As everyone knows, I'm famously modest.Is there someone here without an ego?
As everyone knows, I'm famously modest.Is there someone here without an ego?
The GM then rather than simply telling us to stop discussing the topic, advised us that our course of action might be misguided. Players play the game not GMs. I would consider it far more just for me to haven been auto lynched on the spot for daring to discussion Jackson's PM than to be told I might be over reading it by the GM. When the GM contacted me one on one to say I must stop or he would end the game, I told him I would prefer to be subbed out as I could not continue to play in game which seemed to lack integrity based on what I knew, I am sad to say what I have learned since does not change that view.
Players make mistakes that's part of the game. There was no rule to safe guard Jackson from sending the wrong message and the GM should have allowed that mistake to play itself out with zero interference. I once hosted a lite game where the pack forgot to send a hunt order one night and hadn't set a standing order. I could have sent them a gentle reminder to set an order, but I didn't
Players should be allowed to play through mistakes.
But as GMs we are all much to quick to think we know best. In a later lite the goodies were all scanned and in contact. It was obvious who the last wolf was, all the goodies had to do was pile on and the game was over. So I ended the game. I shouldn't have done that, I completely foreclosed on any possibility of a miracle finish like what happened with Aedan. What's worst when the players rightly pointed out my error, I pestilently insisted on carrying out the last day to prove how meaningless it was....yeah. And I hope that Rysz will take the ending of this game better than I took the end of that game. And he will realize that myself, nor no one else bares any personal ill will for how this game unfolded, and instead we should all learn from it.
We all think we know how the game will play out when we GM, but we don't that's up to the players to decided and once the game has started we refrain from tinkering unless we absolutely must.
Thank you Rysz for hosting.
Ryzs when you start highlighting player mistakes and posting Ohh hey Jackson didn't make any mistakes and we will not speculate on what he might or might have not done it really creates this whole issue which I and as I suspect many other folks hate here: you screw up you have to pay for it... This is how it works in real life that's how it should work here...
Yes, the vote on Griffin. Changed it from jeray to you because of that. Don’t remember exactly why since 80% of the players had vote one of us at the point I don’t think you were the most obvious non Nay. I was planning on hunting Capibara today for similar resdons.
Welp, guess it can't be helped.
BTW, is there any wolf from the Nay Pack who would be so kind as to explain the hunt on me ? I think it's my vote on Black_Griffin that caused it (that vote feels like it was a huge mistake anyway, though I didn't expect to get hunted for it - more like lynched), I'd like to at least know if that's true or no.
(Or are wolves like magicians, never revealing their tricks ?)
First of all, let me say that I would qualify this as a "game ended by player mistake followed by GM overraction".
I was quite unwilling to start autolynching people for the mistake of another.
I totally agree on these kind of mistakes. But a mistake like this, caused more by how the software is setup, is never something that should interfere with the game. As far as I know, these kind of things did not happen back when I played a lot. It's a bit the same at my work. If the user makes a mistake in a customs declaration, that can and should not be corrected as per the rules. If it is a software hickup, it needs to.
But I now know better, that these kind of things apparently happen. I have learned here and next time I will just let it continue. Or, as this happened only on the 2nd day, I probably would have rerolled and start again.
I have learned. And that's also why I decided to end now rather than let it continue and make more errors along the way.
I never said as much. I only tried to highlight the distinction between facts and whatever people would gather from it.
Yeah if someone had hunted Jackson there would have been 4 witnesses....It actually could be a clever way to catch a wolf.I don't think it is a software mistake unless I'm misunderstanding @Jacksonian Missionary it seems like he typed the PM into the wrong box. That's on him. No GM intervention should happen. For that matter, people should be allowed to cleverly fake their role like that as an attempt to phish if they so desire.
