• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Tinto Maps #18 - 13th of September 2024 - Persia & Caucasus

Hello everyone, and welcome to one more Tinto Maps! Today we will be taking a look at Persia and the Caucasus! These are regions that encompass several modern-day countries and regions (Iraq, Iran, Balochistan, Afghanistan, Transoxiana, etc.), but for the sake of simplicity, we decided to name this DD this. Let’s start, without further ado!

Countries:
Countries.png

Colored Wastelands.png

The region is quite interesting in 1337, as there are plenty of countries to play with. The Ilkhanate is still alive, but in name only, the real power being hosted by the Jalayirids, who are overlords of some of their neighbors (the Chobanids, and the Eretnids). Other countries, such as Gurgan, the Kartids, and Muzaffarids are also struggling to get the hegemony over the region. Meanwhile, the strongest power in the Caucasus is the Kingdom of Georgia, although the region is also quite fragmented among different polities.

Ilkhanate.png

And speaking of the Ilkhanate, you may have wondered why isn’t it a unified tag… Well, it’s because we consider that it is clearly in decadence, having lost any grasp of authority over the provinces, so the best way of portraying it is through an International Organization. What we can see in this mapmode is that there are two pretenders to get the power, the Jalayarids and Gurgan, with the other countries still being formally part of it. I won’t talk more today about how it works and its features, but I’ll just say that there are two clear fates for the Ilkhanate: being dissolved, as historically happened, or being restored in full power as a unified country.

Dynasties:
Dynasties.png

Not much to say today about the dynasties, as they’re akin to the country names, in most cases. Well, you might wonder which one is the yellow one, ruling over Gurgan… That country is ruled by the Borgijin, heirs of Genghis Khan. Now you get the full picture of their rule over the Ilkhanate being challenged by the Jalayirids, I think…

Locations:
Locations.png

Location 2.png

Locations 3.png

Locations 4.png

Locations 5.png


Provinces:
Provinces.png


Areas:
Areas.png


Terrain:
Climate.png

Topography.png

Vegetation.png

We’re back to a region with lots of different climates, topography, and vegetation. This will make it very unique, gameplay and looking-wise.

Harbors:
Harbor.png

You might notice that there are ports in the Caspian Sea… Because, well, it’s considered a sea in our game, so there can be ships and navies over it.

Cultures:
Cultures.png

There's quite a lot of cultural division throughout the region... The Caucasus is, well, the Caucasus, divided among lots of different people. Then we have the Iraqi and Kurdish in Iraq, Persian and a number of other cultures in Iran, Baloch in Balochistan, Afghan in Afghanistan, and Khorasani, Turkmen, Khorezm, Hazara, and Tajiks, among others, in Khorasan and Transoxiana.

Religions:
Religion.png

Another interesting religious situation. Orthodox is the main religion in Georgia, and Miaphysitism in Armenia, with other confessions spread here and there throughout the Caucasus (Khabzeism, and three 'Pagan' confessions, Karachay-Balkar, Vainakh, and Lezgin). Then Iraq is divided among Sunni, to the north, and Shiism, to the south. And Iran is in an interesting situation, having a Sunni majority, but with some important Shiite pockets here and there. And Zoroastrianism, of course. It was not trivial to properly portray them, as we don't have good data for the 14th century. So what we did was some calculations, between sources that tell that there was still a majority as late as the 11th century, and the religion becoming severely reduced by the 16th century. Therefore, we decided to go with 20% of the population as a general rule of thumb; however, we're quite open to feedback over this matter.

Raw Materials:
Raw Materials.png

This region is full of rich resources, in stark contrast to the one we showed last week, Arabia. There are a couple of bugs on this mapmode that you might spot, I think.

Markets:
Markets.png

This region has several markets: Tabriz, Baghdad, Esfahan, Hormuz, Nishapur, and Zaranj., This will make for regionally fragmented-but-integrated economies (that is, good market access everyhwere, but with regionally diverging economies).

