Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

Patch Notes | Operation HEAD Checksum 48b7

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Hearts of Iron IV 48129 Bug Reports 17169 After Action Reports (AAR)
Show only dev responses
Can someone explain to me why the Persian Empire formable is missing in GoE? I think the Decision should restored for GoE, and Iran's Focus tree would instead be used to make it easier to get the necessary territory. Belgium has the same problem: ever since Gotterdammerung, it can't form the Benelux by decision anymore.

There are already a few countries where the Focus Tree doesn't actually form a larger nation, but makes it easier to take the Decision by giving you the means to acquire the necessary territory (like New Zealand -> Polynesia, South Africa -> Mutapa, or Estonia/Finland -> Nordic Empire). Why didn't Paradox do that with Belgium and Iran?
 
  • 6Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Give iraq the abillity to make other arab states rebel you shoudnt have to go to naval invade britan to gain egypt and aden when there was already a huge anti-british sentiment
a small communist path could fix this
also add portrait for communists afganistan
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
GENJI_MUSSOLINI76 said:
Give iraq the abillity to make other arab states rebel you shoudnt have to go to naval invade britan to gain egypt and aden when there was already a huge anti-british sentiment
a small communist path could fix this
also add portrait for communists afganistan
Click to expand...
Given that Iraq was training Yemeni officers, Iraq should have the ability to influence politics in Yemen, before staging a coup and integrating Yemen into its own realm.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Why does the province of Ilam not become national for Iraq, please correct it.
And please change the decision on territories so that we don’t have to wait until one territory becomes national.
 

Attachments

  • 2025-03-17_11-11-49.png
    2025-03-17_11-11-49.png
    2,4 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Afghanistan can get a core on stalinabad through focus tree, if Azad Hind take the decision to core afghanistan after that, it becomes Azad Hind's core also and must be conquered to form Akhand Bharat.

Ignoring the fact that having to defeat the Soviet Union for a single almost worthless state is obnoxious, the state also messes up Akhand Bharat's otherwise neat looking borders. Can the formation decision be changed to only target starting states?
 
  • 2
Reactions:
  • 1
Reactions:
If you could finally fix the "eaten" T letter in these lines below for Polish localization, it would be most awesome. It's there since forever, lol.

From:
Code: 
SOFT_ATTACK_TAKEN: "§Trafienie atakiem pżyw.: §!"
HARD_ATTACK_TAKEN: "§Trafienie atakiem ppanc.: §!"

To:

Code: 
SOFT_ATTACK_TAKEN: "§TTrafienie atakiem pżyw.: §!"
HARD_ATTACK_TAKEN: "§TTrafienie atakiem ppanc.: §!"

Of course, there's *tons* of other grammar errors all over the place for the Polish localization, but since I'm not on the team, I ain't fixing them except for this, most glaring and ancient one. Cheers!
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Reichskommissariats for Germany are still no valid option and so economy of conquest is hindered too drasticly. Compliance gain for RKs isnt working properly ether. Maybe, since germany is the most played nation and its one of its core mechanics someone can take a look at it:

German Reichskomissariats cant manage themselves and become resistance country

Summary German Reichskomissariats cant manage themselves and become resistance country Platform Steam Operating System Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit-Version (10.0, Build 26100) Game Version Countenance v 1.16.1.962c (48b7) (S) Enabled DLC All of the...
forum.paradoxplaza.com forum.paradoxplaza.com
 
  • 3Like
Reactions:
PDX_Gorion said:
I just looked into the air volunteer cap bug (Legion Condor as mentioned earlier in the thread), as far as I can see it's working correctly, but quite likely badly explained.

For the cap to be raised you need more airfield capacity, so make sure you expand your airfields, otherwise you are not allowed to send more.
For every air volunteer you want to send, you actually need 1000 capacity at the moment. I will ask the question to the design team, so they can think if this WAD or not
Click to expand...


I do think that sending divisions as volunteers should raise world tension and that Germany should get the option to either send only planes (meaning a higher cap) or a mix of both (as is) at the cost of world tension. It is also a bit far fetched to have majors send their armored divisions to Spain. Volunteers in essence could be a sort of "arms race" to support a country which could spiral out of control and lead to a full declaration of war/invitation to faction. The more volunteers that are sent to an opposing side, the more volunteers you can send to your side.

If it were up to me, I'd have volunteers be manpower and I'd have expeditionary forces work the way volunteers currently work. Expeditionary forces the way they are now would then be a different button (Assume Supreme Command or something).
 
The thing about Iran is that it will often need to fight the UK for Iraq and France (in Allies or Axis depending on the year) for Syria which will throw you into a war you are unprepared for. The 70 day focuses also don't give much to work with.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back