Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

HoI2 ARMA 1.3b multiplayer on Gameranger

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Guess i shouldnt expect an answer to a fair question. Next time i will just take the blame for your errors and not question it huh?


-A host who stacks the team in his favour and subs the german player and stymees the Axis team by throwing noobs in willy nilly to benefit himself.
-Shit Rules made by a noob with little Mp experience.
-Shit strategy that backfires....... yet blame the guys who have only been in the war 60 days and allready managed to make progress last session. Squandered this session because you lack the skills to micromanage your convoys efficiently. how you fucked up all those convoys i had setup is beyond me. Uk was in a good position for recovery last session, yet your hopelessness at managing convoys is your biggest downfall.

To the rest of the players here some i have played with before and some i presently play with in other games. I cannot tolerate this lodonoob anylonger. Im out of this game.. Im sorry to you all for doing this but i will not tolerate being rediculed by some little euro punk who thinks the game is all about winning in 1939, whilst he subs the most important players in the game to serve his own purpose. It's really no wonder he is such a shit player who blames others for his losses.

Your rules are shit and they match your playing skills lodo. you need to grow up and stop accuing players for things that you yourself fucked up. If you dont play against half decent players and just keep subbing noobs every session of course you will think you are the man, when in fact you are dog shit.

Pepsi and hax, im sorry to you guys the most as i respect you both as adversarys and i was looking forward to a good fight against use, win or loose.

In the interests of the game though im bowing out. I hope to see you others in a game soon with fair rules and serious players who dont accuse there allys of there own mistakes, as i simply cannot play another session listening to BS from a noob who has more XP in SP then in MP.
 
Last edited:
never get this problem in aussie/nz group. as everyone works together and doesnt ridicule there allies when something goes wrong. We also dont sub the most important players in the game. so if your keen for a real challenge be in gayranger at 18cet tomorrow.

pepsi could use a good italy i suspect.
 
This is why I didn't want to sub for Germany as I get the blame if it all turns to custard. In aussie/nz group we all rip on each other but its not serious. Pepsii gets ripped on for being French and Angryginga is from Chch and he loses to the AI.
 
That's what i said from the start of the game/session to hax/citizen/hojo/zard.

1) Italy is basically german puppet. Germany decides what is the european axis strategy. Italy has no word to say unless germany allows it.
2) In all cases, Italy should be confident on germany. Japan and Italy can give their opinion to make the global strategy more efficient.
3) Germany-Japan have to play on their own. If you start doing plans in 1936 until 1941-42...if ONE thing doesnt work as expected all those years and IC are wasted, and the war is probably lost. This is exactly what happened.....you really thought i would let you escape and crush germany in 1942 ?

For the allies, just replace Italy-UK, Ger-USA, Sov-Jap.

Some others things :

1) I find it bad to leave/threat to leave the game like that.....i still think this is not the best solution to solve problems. All of us already got crushed in a game. All of us have been new to hoi one day (unless geofactor, he is a dinosaur).

2) The fact you are new doesn't mean you are noob. Hojo is new but he made much better than i would expect. Hax also did great things (allied planes in narvik, then oslo....)

3) Allies are not dead, this is absolutely obvious. But if allies doesnt re-think their strategy...those fails will become much harder to recover.

4) For the MG-Lodovico conflict, for me this is absolutely obvious that the main errors have been made by Lodovico. Hax also clearly saw that against Mighty G i was fighting for survival ... while against lodovico, I only limited myself to wait until he makes a mistake to use it (in this case the empty province near karachi and the convoys). This is not only a strategic problem, but also a troops managements problem.

5)...but lodovico shouldnt be blamed for everything. Did MG took his responsibilities and tell Lodovico what to do, even before he entered the war ? even before he began to fight me ?
 
It has become very clear to me now what has happened......Balderdash!!!......yes thats right...Balderdash!!! so now the usa has no choice but to research and use it asap!!!.......Balderdash!!!
 
btw....ill be here next sat.....and if any one was wondering why i was so quiet during the game? i was told long ago, if ya cant say anything nice. dont say anything at all
 
Ok. I apologize for being rude. I made some mistakes but they are not fatal. I came to India because MG was boasting about his powerful navy and told me he would be able to finish off Japan in several months. The problem was bad communication between me and Kyber on one side and MG on the other one. MG should have told us realistic plans of him, not fantasies. I shouldn't have relied on his navy which proved useless against much weaker Japanese navy covered by planes.

Also, MG didn't even read the rules and he breached them for several times. He didn't know until 41 that SU would stand against China and Japan too. He funded Japanese IC buildup which I still don't understand. Oh yes, he didn't read the trade rules...

I will send a PM to MG soon.
 
Last edited:
ill come crawling back like a cockroach, i always do :p Lets just agree to move forward and deal with the problems at hand in game.
 
LodovicoAriosto said:
Also, MG didn't even read the rules and he breached them for several times. He didn't know until 41 that SU would stand against China and Japan too. He funded Japanese IC buildup which I still don't understand. Oh yes, he didn't read the trade rules...

I will send a PM to MG soon.
Click to expand...

Wut? There are trade rules? :eek:
Glad you you made up.
Now, time for a new Chinese Empire!
 
you saved europes ass twice? Are you freakking kidding me? In ww1 americans only came in at the end of the war, when germany was exausted and in ww2 the entire western allies had trouble facing an undertrainned wehrmacht and whose 80% of forces were concentrated in the east against the soviets, and you saved europe? Suuure.
 
Colonel_General said:
you saved europes ass twice? Are you freakking kidding me? In ww1 americans only came in at the end of the war, when germany was exausted and in ww2 the entire western allies had trouble facing an undertrainned wehrmacht and whose 80% of forces were concentrated in the east against the soviets, and you saved europe? Suuure.
Click to expand...

Are you sure you don't have the wrong thread?
 
I see an alliance as a football(soccer) team. All players must play together, that way they will win. (Barcelona ;))
You can't say that only 1 player(in this case 1 country) is the only player.
Of course as in football there is some players which are better and more skilled(Messi) but still it's teamplay that is the winning way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back