STEAM is about "money". Much money. if you can sell on a ~35 million customer market or on local with some hundred thousands..
You will most times get more sales on the first one.
With the success of Magicka, Paradox was known as a brand suddenly much more as before.
And then maybe the "big market effect" kicked in. STEAM customers bought more Paradox games as customers bought before. Maybe.
CKII stormed not only it is solid made, but it has a much bigger market as say EU3 has or HoI3..
With that in mind, It is maybe a bit "unfair" to say the non STEAM buyers of CKII where so few. I just don't think that the non-STEAM buyers where much less as before, but the STEAM buyers where just much much more as the others suddenly. So thats a quite different view on the whole topic.
Maybe most vocal non STEAM buyers are often long time customers who supported the company "in good and in bad times". And As such feel maybe "betrayed" now as the "greater success" kicks in, and they have also to go to STEAM, wich they don't like.
And in the past, STEAM was not the distribution channel with the least problems around. And hard to solve because of STEAM's behaviour as a company.
There were problems
because of STEAM. So the "solution" is now to drop the other distrtibution ways and so "solve" the problems. Just use STEAM and there will be only "STEAM problems" anymore, but no more "STEAM and others" problems..
And sure a company will make more money if not having the need to support different distribution platforms. How could Paradox then survive all the years without STEAM?
Now that the company has even greater success, they could not afford that modell anymore? That sounds maybe not really understandable from a customers perspective.
Since the days of EU3 the comp. grew by ~4 times, and now is not able to support that old business modell anymore? "Just" because of maximizing profit? Tweak the modell until the most money comes around? That approach is legit as a company, as it is also legit as a customer to raise its opinion about that approach. At least in my opinion.
There are people out there wich dislike STEAM because of several reasons.
It is quite different to, say GamersGate, because yo have to install the third party software with STEAM. That is not the case with solutions like GamersGate!
So I have used STEAM myself, but really dislike to use it so far too and most times will not buy games there even if they have nice sales.
So this extra needed step is
not a classical DRM in regard to Paradox Development Studio games, but an additional annoying step.(Imagine you must have set up a payback card account, wich gathers all your customer behaviour, until you can buy some food..)
If many people have no problems with the EULA that comes along with STEAM is up to them. Maybe they just never read them. I read it once and found them not very customer friendly.
And of course STEAM also has nice features for some customers. If that wouldn't be the case, STEAM wouldn't be as big as it is today.
I made also STEAM group for players of my Mod, so I'm no kind of "anti STEAM fighter". But I can clearly say I don't prefer it over the other ways/offers.
Mayby that would change if I would earn much money with it.
In the end all vote with their wallet. And if the mass market of STEAM is the way to go for Paradox, than thats up to them.
And if we still buy their games if STEAM only then is up to us.
In Vicky2 terms, consciousness +10.