Population:
Population.png

Population 2.png

Population 3.png

Population 4.png

Population 5.png

The total population of the region is around 9M, taking into account all the different areas that we’re showing today. That is divided into about 4.5M in Iran, 2M in Iraq, 1.5M in the Caucasus, and around 1.5M in Transoxiana.

And that’s all for today! Next Friday we will be taking a look at India! Yes, in its entirety; we think that it is the best way to do it, although we’ll talk more about it next week. Another change, only for next week: the DD will be published at 10:00 instead of the regular 15:00, as I won’t be available in the afternoon to reply. Letting you know so there’s a proper wow-pole-run, yes. See you!
 

Attachments

  • Religion.png
    Religion.png
    3,2 MB · Views: 0
  • Cultures.png
    Cultures.png
    3,1 MB · Views: 0
  • 86Love
  • 84Like
  • 5
  • 3
  • 1Haha
  • 1
Reactions:
It's Morbin' time!

Sorry, wrong forum.

For those who don't know, I’ve posted the South and East Georgia critiques already. If you wanna see them, just go couple of pages back and check them out. My "critiques" have rather been suggestions and reviews to be honest. seems like this one might be just the same, not gonna lie. Without further ado, today I'll talk about the West Georgia (also known in Late medieval times as Likhs Imereti and Imereti, in early medieval times as Egrisi and Apkhazeti and in antiquity Lazica and Colchis).

Okay so, about the west Georgia. My dear fatherland. To my opinion, it's probably the most important part of the country for it's survival. I'll explain later the reasons why is that so. Two of three Kartvelian peoples originated here in the western Georgia, those two being : Zans (Mingrelians and Lazs) and Svans. Here is a cultural-geographic map of Likhs Imereti:
Opera Snapshot_2024-10-03_155109_earth.google.com.png

here you go.

The west Georgia is located between Greater and lesser Caucasus and Likhi ranges. Which gives it strategic defensive upper hand, more so than other two parts of Georgia ever had. mountain ranges are mostly covered in Woods and so is Kolkheti valley, which, unlike east Georgian valleys, is not very fertile, only little chunks of it are. It is also covered in many swamps and rivers. So this is the reason why Mongols never went there and Turks only managed to subjugate it. Russians are only ones, since Byzantines, to manage incorporating this part of Georgia into their country and they didn't even use warfare, they annexed their vassal Georgian states one-by-one. Even if the conquerors managed to ever cross Likhi pass, people would abandon their settlements and go to hideouts in the woods and mountains. while the foreign armies were left to starve when they couldn't cross back to east or south Georgia, cause crosses between them would be blocked by snow or flooded by rivers. For large group of people, passing through Caucasus mountains is unimaginable, even if the warrior peoples like Svans that would kick your ahh in an instant didn't live there, U can't pass the Caucasus with an entire army, even Hannibal wouldn't manage to do that lol. All over the West Georgia there are couple a-dozen of rivers that swell up every year and are impossible to pass if locals remove the bridges. partisan warfare from locals and possible interactions with wild animals would be a major pain in ahh too, not to mention diseases passing down from flies and mosquitos. Did I forget to mention constant avalanches and landslides that are as common as a rainfall here? Haha, I think now you understand what makes the west Georgia the best for survival of Georgian nation. The west and mountainous east has always been basis for Georgian survival and rebuilding, that what makes it so important.

Here I'll show the things I've talked about on the map below:
Opera Snapshot_2024-10-04_134001_earth.google.com.png

This atrocity of a map might be a little confusing but It depicts western Georgia perfectly imo. I'd like if game makes it as hard and as costly as possible to conquer this piece of land. I think Paradox team did good job about landscaping the west Georgia. BUT, WE NEED IMPASSABLE LIKHI RANGE ! Please Tinto team, Likhi range is an imperative thing to add. The reason why the west Georgia and East Georgia were called “Likhs Imereti and Likhs Amereti” is also connected to Likhi range. In medieval Georgian “Likhs Imereti” means the “the other side of Likhi”, while “Likhs Amereti” means “this side of Likhi”. Georgians have always been aware of Likhi’s strategical significance.









