• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Plan C would be the "historical" push to Rostov but this time focus on Caucasus and hopefully link up with the Turks (then what?) I'd actually opt for that if operational safety is the greatest concern.
(might benefit from forming up calvary divisions for that matter for the Southern Russian campaign)
 
Last edited:
  • 1Like
Reactions:
It seemed at least 13 under-strength Soviet divisions had managed to escape from Odessa the following morning and while there were also Allied convoys in the same seas space, there was no evidence of Allied naval forces trying to intercept them.

This accelerated through the morning of the 28th, until the last Soviet formation surrendered at 0900hr. Almost 165,000 Soviet troops had either been killed or surrendered in Odessa and 19 divisions destroyed.

All credit to the Soviets getting those units out, but this still a major victory for Poland and the Allied cause. :)

As the Dnieper Salient was extended to the outskirts of Dnipropetrovsk in the east and south of the river between Kherson and Zaporozhe, the supply lines were working well, allowing advances to be sustained.

It looks like the Soviets built some good rail lines there. The Polish engineers can take it easy for once! :D

In the Black Sea a Red Navy flotilla had been ambushed by a far larger French-led Allied fleet, with the battle still in progress as the month ended.

I think I see French, Turkish and Romanian squadrons involved in this naval action? Hopefully the Soviets who escaped Odessa also had a rough passage!

The first convoy of the former German Mexico Corps had arrived safely in Sydney some days before the next convoy of two divisions was nearing Wellington in New Zealand. Where they were attacked by an American sub wolf pack on 25 April – ANZAC Day.

Luftwaffen-Feld-Division 2 suffered 25% losses when one of its four convoys was sunk. In return, the USS R-4 was sunk when Allied naval bombers and an Australian destroyer task group led by two light cruisers came to the Poles’ aid.

Fortunately this incident happened within the range of Australian naval and air cover, because that could have been a lot worse than it was.

What's the plan for the Germans? Deploying them to help defend Australia would probably be a good move?

Once more, the Soviets had fared worse against the Allies as a whole, having lost another 290,000 troops and the 19 divisions destroyed in Odessa. Once more, their manpower pool was essentially empty, a few thousand men in transit to reinforcement divisions that were often considerable under strength.

The Allied advantages in both divisions and industry continue to bleed away so I have to say the overall direction of this war still looks unfavourable. The eventual outcome may hinge on Poland's success on the Eastern Front in 1947 (and perhaps '48). No pressure at all... ;)
 
  • 1Love
Reactions:
All credit to the Soviets getting those units out, but this still a major victory for Poland and the Allied cause. :)



It looks like the Soviets built some good rail lines there. The Polish engineers can take it easy for once! :D



I think I see French, Turkish and Romanian squadrons involved in this naval action? Hopefully the Soviets who escaped Odessa also had a rough passage!



Fortunately this incident happened within the range of Australian naval and air cover, because that could have been a lot worse than it was.

What's the plan for the Germans? Deploying them to help defend Australia would probably be a good move?



The Allied advantages in both divisions and industry continue to bleed away so I have to say the overall direction of this war still looks unfavourable. The eventual outcome may hinge on Poland's success on the Eastern Front in 1947 (and perhaps '48). No pressure at all... ;)
The theory right now is that Soviets cannot replenish their battlefield losses so actually I'd say "defending" is not a big issue. The allies do not need to base their frontline on rivers like Germans historically did. The only basis of "advance line" should be logistical feasibility. It is also pretty unlikely for massive Soviet counterattacks to roll out.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Travelling again at the moment, so it will be a couple of days yet before I get back home, keep going with the other AARs and am then able to fire up the game again for the next monthly session. So I’ll do the comment feedback so far from the last chapter now.
The fall of Odessa is most welcome, and good news around Kiev, but still a very long way to go.
Progress has been decent in the last few months I think. More than some thought would be possible, less than some would like. But overall I’ve been pleased and it is setting things up just how I aimed for: to get the USR close to the point where they can be properly broken and perhaps change the momentum of the war, at least on the Eurasian land mass.
One has to wonder idly how are the Rats of Oran doing? A long long time now since their valiant efforts against the Italians.
Good question. I’d have to drill right back to see who they were, where they are now and how they got there. The division, anyway. Depending on that and casualties along the way, one wonders how many of those veterans would have survived. Some, no doubt.
Leaders being immortal seems to sometimes occur.

