That is precisely the case. I don’t know why you even have to come up with manipulative assumptions out of thin air as the following:
Zero empirical evidence for your claim, zero experience of the actual world out there, zero anything.
Have you ever been to the so called third world? They’ve got massive social inequality over their, with the middle class being basically non-existent. Their slum population will not pay for the game by any means, so in the end you’re just subsidising their upper class at the extra expenses of middle class consumers in the first world.
That is absolutely nonsensical, immoral, and unfair. And in reality, luxury goods (yes, their most sophisticated really, REALLY love to import prestigious goods from. And guess what; they’re not getting any discount on that but, in fact, have to pay even more for the import due to the overhead).
Anybody of you that ever witnessed the obscene living standard of third world’s upper class will understand what I’m talking about.
You and Paradox are running a very sneaky campaign here by arguing in bad faith, or even outright censoring discussions on this topic (like in my thread where I’m asking the Publisher why they are charging me 50€ for Victoria 3 whereas others only need to pay 26 € for it) while giving me an unwelcoming feeling that I’m somehow economically illiterate. While in fact the opposite is the case.
Imagine being charged in the supermarket the double price for your goods than the customer in front of you, just because you live in a different area of the town! If you don’t even feel subconsciously ashamed for taking this capitalist injustices for God given then we truly are living in a clown world.