Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

Kingdom of Jerusalem

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
unmerged(51378)

unmerged(51378)

Field Marshal
Dec 5, 2005
2.893
0
This thread is for everything regarding KoJ and also things affecting KoJ.

New random events. :)

event = {
id = XXX
random = yes
country = JER
trigger = {
OR = {
religion = catholic
religion = counterreform
}
name = "Wave of Crusaders"
desc = "Although the Crusades have ended, waves of Crusaders could sometimes appear."
style = 1
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
offset = 3600
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1520 }
action_a = {
name = "Welcome!"
command = { type = INF which = -2 value = 2000 }
command = { type = CAV which = -2 value = 1000 }
}
}
Click to expand...
 
Redone. :)

event = {
id = 534107
random = no
country = JER
trigger = {
control = { province = 489 data = JER }
NOT = { owned = { province = 489 data = JER } }
}
date = { day = 1 month = june year = 1492 }
offset = 360
deathdate = { day = 30 month = december year = 1819 }
name = "The Sack of Baghdad"
desc = "When the Crusaders captured Baghdad, the temptation to loot and plunder was just a little too much..."
style = 4
action_a = {
name = "Sack the city!"
command = { type = cash value = 1000 }
command = { type = badboy value = 2 }
command = { type = relation which = CAL value = -400 }
command = { type = relation which = OMA value = -200 }
command = { type = relation which = TUR value = -200 }
command = { type = relation which = FAT value = -200 }
command = { type = relation which = EGY value = -200 }
command = { type = relation which = MAM value = -200 }
command = { type = relation which = ARA value = -200 }
command = { type = relation which = TEK value = -200 }
command = { type = relation which = CAN value = -200 }
command = { type = relation which = KAR value = -200 }
command = { type = trigger which = 534108 }
}
}
Click to expand...

I removed action_b as preventing the crusaders from looting Bagdad would have been as impossible as it would have been too stop them from looting Constantinople after the Fourth Crusade.
 
SunZyl said:
Redone. :)



I removed action_b as preventing the crusaders from looting Bagdad would have been as impossible as it would have been too stop them from looting Constantinople after the Fourth Crusade.
Click to expand...

Everbody is intrested in looting Baghdad lately ;)
 
Avernite said:
I still wonder why that event can only trigger in 1492...

Glitch, intentional? :confused:
Click to expand...

Not sure, but I have been reworking the file and it can now trigger at any time.

I don't agree with removing option B. Players need to be able to make choices, and one cannot say that such destruction would have been 'inevitable'. It has an 8% chance of not happening with the ai, pretty fair, I'd say.

I added more to the impact, including a loss of more pop and the COT.

I also already removed the Troops for the KoJ events. Check out the new stuff in 6.17, out in about an hour.
 
Last edited:
MattyG said:
I don't agree with removing option B. Players need to be able to make choices, and one cannot say that such destruction would have been 'inevitable'. It has an 8% chance of not happening with the ai, pretty fair, I'd say.
Click to expand...

Well. Say that the fields ain't good in 1434. Should we player suddnly get to CHOOSE whetever the fields sucked or not?

MattyG said:
I added more to the impact, including a loss of more pop and the COT.
Click to expand...

Good.

MattyG said:
I also already removed the Troops for the KoJ events. Check out the new stuff in 6.17, out in about an hour.
Click to expand...

Excellent!
 
Whatever. I want to get the monarchnumbers on the kings of Jerusalem right, so I want to know; Would anyone complain if I do a new monarchlist from scratch after the success of the Third Crusade?
 
Either way, I did it. Adopt it if you want or throw it in the trash bin if you want. :rofl:

???? - 1194: Guy I de Lusignan (Reinstalled)
1194 - 1205: Amalric II de Lusignan
1205 - 1207: Baldwin VI
1207 - 1234: Henry I
1234 - 1240: James I
1240 - 1242: Baldwin VII
1242 - 1267: Charles I of Sicily
1268 - 1294: Charles II
1294 - 1297: James II
1297 - 1304: Henry II
1304 - 1312: Roger I of Damascus
1312 - 1317: James III
1317 - 1320: Charles III
1320 - 1333: Jean I
1333 - 1357: Conrad I of Germany
1357 - 1360: Frederick I of Germany
1360 - 1365: Henry III
1365 - 1387: Henry IV
1387 - 1402: Henry V

:)
 
MattyG said:
I added more to the impact, including a loss of more pop and the COT.
Click to expand...