I disagree, Jacksonian is blameless here. Well, not blameless in the sense he did nothing wrong, he certainly made a mistake. However his mistake was not remotely game breaking, it wasn't even role breaking. Had you done nothing the issue would have been minor. It wasn't something anyone expected, maybe it would upset "the balance," but the game could have continued on perfectly fine without any GM interference. My two cents is that this game goes on the record as some variant as "GM fail" with no blame assigned to players for the premature end.First of all, let me say that I would qualify this as a "game ended by player mistake followed by GM overraction".
Unless I'm missing some wildly different information, the issue here had nothing to do with software, Jacksonian just wrote it in the wrong PM chat. His message since you posted this only further suggests that this was solely due to human error, not blamable on the software. If software caused some kind of issue in the game, maybe GM interference is warranted, depends on the context. But this situation, as I understand it from the public evidence, was purely due to player error.I totally agree on these kind of mistakes. But a mistake like this, caused more by how the software is setup, is never something that should interfere with the game. As far as I know, these kind of things did not happen back when I played a lot. It's a bit the same at my work. If the user makes a mistake in a customs declaration, that can and should not be corrected as per the rules. If it is a software hickup, it needs to.
If that's the lesson you take away, I feel you're going in the wrong direction. If a player makes an error, that isn't against the rules, the GM should not interfere. Ending a game because a player accidentally revealed they were a scanner to a small group is a ridiculous overreaction by a GM, and shouldn't happen, regardless of the day it happens on.But I now know better, that these kind of things apparently happen. I have learned here and next time I will just let it continue. Or, as this happened only on the 2nd day, I probably would have rerolled and start again.
And why are you doing that as a GM? That's completely undue interference by the GM. Especially since, as we can see from the conversation posted, you were directly responding to the conversation and speculation of the wolves without having been prompted. If players start speculating about events that have occured, the GM should do nothing. A GM should only be contributing to conversations to clarify rules, not telling players that maybe they are reading an event inaccurately.I never said as much. I only tried to highlight the distinction between facts and whatever people would gather from it.
As I've said before, your mistake should not have wrecked the game. Worse mistakes have been made and the game gone on. I once had a packmate reveal the entire wolf pack to a villager in a lite on the old forum. The game didn't end, and Al-Aziz convinced the villager he was actually a wolf long enough for us to hunt him without him spilling our names. The wolves went on to win that game. Players coming back from major mistakes often make for compelling games. A GM ending a game because a player makes a mistake is the most ridiculous thing I've seen a GM do in the over five years I've player werewolf, and I played in both of Dadarian's games.I really am sorry guys, I didn't mean to wreck an entire game due to my mistake. I shouldn't be playing if I don't give my 100% focus. And especially sorry to Rysz, who spent a bunch of time on this game.
That's what I thought. Thanks !Yes, the vote on Griffin. Changed it from jeray to you because of that. Don’t remember exactly why since 80% of the players had vote one of us at the point I don’t think you were the most obvious non Nay. I was planning on hunting Capibara today for similar resdons.
He thought you were on a fishing trip.
So the villagers benefited too.
I am frankly astounded that no player did. I have never seen a GM attempt to simply remove a player midway through the game.
Tbh, I hadn't really put together the Randy who was on the fishing trip was the same Randy I said might be the seer's app![]()
Is there someone here without an ego?
I really am sorry guys, I didn't mean to wreck an entire game due to my mistake. I shouldn't be playing if I don't give my 100% focus. And especially sorry to Rysz, who spent a bunch of time on this game.
Yeah if someone had hunted Jackson there would have been 4 witnesses....It actually could be a clever way to catch a wolf.
I really am sorry guys, I didn't mean to wreck an entire game due to my mistake. I shouldn't be playing if I don't give my 100% focus. And especially sorry to Rysz, who spent a bunch of time on this game.
Hey I was building a case on Johho despite the "scan" clearly I wasn't all here for this game....Pfft. If you had connected the dots you'd have know there was no way I was a scanner![]()
Hey I was building a case on Johho despite the "scan" clearly I wasn't all here for this game....
Another abandoned game? Haven't been too many of those!
I'm traveling to DC today so I couldn't be active anyway.
I'll play in the next one. Put it up!