this is my first post i know but hey well all start somewhere. anyways i found this article and was wondering if someone could enlighten me.
if i'm not mistaken, steam is one of those DRMs that the CEO of paradox is talking about. and the games i've bought from these guys are indeed steam protected.
i was looking forward to buying impire from these guys for months but i've recently turned away from steam. they're unsupportive, don't allow free speach in their forums... and their flawed software keeps hanging even crashing and i've a beast of a computer i'd say. enough toting. read this article (had to type it out because the site doesn't allow copy and paste!)
PARADOX VOICES OFF ON DRM USELESSNESS
another publisher has joined the anti-drm ranks. paradox interactive - who can be found among the companies who'll be offering their wares on EA's origin service - says the anti - piracy method doesn't make sense, is a hassle for the legitimate customer and creates work for the company deploying it.
"i'm so suprised that people still use DRM, we haven't done that for seven or eight years, and the reason is that it doesn't make sense." CEO fred wester told gamespy.
"no one should have to purchase a product that they're unable to install because of the DRM. people who purchase the game should have just as easy a time as those who pirate the game, otherwise it's a negative incentive to buy a legal copy"
"i see no reasonable explanation for why people keep on adding it" he added and singled out ubisofts highly controversial always connected approach. "especially the kind where you have to be online all the time, like ubisoft. i think that's to me, that's 2003"
wester all finds it a 'waste of money' saying it will only keep the company protected for only a few days but creates a lot of techical support and it will not increase sales.
"and i know this for a fact because we tried it eight years ago and it never worked for us"
http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/2012/01/25/paradox-voices-off-on-drms-uselessness/
Me: as i said before, isn't steam a drm? you are explicitly required to be on the internet even when physically buying a game that needs it when you first try and play it. is that not exactly what this guy's on about? and people are always pirating and cracking steam games. it doesn't stop anyone. to me, no DRM is what gog.com does, no DRM is what witcher 2 is even.
if i'm not mistaken, steam is one of those DRMs that the CEO of paradox is talking about. and the games i've bought from these guys are indeed steam protected.
i was looking forward to buying impire from these guys for months but i've recently turned away from steam. they're unsupportive, don't allow free speach in their forums... and their flawed software keeps hanging even crashing and i've a beast of a computer i'd say. enough toting. read this article (had to type it out because the site doesn't allow copy and paste!)
PARADOX VOICES OFF ON DRM USELESSNESS
another publisher has joined the anti-drm ranks. paradox interactive - who can be found among the companies who'll be offering their wares on EA's origin service - says the anti - piracy method doesn't make sense, is a hassle for the legitimate customer and creates work for the company deploying it.
"i'm so suprised that people still use DRM, we haven't done that for seven or eight years, and the reason is that it doesn't make sense." CEO fred wester told gamespy.
"no one should have to purchase a product that they're unable to install because of the DRM. people who purchase the game should have just as easy a time as those who pirate the game, otherwise it's a negative incentive to buy a legal copy"
"i see no reasonable explanation for why people keep on adding it" he added and singled out ubisofts highly controversial always connected approach. "especially the kind where you have to be online all the time, like ubisoft. i think that's to me, that's 2003"
wester all finds it a 'waste of money' saying it will only keep the company protected for only a few days but creates a lot of techical support and it will not increase sales.
"and i know this for a fact because we tried it eight years ago and it never worked for us"
http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/2012/01/25/paradox-voices-off-on-drms-uselessness/
Me: as i said before, isn't steam a drm? you are explicitly required to be on the internet even when physically buying a game that needs it when you first try and play it. is that not exactly what this guy's on about? and people are always pirating and cracking steam games. it doesn't stop anyone. to me, no DRM is what gog.com does, no DRM is what witcher 2 is even.