About impassable terrain, Georgia is verry Mountainous, so there are many places that one would have a hard time getting to. many of those are already marked by Paradox team, but some are missing. I have suggestions though. lets view it on the map:

Location 24.png

Pink color might be ugly here, but I chose it for better visibility. About the topic itself - there should be impassable terrain between Lata and Bedia, a mountain range is between them. Same is true for Latali (I'll talk about this location later) and Lentekhi, there is a mountain range called "Svaneti range" between them, pass should be located from Lentekhi to Ushguli. Tsageri and Samegrelo have no points where they connect to each other, there is an enormous mountain called "Askhis mta" and a mountain range between them, so I think that adding impassable terrain here would increase accuracy as well. There are marshes around Rioni river between Guria and Mingrelia, so Poti is an only spot where these two would connect to each other. I've talked about next ones already in other two critiques I made about the South and East Georgia, nevertheless, I'll repeat it here too. Akhaltsikhe and Khikhani should have a passing connecting them. There should be no connecting points between Shorapani and Tori (Akhaltsikhe). And most important, Likhi range impassable terrain must be implemented between Surami (Tsagvli) and Shorapani, Katskhi (Skande).









About province map mode here is a map of my proposals:

Location 2.png
In the current version of the Tinto maps, West Georgia has three provinces: Abkhazia, Imereti and Samegrelo. I suggest renaming Samegrelo to either Mingrelia or Odishi. Odishi is medieval Georgian word for Samegrelo, while Mingrelia is an English form of it. I also suggest adding two more Provinces - Guria to the south and Svaneti/Takveri to the north. I'll Explain why. So to be honest, there are way too few locations the map as it stands and if u add more of them, the need for new provinces appears. Representing Guria as Mingrelia is a crime against humanity, Guria should be a completely separate province. Gurians, who are Georgian-speaking, have very strong regional identity, way different than Mingrelian one, they are descendants of Meskhetians migrating westwards after Arab invasions, There are natural boundaries of the river Rioni, swamps around it and Paliastomi lake that separates these two from each other. Guria has also been an independent principality from 1460-ies onwards before it's annexation by Russia in 1829. So I think that giving Guria a province of it's own is a must. About Svaneti/Takveri, well this region doesn't have a real name of it's own, so I had to come up with something. This one includes three historical-geographical entities of Georgia: Svaneti, Lechkhumi and Racha. Originally all three where settled by Svan speaking Peoples while rest of the west Georgia has been populated by Zans. I think having this province as a separate one is very logical. Imereti province, in its current state, is way too overcrowded. mountainous western Georgia is different than Imereti. Svans need to have a province of their own, in this way, it's more interesting and strategical to play. I’ll go on and review each and every one of my proposed provinces one by one.

Okey so lets start with Imereti:
Opera Snapshot_2024-09-23_040209_earth.google.com.png

