I HATE the "can't research the other techs because you picked x" thing. Please @Johan Reconsider (or add game rule to bypass that)
- 2
- 1
- 1
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I think 3d models are still ugly but they did improve them since when they were revealed originally. I think the levies system and the transition to professional armies is most worst thing because it is most simplistic in the game, there is no strategy just rush it the tech and building barracks. In reality, levies should function like CK2 and not CK3.
- 1
I mean people did WC's in Victoria 2 with GREECE. In a 100 years. Of course somebody will conquer the world in 500 years, or probably 200. They will just spam bailiffs and kill rebels and something. IDK why there is so much hostility around that, though I'd also like it to be very, very hard
- 1
The balance against "just rush professional armies" where supposed to be that those are hella expensive.
Problem was probably that money was far to available in the YT build.
If you got to chose between levies and infrastructure or professional armies and minimal infrastructure. Levies will probably be the best option for most nations for a while
Me too. I'd prefer to have all techs available but a slight bonus to researching techs from focus group.
- 2
- 1
top 4 the worst things:
1. easy blobbing
2. antagonism system (a little updated version of ae from eu4)
3. rivalry system (artificial, same system from eu4)
4. colors (too grim and unsaturated)
1. easy blobbing
2. antagonism system (a little updated version of ae from eu4)
3. rivalry system (artificial, same system from eu4)
4. colors (too grim and unsaturated)