It seems as if there are worries of this becoming a multi-way civil war. How true those are... that remains to be seen.
A War of Three Kings, perhaps?
A War of Three Kings, perhaps?
- 1
Thus it always is, right? The phrase "save your skin" seems apt.A good point well made. That hard won by the king’s great father stands in peril.
It’s like politicians these days when they go from ‘under attack’ to ‘embattled’ and ‘in the bunker’: as soon as the blame deflected from the king to them becomes strong enough to be labelled Evil Councillors, they are in mortal peril. They will only be partially removed though: just their heads.
Could be. Can't say yet, but I did introduce Arthur for a reason.It seems as if there are worries of this becoming a multi-way civil war. How true those are... that remains to be seen.
A War of Three Kings, perhaps?
The train (poor metaphor for this period, I know) rolls ever forward. Each seemingly working from their own interest and for their own interest. Writing this one, I actually started to feel some sympathy for good old Margaret.Margaret once against showing the boys how to do their jobs, and who's boss besides. Henry does seem to suffer from a want of clear-sighted advisors. But then sometimes it can take someone from outside the realm to see its problems most clearly. The million pound question, of course, is whether anything can actually be done before the shit begins to hit the proverbial.
I wonder who this could be…Allen bent forward at the table, holding his ale gingerly.
Ah. And here’s another likely lad. Stirrings, rumblings, plotting afoot from below. How much trouble can these disaffected cause?He’d known John Cade for some few years now
Indeed, I'm not certain why I decided to include my likeness in the work, but I did. I can't say it is a perfect representation, but it was a bit fun. By the way, my father's name is Lee. That gives away the game. (The other easter egg is a line from Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.)I wonder who this could be…
Ah. And here’s another likely lad. Stirrings, rumblings, plotting afoot from below. How much trouble can these disaffected cause?
That's exactly right. I'll have more to say about this later as we get another actual gameplay update, but as above things are still hewing close to RL history.Discontent runs within England. Plots are set in motion.
France is mostly lost, and there are those who dislike that.
Nay, Jack, me lad!We should ignore the poor administration by these high men that give our King his counsel?
True words.Suffolk, Moylens, Somerset...whomever. All of them snakes. All of them useless!
PlentyHow much trouble can these disaffected cause?
It’s been ages since I’ve played, but they were there in the past so I’m sure they still are. Presumably they’re more likely to get triggered when stability is very low. Religious revolts are certainly a thing, and they obviously have some overlap with peasant uprisings.Does the game include peasant revolts (most Paradox games seem to)? I’ve not played the EU series.
They do include peasant revolts but this one is more to keep with RL while we are in the early going.Nay, Jack, me lad!
True words.
Plenty
Does the game include peasant revolts (most Paradox games seem to)? I’ve not played the EU series.
Indeed, there are all types of different revolts in the game.It’s been ages since I’ve played, but they were there in the past so I’m sure they still are. Presumably they’re more likely to get triggered when stability is very low. Religious revolts are certainly a thing, and they obviously have some overlap with peasant uprisings.
Quite true. And it's not getting any better.There are troubles in England. Nobody is happy with this king and his council.
I'm getting all the players in place on stage, so I could not rightly leave out the Tudors.Aha, so now old Owain enters the fray. Just what sort of game is he planning on playing?
It is indeed quite a confusing period, especially with the many Richards. I try my best to keep them individuals, but it can get difficult.Another player? This is going to be hard to keep track of. That's good. It indicates that things are not being oversimplified.
Heh. True enough.If a telling of the Wars of the Roses doesn't have too many characters to properly remember, it's doing something wrong.
Though to be fair, for me that's a low number.
The Tudors will not if I have anything to say about it. I still need to do a bit more gaming so we're not quite there yet.Ah, the Tudors enter, stage left (the sinister side ). Their eventual rise to the crown was so improbable in our time that it would be unlikely to happen in a random situation again without some event-guidance etc. And we assume Normandy is likely to end up the same as it did in OTL: a cock-up, as Owen rightly observes.
Quite true.Like the others, I'm glad to see the Tudors enter the stage. The party could not be complete without them.
I think that the only possible way to have them on the throne at the end of the War is by an event.
It is indeed difficult. Yet I try my best...and mostly fail I think. It is an interesting read nevertheless, though.Another player? This is going to be hard to keep track of. That's good. It indicates that things are not being oversimplified.
Dare I say I find that one more interesting, both for novelty and the fascinating twists and turns of that world?To all - Things continue to move slowly on this one as my efforts have been towards the Creek AAR