Hitler sometimes survives and leads post-war Germany (even if defeated, his historical fate is limited to the German Civil War iirc).
Wendell Wilkie doesn't die if he's elected in 1940 (in OTL he died in 1944).
If France goes down the Orleanist path, the only way to get the younger king (Henri VI) is to wait until his father (Jean III) dies to complete the restoration focus. If you restore Jean III, he won't die at all (he dies on August 24th 1940 if he isn't already king).
Probably like HOI3, they’ll probably live forever unless a specific event kills them off.
Hooray! Another victory and more friendly divisions freed up for future endeavors.
Both aspects are equally important. The extra divs will help form the new spearhead(s), while the Romanian and other Allied units will I hope fill in behind as we form the tip of the spear. Their performance in that role has been patchy: sometimes they melt away and form dangerous gaps.
Whatever the target is, the Soviet lines are thinning considerably. It is not if, but when, the next pocket is closed.
This is what we’ve been aiming for all this time.
Every little bit helps.
Let's hope they delay for as long as possible.
Peripheral distractions do help in aggregate, even if none will be individually decisive.
There's no movement up here, the opposite from your rapid campaigns down south.
True, both sides must have defensive orders. But at least it keeps Soviet attention split between multiple fronts.
Do you have a separate occupation focused garrison? That could be a good idea. You don't need to deploy any of it, just make the template and assign it as your garrison unit.
Don’t really know what these are: will need to investigate!
Everyone bleeds, but the enemy bleeds more. Keep the pressure up!
Indeed. Whether it will be enough globally remains the big question.
View attachment 1262006
My theory right now. Again, my belief is that if frontline integrity (and minimisation of risk) is to be preserved then this is the most dynamic plan possible. Only a swing north has the potential to "decisively" win the war in europe before American/Japanese/Chinese march down Australia and Raj. Doubt any good could come from Black sea convergence with the Turks.
The northern army group would have to play some risk leaving some parts of the line/secondary efforts to be supported by allied partner forces. The enemy concentration along that front is simply too high. Do not attempt small scale encirclements as this is detrimental towards force economy, commit to the least defended sectors along enemy line with overwhelming numerical advantage (do more with less). The high force concentration on that front means actions will have to be attritional with an explicit aim to pin Soviet forces in theatre. If necessary the southern pincer will have to commit to the encirclement.
Two echelon of army groups would have to be involved in the south, The army group currently at the frontline should swing north while the group responsible for Odessa should drive east until reaching rivers for a natural defense line as second echelon or reinforce the first echelon.
For southern offensives it is more possible to attempt limited encirclements, single envelopments pinning Soviet units against the shores of Black sea could work. Still, avoid dissipation of effort. The main effort should be aimed at Kharkov and beyond. Go towards Moscow.
The main threat with the encirclement effort would be Soviet reserve units and reinforcements from other theatres, the defenders along Dniepr river consists of single divisions that is less threatening during breakouts.
Another theory is that the most important part in Allied planning should be targeting Soviet industry, capture as many factory as possible. Again, go for the Moscow belt
This kind of approach is closer to what the High Command has in mind. Stretch out a long but easily secured salient in the south, then pick a point to smash through with all the forces that can be spared. The hammer, while the bridgehead salient east of Kiev forms the anvil.
Of course again this is gross underestimation of "Clausewitzian friction", my frustration with the slow moving battlefield has "forced" me to result to this aggressive plan. The plan is perhaps overly aggressive and risks signifficant dispersion of effort.
View attachment 1262033
The more ”conservative" plan.
Control of Crimea do open up some new plans, such as crossing the Kerch or landing operations along black sea coasts and converge with Turkish forces in theatre. However the exact influences are largely marginal. Even if the central Asia corridor is opened the strategic value will be significantly less than the potential to knock Soviet Union out of the war
Landing on Crimea is not the best idea actually, have my doubts on that approach.
Will move divisions to the Belarusian front or even Baltic for future operations in July-August.
Not quite sure what you’re getting at here, but a subsidiary cut off of Crimea is definitely being aimed at, even if it is a secondary objective. But not to the detriment of the main effort.
Plan C would be the "historical" push to Rostov but this time focus on Caucasus and hopefully link up with the Turks (then what?) I'd actually opt for that if operational safety is the greatest concern.
(might benefit from forming up calvary divisions for that matter for the Southern Russian campaign)
Not really interested in a major Caucasus push at this stage. Looking for the Destruction of Trotsky’s Army Group Centre. ;)
All credit to the Soviets getting those units out, but this still a major victory for Poland and the Allied cause. :)
Yes, depriving them of more divisions and freeing up ours and the Allies: double bonus.
It looks like the Soviets built some good rail lines there. The Polish engineers can take it easy for once! :D
Exactly. It would be nice to build a few more factories if possible.
I think I see French, Turkish and Romanian squadrons involved in this naval action? Hopefully the Soviets who escaped Odessa also had a rough passage!
I believe so. Let’s hope their flotilla and any previous convoys were at least degraded.
Fortunately this incident happened within the range of Australian naval and air cover, because that could have been a lot worse than it was.

