Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

EUIV - Quick Questions / Quick Answers

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Europa Universalis IV 82703 EUIV: Bug Reports 1302 EUIV: Suggestions 19372 EUIV: Technical Support 6879 EUIV: FAQ & Strategy Guides 241 EUIV: AAR's, Let's Plays, and Fan Fiction EU IV: Alternate History Short Story Contest Contr 29
Show only dev responses
If I core one province next to my vasall, will I get my full coring range added to that province?

for example:
I am Hungary and couldnt core in England.
Now for some strange reason Brittany becomes my vasall and I core 1 province next to Brittany. Could I now core something like Hamburg, because my province next to Brittany + coring range?
 
Lordkaiser said:
If I core one province next to my vasall, will I get my full coring range added to that province?

for example:
I am Hungary and couldnt core in England.
Now for some strange reason Brittany becomes my vasall and I core 1 province next to Brittany. Could I now core something like Hamburg, because my province next to Brittany + coring range?
Click to expand...

Yes, your coring range (and also your colonial range) are calculated from any cored province you own.
 
PhoenixG said:
It prevent the AI for declaring war for a year and it gives +20 reason to join your war.
Click to expand...

I think the AI also stops drilling and some other war preparation stuff!

Lordkaiser said:
If I core one province next to my vasall, will I get my full coring range added to that province?

for example:
I am Hungary and couldnt core in England.
Now for some strange reason Brittany becomes my vasall and I core 1 province next to Brittany. Could I now core something like Hamburg, because my province next to Brittany + coring range?
Click to expand...

Indeed; It's a very nice tool for when you are landlocked. Like if you start as any tag in Asia, get down to Malaysia and vassalize Sunda and expand from there. Or go into Manchuria and become Manchu. Countries like Hisn Kayfa suddenly becomes alot easier.
 
I've made the amateur mistake of letting the end-game summary screen pop up before making my usual screenshots in every single map mode.
If I open the timeline, I can make screenshots of political view, but if I click on another map mode, the end game screen pops back up again.
It was Ironman, so no saves from before the very last day.

Is there a console command or anything to help me out here? :/
 
Lordkaiser said:
But it is calculated as a % of something, isnt it?
For example, if I want to reduce the influence of the burghers for 10%, how much Dev do I have to take away from them?
(for example if I have 1000dev total?)
I mean, they get 100% influence way before they own 1000dev. how much do they have to own for 100%?
Click to expand...

According to the wiki, "Influence of an estate increases by 1.5 for every 1% of the nation's total state development it manages, up to a maximum of 40." This maximum of 40 corresponds to 26.67% of your state dev: you can grant more to an estate, but it won't increase its influence.

So it is not your total dev that counts, but your state dev. You can state an area and not fully core the provinces, they will still count. So if you want to reduce the influence of burghers from 10%, you need to take 6.67% of your state dev away from them, and this will cost you 13,3 points of loyalty with this estate.
 
What is the best option to take provinces from nations in north/south america and add them to my Colonial Nations?
It looks that I am not able to fabricate claims on them.
 
grotaclas said:
Because the english channel has a value of 45.84, while Gujarat only has 36.01 (49.73-13.72). For the highest valued trade node, only the value which is retained in the node counts. You can see this values in the trade map mode.
Click to expand...

Then they should rewrite the tooltip for Global Trade. "Node with the highest retained value" would work much better, as trade from Node A pulled forward by Node B still remains Node A's trade.
 
klingonadmiral said:
trade from Node A pulled forward by Node B still remains Node A's trade.
Click to expand...
Can't say I agree with that, as by extension it would mean that any trade brought forward to node A would not be its value as well, leaving each trade node in the world with the static value of its own trade, completely defeating the purpose of the whole mechanic.
I think you're confusing "highest value" with highest local value".
 
Vohen said:
Can't say I agree with that, as by extension it would mean that any trade brought forward to node A would not be its value as well, leaving each trade node in the world with the static value of its own trade, completely defeating the purpose of the whole mechanic.
I think you're confusing "highest value" with highest local value".
Click to expand...

You know what ... you are right.

(I spare you my moans about the horrible Indian trade setup)
 
how do I push my opinion of milan down -7 ?

would justify a trade conflict work? wiki says "have a casus belli" would give -15, but I dont know who gets it and if it works when I already had claims and by that another CB.

milanexpel.jpg
 
Lordkaiser said:
how do I push my opinion of milan down -7 ?

would justify a trade conflict work? wiki says "have a casus belli" would give -15, but I dont know who gets it and if it works when I already had claims and by that another CB.

View attachment 524394
Click to expand...
If you embargo him, it should work. It would give him a cb (with the opinion malus). unless he decide to embargo you back (which removes the cb)
 
Lordkaiser said:
how do I push my opinion of milan down -7 ?

would justify a trade conflict work? wiki says "have a casus belli" would give -15, but I dont know who gets it and if it works when I already had claims and by that another CB.

View attachment 524394
Click to expand...

I still would like to know how to excommunicate them.
they have so many such high dev provinces..
 
I know that HRE cannot form the Roman Empire, but is it possible to do the opposite and pass the HRE reforms as Rome? Will it matter that all provinces leaves the HRE upon taking the "Restore the Roman Empire" decision, apart from being able to re-add them for more authority?
 
Lordkaiser said:
how do I push my opinion of milan down -7 ?

would justify a trade conflict work? wiki says "have a casus belli" would give -15, but I dont know who gets it and if it works when I already had claims and by that another CB.

View attachment 524394
Click to expand...

The obvious mean is the insult letter, especially the scornful one if you have the right DLC (Dharma? Golden Century?).
 
cuendillar said:
I know that HRE cannot form the Roman Empire, but is it possible to do the opposite and pass the HRE reforms as Rome? Will it matter that all provinces leaves the HRE upon taking the "Restore the Roman Empire" decision, apart from being able to re-add them for more authority?
Click to expand...
The Roman Empire can form the HRE. Budgetmonk did that when going for One Tag Roman Culture.
 
cuendillar said:
I know that HRE cannot form the Roman Empire, but is it possible to do the opposite and pass the HRE reforms as Rome? Will it matter that all provinces leaves the HRE upon taking the "Restore the Roman Empire" decision, apart from being able to re-add them for more authority?
Click to expand...
If you have passed the Erbkaisertum it does not matter at all that your land leaves the HRE. Infact this is the only way (without purposely losing a war) that allows you to move your capital outside the realm (because even your capital leaves the Empire.
If you have not passed Erbkaisertum it could be that a new emperor is elected.


Now to my question:
Wiki says that to form yuan I have to either be the celestial empire or have destroyed it while being my own Empire.
The thing is that I'd like to reform the Mongol empire and I don't know which approach I should take to become yuan (I'm oriat), as I know that becoming the EoC changes my government type to the Chinese one, besides of that I'd have to deal with a weak mandate etc which would slow down my conquest and take a long time to stabilise (although I have to admit that my hord nation is extremely unstable as well as I've gone through one bankruptcy and keep losing money even after its end).
Also I am confused about the decision description on the wiki.
The mandate of heaven says that it disables all decisions that changes my government type, while the Mongol empire decision says it destroys the mandate if it exists, even if I am the emperor?
Will I when have the decision to form the Mongol empire?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back