Here (in Italian) on the third text section you can read: [...] ...at Valence, in 890, an assembly of lay people and bishops, elevated LUDOVICO (Louis), Bosone's son, to the throne of Provence.[...]Yes, but could you please refresh my memory and tell me how Louis III is related to the events you are mentioning? It has been a while since I made them.
OK, but I still think that ITA should have a "submission" event, as in the same site I linked above, in the eighth text section, about BERENGARIO they say [...] e gli porse l'omaggio feudale [...], that is Berengario submitted to Arnulf in Trento at the end of year 888. Arnulf acknowledged him as king of Italy (confermò a Berengario il possesso d'Italia)We could definitely add events for the kinglets' submissions to Arnulf but, except for PRO, I do not think the other three should be vassals of GER. They did retain an independent foreign policy and they did not pay any tribute, the two major effects of a vassalization in EU2/FTG.
So PRO could start as GER vassal, whilst ITA should become vassal by event in 888.
This ITA event could also have an action B where Berengario refuses and Arnulf can get the crown of Italy before Wido ever did. Then we can follow the historical path (and the events already scripted!) about Wido's imperial aims without involving Berengario. Berengario will follow after Lamberto in 898 (monarch 064505).
Yes, Spoleto against West Francia seems to be unreal.I am not against fantasy as long as it is plausible but from what I have read, this is not the case here. Eudes was marquis of Neustria, that is all the lands between the Seine and Loire rivers, certainly the most powerful and richest principality of West Francia. On the other side, the Widonids had left too long ago to retain any kind of substantial influence or lands in the western kingdom.
I have left it as a third option for FRA, but once the French northern magnates have chosen Eudes, there is no way Wido could have "conquered" the crown.
I don't have any info about Tuscany between 888 and 894 when Adalberto teporarily submitted to Arnulf. But I believed that the Margrave was still a king's vassal.The sources I remember state that Tuscany remained neutral in the conflict between Berengar and Wido, at least in the beginning. If you have any info about when/if they picked a side, I would be glad to hear of it.
No, better having Spoleto independent as even in 880 the duke acted independently. Charles the Fat sent Berengario, as Margrave of Friuli, to tame Wido.Spoleto could start as a vassal and break it when Wido claims Italy, but did he ever recognize Berengar's authority, even in early 888?
Ok, I don't have a specific source, but Verona is always associated to Berengario instead of Cividale or other sites in Friuli.I trust you on that, will change.
Of course. There is also the possibility to have long time revolts in specific provinces such as Secusia (Ivrea), Milan, Placentia, Brescia and Pavia, as to simulate the great nobles switching sides. I hava thought about 50% considering the American revolts in agceep... I can't remember how long the rebels take to conquer a city with walls. We have only 7 years to change the king from Berengar to Wido (SPL_382001).50% sounds like a lot, it would have to be tested.
Well, from what I have understood there was a split into two zones of influence. But, yes that could be a de facto cease fire. I didn't think about any event to cover this just to have 896 as a deathdate for the province or country RR.Was there a formal treaty in 896? My understanding so far was that it was more of a de facto ceasefire, essentially for lack of manpower to go on with the war, but it has been a long time since I read about it and I could be wrong.
Now I am looking at some possible improvements to the chain of ITA events from 888 to 898. I must say there is not much to improve, indeed, as the events are already good.