What's the plan for the Germans? Deploying them to help defend Australia would probably be a good move?
Yes, I was quite worried they’d be targeted on the way across. A decision will be made after a review of the situation in Australia, to see if it would be worthwhile, or whether they be of more use in Persia, Iraq or back in Europe.
The Allied advantages in both divisions and industry continue to bleed away so I have to say the overall direction of this war still looks unfavourable. The eventual outcome may hinge on Poland's success on the Eastern Front in 1947 (and perhaps '48). No pressure at all... ;)
At least the Allies have lost none of their major powers, unless you count Nat China early on. The European heartland remains unscathed and Italy has long since stabilised as a significant Allied member, with Yugoslavia and Poland pretty substantial second tier members too. Turkey may also be getting there I think. Not easy, nor lost.
The theory right now is that Soviets cannot replenish their battlefield losses so actually I'd say "defending" is not a big issue. The allies do not need to base their frontline on rivers like Germans historically did. The only basis of "advance line" should be logistical feasibility. It is also pretty unlikely for massive Soviet counterattacks to roll out.
Yes, this is what I’ve been aiming for since early December, through that bitter winter. I’m not convinced the Soviets have completely lost the ability to attack in their heartland, though I won’t hold back for fear of it. Their multifront commitments and heavy losses of the last few months will be weighing on them. We hope to exploit that in late spring to summer.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
The theory right now is that Soviets cannot replenish their battlefield losses so actually I'd say "defending" is not a big issue. The allies do not need to base their frontline on rivers like Germans historically did. The only basis of "advance line" should be logistical feasibility. It is also pretty unlikely for massive Soviet counterattacks to roll out.

I agree with that assessment. The Soviets are very much on the defensive at the moment and I don't see that changing. My concern is how long will it take to force a Soviet capitulation and how far will the Polish front lines have to push in order to achieve that? I think there's a time factor here - can Poland defeat the Soviet Union before the Allies manage to lose in the rest of the world? I think the answer to that question is "yes", but I'm not certain of it.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
I agree with that assessment. The Soviets are very much on the defensive at the moment and I don't see that changing. My concern is how long will it take to force a Soviet capitulation and how far will the Polish front lines have to push in order to achieve that? I think there's a time factor here - can Poland defeat the Soviet Union before the Allies manage to lose in the rest of the world? I think the answer to that question is "yes", but I'm not certain of it.
That’s the big problem
 
  • 1
Reactions:
I agree with that assessment. The Soviets are very much on the defensive at the moment and I don't see that changing. My concern is how long will it take to force a Soviet capitulation and how far will the Polish front lines have to push in order to achieve that? I think there's a time factor here - can Poland defeat the Soviet Union before the Allies manage to lose in the rest of the world? I think the answer to that question is "yes", but I'm not certain of it.
That’s the big problem
I agree too. I actually played the next session before reading these post-scripts: it was great fun! You will soon see where things went for May 1947 (or at least the first part of it) and the extent to which Polish attempts to shift the momentum of the war succeeded or failed. :)
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
1742160014498.png

Here he is, eager to fight, scared about death, want to go home with medals, all the contradictions of men.
 
  • 1Love
  • 1Like
Reactions:
To All: next chapter ready to publish soon. This time, to give concentrate the story and maintain flow-through of the different campaign arcs, I'll be doing Eastern Front pt 1, then Rest of the World for the month, then Eastern Front Pt 2.
Really, I love this series so much.
My general idea right now is Pvt. Lesniak, 18 year old conscript from a village near Krakow drafted to the Kiev bridgehead
Thanks!
View attachment 1267085
Here he is, eager to fight, scared about death, want to go home with medals, all the contradictions of men.
So I've isolated the division: 93 DP. At the tip of the spear in the Kiev-Chernigov encirclement. Details below. Later, after the month is done, I'll do a little review of the battles 93 DP were in. I'll let you fill in any personal details you wish to at that point, if you like (as long as it's relatively short, sharp and can't be labelled as an 'interactive AAR', which I don't have moderator permission for on this one. :)

NT39Eb.jpg

A good thing is that most Soviet armored divisions on the field seems to be understrength, something must has gone wrong for their tank industry.
Let's hope so. With their current manpower problems too, it can only be so long before they upgrade their conscription policies. Though that will presumably damage their production capacity (along with the territorial gains that are being made against them now).
 
Chapter Ninety-nine: Crash Through or Crash (1-13 May 1947)
Chapter Ninety-nine: Crash Through or Crash
(1-13 May 1947)

mtCeDT.jpg

Polish infantry and armour cross the Dnieper River north of Dnipropetrovsk in early May 1947. The Poles had to cross the great river at multiple points north, east and south during the offensives to expand from the Dnieper Salient in April and May. [Leonardo AI, Phoenix 1.0, using a reference image]

=======​

1-4 May: Breakthrough Battles

As May began, the Polish-Allied Spring 1947 Offensive was in full swing. Having debilitated the Soviet defensive line considerably over the last five months, the Polish High Command believed now was the time to crack the whole front open and execute a series of pincer movements as part of a general offensive across the southern theatre of the Eastern Front.

First up were the battles to try to close off the Kiev-Chernigov pocket. This was close to fruition by 0400hr on 1 May as the lead Polish division advanced from the south and briefly joined in the attack coming from the north.

yXm3Ox.jpg

However, the Soviets counter-attacked the exposed troops, forcing them back. Reinforcements arrived soon after to hold the province open but they were under attack by a whole Soviet corps and would need more of the relief column approaching from the south to be able to hold the position, which remained under severe pressure by midday.

