Werewolf CCXXXVIII - A New Year's Celebration

[Avernite]

I wanted to ask in general, especially towards the ghosts at the time, do you think I ruled in the right way regarding Dedonus's unvote?

I think the vote and unvote intent were clear, even if the spelling was off, so I would have 100% approved it.

 

[johho888]

Night 0 even. Imagine the village losing the seer then.

Might have the fixed the game balance considering the liar could claim the same role multiple times.

BTW I never even considered there was a liar in the game but RP posts are great places to hide that.

I wanted to ask in general, especially towards the ghosts at the time, do you think I ruled in the right way regarding Dedonus's unvote?

Yes. It was obvious he meant 'unvote'.

 

[Avernite]

Avernite - 5: aedan777 [129], De Chat [135], Werewolf-Bot-9000 [138], Darrman [147], Chieron [153]

Something I noticed: a zombie, 3 wolves, and aedan got me killed. I must've looked mighty scary.

 

[brovahkiin]

I agree that the goodie side was a bit stronger than the baddies in this game. I think a sorc would have been a good complement.



No, because afterwards I received from Dedonus both the priest's and the seer's scan lists. aedan2.0 had been double cleared on night 4, which I didn't know at the time I asked you to scan him.


Just minutes before deadline brova asked me "but why" in PM, I replied that he had been seer scanned just to see his reaction.

My reaction was "oh shit, this is an IJL they are going to TIE two villagers and get parity"

 

[beartjah]

I wanted to ask in general, especially towards the ghosts at the time, do you think I ruled in the right way regarding Dedonus's unvote?

Yes. The only part I disagree on is the note that you would not count misspelled unvotes in the future. So long as the intention is this obvious it shouldn't affect the game.

 

[nepechri]

Hey guys sorry for disappearing like that, I was quite busy over the weekend, and in that business I completely forgot about this game.

I am also a meh seer.

 

[Chieron]

I think the vote and unvote intent were clear, even if the spelling was off, so I would have 100% approved it.

I don't think so. Because it could've been a ruse, to get additional information about vote switchers and their activity. Intention was not 100% clear.
And as I said, there was enough time to correct it, that wasn't exactly a snipe vote (in which case, I'd consider to be more lenient, if there was no following vote).

 

[Arkasas]

Hey guys sorry for disappearing like that, I was quite busy over the weekend, and in that business I completely forgot about this game.

I am also a meh seer.

At least you're not a meh bear?

 

[De Chatillôn]

Yes. The only part I disagree on is the note that you would not count misspelled unvotes in the future. So long as the intention is this obvious it shouldn't affect the game.

Agree.

 

[nepechri]

So what about a new lite or something? I would rn it but
A) I probably don't have time and
B) I would forget most likely

I also noticed that I was a blessed seer and that was pretty dumb lmao.

 

[beartjah]

New lite is up

 

[PanzerCorps]

New lite is up

And a new big too!