Imereti is a part of west Georgia that has the closest cultural ties to the east Georgia. Imeretians are Georgian-speaking people themselves, they are a product of Kartlians gradually migrating towards west Georgia after Arab invasions. Imereti has historically been divided into two geographical and four cultural parts. Geographical ones being: Upper and Lower Imereti and cultural ones: Argveti (Margvi), Persati, Okriba and Vake (Samokalako). Upper Imereti is covered in hills and woods, while lower one is mostly just valleys. Cultural Ones are along these lines too, Argveti and Persati have high altitudes, while Vake and most Okriba, on the other hand, are located on lowlands. Location map mode also follows the cultural division of Imereti. Katskhi, Shorapani and more than a half of Skande are parts of Argveti. Vartsikhe is Persati, Sajavakho is Vake and Kutaisi is Okriba. Imereti the center of west Georgia and has the best strategic location there as well. It’s guarded by mountains on the three sides: from the north Greater Caucasus and its tributary ranges, from the south by Meskheti range and from the west by Likhi range. Lower part of Imereti has traditionally been more populated and developed, the abundance of noble families, such as: Chijavadze, Chiladze, Lortkipanidze, Agiashvili, Ghoghoberidze... also strengthens this argument. So, Sajavakho here should have around 20k pops and be grasslands, Vartsikhe should be around 10k and Kutaisi 30-35k. Skande should have around 10k pops, while Katskhi and Shorapani around 5-7k each. Katskhi is another new location I think should be added. This land has Historically been ruled by Tsereteli family. Katskhi has strategically important location, as it is on crossroads between Imereti, North Georgia, Kartli and savage tribes of North Caucasus such as Alans. Shorapani has the same strategical upper hand as well, it connects west, east and south Georgia to each other. Shorapani was controlled by Abashidze family for most of Kingdom of Imereti's existence (1478-1810). Abashidzes were considered as the most influential and powerful feudal lords of Imereti. King Solomon I (1752-1784) spent the entirety of his early years fighting to weaken those strong feudal lords from Abashidze and Eristavi of Racha families and end human trafficking ring around Georgia. Other location that I propose on adding is "Sajavakho". Sajavakho is a little strip of fertile land, originally it was even larger, included parts of Samegrelo, but it was shortened later and Mingrelian parts are called "Sachilao" (name comes from a large feudal lord called Javakh Chiladze, who was the owner of it). Sajavajho should be flatlands and producing wheat, Kutaisi instead should be hills and producing lumber (now it's producing wheat).

Let's jump to Mingrelia:
Opera Snapshot_2024-09-23_033400_earth.google.com.png

About Samegrelo. As you can see I propose further on dividing Mingrelian locations, adding 3 more + giving Poti to Guria.

Mingrelians are members of Georgian sub-ethnic group that speaks their own Mingrelian language which is closely related other three Kartvelian languages, but is mutually intelligible with only Laz. It makes sense, as Lazs and Megrels are both Zans, they were only distanced after Meskhetians migrated from the east and separated these two. You might wonder, if that means that Georgians and Megrels are different groups or not, but no there not. It's confusing only because of English language error, for us Georgians it's not. Let me explain, so in last critique I've mentioned that Georgians are mix of three sub-ethnic groups, these three being: Karts, Svans and Zans (most Lazs don't consider themselves as Georgians though). Every one of them have their own language - Svans speak Svan language, Lazs - Laz language, Mingrelians - Mingrelian and Karts - Georgian. So that's the problem, Georgian language should of be named Kart, or Kartian language as it is in Georgian itself (Kart-uli), and word "Georgian" itself would better describe collective name for Kartvelian languages as it is in Georgian (Kartvel-uri). Kart = Georgian speaking, Kartvel = ethnic Georgian.

Okay so back to the main topic from my rant, So there are 6 locations in Samegrelo province of current version of Tinto maps, those ones being: Bedia, Anaklia, Tsalenjikha, Poti, Ozurgeti and Batumi. I think Guria should be a separate province, taking Poti, Ozurgeti and Batumi locations with it, I'll talk about Guria later. After those changes Mingrelia would have been left with only 3 locations, more should be added imo. Let's divide Poli location into two, as I did on the map, make Poti part of Guria province and Tsikhegoji entirely different Megrelian location. Tsikhegoji is located near Imereti and is mostly flatlands, I think fruits would be a good bet for a raw material there, but honestly idk. People here would be Majority Mingrelian, not minority, please change it. There would’ve been around 25k people here. Lets move on, about "Anaklia" location, I divided it into two - Zugdidi and Samurzakano locations. These two are divided by Enguri river, Mingrelian people here have historically been different from each other. Anaklia location should be renamed as Zugdidi, because Anaklia has, for most of the time, been a small settlement, while Zugdidi was the center of the principality of Mingrelia. Samurzakano to west of Zugdidi is a flatland, I think there is a whole lot of woods there. About population, Bedia and Anaklia both have about 60k population both in current preview of the game. Samurzakonano is between these two and has both of their territories, Abkhazian locations also have way too much population (I'll talk about it later). so what I think should done here is - Zugdidi - 25-30k people, Samurzakano - 20-25k, Bedia 10k. Samurzakano had more people living there than entire Abkhazia before XX century. Also in both Bedia and Samurzakano population should be almost entirely Megrelian, as Abkhazian migrations to the east started much later. About Tsalenjikha and Chkondidi (Tchkondidi, i don't know if a Georgian letter "ჭ" is spelled as "Ch" or "Tch"). I think Tsalenjikha should be divided into two. Chkondidi location was suggested by one of my fellow Georgian gamers here, I agree with him, Chkondidi and territory around it has been significant location for much Megrelian history. Firstly, it was a center of one of most powerful and wealthy Georgian Orthodox church eparchies. Secondly, It has an insignificant strategical location connecting Lechckumi and therefore, entire north western Georgia to Samegrelo proper. This place was called "Salipartiano" and after feeble Lechkhumian feudal lords, from the Lower Strad of “Aznauri” class, Chikovani family, got hold of "Salipartiano" they became the most powerful nobles of west Georgia and eventually, became second Dadiani dynasty, meaning, Princes of Samegrelo themselves, overthrowing the first Dadiani dynasty that ruled it from 11th century. I think legumes should be produced here, this place is located on hills and is covered in woods. Population would be around 7-8k. About Tsalenjikha, leave everything just the same. Chkondidi and Tsikhegoji would have had some Georgian pops and Zugdidi Svans.

