Also, @Arkasas care to explain your PM vote? I believe that, without my vote being miscounted/screwed, your PM vote-switch would've made a tie.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
.png){kind=avatar}
I thought they were both wolves. It appears I was at least 50% mistaken.
I just checked rhe votes from yesterday.
You didn't change your vote.
Unless there's any vote altering traits, then IG made a wrong count and historydude should have died.
@Ironhide G1 we'll need you to look at this ASAP. MC clan members, try and reach out to IG and tell them to look at the thread, perhaps.
As this is a mess and will need GM ruling on how to proceed, as from what I can tell Historydude DID die last night and as such it's currently up in the air whether they're dead or alive.
As a result I also think for the fairness of rhe game that historydude shouldn't be posting anything until we have a, hopefully speedy ruling from IG on whether they're dead or alive. As in, I think they should act like if they'd been lynched, but pre update.
To get back to matters then I've noticed that Euro has been very absent. Which is peculiar. So I think I'll stick a vote their way to see if that might make them be active.
Vote Euro
Hey everyone, I've got a friend who needs some plausible deniability, so everyone say it with me:
I'm a seer.
I'm a seer.
Eheu.
No, it is a mistake which I have no clue how it happened. Doing it after long days of work is taxing on the brain.
This to me seems to fit this circumstance, if only because it is a pretty major GM mistake on my behalf that has stood for over 12 hours. This was a hard decision to make, but the mistake stands.
To be clear, please post the claim to give my friend deniability. Also, info that I feel like isn't worth keeping secret. There's 4 baddies remaining per a psychic using it last night.
I'm a seer.
With that out of the way:
- We've got arkasas killing historydude by PM. If we count 4 baddies (per happcats).
If we assume that historydude was a vill and we assume there was a single pack this might've been a parity push?
If wombat hadn't been shot and a vill!historydude got lynched, we'd have been at 5 baddies out of 10 living players.
That said, the update explicitly mentioned wombat as part of the arius pack, which usually doesn't happen in single-pack games? If it's a two-pack game then this parity-push idea can go straight out of a window.
And 5 starting baddies out of 16 players seems a bit much for a one-pack game, though it might've been 4 starting and an early sorc apprentice pickup, but still requires a lot of luck for the baddies.
Ok maybe not a parity push. But it still feels really off to me, lynching a second person just because makes me lean baddie on him. He hasn't been doing much of anything before this and then just randomly making a tie out of nowhere doesn't feel like something a villager would be doing.
VOTE ARKASAS
- Looking at wombat, I can't make much sense of his day 1 actions: He wasn't in major danger himself anymore by the time of that switch, and I was the main benefactor of that switch so I know it can't have been about bailing me out. I suppose it could've still been a 'redirect the voteswitch away from ike', but then nepechri was the most sensible target for a switch with how few people were online. Though then it might've just been him wanting to show activity.
His day 2 action was a vote for happycat in opposition to the chumley/historydude votes. I suppose this might be taken as historydude being a potential packmate, though it's also possible he was just trying to show activity in opposition to what might've been a vill vs vill runup. Leaning towards the latter tbh.
With that out of the way:
- We've got arkasas killing historydude by PM. If we count 4 baddies (per happcats).
If we assume that historydude was a vill and we assume there was a single pack this might've been a parity push?
If wombat hadn't been shot and a vill!historydude got lynched, we'd have been at 5 baddies out of 10 living players.
That said, the update explicitly mentioned wombat as part of the arius pack, which usually doesn't happen in single-pack games? If it's a two-pack game then this parity-push idea can go straight out of a window.
And 5 starting baddies out of 16 players seems a bit much for a one-pack game, though it might've been 4 starting and an early sorc apprentice pickup, but still requires a lot of luck for the baddies.
Ok maybe not a parity push. But it still feels really off to me, lynching a second person just because makes me lean baddie on him. He hasn't been doing much of anything before this and then just randomly making a tie out of nowhere doesn't feel like something a villager would be doing.
VOTE ARKASAS
- Looking at wombat, I can't make much sense of his day 1 actions: He wasn't in major danger himself anymore by the time of that switch, and I was the main benefactor of that switch so I know it can't have been about bailing me out. I suppose it could've still been a 'redirect the voteswitch away from ike', but then nepechri was the most sensible target for a switch with how few people were online. Though then it might've just been him wanting to show activity.
His day 2 action was a vote for happycat in opposition to the chumley/historydude votes. I suppose this might be taken as historydude being a potential packmate, though it's also possible he was just trying to show activity in opposition to what might've been a vill vs vill runup. Leaning towards the latter tbh.
Eh, mistakes happen. I also made more than a few counting errors in my game, I was just lucky enough they didn't affect the result.
Honestly Arkasas's plotter looks really bad as if it was counted right and I didn't shoot then the baddies would have won last night. I'm going to choose to place my vote there for now.
VOTE ARKASAS
VOTE ARKASAS
I'm a seer.
Not sure exactly what occurred last night other than Happycats shot Wombat. Was not aware of feline-wombat rivalry but WW is a strange and magical place. Looking over the voting record ::checks notes:: Arkasas is apparently playing the game, made some shifty moves, and it is day 3. Seems the stars have aligned and it's time to vote Ark.
Vote Arkasas
Not sure exactly what occurred last night other than Happycats shot Wombat. Was not aware of feline-wombat rivalry but WW is a strange and magical place. Looking over the voting record ::checks notes:: Arkasas is apparently playing the game, made some shifty moves, and it is day 3. Seems the stars have aligned and it's time to vote Ark.
Vote Arkasas
I think we determined that I'm still alive, then?
Anyway, Arkasas's vote should have killed me, and that would've killed two villagers, so they're looking suspicious.
Vote Arkasas.
Anyway, Arkasas's vote should have killed me, and that would've killed two villagers, so they're looking suspicious.
Vote Arkasas.
I, the seer, must apologize, for my tardiness. It was next to impossible finding a good samaritan to point me in the right direction.
I know now what needs to happen, and I'm lucky to find you playing your part as the Leader of the People's Justice League.
Seeing no mention of a substitute, I will reclaim my role and continue this conversation en privado...
Vote Wagonlitz
For using an invalid excuse to vote me (I am active--look at this post you are currently reading)
Having just read about the Historic Apprehension from the Game Master to render to the village that which belongs to the village, I must make the public case for the follow-through of the village's decision. A miscount is no reason at all to deny the life purchased by the village with its plurality of votes. It may be reason for delay, and that is only fair and can be excused. What cannot be excused is the denial of the very essence of the game, which is that the village votes to kill. Granting GM protection on the basis of incompetence is unfortunately not within your rights when facing a lynching mob. You are merely the rope we use to get our kill.
SURRENDER THE LIFE YOU OWE THIS VILLAGE NOW!
@Ironhide G1
SURRENDER THE LIFE YOU OWE THIS VILLAGE NOW!
@Ironhide G1
Alright, well, let's make this happen. Aedan bravely reached out prior to his death to provide his scans to a number of players. This included the fact that:
Euro is a scanned wolf.
Unvote Arkasas
Vote EURO
Euro is a scanned wolf.
Unvote Arkasas
Vote EURO