After advice from several naval advocates, a flotilla of 10 Polish subs (a mix of five each of their more modern 1944 hulls and 1940 models) to the Black Sea that afternoon, to be based out of Samsun. They would hopefully support the next offensive in the south if any Soviets were cut off in ports, as the drive to cut off Kherson gathered pace:

r25oET.jpg

The last of the troops in Odessa were also sent forward to assist with that operation and to be ready to support a planned bridgehead over the Dnieper north of Dnipropetrovsk, where Polish forces were advancing after an earlier victory.

And a major naval battle between a British-commanded cruiser-destroyer fleet (comprising British, French, Turkish and Romanian vessels) and a smaller Soviet force had already seen two Soviet destroyers sunk. Eight would be sunk by 0100hr on the 2nd.

J5zgVD.jpg

The battle to close the Kiev pocket continued into 2 May. The defence of the southern pincer by 93 DP was boosted by the arrival of more divisions during the night, permitting victory by 0600.

gVf6di.jpg

More divisions also arrived to reinforce the attack from the north, however that eroded from favourable to unfavourable by 0900hr on the 2nd as the Soviets also boosted their defence.

The four 4th Army divisions in Iraq (three pushed there after the fall of Basra and one of the previously evacuated German Mexico Corps divisions) were deemed no longer necessary for the defence, which had now been thoroughly handled by the Allies. They were put on trains to begin redeployment to Ukraine to support the burgeoning offensives on the Eastern Front.

In the Dnieper Salient, after the first Allied victory the day before, the enemy managed to slip another division into their last toehold in Dnipropetrovsk early on 2 May that afternoon, requiring another Polish-British attack to finally defeat them.

gIdWzZ.jpg

The Kiev gap was closed, counter-attacked and closed again in three battles over 2-3 May. While that was playing out, two encircled, disorganised and unsupplied Soviet divisions and another that retreated there were attacked and surrendered by the afternoon of the 3rd, with another 20,000 Soviet troops marched into captivity.

Q8mmp6.jpg

NB: 93 DP sat out this attack as they held the eastern flank of the pocket.
At the same time, Dnipropetrovsk was finally secured and the Poles welcomed significant Allied reinforcements which had now solidly held the line of the Dnieper and in some cases made their own or supported Polish attacks in the sector. This would largely free the Poles to concentrate on their breakthrough battles.

ARHgLN.jpg

Soon, the reinforcements in the Kherson bridgehead in the south were attacking to close up on the coast of the Sea of Azov. Their aim was to seal off Kherson from Crimea and encircle as many Soviet divisions as possible.

jdjao6.jpg

In the north, the thinned Soviet line offered an uncontested crossing point north from Dnipropetrovsk which three Polish divisions were soon taking advantage of.

In the Ukraine air zone, the Allies maintained heavy air superiority, aided by the Polish Air Force. New TAC production was added to the 57 available miscellaneous lend-lease bombers to form a new wing – 4 DB – on the 3rd, to be based in Bialystok, where there was some spare airfield capacity.

oBCCuy.jpg

Another six divisions (three of them light tank) were peeled away from the static Belarus sector and fed down into the Kiev-Chernigov breakout zone. And persistent warnings about Byelorussian SSR partisan resistance, especially in the Minsk state, were examined more closely. It was causing equipment shortages, including now in AT guns as well as infantry equipment.

uZ4YZz.jpg

That first led, based on previous advisor input, to the standard garrison formation being changed from main line infantry divisions to essentially what were small infantry-only militia brigades. It may take more of them to patrol all the occupied zones, but the demand for under-pressure AT guns was reduced.

0f3Zt6.jpg

A new attack across the Dnieper was launched on the evening of the 3rd directly into Zaporozhe, which had been left temporarily unoccupied. However, defenders appeared on the morning of the 4th and put up a strong resistance, using the river and city streets to make the attack difficult.

OWuhYa.jpg

Czech ER cavalry secured the northern Dnieper crossing on the 4th and were able to easily defeat a Soviet attempt to dislodge them just before midnight, while more Polish divisions continued their crossing operation.

Up near Chernigov, the last Soviet divisions trapped in the pocket there were under attack by the British on the evening of the 3rd. The Poles joined in would eventually force the enemy to surrender a day later: another 20,000 Soviet troops went ‘into the bag’, as they continued to defend Soviet attempts to rescue their encircled comrades from the east.

QiYPeF.jpg


=======​

4-9 May: Kherson, Dnieper and Chernigov Offensives

Not all news from the front was good: one of Poland’s celebrated fighter aces was shot down on 4 May in an aerial duel with a Soviet counterpart. However, support for the war was too strong for this to do any damage to it.

2r7YJH.jpg

By 5 May enough troops were across the Dnieper at Dnipropetrovsk to strike inland towards Poltava and Kharkov, though the fighting in Zaporozhe still favoured the Soviet defence.

ojQoCs.jpg

On 5 May, Polish forces reached the Sea of Azov and, though counter-attacked strongly at first, more divisions began to arrive and the gain was secured by 1100hr. This enabled a new attack to be launched towards Kherson that saw victory the following morning as to the west, the British attacked across the river to the city itself.

B0dxNs.jpg

Supply was now excellent within the Dnieper Salient, which helped to maintain attacking momentum, though far patchier in the Kherson pincer.

