oh yeah
Accept
I did vote!
Also Aedan and Panzer why did you accept?
oh yeah
Accept
I'd also like to hear this. One of me you or EURO could be spymates with Panzer or Aedan. Then again they must just do it because they felt like it.I did vote!
Also Aedan and Panzer why did you accept?
My philosophy is to always approve the first team to move the game forward.
Moving the game along is not a good idea if you're resistance
Unless there's a No Confidence drawn on round 1, there is nothing wrong with going all the way to the 5th proposal. Remember that the Spies never have enough people to have a mission rejected, so unless a resistance player is stupid enough to reject a 5th proposal, we can't lose the game like that.
I for one would very much prefer to start round 2 one mission down but with information about 5 proposals, rather than starting it one mission down and only knowing one proposal.
You completely missed the point. I'll elaborate on it some other time.
But that narrows down their options somewhat if they do decide to go down that route. And eventually they'll exhaust those possibilites and may expose patterns.
If I understand the ITS card, it means the person chosen by me has to tell everyone if they're going to sabotage or pass, (not just me) yeah?
Curious. What makes it so necessary for him to be on the team and me to be on it, when we both have similar powers?
I mean, his does give the opportunity for a FalcSpy to lie, I suppose and thus more information potentially, but then again, it doesn't necessarily gain us anything if he is indeed a spy, and would be damaging if we don't find that out sooner or later.
Anyway, to clear any possible suspicion of manipulation of my power, I'm going to let the rest of you decide whom to use my ITS card on, and when, too. I don't have an agenda myself and I'm not particularly good at analysis so there's nothing to gain from me choosing as a resistance member.
Also, I don't really have time to do this stuff myself![]()
If he tells us somebody sabotaged when they didn´t, we´ll know that either one of them sabotaged and therefore has to be a spy.
If he tells us somebody supported when they didn´t, and other cards later on tell us his target was a spy, we know he has to be a spy as well.
Did I just time-travel back to early 2010?Reject
Because I'm following marty.