-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Leap would be from the current 1903 to a whole new imagining of the world in 1910 - so some alt hist, but those not thrown too far off course would also happen historically.
3 is best choice indeed.
2 is just dumb, I am not going to start again.
1 will never happen, we will find another to GM this game if you leave.
2 is just dumb, I am not going to start again.
1 will never happen, we will find another to GM this game if you leave.
Thanks for clarification, Keld. With that in mind, I change my vote to option 3.
2- My reasoning here is that the game got torn up by just ridiculous things happening and then players leaving. Just going forward won't fix the fact the early timeline got screwed up quite badly due to a "I felt like it" decision that had no bearing or purpose in IC resulting in quite a lot of arguments/disagreements (on my part at least).
But do we really want to lose 4 turns of progress? The Balkan War would have to be re-fought, as would the Second Boer War.
I vote for 3. If there has been idiotic decisions, that is part of the game. Perhaps turning the game into a regular 1 player, 1 nation would end this problems, since currently we are too few to cover those who resign.
Can I ask, WHo will get to keep their currant roles, and who will be moved/can move? If At all possible, I would like to retain my Role as The French Left.
