-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Aftermath
Following yesterday's events, the last wolf surrenders himself to the remaining posse of townspeople, and leaves the region for good. The remaining townsfolk rejoice with the ending of the attacks, and the remaining festivities are ones for the ages. It's only a shame not everyone was able to attend the grand finale.
Winners:
Dedonus the Apprentice turned Priest with used Seerish Powers
Wagonlitz the Padre
Hax the Pathological Liar Villager
Aedan2.0 the Cursed Villager
Loser:
Alynkio the Wolf of the Vindictive Pack with used Seerish Powers
There wasn't a sorc but the priest had (or found) an apprentice? Blessed Seer? Ugh. I figured we were screwed after Johho got shot, but I didn't truly appreciate the extent of it. (Had I reported Aedan as a wolf would y'all have gone for it? I was kicking my pretty hard for not trying to get a fake outing, guess it wouldn't have mattered -- we weren't as close to parity as I thought.) (I guess we did have Arky's and Chieron's free kills to compensate). Also, looks like Alxeu left a prize for the first pack to hunt the zombie 
. Hunting Aedan after he subbed back in just would have been mean, and we felt other people were better targets anyway.
Even if we got the hunt back after Darman died, our standing order would have hunted DeChat.
We had Nepechri figured for seer as soon as Darrman turned out to be evil, but figured he might be guarded. Hax, we figured, might also be guarded and Johho had scanned Beartjah, so we knew he wasn't a cultist/sorc and figured he was our safest hunt.
Still, thanks for hosting, Alxeu. Sorry things didn't work out, packmates. I'd laugh at the other pack's floundering, but that would be mean, and they did apparently (try) to hunt the seer night 1 for us and it's not like I played much better
. Hunting Aedan after he subbed back in just would have been mean, and we felt other people were better targets anyway. Even if we got the hunt back after Darman died, our standing order would have hunted DeChat.
We had Nepechri figured for seer as soon as Darrman turned out to be evil, but figured he might be guarded. Hax, we figured, might also be guarded and Johho had scanned Beartjah, so we knew he wasn't a cultist/sorc and figured he was our safest hunt.
Still, thanks for hosting, Alxeu. Sorry things didn't work out, packmates. I'd laugh at the other pack's floundering, but that would be mean, and they did apparently (try) to hunt the seer night 1 for us
and it's not like I played much better 
Didn’t have much time for this unfortunately. Sorry about that.
Thanks for hosting alxeu and congrats to the winners.
Not crazy about the setup though. Blessed seer, priest, GA, liar, padre, witness, hunter in a game not much bigger than a Lite and with the baddies divided in two packs with no way to find the seer but one single sorc scan. Not that any of the pack played very well...
Thanks for hosting alxeu and congrats to the winners.
Not crazy about the setup though. Blessed seer, priest, GA, liar, padre, witness, hunter in a game not much bigger than a Lite and with the baddies divided in two packs with no way to find the seer but one single sorc scan. Not that any of the pack played very well...
What was the other pack thinking on day 2?
I faintly remember something similar from another game, where it also ended in desaster.
And yeah, this was a difficult setup, even without mishaps.
The hunter power is awkward as a compensation, as it reveals the name.
I faintly remember something similar from another game, where it also ended in desaster.
And yeah, this was a difficult setup, even without mishaps.
The hunter power is awkward as a compensation, as it reveals the name.
.png){kind=avatar}
I spent most of this game forgetting I was playing in this game. *insert shrug here*
GG and thanks for hosting.
How many land which lies did you make, Hax?
I'm glad that it was Hax who was the mouthpiece. I'm not sure how many other poeple I've been in so many JLs/packs with that they'd know that I'd never make things like a fake padre claim and hence that it could be trusted when I claimed it.
(I consider fake claiming things like padre, seer, priest, GA, etc. too dangerous so never do it. If I fake claim stuff it'll be something else.
How many land which lies did you make, Hax?
What did he claim?
I'm glad that it was Hax who was the mouthpiece. I'm not sure how many other poeple I've been in so many JLs/packs with that they'd know that I'd never make things like a fake padre claim and hence that it could be trusted when I claimed it.
(I consider fake claiming things like padre, seer, priest, GA, etc. too dangerous so never do it. If I fake claim stuff it'll be something else.
We will not go quietly into the night. We will not vanish without a fight. We’re going to live on. We’re going to survive. Today we celebrate our INDEPENDENCE, MURICA AND FOX NEWS!
I agree that the goodie side was a bit stronger than the baddies in this game. I think a sorc would have been a good complement.
No, because afterwards I received from Dedonus both the priest's and the seer's scan lists. aedan2.0 had been double cleared on night 4, which I didn't know at the time I asked you to scan him.
How did you figure out that nepechri was the seer? Darrman was found out by myself through my first pathological lie that I used to seer scan him.
I was protected on night 4 after I outed Darrman, which also was a no-hunt night. @alxeu, I presume I was the target but got saved by beartjah?
and they did apparently (try) to hunt the seer night 1 for us
Night 0 even. Imagine the village losing the seer then.
I'm sorry brova but the JL knew only you or alynkio could be the final remaining wolf. We chose you because of the hunter trait. :/
No longer updating the Records?
Night 3: Seer scan Darrman (result: wolf)
Night 4: Seer scan Wagonlitz (result: "You were imprisoned by the Security Chief last night, your scan went to waste.")
Night 5: Seer scan Wagonlitz (result: villager)
Just minutes before deadline brova asked me "but why" in PM, I replied that he had been seer scanned just to see his reaction.
The first no hunt was on nepechri.
The second no hunt was from pack extinction. Had the feral pack lived, they were targeting Hax, anyway, so still a no hunt.
The second no hunt was from pack extinction. Had the feral pack lived, they were targeting Hax, anyway, so still a no hunt.
As Hax had already mentioned, we had Aedan double scanned. If you would have told us that he was a wolf, we would have known you were the last wolf (and brovahkiin would still be alive for the victory).
I wanted to ask in general, especially towards the ghosts at the time, do you think I ruled in the right way regarding Dedonus's unvote?
In the situation when it happened, I don't think it affected the game. The village was going to win by that point and it would have only delayed the game if you have ruled my typo as disqualifying my vote change. The only players who were not scanned were alynkio and brovahkiin. The only shot the wolves had for winning was hunting Aedan, but because he took over for the bot, that hunt would not have been as appealing as hunting some of the other players.
Chieron was going to be lynched, whether you ruled in my favor or against it. However, I could understand how something like this could be controversial in a different context (such as the wolves being two deaths away from parity, which wasn't the case in this game).
Chieron was going to be lynched, whether you ruled in my favor or against it. However, I could understand how something like this could be controversial in a different context (such as the wolves being two deaths away from parity, which wasn't the case in this game).