavia, the Treaty event can still be relevant because it be a gauge to whether or not the Yugoslav player or AI deems it necessary to further intervene in Albania. Thoughts?

Also as for that cabinet, security minister should definitely be Koçi Xoxe like in my original suggestion. Also, Malëshova was never head of state, it should be Omer Nishani like in my original suggestion. Finally, Chief of Staff should be Nako Spiru. The rest is okay since ministers are pretty much approximations anyway.

Edit: As a note, Albania should start as a puppet in 1936 to Italy if it isn't already. Just saying.
 
Last edited:
My thoughts are to write three events on the same date. Event #1 would fire if Albania is communist and a puppet of Yugoslavia. Event #2 would fire if Albania is communist and NOT a puppet of Yugoslavia. Either event puts Enver Hoxha in as foreign minister (and any other changes you feel are warranted), and #2 depuppets Albania and triggers Yugoslavia event #3, which makes Albania a Yugoslav puppet. If Yugoslavia is not communist or does not exist, then triggering event #3 would have no effect and Albania would remain communist and stay allied but not a puppet.

I'll make the changes you recommend in personnel for the Albania 1945 inc file and change the foreign minister to #32077 Hassan Shqabi as per your PM.
headofstate = { type = 9 id = 32049 }#was 32050
headofgovernment = { type = 9 id = 32062 }
foreignminister = { type = 9 id = 32077 }#32078 is dead
armamentminister = { type = 9 id = 32099 }
ministerofsecurity = { type = 9 id = 32203 }#was 32123 changed per mod
ministerofintelligence = { type = 9 id = 32142 }
chiefofstaff = { type = 9 id = 32215 }#was 32156 changed per mod
chiefofarmy = { type = 9 id = 32172 }
chiefofnavy = { type = 9 id = 32185 }
chiefofair = { type = 9 id = 32201 }
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Kretoxian, I'll take a look at that again. What did you take away to give Guantanamo or did you use one of the 6 free provinces at the end? Even though it was very real I'm not sure it's really needed for the game since the US already has Puerto Rico and it might make it too easy for the USA to invade Cuba. I already made a map mod to give an administrator nation and a sea passage from Egypt to Sinai bypassing the Suez Canal so I'd need to add it if I decided to use it. And I'll take a look at your ministers.

You're welcome, the ID for Guantánamo Bay is 1623.
 
I'll experiment with the Guantanamo province before deciding to include it. If it's included I'm tempted to just give it to Cuba except in the 45 scenario, which is the only time it becomes an issue--maybe Castro can demand it. Looking over the treaties the US has a perpetual lease but Cuba retains ultimate sovereignty--a classic case of ambiguity. If I give it to the USA before Castro comes to power it may require rewriting of a slew of AI files to make sure the USA defends it.


Kretoxian,
Can you post a link to the departure version? All I have is 1.3 alpha which does not have the province change.
 
Last edited:
I'll experiment with the Guantanamo province before deciding to include it. If it's included I'm tempted to just give it to Cuba except in the 45 scenario, which is the only time it becomes an issue--maybe Castro can demand it. Looking over the treaties the US has a perpetual lease but Cuba retains ultimate sovereignty--a classic case of ambiguity. If I give it to the USA before Castro comes to power it may require rewriting of a slew of AI files to make sure the USA defends it.


Kretoxian,
Can you post a link to the departure version? All I have is 1.3 alpha which does not have the province change.

Try this link:

http://rapidshare.com/files/141502021/TCWMod_departure_version.rar.html
 
My thoughts are to write three events on the same date. Event #1 would fire if Albania is communist and a puppet of Yugoslavia. Event #2 would fire if Albania is communist and NOT a puppet of Yugoslavia. Either event puts Enver Hoxha in as foreign minister (and any other changes you feel are warranted), and #2 depuppets Albania and triggers Yugoslavia event #3, which makes Albania a Yugoslav puppet. If Yugoslavia is not communist or does not exist, then triggering event #3 would have no effect and Albania would remain communist and stay allied but not a puppet.
Perhaps you can do the triggers? (I'm not good with them)
 
OK Mrdie,
Just make the events without triggers but tell me what you think the conditions should be.