• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I'm inclined to believe Falc is resistance, but since I5 proposed it that says nothing about the soundness of the team. I'm not really sure what to make of I5 vote, so to be safe.

Reject.
 
Going to reject.

Reject

Since we usually reject the first team, and since the technical first team "had" to be NCed, this is the first team that we really can reject. It wouldn't be much different from accepting team one to go ahead with this one.
 
Reject

I'm not on it, no reason to trust those on it.
 
Because of all the public votes, I no longer have to care whether or not I want this proposal to succeed or not. All I have to care about is what impression I wish to give.

Do I trust myself? Yes.
Do I trust IH? Not yet. But if this mission goes through, I would get some solid info on him.

APPROVE
 
People are not going to like me approving this but I

approve

anyway.

Because I think it's unlikely I'll be on the first team anyway(too low on the leader order), and I trust Falc and I5 more than others because of the way Falc wanted to handle the NC(though he backed off a bit too quickly for my taste) and Ironhead because... I don't really know why. I thought his post about there being too many approves showed some goodie confusion but that's not really something. But no one has much of anything anyway.
 
Ironhead's team of Ironhead and Falc was REJECTED 4-3:

APPROVE: Ironhead, Falc, Panzer
REJECT: madchemist, k-59, aedan, Cliges

Cliges becomes the leader.
 
Team of:

Cliges (me)
K59


Approve


More of MC's "see how the new person fits in". Blatant plagiarism, but I'm curious.
 
Reject

Second verse same as the first. (Technically third, but NC doesn't count)
 
Cliges's proposal of Cliges and k-59 was REJECTED 6-1:

APPROVE: k-59
REJECT: everyone else

k-59 becomes the leader.
 
Cliges secretly rejected his own proposal.

Cliges: Why would you do this? Why would you propose a team that you are not comfortable with?
 
I didn't think anything was likely to pass, but I wanted to see who might support k-59 and why. Further, I rejected it as insurance in case it gained some momentum.

All that did was raise the question of why no one supported him apart from himself. I'd have thought that we've moved past the "I must be on the team or else I'm opposing it" stage.
 
Huh. So nobody seemed to like that mission. Could mean it was a good mission and spies rejected, or it had a spy and the spies wanted to avoid incriminating themselves (though at proposal 3, you'd think a couple approve votes would look less suspicious than normal). It'd be interesting if it had two spies, but I'd think the spies would have been quite happy with that if so.

So I've basically said nothing of substance, but I'd be kinda tempted to try that mission again. Or to replace one of the parties with me, of course. :D
 
Oh, there's a proposal now.

Not sure what I think of Falc as of now. Or aedan, who would get the fifth proposal. Falc's reluctance to use the NC was odd, but then again, insisting that he use the NC is kind of a way of gaining cheap goodie points (and I know, I did the same thing myself). :laugh:

Meh.

Approve

I dislike being forced to accept proposals. Panzer, don't forget to use your card.
 
I'm going assume everyone was voting against Cliges and not me.

Must be, unless they didn't notice you were the next leader and almost bound to put yourself on the next team.

I'm wondering if that somehow clears you, though.