I must protest, since when did conquest of a region warrent it's loss of 'importance' as a trade center? Also, I think it could easily be abused by players - that is to say, in my opinion at least. I fear players will make it a priority to capture Baghdad (Ill-Khans) or Crusaders.....

dunno really, seems somewhat unfair to me. Perhaps a better simulation is that IF IRAQ is owned by Jeruslem, it loses it's cot.
 
Calipah said:
I must protest, since when did conquest of a region warrent it's loss of 'importance' as a trade center? Also, I think it could easily be abused by players - that is to say, in my opinion at least. I fear players will make it a priority to capture Baghdad (Ill-Khans) or Crusaders.....

dunno really, seems somewhat unfair to me. Perhaps a better simulation is that IF IRAQ is owned by Jeruslem, it loses it's cot.
Click to expand...

Agreed. I do, howeve, think more people should be killed.
 
Calipah said:
I must protest, since when did conquest of a region warrent it's loss of 'importance' as a trade center? Also, I think it could easily be abused by players - that is to say, in my opinion at least. I fear players will make it a priority to capture Baghdad (Ill-Khans) or Crusaders.....

dunno really, seems somewhat unfair to me. Perhaps a better simulation is that IF IRAQ is owned by Jeruslem, it loses it's cot.
Click to expand...

Hmmm. Interesting, because youn praised the Il-Khanate event and it had the loss of the CoT.

These events represent the destruction of the city, it's looting and pillaging. It's a pretty dramatic and traumatic event. Infrastructure gone, investor confidence destroyed, the administrators of trade killed off or exiled.

Remember that ONLY Jerusalem and the Il-Khanate have these events. It's not something a player of Armenia can do. These two countries are the 'long-time foes' of the Caliphate, and it's a scenario that we have built together. I don't think its far-fetched or unfair. However, I DO think that we need to have an event that allows for Baghdad to be rebuilt if destroyed and which would eventually become a CoT again. We'd have to do it this way, because Baghdad is not in Europe, and the game stupidly allows only for countries with European capitals to get new CoTs.
 
Maybe have the event that triggers for the Caliphate be a prerequisite for a random event for them, titled something like 'rebuilding Baghdad' which gives the CoT, and maybe some BTV, back in exchange for some money?
 
Would you guys mind awfully if I gave Cyprus to Knights Templar?

Say that the Third Crusade was successfull. Then Richard Lionheart would have been much more eager to reinstall his favorite Guy as king instead of Conrad.

When he took Cyprus from Isaac Komnenos, he sold it to Knigts Templar. They became very inpopular with the orthodox population. So, when Guy was denied the throne and Conrad took it, Knights Templar gave it to Guy. But what if Guy became king, as he would have been, logically. Then they would most likely still have been in position of Cyprus.

So, I think we should give Cyprus to Knights Templar.
 
MattyG said:
Hmmm. Interesting, because youn praised the Il-Khanate event and it had the loss of the CoT.

These events represent the destruction of the city, it's looting and pillaging. It's a pretty dramatic and traumatic event. Infrastructure gone, investor confidence destroyed, the administrators of trade killed off or exiled.

Remember that ONLY Jerusalem and the Il-Khanate have these events. It's not something a player of Armenia can do. These two countries are the 'long-time foes' of the Caliphate, and it's a scenario that we have built together. I don't think its far-fetched or unfair. However, I DO think that we need to have an event that allows for Baghdad to be rebuilt if destroyed and which would eventually become a CoT again. We'd have to do it this way, because Baghdad is not in Europe, and the game stupidly allows only for countries with European capitals to get new CoTs.
Click to expand...

Well putting it that way, it makes sense.
 
SunZyl said:
Would you guys mind awfully if I gave Cyprus to Knights Templar?

Say that the Third Crusade was successfull. Then Richard Lionheart would have been much more eager to reinstall his favorite Guy as king instead of Conrad.

When he took Cyprus from Isaac Komnenos, he sold it to Knigts Templar. They became very inpopular with the orthodox population. So, when Guy was denied the throne and Conrad took it, Knights Templar gave it to Guy. But what if Guy became king, as he would have been, logically. Then they would most likely still have been in position of Cyprus.

So, I think we should give Cyprus to Knights Templar.
Click to expand...

I have also some plans for the Knights Templar. Also, Cyrus is where the KoJ current flee to if Jerusalem is captured.

I'd like you and I to work on a plan for the Templars. Have a read of the Templar event in the KoJ with the new text.