With the Kiev pocket now liquidated, new attacks were launched in the Chernigov sector towards Sumy from 6-9 May. A series of clear victories followed against some clearly disorganised Soviet divisions as the momentum was maintained. It did help to slow the advance somewhat though as each obstacle had to be cleared out.

aUbsJT.jpg

In Kherson, good progress was made with a heavy attack on the northern approach to Crimea. Six Soviet divisions were defeated in a first attack on 7 May, then another two were pushed back the following day. It remained to be seen which way the retreating enemy formations would go – trapped to the west, or escaping to Crimea in the south.

M7GmuV.jpg

Near Poltava, the advance was extended by 7 May but the advance guard was defeated before fresh troops arrived to secure the recently gained province at midday on the 8th. The Soviets were attempting to scramble a defence and continued to resist in Zaporozhe (now with three defending Soviet divisions in place), while getting across the river was slowing down Polish reinforcement of the bridgehead.

R5lO6u.jpg

Kherson was cut off by the evening of 8 May and the two available armoured divisions led a quick attack across the land bridge to Crimea which quickly dislodged the exhausted Soviet defenders who had recently retreated from the north.

8r2vur.jpg

More Polish divisions were finally making it across the Dnieper, enabling the dagger thrust to the north to be continued from 8-9 May. At Zaporozhe, between 1800-2400hr on the 8th, additional Polish reinforcements finally managed to turn the tide and the victory would be won by the night of the 9th.

FzRb1g.jpg

The Poles attacked Kherson itself on the night of 9 May after another larger battle, while they had secured the crossing into Crimea by their quick actions – though not before the bulk of the retreating Soviet divisions had made it across, avoiding encirclement in Kherson.

roEKDG.jpg

There was a brief stir in the often-dormant northern theatre when a sole Hungarian division tried to attack the Soviet capital of Petrograd on 9 May. A total of 74 Allied divisions were stationed in southern Finland at the time, but most seemed to be holding back in depth (much as they had done in other theatres, much to the frustration of the Poles).

goQsM1.jpg

The Archangelsk Enclave continued to hold strongly enough and even had an attack in progress. Estonia too had plenty of Allied troops, though again many were in depth and Narva had not yet been retaken from the Soviets. And even though a Polish ace had been lost a few days before, a new one – Maksymilian ‘Mouse’ Wojciechowski was acclaimed on 9 May.

=======​

10-13 May: Poltava-Kursk, Dnieper and Crimea

With the entry to northern Crimea secured and Kherson cut off, the Poles decided to push hard to cut off the rest of Crimea with a drive by limited forces along the coast towards Kerch while the enemy was in disarray, relying on follow-up formations to support them.

hwpQiJ.jpg

This tactic paid off during 10-11 May with the trapped Soviet divisions in Kherson surrendering on the evening of the 10th and a quick breakout victory on the Azov coast of Crimea on the 11th.

Supply remained strong within the Dnieper Salient and even into the northern breakthrough zones. Logistic support was weaker south of the river in the Kherson-Crimea breakout sector but remained enough to sustain the advance against the disorganised and back-pedalling opposition.

eLPmuy.jpg

A new operation in the Shostka-Sumy-Poltava sector kicked off with attacks on 10 and 11 May to create another encirclement, even as the Poles sought to secure the approaches to Shostka after the advance guard was defeated on the night of the 10th. A follow-up division had renewed the defence by the morning of the 11th and was trying to hold on until the rest of the advancing troops could reinforce them.

nyY1We.jpg

NB: 93 DP sat out this attack.
Meanwhile, a series of victories in the east of Poltava from the Dnipropetrovsk breakout expanded the south-eastern pincer of the encirclement attempt.

It was at this point, as equipment losses from the high operational tempo accelerated and re-oriented production priorities were unable to immediately remedy them, that a decision was taken to release the state of Minsk to the control of the Allied Belarus government.

YBuI8I.jpg

Poland’s aims in the war were not strictly imperialistic, while this would bolster Belarus and decrease the increasing burden of occupation management as more Soviet territory was taken in the east. Whether this was a sound decision would no doubt be debated in the Polish (largely state-controlled) papers.

During the afternoon of the 11th, the eastern pincer was extended and the breakout extended both north around Poltava and towards Kharkov as more troops were fed into the bridgehead. The battle for the western approach raged on against determined opposition but was running in the Poles’ favour.

2VWzAz.jpg

NB: 93 DP also sat out this attack.
In Crimea, the bold cut-off drive had succeeded by the evening of 11 May. Some of the Soviet divisions in the enclave tried to break out towards Kerch. Their attack, though initially making progress against the advance guard, was defeated by the end of the day as another light tank division came to their aid and a spoiling attack by mechanised formations from the north debilitated the enemy and defeated them four hours later.

QVTMHw.jpg

The occupation of Zaporozhe was secured on the night of 11 May, with freshly arrived divisions enabling it to combine with a militia division from the Dnipropetrovsk breakout to link up the two bridgeheads on 12 May after a comprehensive victory.

rNMznU.jpg

As preparations to collapse the new Sevastopol Enclave were being made, the Polish TF4 sub flotilla arrived in Samsun in Turkey to establish its new Black Sea base of operations. It would take some days yet for them to be ready for operations after the transfer, with the subs only rated at 20% organisation after their arrival early on the 12th.

