Sveland88 said:
Looks to me as if the county borders need the most help, they still look like a quick "MS Paint" job...
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Looks to me as if the county borders need the most help, they still look like a quick "MS Paint" job...
beezneez said:i'm thinking first mod for CK of course---"The First Crusader"
Aahh. Well then, stop dawdling and start collecting historical information - rulers, 'nations', spread of christianity (and flavor) etc. so you are prepared to start modding once the game is released
Fredrik II said:
Nice, website changed as well I see...
Man the coat of arms are beautiful! very nice pic! But yeah what a nose! impressive! :rofl:
Odin1970 said:
In my case and yours that is true - we bitch because we love the game. Not sure that is the way with all the folks though - especially in the Victoria forum.
Sonny said:
Dont own Victoria so I dont go there. I like Paradox games so I buy them, for those who dont or are unsatisfied with thier purchase they should return the game immediately for a refund.
Simple really, if the games arent up to your expectations dont buy them, including CK when it comes out (see sig).
EnPeaSea said:Now we know why some knights had those beaked helmets.
--
EnPeaSea
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
I learn so much history on this forum.
Sonny said:Hmmm, a paradox on the Paradox forum??
No, I just didnt purchase victoria for my own personal reasons. To go into it would be a violation of board rules, when ever possible I dont blatantly skirt rules or engage in hypocrisy. Paradox will never benefit from my purchase of Victoria, it will never reside on my hard drive.
CK however will, I like the game concept and have been entertained by its saga, and afforded the respect due me as a customer which will translate into purchase on release.
I hope victoria goes well for Paradox anything else on Vic or anything other then CK PM Sonny.
Unit symbols
Is it how it's gonna be?
Halebard= archers?
Shield =pikemen?
I think that maybe H.A. bow symbol is lacking an arrow and should be used for [foot] archers instead. H.A. need a new symbol.
Heh, I like the trident for the marines. I mean militia
Is it how it's gonna be?
Halebard= archers?
Shield =pikemen?
I think that maybe H.A. bow symbol is lacking an arrow and should be used for [foot] archers instead. H.A. need a new symbol.
Heh, I like the trident for the marines. I mean militia
Vytis said:Is it how it's gonna be?
Halebard= archers?
Shield =pikemen?
I think that maybe H.A. bow symbol is lacking an arrow and should be used for [foot] archers instead. H.A. need a new symbol.
Heh, I like the trident for the marines. I mean militia
looks as though the unit information tells you what type of weapon they have and the type of armor. very cool
i wonder if militia always have farm tools to fight w/ or if they can be outfitted w/ different equipment. of course if you gave them all pikes, i guess they'd be pikemen then poorly trained pikemen al least
roachclip76 said:
I wonder if the 'crosses' are swords?
To show military power of that class - so you know roughly what you'll get if you raise an army?
I really like the map! The stripes on the wather gives it a "ink on parchment" kinda look - very nice!
Lasse Nielsen said:
do you? Including the RED Borders??????By the way, is that all the unit types or is there more?