I thought that we could have a weak monarch in about 1430s that precipitated the Templars 'taking over' the administration of the realm or imposing themselves on it significantly.

Not that the Cyrus idea isn't a good one. Maybe that's what could happen as a result of the tussle between the king and the Templars. Either they take control of the Kingdom, or else they are given Cyrus (or retreat their and capture it?)
 
MattyG said:
I have also some plans for the Knights Templar. Also, Cyrus is where the KoJ current flee to if Jerusalem is captured.

I'd like you and I to work on a plan for the Templars. Have a read of the Templar event in the KoJ with the new text.

I thought that we could have a weak monarch in about 1430s that precipitated the Templars 'taking over' the administration of the realm or imposing themselves on it significantly.

Not that the Cyrus idea isn't a good one. Maybe that's what could happen as a result of the tussle between the king and the Templars. Either they take control of the Kingdom, or else they are given Cyrus (or retreat their and capture it?)
Click to expand...

What about inheriting Knights Templar if they loses Jerusalem and move to Cyprus. No B choice, no acceptation from Knights Templar, just BANG! Then there would be some actual point beside roleplaying in defending Jerusalem as Knights Templar. Also I'm afraid I can't read it until Thursday, and on Friday evening I depart for Italy where I'll stay in 1.5-2.0 weeks.

Otherwise that's a pretty good idea.
 
event = {
id = 534061
random = no
country = JER
trigger = {
atwar = no
religion = catholic
owned = { province = 493 data = JER }
NOT = {
leader = 31083
leader = 31084
leader = 31087 #If implemented
}
}
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
offset = 7200
deathdate = { day = 30 month = december year = 1819 }
name = "The Rise of the Knights Templar"
desc = "EVENTHIST3002"

action_a = {
name = "Openly support and encourage the Knights"
command = { type = relation which = PAP value = 200 }
command = { type = relation which = HUN value = -150 }
command = { type = relation which = MLO value = -150 }
command = { type = relation which = GEN value = -150 }
command = { type = relation which = SAV value = -150 }
command = { type = relation which = BAY value = -150 }
command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 3 }
command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = -2 }
command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -2 }
command = { type = domestic which = quality value = 1 }
command = { type = inflation value = -2 }
command = { type = trade value = 1000 }
command = { type = infra value = 1000 }
command = { type = cash value = 300 }
}
action_b = {
name = "Support the Knights, but keep them under control"
command = { type = relation which = PAP value = 50 }
command = { type = relation which = HUN value = -50 }
command = { type = relation which = MLO Value = -50 }
command = { type = relation which = GEN value = -50 }
command = { type = relation which = SAV value = -50 }
command = { type = relation which = BAY value = -50 }
command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = -1 }
command = { type = trade value = 500 }
}
action_c = {
name = "Burn their leaders at the stake and seize their assets!"
command = { type = stability value = -3 }
command = { type = revolt which = -1 }
command = { type = revolt which = -3 }
command = { type = revolt which = -1 }
command = { type = revolt which = -3 }
command = { type = relation which = PAP value = -250 }
command = { type = relation which = HUN value = 200 }
command = { type = relation which = MLO value = 200 }
command = { type = relation which = GEN value = 200 }
command = { type = relation which = SAV value = 200 }
command = { type = relation which = BAY value = 200 }
command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = 1 }
command = { type = cash value = 500 }
command = { type = sleepleader which = 31083 }
command = { type = sleepleader which = 31084 }
}
}
Click to expand...

I added the atwar = no, as _no one_ would be mad enough to burn the leaders of the Templars on the stacke during war. I also added that the leaders aren't at your side as it would be ugly if you burn the Grand Master and he still fight for you. I also removed command to sleep the various sackings as I can't see why Knights Templar would be essential for sacking some cities. I can understand the idea of having the opportunity of not being catholic as the KoJ, but a non-catholic Knights Templar is just too ridiciolous.
 
Last edited:
Changed some names & numbers & stats on the Kings of Jerusalem.