A precarious link was made to shut off the Poltava Pocket on 12 May, though as before the first division into the ‘cork’ province was counter-attacked and driven back as more Polish troops advanced to keep the precarious block in place.

ZgQBFn.jpg

NB: 93 DP are part of the attack west of Sumy.
In Crimea, the Poles continued to squeeze the trapped Soviet divisions into the south-west of the peninsula as more forces freed from the Kherson battles became available. And an attack was made towards Kerch, seeking to close off the ability for the Soviets to reinforce counter-attack across the narrow strait. Victories on 13-14 May north of Sevastopol would see the Soviet defence compressed further into the port and neighbouring Yalta.

cE9kl8.jpg

Those 4th Army divisions sent from Iraq finally arrived in Krivoi Rih early on 13 May and were reallocated to the 3rd and 5th Armies.

lrJvxz.jpg

As they arrived, the recovered veteran General Źeligowski was brought it to take over the crucial 1st Army command. Roman Abraham had served well, but Źeligowski’s peerless experience from fighting in China and elsewhere for the years before the Soviets had invaded had made him the leading exponent of offensive operations in the Polish Army.

SfPPGQ.jpg

Two more encirclements were now under way, while the current attack on Kharkov would see it taken the following morning. The tough breakthrough battles had already led to two smaller encirclements being completed at Kiev-Chernigov and Kherson. The Poltava and Sevastopol pockets promised even greater rewards, though more hard fighting would no doubt be required.
 
Last edited:
  • 2Love
Reactions:
Well that was all in all a very positive period on the Eastern Front.

It's quite pleasant to see Archangelsk endeavour also continues to be a useful distraction for quite a few Soviet units. No doubt makes your work easier.
 
  • 2
Reactions:
  • 1
Reactions:
The Soviets were attempting to scramble a defence and continued to resist in Zaporozhe (now with three defending Soviet divisions in place), while getting across the river was slowing down Polish reinforcement of the bridgehead.
Anywhere they do manage to defend seems to be only temporary though, and cost equipment and manpower they can't afford. And it leads to Polish breakthroughs elsewhere. The Soviets are crumbling.
There was a brief stir in the often-dormant northern theatre when a sole Hungarian division tried to attack the Soviet capital of Petrograd on 9 May. A total of 74 Allied divisions were stationed in southern Finland at the time, but most seemed to be holding back in depth (much as they had done in other theatres, much to the frustration of the Poles).
At least the Allies aren't losing ground and are tying up many Soviet divisions. Eventually you might detroy enough down south that the Allies will feel confident enough to advance here.
With the entry to northern Crimea secured and Kherson cut off, the Poles decided to push hard to cut off the rest of Crimea with a drive by limited forces along the coast towards Kerch while the enemy was in disarray, relying on follow-up formations to support them.
Yes! More attacks! Don't let them recover!
The Poltava and Sevastopol pockets promised even greater rewards, though more hard fighting would no doubt be required.
And afterwards, Azov? One pincer coming from Zaporzhe/Kharkov, another from Kerch.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Anywhere they do manage to defend seems to be only temporary though, and cost equipment and manpower they can't afford. And it leads to Polish breakthroughs elsewhere. The Soviets are crumbling.

At least the Allies aren't losing ground and are tying up many Soviet divisions. Eventually you might detroy enough down south that the Allies will feel confident enough to advance here.

Yes! More attacks! Don't let them recover!

And afterwards, Azov? One pincer coming from Zaporzhe/Kharkov, another from Kerch.
Actually I'd recommend going north. One division stay behind to look after Kerch while the rest go join the Dnipropetrovsk salient. I think the centre of mass now lies in the Kharkov front. (The general idea is to keep going north until reaching Moscow. The steady encirclements will thin out the front for the Reds. (alternatively they can also do the drive to Rostov after getting out of Crimea).
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Interim comment responses:
Well that was all in all a very positive period on the Eastern Front.

