Provided that we have a world conquest going on, it's past 1700 and we have a bit to go.. Regarding war exhaustion and call for peace. In the grand scheme of things how much does the increased coring cost matter? Currently in the above scenario the biggest enemy is coring time. There's stratetical value in waging multiple wars at once, but they're won so quickly that call for peace surfaces. So we can either accept that, or peace out to core, but then over extension will be through the roof.
So, we can either eat WE, OE or risk not succeeding at all, unless I'm missing something.
With WE we have increased coring costs.
With OE we have rebels, practically no foreign trade power (perhaps negligible ) and reduced diplo reputation, meaning lower vassal integration speed.
Don't want either but will probably have to choose. Which scenario is probably less worse? Or is there something more to evaluate ?
So, we can either eat WE, OE or risk not succeeding at all, unless I'm missing something.
With WE we have increased coring costs.
With OE we have rebels, practically no foreign trade power (perhaps negligible ) and reduced diplo reputation, meaning lower vassal integration speed.
Don't want either but will probably have to choose. Which scenario is probably less worse? Or is there something more to evaluate ?