Fb-fb:
Welcome to being Royals, fortunate princes. You at least have the freedom to ignore being told.
Many there be in the nobility who are not merely told, but forced with violence.
What naive fools these children be.
You may be too hard on them...and yet exactly right. This is the world they know and so they react as such. More below, but an astute point. I don't entirely agree, but you make a very good point.
Christ, this family is actually not as dysfunctional as it should be. Richard is either playing an extremely long game or in earnest. The crown Prince is a cad but not a hateable one. His wife is pleasant and sensible.
If the king and queen could just relax, perhaps things would be better. Though the king is right, his heir cannot keep two mistresses and expect no consequences.
I have a sinking feeling we are looking at a Comodus situation where the heir has all the qualities and training to be a great ruler and yet expectation, family issues and his own failings make him first a tyrant and then a disaster.
Functional or dysfunctional. Either, or...or both? I don't write for either. I write...or try to...for human beings and all of their attributes, fallible or no. As discussed in the not too recent (now) discussion in the
SolAARium...we all have faults. (This was a
good discussion, BTW. Worth it to pick up where I linked it.)
When Edmund is king, Isabella will rule him and the land.
IF Edmund is King...
Isabella is not likely to be left behind.
Honestly, I didn’t understand how Commodus turned out that way until I read Meditations. I can grasp how some people might come to believe and follow a dogma of “you will inevitably die, there is no life after death, and your soul will be annihilated as it merges with the universe from whence it came, therefore you should conduct yourself with soberness and rationalism in order to bring about the earthly harmony that the universe you will soon be rejoining desires,” but conversion is different from being born into it. When someone is born and indoctrinated from the time they can walk into something, that imprint never leaves them (at least partially), but as their system of logic is based on it, they usually run headlong into any flaws that the doctrine may have and may wind up inverting the original entirely. We will never know for sure, but I’d bet the clothes on my back that Commodus sat down to have a think one day and said “Wait, if there are no consequences for my actions in life after death, then why should I deny myself anything? I am (or I am about to be) Roman emperor, there is no limits to the amount of hedonism I could do!”
There are always consequences. FAFO.
Yeah. He could have been really good, and probably had the skills to make a good start at least, and inherited a great position. But...becoming king of the realm when very young, your stoic dad no longer around, and never having done anything fun?
Kinda obvious what happened next.
It's why you really can't do ck2 and 3 runs in real life forming perfect heirs from birth. Not without expecting some massive teething problems as they come into the throne anyway.
The actual system of the good emperors was better. A great emperor finding a non relative adult who had the potential to also be a great emperor. Make them heir.
Bingo. 5 good emperors after a century of issues.
Oh goody...more discussion of Roman history in a medieval English AAR. It counts. A bit off topic, but I'll allow it.
This is a really good reminder of how bad nepotism is...and it's not just from the perspective of government...
The amount of 'I only promote from my trusted closed group clique' nepotism at work I see is astonishing and also destructive to the business...
While I might normally agree with you, especially about unqualified trusted people; there is something to be said for those that are trusted. A fine line, to be sure. But I would much rather go to battle with one I trust than an unknown, no matter how much someone tells me that they are qualified. Nepotism is something else entirely.
Let's just say this - Edmund is qualified. Whatever that means. He has the pedigree. He just doesn't want it. Maybe I have been in-artful in pulling that across ( I don't think so) but he is NOT his brother. He does not hold the same ambition, clearly.
Well this seems incredibly messy but somehow, sort of, working. Either TBC or Kurties predictions could work, though I think I lean Kurtie. Edmund doesn't particularly want to rule, Isabella absolutely does, so gets to play about and she gets to run the country.
That is looking too far ahead though, Richard is going to provoke some kind of revolt/rebellion/power play against himself long before that. I'm fairly sure I've mentioned it before, but Warwick and Isabella one the same team in that struggle would be a sight to behold.
Gosh...now I want to write an entirely different road movie with Isabella and Warwick! Fun times!!
I obviously cannot say how it will play out, but there are myriad folks here that WANT. How will they get what they want?
Sorry I read this when first posted but didn't have time to reply. Hadn't realized I hadn't
I was surprised, and yet not so, to find that Edmund was aware of Dickon's feelings and relationship, and yet was okay with it.
When she claims she has slept with no other I wonder if she's being truthful or just saying what must be said.
But there is a vulnerable conversation between Edmund and Isabella, and this seems to being them closer to intimacy.
And after seems a true alliance of convenience and power is formed between two players with different but non-conflicting objectives.
I wonder how powerful that alliance might be, and if it might survive any challenge inflicted by King Richard's inept diplomacy.
And I wonder which alliance, in the end, might prevail. Edmund and Isabella? Elizabeth and Warwick? So many directions this could still go.
Gripping, as always,
@coz1!
Renss
Elizabeth...you mean Margaret. Easy to forget.
I'm really pleased that the nuance between Edmund and Isabella is appreciated. It would be so easy to write it as they hate each other for their various "extracurricular" activities. It just did not present as such to me as I wrote it. As I have developed them. This seemed somewhat natural and they rather took over as I wrote it out. I was not sure how it would be received and I am very happy that it was not entirely second guessed (though never fear to tell me if it does beg disbelief!)
I cannot say that Isabella is being truthful with Edmund. Is Edmund even truthful with himself? Is she? They each say what they need to say when they need to say it. Again, and as above...human.
As to alliances...and as
@El Pip suggests above...we all know something is coming. I know. And you folks will know it as I know.
To all - Timid territory here because I have another scene to present (and an important one) but I have not done as much writing as I would like of late. We are two scenes (including the one I will present in just a moment) from the end of chapter. It all builds, I hope. But I don't have the next one after to finish the chapter fully built and ready to go. Scary times!
I really do appreciate all of you that keep up as you can and I hope that I can continue to produce this story that I really want to tell! It is always in my mind. RL keeps it difficult, but I will persevere. I promise. And like an idiot, I started a new work too!
Mercia, Mercia Me in CK2. Another lark AAR, but I actually like the game. As if you don't have enough to read around these parts.
On that score, and as one more reminder...please do not forget to vote in the
Yearly AARland Year-end AwAARds. Less than a month left to add your voice if you have not already and as always...you should not feel any need to vote for this work, but please do vote! I'm not the only authAAR round these parts as you well know! I always appreciate the support and so will any and every other that toils upon these virtual boards. Please vote!
![Smile :) :)]()