-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
King John said:
I could host 15 players in Götterdammerung 1, where we had a Genoa, Palatinat and Bavaria in the game as well. However, with so many players rehosts are too frequently and cumbersome. Odds that at least one player crashes in-game increase, that one or more won't show up in time during a rehost increase etc. That's the real issue.
So I would stick with 12 max.
FAL said:
Alright me hearties. We'll start with the countries of the temporary roster.
They are 12 all in all. NL, however, will only enter the campaign after several sessions have been played. Hence we will include Denmark in the roster and see how things go from there (some country is bound to get annexed at some point.
)Does this bode well with ye good sirs?
Mats_SX said:
As far as I'm concerned you can. So I appoint you perm of Denmark pending the rest of the gang is ok with this.
grabah said:new campaign.
nice.
i want piece of the action.
(and what's with denamark and bavaria?! i would rather take persia or something..)
i need my eu2 fix. eu2 is only game you can play online while drinking coffee and smoking cigarettes so gm please find a spot
I have never played a campaign with you yet. Hence I would like to ask you and mayhap someone else to assess your capabilities. I'm willing to put you in Poland (that is presently not taken yet). I am not sure, however, if you would have a chance at prevailing against such virile gentlemen as King John and Van Engel etc.
What do you think?
Also: Can solemnly promise campaign dedication & reliability (no offense meant - I have just never played with you yet)?
Moving on: Starting time - which one would you prefer?
We could play from 18.00 to 22.00 or from 19.00 to 23.00 CET.
Personaly I would prefer 18.00 to 22.00 CET (with the possibility of extending sessions to 23.00 CET now and then if all are ok with it).
But the other option would work well for me as well...
We could play from 18.00 to 22.00 or from 19.00 to 23.00 CET.
Personaly I would prefer 18.00 to 22.00 CET (with the possibility of extending sessions to 23.00 CET now and then if all are ok with it).
But the other option would work well for me as well...
Amp, you're disappointing me. Why did you ask for our preferences if you're placing us wherever you want? the worst part is that you're trying to convince us it's a good starting for everyone.
Gentleman, say it isn't a matter of reliability, say it's a matter of social class.
Let me give you my 4th or 5th ... or 6th... option if it helps you to place us efficiently, and at the same time, to avoid you placing us there you like.
Gentleman, say it isn't a matter of reliability, say it's a matter of social class.
Let me give you my 4th or 5th ... or 6th... option if it helps you to place us efficiently, and at the same time, to avoid you placing us there you like.
im interested in this campaign, though its quite some time untill the start...i cant be sure ive got the time...but is there any nation open??
Cool. I hope there's nobody objecting to crush a puny little noob like me, though. Denmark seems safe enough for a couple of years, at least.Ampoliros said:As far as I'm concerned you can. So I appoint you perm of Denmark pending the rest of the gang is ok with this.
A question, however; what mod exactly? Watk 3.1 or 3.11?
poland, most excellent! im taking it.Ampoliros said:
im as reliable as real life permits it, same like anyone else, you'll just have to trust me for start
and btw i just tried out this watk thing.
my first impresion it sucks i dont know what do you guys see in it. i like those extra cultures but map is a mess. and worst of all it doesn't even work properly.
Whats the problem? As for the map - it is the best map mod out there. It even beats vanilla!
First of all don't install 3.11 but 3.10. All those minor cultures in Europe are a mess.
The reason it might crash after a short while, is that Muscowy launches ships in the artic. Not sure that bug was corrected.
The reason it might crash after a short while, is that Muscowy launches ships in the artic. Not sure that bug was corrected.
Ok, there's some issues here. It's 3.1 that's the one we're gonna use, it seems. But the link to dl it is broken. I dunno if it's just for now, but if it isn't there's gotta be another way for me to get the mod. Anyone here feels like uploading it somewhere?
Ampoliros said:
I can't play before 19:00. I should have said this earlier, sorry.
Last edited:
BurningEGO said:
It doesn't beat vanilla for multiplayer. I thought for years it did, but it doesn't.
You can of course still have a fun game with it.
Last edited:
Ulschmidt said:Amp, you're disappointing me. Why did you ask for our preferences if you're placing us wherever you want? the worst part is that you're trying to convince us it's a good starting for everyone.
Excuse me?
I have tried my utmost to respect each and everyone's preferences. Most players have ended up where they wanted to be. This hasn't been the case in your case thus far but let me remind you: this is not a definite roster yet. It is a temporary one and your placing is by no means definite.
I can explain to you, however, why I believed placing you in Austria to be good for the entire campaign. Afaik you are usualy strongly engaged in warfare and concentrate less on economy. Is this correct? (I have never played with you and hence based this on what people that have played you told me).
Now I have taken notice of the fact that you don't want to play Austria and I'm working on another solution so there is no real need for this tantrum here.
Ulschmidt said:Gentleman, say it isn't a matter of reliability, say it's a matter of social class.
What do you mean by this?
Ulschmidt said: