Cb_types. Can_use_title. It doesn't seem to recognize ROOT as a valid character/title (condition: de_jure_liege_or_above = ROOT)
On_success_title. It doesn't seem to recognize that you can PREV your way back to on_success_title (title = PREVPREV, PREVPREV being on_success_title)
Events/decisions/etc.: de_jure_liege = title/ROOT/etc isn't recognized. (Command, not a condition)
Events/decisions/etc.: The Validator doesn't seem to know yet that it can read modifiers from common\event_modifiers
That's all I can find for now.
1)Invalid Node1) Could you post the error message? Also was this in the 1.05d patch or something modded?
2) That was the issue we discussed where PREVPREV seemed to be strange and we weren't sure if it was working or not
3) Could you post the error message? Also was this in the 1.05d patch or something modded?
4) Could you post the specific issue? Right now the Validator reads stuff from the event_modifiers folder.
hidden_tooltip = {
k_norway = {
any_de_jure_vassal_title = {
de_jure_liege = k_scandinavia #ROOT/PREV/etc. is also valid
}
destroy_landed_title = yes
}
}
4) It's in there. It seems it can't parse event_modifiers due to a missing bracket, which seems to be the cause (someone at paradox apparently missed AltGr when typing the {, so wrote 7 instead)1) Fixed
3) Fixed, as well as the issue that k_norway wasn't recognized.
4) So heretic_stronghold is in event_modifiers\00_event_modifiers.txt? Did the Validator report any error messages about a typo inside the 00_event_modifiers.txt file? If so that would be the issue.
4) It's in there. It seems it can't parse event_modifiers due to a missing bracket, which seems to be the cause (someone at paradox apparently missed AltGr when typing the {, so wrote 7 instead)
Yeah, it worked.And fixing it, it works now? Yes, that typo...I reported it for 1.05b and still it isn't fixed
As useful as this tool is (and it is very useful) I just wish it could scan cultures.txt and find which names are unlinked or broken. Obviously I can't see a mechanical validation tool being able to do that but it would be incredibly useful -- because it's absolutely beyond tedious wading thru that file.
It wouldn't be possible because names are totally subjective (for want of a better word). I'm not sure how to explain the problem -- if you look in cultures.txt certain root names are linked up, such as Lewis_Louis and Étienne_Stephen. This means (for example) that if a King Stephen of England inherits the French throne then he'd become King Étienne because those names are linked. If you look thru the file you'll see what I mean. The problem is that there are loads of unlinked or incorrectly linked names in that file, but I can't think there's a way the validator could help locate them.Could you expand on what you are looking for?
It wouldn't be possible because names are totally subjective (for want of a better word). I'm not sure how to explain the problem -- if you look in cultures.txt certain root names are linked up, such as Lewis_Louis and Étienne_Stephen. This means (for example) that if a King Stephen of England inherits the French throne then he'd become King Étienne because those names are linked. If you look thru the file you'll see what I mean. The problem is that there are loads of unlinked or incorrectly linked names in that file, but I can't think there's a way the validator could help locate them.
One thing that'd be nice (if it isn't in currently) is checks for missing localization for events, decisions, etc. It'd be especially nice to have as an option separate from the rest of the localisation checking so it'd stand out more.Hmm okay. If you ever want some validation that seems possible to do, please say so.
One thing that'd be nice (if it isn't in currently) is checks for missing localization for events, decisions, etc. It'd be especially nice to have as an option separate from the rest of the localisation checking so it'd stand out more.
Yeah, that'd be amazing.Is it possible to impliment a check for missing flag .tgas? :unsure:
I said it before and I'll say again - very useful tool, thanks a lot!
Out of curiosity, using the latest version, I get a few results that intrigue me... I'n not sure if they were supposed to be picked on or not.
let me post their images, I suppose they'll speak better than words.View attachment 53456View attachment 53457View attachment 53458View attachment 53459View attachment 53460