#########################################################
#
# Monarchs for The Kingdom of Jerusalem in Aberration:
# IDs: 31021 - 31070
# By Robert Jackson "Artemis667"
# Modified a bit by SunZyl
##########################################################

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31021 }
name = "Baldwin VIII"
startdate = { year = 1400 }
enddate = {
day = 15
month = october
year = 1424
}
DIP = 8
ADM = 7
MIL = 8
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31022 }
name = "Philip I"
startdate = {
day = 15
month = october
year = 1424
}
enddate = {
day = 10
month = june
year = 1457
}
DIP = 5
ADM = 3
MIL = 2
dormant = no
#SunZyl's note: The weak king, used for templars
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31023 }
name = "Amalric III"
startdate = {
day = 10
month = june
year = 1457
}
enddate = {
day = 2
month = february
year = 1464
}
DIP = 7
ADM = 7
MIL = 6
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31024 }
name = "Henry VI"
startdate = {
day = 2
month = february
year = 1464
}
enddate = {
day = 17
month = may
year = 1478
}
DIP = 7
ADM = 8
MIL = 7
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31025 }
name = "Amalric IV"
startdate = {
day = 17
month = may
year = 1478
}
enddate = {
day = 2
month = january
year = 1483
}
DIP = 5
ADM = 4
MIL = 6
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31026 }
name = "Hugh I"
startdate = {
day = 2
month = january
year = 1483
}
enddate = {
day = 17
month = may
year = 1486
}
DIP = 5
ADM = 5
MIL = 4
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31027 }
name = "Charles III"
startdate = {
day = 17
month = may
year = 1486
}
enddate = {
day = 9
month = october
year = 1497
}
DIP = 5
ADM = 5
MIL = 6
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31028 }
name = "Amalric V"
startdate = {
day = 9
month = october
year = 1497
}
enddate = {
day = 4
month = march
year = 1517
}
DIP = 6
ADM = 5
MIL = 5
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31029 }
name = "Hugh II"
startdate = {
day = 4
month = june
year = 1517
}
enddate = {
day = 19
month = october
year = 1548
}
DIP = 9
ADM = 9
MIL = 6
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31030 }
name = "Thomas I"
startdate = {
day = 19
month = october
year = 1548
}
enddate = {
day = 4
month = january
year = 1567
}
DIP = 4
ADM = 5
MIL = 4
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31031 }
name = "Philip II"
startdate = {
day = 4
month = january
year = 1567
}
enddate = {
day = 9
month = september
year = 1590
}
DIP = 6
ADM = 6
MIL = 7
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31032 }
name = "John I"
startdate = {
day = 9
month = september
year = 1590
}
enddate = {
day = 25
month = may
year = 1621
}
DIP = 6
ADM = 7
MIL = 8
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31033 }
name = "Baldwin IX"
startdate = {
day = 25
month = may
year = 1621
}
enddate = {
day = 8
month = october
year = 1626
}
DIP = 4
ADM = 6
MIL = 4
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31034 }
name = "Henry VII"
startdate = {
day = 8
month = october
year = 1626
}
enddate = {
day = 15
month = november
year = 1640
}
DIP = 6
ADM = 5
MIL = 5
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31035 }
name = "Charles III"
startdate = {
day = 15
month = november
year = 1640
}
enddate = {
day = 15
month = april
year = 1648
}
DIP = 4
ADM = 5
MIL = 5
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31036 }
name = "Thomas II"
startdate = {
day = 15
month = april
year = 1648
}
enddate = {
day = 8
month = may
year = 1650
}
DIP = 7
ADM = 6
MIL = 7
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31037 }
name = "Henry VIII"
startdate = {
day = 8
month = may
year = 1650
}
enddate = {
day = 5
month = april
year = 1658
}
DIP = 5
ADM = 8
MIL = 6
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31038 }
name = "Baldwin X"
startdate = {
day = 5
month = april
year = 1658
}
enddate = {
day = 9
month = september
year = 1678
}
DIP = 8
ADM = 5
MIL = 6
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31039 }
name = "Philip III"
startdate = {
day = 9
month = september
year = 1678
}
enddate = {
day = 5
month = march
year = 1709
}
DIP = 5
ADM = 4
MIL = 6
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31040 }
name = "John II"
startdate = {
day = 5
month = march
year = 1709
}
enddate = {
day = 18
month = april
year = 1752
}
DIP = 7
ADM = 6
MIL = 5
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31041 }
name = "Louis I"
startdate = {
day = 18
month = april
year = 1752
}
enddate = {
day = 12
month = june
year = 1780
}
DIP = 5
ADM = 6
MIL = 5
dormant = no
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31042 }
name = "Charles IV"
startdate = {
day = 12
month = june
year = 1780
}
enddate = {
day = 7
month = august
year = 1796
}
DIP = 5
ADM = 3
MIL = 6
}

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31043 }
name = "Henry IX"
startdate = {
day = 7
month = august
year = 1796
}
enddate = { year = 1825 }
DIP = 3
ADM = 3
MIL = 2
}
Click to expand...
 