It's quite pleasant to see Archangelsk endeavour also continues to be a useful distraction for quite a few Soviet units. No doubt makes your work easier.
It was - quite exhilarating to play after so much grind to this point. And yes, despite their frequent inactivity, all the various Allied diversions (Western China, Iran, the Middle East, Estonia, Finland and Archangelsk) of the Soviets do indeed help. And they have been noticeably more present in support in the Polish theatre this last month or two.
That's a lot of encircled Soviet troops, which could be a major loss for Stalin if the encirclements are closed.
We'll be doing our very best to put the cork in and never let them escape!
Anywhere they do manage to defend seems to be only temporary though, and cost equipment and manpower they can't afford. And it leads to Polish breakthroughs elsewhere. The Soviets are crumbling.
We hope this to be true, though in some places we simply didn't bother trying to attack because we couldn't muster the strength at too many different places. Perhaps if we had direct control of all the other Allied forces in the theatre, but ... "alas, Ear Wax?" :D
At least the Allies aren't losing ground and are tying up many Soviet divisions. Eventually you might detroy enough down south that the Allies will feel confident enough to advance here.
Very true - it does help. But more activity when they have so many troops in reserve would be so useful - lest the Alliance runs out of time elsewhere.
Yes! More attacks! Don't let them recover!
Attack, attack - always attack!
And afterwards, Azov? One pincer coming from Zaporzhe/Kharkov, another from Kerch.
Could be ... you will have to stay tuned for the next Eastern Front chapter to see what happens during the rest of May. But before then, it will be a round-up of the other global theatres.
Actually I'd recommend going north. One division stay behind to look after Kerch while the rest go join the Dnipropetrovsk salient. I think the centre of mass now lies in the Kharkov front. (The general idea is to keep going north until reaching Moscow. The steady encirclements will thin out the front for the Reds. (alternatively they can also do the drive to Rostov after getting out of Crimea).
Again, per above, I won't spoil what happened next. But yes, Moscow is now in Polish sights as the ultimate objective of the main 1947 campaigning season. Apart from the VPs, its status as a rail hub for the USR is as/more important. More Allied activity around the north would be very helpful, but they just ignore my pings in that direction. :rolleyes::D

PS: OK, I'll go with the next chapter now, as it's complementary to this one and is a bridge between the two Eastern Front centric 'main arc' ones. It will cover the Rest of the World for the whole month in four general theatre-related segments.
 
Last edited:
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Chapter One Hundred: Peripheral Vision (The Rest of the World: May 1947)
Chapter One Hundred: Peripheral Vision
(The Rest of the World: May 1947)

=======

wobuv6.jpg

Australian troops on patrol near Borroloola, south of the Gulf of Carpentaria in northern Australia, May 1947.

Australia

With the new month of May 1947, the now well-established American lodgement in northern Australia was expanding east and west, though the terrain would slow them down somewhat. By 1 May, the first Australian division had arrived at the eastern edge of the invasion, with the possibility of more Australian and Allied divisions on their way to support them.

Ma84uG.jpg

Panning further out, we see 2. Pz Div in Sydney is given orders to begin a rail redeployment all the way across the continent to Perth, with the entire West Coast at that stage appearing defenceless. The two 7th Army division that had arrived in Wellington were sent by ship to join them, while those still north-east of New Zealand would change course to dock in Sydney. The German Australia Korps had been established.

UdI408.jpg

By 9 May the US invasion had made limited headway as the Allies sought to shore up the eastern flank of the lodgement.

5CkteE.jpg

The next day, 2. Pz Div began the long drive up the coast of Western Australia as an Australian division began heading the same way.

x6EiHr.jpg

A week later and the Poles and Australians had made rapid progress along the west coast, closing up with the Americans to block off a natural choke point as the German EF commenced fortifying their defensive positions. Two of the other divisions had just landed in Sydney and took to trains up to the railhead in Townsville, while the other two had passed Melbourne by ship on their voyage west.

zVcaQX.jpg

A week later, the two GAK divisions had arrived in Townsville, with the mountaineers staying to defend the vital port and the standard infantry starting the move west to reinforce the defence along the Gulf of Carpentaria. It seemed most of the other Allied divisions in the area had headed off by then, leaving the Australians to fend for themselves – except for their Polish-commanded comrades of the GAK.

yZZ24d.jpg

By the end of the month, the last two GAK divisions had arrived in Perth, the Australians had reinforced the west coast line of defence and the Australians were fighting off an attack on the eastern sector.

PrXtiG.jpg

A closer look showed the US appeared to be building a numerical advantage, while the Allies probably had the better defensive terrain. All were having some supply problems.

sUAiMN.jpg


=======

NebkWZ.jpg

The Allies began digging in on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur even as the Japanese were still trying to break out of northern Malaya in early May 1947. [Leonardo AI, Phoenix 1.0]

Malaya-Borneo and the South West Pacific Area

On the afternoon of 9 May, the threatened Communist Japanese breakout from northern Malaya appeared to be under way. Despite having many divisions in the general vicinity, once again it seemed the Allies were failing to concentrate enough of them at the key points.

wBeTRD.jpg

More widely, the situation in the rest of the region (Borneo, Java, PNG and Australia) had not really changed by the middle of the month.

ZSb9yg.jpg

But in Malaya the Japanese had broken out and were now advancing south on a broad front. Again, the Allies had plenty of formations on the peninsula and nearby but perhaps the myriad nationalities was preventing decent coordination. [Could it be doing the collective AIs’ little heads in, here and elsewhere?]

0hhYgB.jpg

In any case, three days later the situation had deteriorated badly as the Japanese raced, seemingly unopposed along both the east and west coasts of Malaya: it looked like a good number of Allied divisions had evacuated rather than sticking around to make a fight of it in the fairly decent defensive terrain.

gotzva.jpg

Things were going a little better in the Borneo ‘side-show’, where the Allies had retaken some ground and were launching a strong attack just west of Brunei.

