• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
This is actually historical, the guy holding the Purang title is a Zhangzhung prince who was ousted from his capital area (he starts as a rival to the Emperor). The guy holding Ngari is a 'Great minister' appointed to govern the area by the Emperor. In 769 Tibet is a hotbed for internal strife and conflict - there's also a mythological Sumpa princess who starts as a lover and friend to the Zhangzhung prince, another 'Great minister' in Lhunzhub, a subjugated Taoist Tangut ruling in the north, etc. :D

Do you have any advice for playing the Sumpa princess? She seems awesome but it seems inevitable that you just get your titles revoked as soon as your liege passes title revocation law. I had almost banked enough piety to get sympathy for eastern religions, but I don't know if that would have saved me.
 
Do you have any advice for playing the Sumpa princess? She seems awesome but it seems inevitable that you just get your titles revoked as soon as your liege passes title revocation law. I had almost banked enough piety to get sympathy for eastern religions, but I don't know if that would have saved me.
Wait, I thought the sympathy traits worked only one way? You can be sympathetic all you want, how does that affect the other guy?
 
Sympathy traits work both ways, although I think it doesn't affect the modifier from the zealous trait.

Also, the decision is specifically about getting your Buddhist vassals and liege to tolerate you aa Bon.
 
Sympathy traits work both ways, although I think it doesn't affect the modifier from the zealous trait.

Also, the decision is specifically about getting your Buddhist vassals and liege to tolerate you aa Bon.

More exactly, Zealous overrides the Sympathy traits IIRC.
 
I mean when one character has a sympathy trait and the other character has zealous. There is no infidel opinion between them, but there is still the zealous opinion for some reason.
 
ck2_135.png


First game I played with JD. William became King of England from taking it from Hardrada's son after the latter's successful invasion.
 
Where are these bears coming from?
 
This is from a vanilla 769 game; I had absolutely nothing to do with it.
5h9XWeh.jpg
 
Not the first, but Erik did it again.

20171118070202_1.jpg


Later 1066 start. He first won a defensive battle and got immediate 75% warscore. Then he in some point fell tributary to Norway, who kindly helped him against over-Baltic subjugators. Also Erik Stenkil died in fight and Heathen took wife of his heir as concubine.

I had nothing to do with this, I was busy with getting awesome education and rigging election.

Also, he got inadverted help from Yatvingians, I think.
 
Last edited:
Actually, Christian Arabs call him Yasu', the name Isa is, in fact, Islamic.
So Christian Americans, for example, call him "Yasu" as well? I am sorry, but that's where your logic leads, and it is obviously false.
*Arab* and maybe other Muslims call him Isa, then. Muslim =/= Arab
 
So Christian Americans, for example, call him "Yasu" as well? I am sorry, but that's where your logic leads, and it is obviously false.
*Arab* and maybe other Muslims call him Isa, then. Muslim =/= Arab
Sorry, but can you please clarify your point? What do christian americans have to do with "Yasu" not being a culturally-Arab name, but a muslim one?