Changed some names of the kings, and changed a few stats. Also added a bit of new ones.

#########################################################
#
# Leaders for The Kingdom of Jerusalem in Aberration:
# IDs: 31071 - 31100
# By Robert Jackson "Artemis667"
# Modifications and new ones by SunZyl
##########################################################

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31071 }
category = monarch
name = "Baldwin V"
startdate = {
year = 1400
}
deathdate = {
day = 6
month = november
year = 1424
}
rank = 0
movement = 4
fire = 3
shock = 3
siege = 0
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31072 }
category = monarch
name = "Philip I"
startdate = {
day = 24
month = february
year = 1423
}
deathdate = {
day = 28
month = march
year = 1449
}
rank = 0
movement = 2
fire = 3
shock = 1
siege = 0
#SunZyl's note: Modified, a bit worse
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31073 }
category = general
name = "Henry de Ligny"
startdate = {
day = 18
month = april
year = 1420
}
deathdate = {
day = 9
month = may
year = 1437
}
rank = 0
movement = 4
fire = 3
shock = 3
siege = 1
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31074 }
category = general
name = "Godfrey de Lyon"
startdate = {
day = 9
month = june
year = 1435
}
deathdate = {
day = 19
month = july
year = 1447
}
rank = 3
movement = 5
fire = 4
shock = 4
siege = 1
#SunZyl's note: Changed name
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31075 }
category = general
name = "Sigurd"
startdate = {
day = 5
month = november
year = 1441
}
deathdate = {
day = 2
month = january
year = 1453
}
rank = 2
movement = 4
fire = 3
shock = 3
siege = 0
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31076 }
category = admiral
name = "Renaud"
startdate = {
day = 9
month = december
year = 1443
}
deathdate = {
day = 25
month = november
year = 1468
}
rank = 0
movement = 3
fire = 4
shock = 3
siege = 0
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31077 }
category = monarch
name = "Henry VI"
startdate = {
day = 8
month = june
year = 1464
}
deathdate = {
day = 16
month = may
year = 1478
}
rank = 0
movement = 3
fire = 3
shock = 3
siege = 0
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31078 }
category = monarch
name = "Philip II"
startdate = {
day = 8
month = february
year = 1569
}
deathdate = {
day = 18
month = october
year = 1587
}
rank = 0
movement = 2
fire = 3
shock = 2
siege = 1
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31079 }
category = monarch
name = "John I"
startdate = {
day = 15
month = march
year = 1593
}
deathdate = {
day = 19
month = june
year = 1604
}
rank = 0
movement = 4
fire = 4
shock = 5
siege = 1
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31080 }
category = general
name = "Lawrence"
startdate = {
day = 9
month = june
year = 1484
}
deathdate = {
day = 13
month = august
year = 1535
}
rank = 0
movement = 5
fire = 3
shock = 5
siege = 1
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31081 }
category = general
name = "Curtis"
startdate = {
day = 18
month = august
year = 1512
}
deathdate = {
day = 10
month = june
year = 1550
}
rank = 2
movement = 4
fire = 3
shock = 3
siege = 0
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31082 }
category = general
name = "Maurin"
startdate = {
day = 16
month = june
year = 1525
}
deathdate = {
day = 5
month = august
year = 1544
}
rank = 1
movement = 6
fire = 1
shock = 5
siege = 0
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31083 }
category = general
name = "William des Barres" #Templar
startdate = {
day = 18
month = june
year = 1555
}
deathdate = {
day = 20
month = october
year = 1594
}
rank = 3
movement = 5
fire = 4
shock = 5
siege = 1
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31084 }
category = general
name = "Bertrand de Gaudin" #Templar
startdate = {
day = 14
month = august
year = 1570
}
deathdate = {
day = 10
month = december
year = 1612
}
rank = 3
movement = 3
fire = 5
shock = 3
siege = 2
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31085 }
category = general
name = "Camporetti"
startdate = {
day = 9
month = june
year = 1540
}
deathdate = {
day = 8
month = july
year = 1572
}
rank = 0
movement = 4
fire = 3
shock = 3
siege = 1
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31086 }
category = general
name = "Arnaud"
startdate = {
day = 4
month = october
year = 1590
}
deathdate = {
day = 17
month = january
year = 1612
}
rank = 1
movement = 3
fire = 3
shock = 2
siege = 1
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31087 }
category = general
name = "Jean de Gascogne" #Templar
startdate = {
day = 8
month = april
year = 1748
}
deathdate = {
day = 20
month = november
year = 1761
}
rank = 3
movement = 4
fire = 4
shock = 2
siege = 0
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31088 }
category = general
name = "Raymond de Sidon"
startdate = {
day = 4
month = january
year = 1532
}
deathdate = {
day = 2
month = january
year = 1547
}
rank = 1
movement = 2
fire = 2
shock = 4
siege = 0
}

historicalleader = {
id = { type = 6 id = 31089 }
category = general
name = "Henri de Nice"
startdate = {
day = 12
month = august
year = 1526
}
deathdate = {
day = 14
month = february
year = 1551
}
rank = 4
movement = 2
fire = 1
shock = 2
siege = 3
remark = "Siege expert."
}
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Some questions and changes.

event = {
id = 534061
random = no
country = JER
trigger = {
owned = { province = 493 data = JER }
}
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
offset = 7200
deathdate = { day = 30 month = december year = 1819 }
name = "The Rise of the Knights Templar"
desc = "EVENTHIST3002"

action_a = {
name = "Openly support and encourage the Knights"
command = { type = relation which = PAP value = 200 }
command = { type = relation which = HUN value = -150 }
command = { type = relation which = MLO value = -150 }
command = { type = relation which = GEN value = -150 }
command = { type = relation which = SAV value = -150 }
command = { type = relation which = BAY value = -150 }
command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 3 }
command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = -2 }
command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -2 }
command = { type = domestic which = quality value = 1 }
command = { type = inflation value = -2 }
command = { type = trade value = 1000 }
command = { type = infra value = 1000 }
command = { type = cash value = 300 }
}
action_b = {
name = "Support the Knights, but keep them under control"
command = { type = relation which = PAP value = 50 }
command = { type = relation which = HUN value = -50 }
command = { type = relation which = MLO Value = -50 }
command = { type = relation which = GEN value = -50 }
command = { type = relation which = SAV value = -50 }
command = { type = relation which = BAY value = -50 }
command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = -1 }
command = { type = trade value = 500 }
}
action_c = {
name = "Burn their leaders at the stake and seize their assets!"
command = { type = stability value = -3 }
command = { type = revolt which = -1 }
command = { type = revolt which = -3 }
command = { type = revolt which = -1 }
command = { type = revolt which = -3 }
command = { type = relation which = PAP value = -250 }
command = { type = relation which = HUN value = 200 }
command = { type = relation which = MLO value = 200 }
command = { type = relation which = GEN value = 200 }
command = { type = relation which = SAV value = 200 }
command = { type = relation which = BAY value = 200 }
command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = mercantilism value = 1 }
command = { type = cash value = 500 }
command = { type = sleepleader which = 31083 }
command = { type = sleepleader which = 31084 }
}
}
Click to expand...

In this one, I removed the sleepevent commands. After all, a city can be sacked regardless of whetever Knights Templar is present in their army?

event = {
id = 534108
random = no
province = 489
# Triggered by 534107
name = "The Sack of Baghdad"
desc = "The cursed Crusaders have sacked Baghdad!"
action_a = {
name = "Blast!"
command = { type = stability value = -1 }
command = { type = relation which = PAP value = -50 }
command = { type = relation which = JER value = -400 }
command = { type = casusbelli which = JER value = 240 }
command = { type = population which = 489 value = -50000 }
command = { type = population which = 490 value = 5000 }
command = { type = population which = 485 value = 5000 }
command = { type = population which = 492 value = 5000 }
command = { type = population which = 493 value = 5000 }
command = { type = stability value = -1 }
command = { type = vp value = -40 }
command = { type = DIP which = -1 value = 120 }
command = { type = ADM which = -1 value = 120 }
command = { type = MIL which = -2 value = 120 } #New
command = { type = infra value = -500 }
command = { type = trade value = -500 }
command = { type = removecot which = 489 }
command = { type = land value = -500 }
command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -1 }
command = { type = provincetax which = 489 value = -1 }
command = { type = fortress which = 489 value = -2 }
command = { type = losemanufactory which = 489 }
}
}
Click to expand...

First, a drop in MIL as the khalif shows that he can't defend the people against the crusaders. Second, -2 fortress instead of -1. Why should the drop be lesser than that in Cairo and Alexandria when it's a far bigger attack? And it's -2 in Il-Khanate version too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back