EfUDnk.jpg

No fewer than 11 Allied divisions were defending Kuala Lumpur on the evening of the 26th, while a thin defensive line had been improvised to the south. Despite being in a port, the KL garrison seemed to be overcrowding it, causing supply problems. And a few divisions had been cut off further up the west coast. A sorry state of affairs!

rtlAAx.jpg

At the end of May, the Allied position across the SWPA was even more tenuous than at the month’s start, particularly in the key outpost of Malaya. The US had now taken Noumea as it continued to dominate the small islands of the South Pacific.

whoTUe.jpg

Borneo was a small bright spot, though it was a limited turn-around in a very peripheral theatre.

9bcnB8.jpg

Malaya continued to be something of a disaster, with KL now cut off by land and under attack. The defence of Singapore – yet to be tested – was also looking decidedly unconvincing.

lvLT1g.jpg


=======

X1COux.jpg

US Marines storm ashore at Iwo Jima, 2 May 1947.

America-Pacific

On 2 May, a bulletin from Iwo Jima, being used as an Allied sub base at the time, was being stormed by a full corps of American attackers. The British defenders looked to be on the wrong end of the combat.

Z4xcEg.jpg

A week later, the Allies appeared to have just cut off to US divisions in the north but no decisive breakout looked to be in prospect. It remained another of those backwater enclaves the Allies were able to defend but then sink lots of divisions into that never made it to the front line in sufficient numbers to be really useful.

OTEvQq.jpg

By then, Iwo Jima had been lost and the British defenders presumably killed or captured as the US grip on most of the Pacific tightened. Perhaps somewhat to the chagrin of the Japanese, who remained preoccupied in South East Asia.

rJawa8.jpg

The month saw no change on the ground in Yucatan, with 26 TRA divisions bottling up but unable to force out 18 Allied counterparts.

4jQtkt.jpg

And so things stood in North America as May 1947 drew to a close.

mIFj33.jpg


=======

agFOqi.jpg

Nationalist Chinese soldiers serving under British command desperately defend their trenches after many weeks cut off in Ayaguz, May 1947. [Leonardo AI, Phoenix 1.0, from reference picture]

Central Asia and the Middle East

The Sinkiang Pockets still stood strong on 1 May, though the larger group of divisions in the east was by now significantly disorganised and badly out of supply. The two divisions in the western pocket seemed to be getting some form of local supply to sustain them.

76ewWc.jpg

The front in Iran remained unchanged all month, though each side attempted some desultory probes. Due to poor supply in the overcrowded Bandar e’Abbas, on 2 May two Polish mountain divisions remained in place while the three standard infantry outfits withdrew to reserve positions inland to see if it made any difference to supply and attrition levels.

8sxjXl.jpg

In part, the 4th Army presence was now being maintained in case Polish success in Europe eventually forced the Soviets to thin their line in Iran opened up some offensive options later the Poles could spearhead.

As noted in the previous chapter, at the same time the four 4th Army divisions in Iraq were sent to Ukraine. As in Iran. There would be no advances in the Middle East by either side during the month, with only some limited attacks made by each during the month. As with the other secondary fronts, the main value for the Poles was in the Soviet troops it tied down away from the ‘main game’ on the Eastern Front.

oLKIk4.jpg

On 4 May, both Sinkiang pockets were under attack yet still held out as Soviet and PLA supply lines looked to be very badly stretched as well, which must be sapping much of the power from their attacks.

MfcJQ6.jpg

Further south however, it appeared a large pocket had formed just north of Kashgar by mid-month, as many Allied divisions were trapped between both Communist blocs and now also out of supply. Another slow-motion Allied train wreck loomed.

RuzpTx.jpg

The rest of the theatre remained static and despite these problems, there had been no dramatic collapse of the Allied position in Central Asia.

MjfprQ.jpg

A follow-up report the next day indicated base Allied positions in Kashgar and to the south remained fairly heavily defended and the enemy had shown no ability to make rapid breakthroughs in such difficult terrain and supply conditions.

Xrz2ZS.jpg

Finally, on May 26 came word that after so many weeks of resistance, the larger of the two Sinkiang pockets had finally been liquidated with the remaining Allied survivors surrendering. The sole remaining Ayaguz Pocket fought on. Though by the end of the month, only one of the divisions (a Nationalist Chinese EF) would remain and its resistance was failing.

ioXpUi.jpg

Soviet problems in Europe had not yet led to any collapse in the Middle East and Central Asia as May ended.

ZP46xM.jpg
 
  • 1Love
  • 1Like
Reactions:
It's not looking good for the Allies, Poland may be advancing against the Soviets, but I think Japan, China, the Soviets and America is far too much for the Allies to take on. Of course, you're playing Poland, so once you deal with the USSR you might be able to help defeat Japan, China and the US.
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Things could be worse. They could be a lot better of course, but they could be worse. It find it very amusing how the AI has just apparently given up on Labrador et al.

It's not looking good for the Allies, Poland may be advancing against the Soviets, but I think Japan, China, the Soviets and America is far too much for the Allies to take on. Of course, you're playing Poland, so once you deal with the USSR you might be able to help defeat Japan, China and the US.
Well if the Poles keep advancing eastward they will end up at China ... eventually.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: