So I was wandering around and found a EUII fo £2.50. At first it made me smile, but then I thought seriously about WHY don't I puchase it. Yes it was such a small amount and I migt aswell,but I needed my 3quid for the bus.
However, at home, I though to myself, should I get it? My reasoning for this is; I own EUIII, but amoung my annoyances, the lack of history wasmy biggest anger. France would always be a mega power, every nation in Europes owned parts of America. And Britain was a pathetic nation that never even got a chance to become powerful. Yes IN will fix gameplay isses, but historical ones will remain.
So, in EUII, does the history stan up well? Will I always expect to see the seven years war, american war of independance, Napoleon and every otehr historical event? Or is it more about random values and hoping that something vagually historical pops up?
Should I stick to EUIII or will EUII's features be better?
How well does it stand up to EUIII, will I enjoy it more (Large question
, I would prefer History over annoying randomness, although do enjoy ahistorical, but on the scale of HOI eg; I win the war as Germany, WC as SU or make the UK the strongest again. But hate seeing Venice, Hesse and Poland owning more of America then Britain, or india left alone along with most of Asia)
'll probally get it anyway
, but how quickly should I run out is what I want to know, should I just rob the shop now? Or wait until I've worn out IN?
Thank you.
(P.S; if you notice spelling or general grammer mistakes, I apologise, my keyboard i utterly broken whenit comes to writting.)
(P.P.S ^ I can see mistakes in that sentance, but it wn't letme change them
)
Edit: Wow, silly me, I must be tired.This hould be in the EUII genral thread. can it be moved please? :wacko:
However, at home, I though to myself, should I get it? My reasoning for this is; I own EUIII, but amoung my annoyances, the lack of history wasmy biggest anger. France would always be a mega power, every nation in Europes owned parts of America. And Britain was a pathetic nation that never even got a chance to become powerful. Yes IN will fix gameplay isses, but historical ones will remain.
So, in EUII, does the history stan up well? Will I always expect to see the seven years war, american war of independance, Napoleon and every otehr historical event? Or is it more about random values and hoping that something vagually historical pops up?
Should I stick to EUIII or will EUII's features be better?
How well does it stand up to EUIII, will I enjoy it more (Large question
'll probally get it anyway
Thank you.
(P.S; if you notice spelling or general grammer mistakes, I apologise, my keyboard i utterly broken whenit comes to writting.)
(P.P.S ^ I can see mistakes in that sentance, but it wn't letme change them
Edit: Wow, silly me, I must be tired.This hould be in the EUII genral thread. can it be moved please? :wacko:
Last edited: