Who would ever do such a thingMake sense but we probably should stop at page 337 for one day to not break the prophecy, would be a shame to have someone posting a message and making it one more page than the prophecy wantef
Who would ever do such a thingMake sense but we probably should stop at page 337 for one day to not break the prophecy, would be a shame to have someone posting a message and making it one more page than the prophecy wantef
I do think the game is further along than the 26ers would guess. they saw bad UI and lacking optimisation and assumed that would take a year to fix. I do think that they should polish this game as much as possible before releasing it, though obviously there will still be bugs. I dont mind certain countries having less/no flavour than others as this is sure to be perfected in DLC, but core features should all work as intended. its already better than VIC3 which has so little flavour, and had virtually none at launchMy objective is to get people to stop complaining/making bad reviews if a game has some issues at launch so that the devs do not have the concerns you highlight. If people want a more polished game before they play, then they can wait until the game is in the state they want. But to make the rest of us suffer because of it just seems like wanton cruelty. I am pissed beyond belief that I might have to wait longer to get my hands on the game because some people bitch about issues and leave negative reviews. I have played every single instalment of EUIV from release and always focused on the joy of getting new content rather than issues. Of course there have been issues, as there will be with EUV, and constructive feedback to help fix them is a good thing. However, expecting a game to be highly polished at release only serves to delay the release and the more comprehensive testing that will occur when fans gets their hands on it.
Brothers in schizo! To mend the current schism, I propose a compromise solution. Most here agree that waiting with the release until the prophesied Holy Page of 1337 would take to long. My suggestion is Early Access at page 337 and a proper full release at page 1337. There is nothing in the scripture that would preclude this.
Let's unite the faith again!
The major problem I had with the UI before wasn't really the artistry, it was how much wasted space there was. EU4's UI - while often obtuse - is relatively compact so you can easily see more of the screen, whereas EU5 made the game looked cramped from how much space the various menus and UI elements took up, and most of that space was just negative space where no useful information was displayed.Also they have mentioned the UI is much better now. Not that i had any problem with it originally given im artistically blind on everything except good country borders
Judging from what YouTubers who have maintained access after the May announcement event have said, it is neither badly optimized nor unfinished. The problems they actually have are UI, balancing, and flavor events. They have fully functional content and gameplay from 1337 through to 1837.
My objective is to get people to stop complaining/making bad reviews if a game has some issues at launch so that the devs do not have the concerns you highlight. If people want a more polished game before they play, then they can wait until the game is in the state they want. But to make the rest of us suffer because of it just seems like wanton cruelty. I am pissed beyond belief that I might have to wait longer to get my hands on the game because some people bitch about issues and leave negative reviews. I have played every single instalment of EUIV from release and always focused on the joy of getting new content rather than issues. Of course there have been issues, as there will be with EUV, and constructive feedback to help fix them is a good thing. However, expecting a game to be highly polished at release only serves to delay the release and the more comprehensive testing that will occur when fans gets their hands on it.
Maybe... we didn't see the youtubers playing the actual game version. Maybe they played a future version...Because we have seen it is in a playable state
Would still be better than not having a game to play at all
Maybe... we didn't see the youtubers playing the actual game version. Maybe they played a future version...
Just think about it...
Yeah that would be wildWho would ever do such a thing![]()
It make sense to release when the game is ready but atleast we can have another saturday buildings or something like thatAs someone who is a Paradox fan, is now working at Paradox, and currently able to play EU5 freely. I personally disagree.
Same as with any game in development, there are a plethora of things that require polish, tweaking, fixing, etc.
Is the game "Playable"? Yes, like Johan has said it's technically been "playable" for a long while. But playable =/= ready for release. I suspect many would ask us "Why would you release it in such a state" if we decided to release it on a whim, rightfully so.
Do I expect a perfect release? No, there's always things we don't catch or things that require more tweaks. With a game as complex and content filled as EUV that applies even more so. I believe a "Release when we are ready" policy works a lot better regardless.
Firstly, so jealous that you can play EUV when you want. Secondly, the problem is that by showing us the game, not in the form of TT’s but in the form of actual gameplay videos, you have essentially reduced EUIV to a pale imitation that at least I am unable to enjoy as before. I think you made a mistake in doing the announcement without a release date. You are not even giving us a continuous supply of new gameplay videos to tide us over until release, meaning we are stuck rewatching the same videos ad infernitum. The best analogy is a drug dealer giving addicts a taste of a new super drug, getting them hooked, and then saying, I will let you know in future when you can get more.As someone who is a Paradox fan, is now working at Paradox, and currently able to play EU5 freely. I personally disagree.
Same as with any game in development, there are a plethora of things that require polish, tweaking, fixing, etc.
Is the game "Playable"? Yes, like Johan has said it's technically been "playable" for a long while. But playable =/= ready for release. I suspect many would ask us "Why would you release it in such a state" if we decided to release it on a whim, rightfully so.
Do I expect a perfect release? No, there's always things we don't catch or things that require more tweaks. With a game as complex and content filled as EUV that applies even more so. I believe a "Release when we are ready" policy works a lot better regardless.
Maybe make people sign NDAs?In a perfect world I'd tend to agree with Rule Britannia, i.e, release the game as is warning it IS an unfinished product and fix as it goes. But that is basically an EA, and while I (and I suspect, a lot of other people) am able to grasp that, I do understand for the overall marketing it could (and most likely, would) go desastrously with people holding the game to a higher standard than an EA would warrant. And indeed, no amount of disclaimer could avoid that, and long term, it WOULD mean a worse game as the initial bad press would mean less commands, and less money on the long run to support the game.
So basically it is annoying but I don't see any realistic way to get anything better, so I just hope PDX gets the time needed to do a good product.
As someone who is a Paradox fan, is now working at Paradox, and currently able to play EU5 freely. I personally disagree.
Same as with any game in development, there are a plethora of things that require polish, tweaking, fixing, etc.
Is the game "Playable"? Yes, like Johan has said it's technically been "playable" for a long while. But playable =/= ready for release. I suspect many would ask us "Why would you release it in such a state" if we decided to release it on a whim, rightfully so.
Do I expect a perfect release? No, there's always things we don't catch or things that require more tweaks. With a game as complex and content filled as EUV that applies even more so. I believe a "Release when we are ready" policy works a lot better regardless.
and currently able to play EU5 freely
Agree with this completely, except we didn't even get to try the drug, we just watched other people get high and talk about getting high.Firstly, so jealous that you can play EUV when you want. Secondly, the problem is that by showing us the game, not in the form of TT’s but in the form of actual gameplay videos, you have essentially reduced EUIV to a pale imitation that at least I am unable to enjoy as before. I think you made a mistake in doing the announcement without a release date. You are not even giving us a continuous supply of new gameplay videos to tide us over until release, meaning we are stuck rewatching the same videos ad infernitum. The best analogy is a drug dealer giving addicts a taste of a new super drug, getting them hooked, and then saying, I will let you know in future when you can get more.
Its all well and good for you having access and playing it already <insert_cry_emoji_here>
But you are right it's better to wait for a game to be how the devs want it to be for us at the end of the day. As one of the people who was beyond hyped, a lot of it has kinda vanished as it looked that the Game Release or Game Release Announcement felt imminent. With the streamer footage and things they said like, "Optimisation takes place at the end of the game dev cycle and that's the stage they are in"
Then the release of the OST a month or two after with a massive ramp up of map updates and flavour, it seemed primed for a release very soon TM. And this probably has lead to some disappointment from ones here.
In saying that, keep doing what yous do. The game looks absolutely amazing. I can't wait to get the super special extreme deluxe special edition. And when its ready (hopefully this year) i am going to absolutely no life it. Thanks again for everything! And RENAME IRISH TO GAELIC CULTURE PLEASE![]()
I'd be really interested in knowing what happened there at some point in the future, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.Thanks for the support!
I understand the frustration with things like OST and Content Creator videos going out followed by nothing. Though sadly I can't comment on it.