I would say 1360 so we can play with Tamerlane. Start him as a commander and make an event chain where he becomes ruler.
- 2
- 2
- 1
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Now that I think about it, if the game started a bit earlier we could get Varna crusade to crash the Ottomans
- 2
- 2
I would like to hear the forums opinion on if the start date(s) should change in EUV, and if so how they should change. Start-dates are an important issue worthy of discussion since they function as focal point for development of new mechanics for the game.
Personally, I would like to see consolidated start-dates similar to CK III with the second start-date at 1648 as it would encourage more play in the later-half of the game and give the option of playing in India where an AI Mughals exist.
Otherwise I should flag in July there was also a discussion on start-dates, but in the context of an EUIV DLC:
1350 Start Date Final EU4 Expansion?
I suggest a new start date, a new pre-renaissance institution, more tech groups (good thing they dont already start at tech 1) and new lqnd and naval unit types. I think this would be a really exciting idea for a final DLC for the game as it...forum.paradoxplaza.com
Should start at 10,000bc and have no end date.
- 3
- 1