Next one up is Guria:
Opera Snapshot_2024-09-23_050202_earth.google.com.png

So as you guys see, I don't suggest changing Guria that much. Well, if don't count bringing it into existence. As I've already said a couple of times, I think that Guria should be a different location than Samegrelo and should incorporate three different locations: Poti, Batumi and Ozurgeti.

As I've already said Guria was an independent principality from XV century. It was still nominally part of kingdom of Imereti. Guria was ruled by Gurieli family which is a branch of Vardanisdze family. Vardanisdze (Vardanidze) family ruled three major Georgian provinces by 1337: Svaneti, Samegrelo (Dadiani first dynasty) and Guria (Gurieli). In the end, they remained only here. Guria itself is Georgian-Speaking and is separating two Zan speaking peoples from each other. Then again, Guria is a product of Meskhetians migrating westwards after Arab invasions, same is true about Achara, Shavsheti and Klarjeti.

Out of three locations I've mentioned in Guria two should be left as it is. One, Poti would get much smaller in size that would also shrink it's population to 2-3k people. Poti should also be made as a marsh and a raw material would probably be fish. Poti itself has historically been contested location between princes of Samegrelo and Guria. According to Julius von Klaproth, XIX century German ethnographer, Poti was at times part of Guria, at times part of Mingrelia, before late XVI century when it was concurred by Ottomans.

Next province is Svaneti/Takveri:
Opera Snapshot_2024-10-04_125549_earth.google.com.png

Svaneti/Takveri should be a province in mountainous north-west Georgia that incorporates 3 historical Georgian regions: Svaneti, Lechkhumi, Racha. all three are divided into different parts. I'll talk about Svaneti first.

Svans are third subgroup of Georgian nation, they've always lived in mountainous West Georgia and Abkhazia. Svans are probably the most prideful, warlike, stubborn and resilient people of all Georgia, they make code of honor and brotherhood as their main mottos of life. They fought the feudalism the longest out of all Georgian people and in the end, after some concessions here and there, they won. I highly recommend reading a book called "Free Svaneti" composed and published by Svan scholar, named Egnate Gabliani (1881-1937) in 1927, where he talks about these issues. Svan language is the hardest and most distant to other three Kartvelian languages. What were boundaries of Svaneti hasn't been defined until much later on. Today it’s divided into three parts: Upper Svaneti, Lower Svaneti and Kodorian Svaneti. These three are represented as Ushguli, Lentekhi and Lata on current Tinto maps version. I'll review every single one of them. I'll start with Lower Svaneti.

So, Lower Svaneti has the mildest nature out of these three, where landslides are much more common then avalanches, not as common as in Lechkhumi to south though. Most of lower Svaneti is located around Tskhenistskali river (which is called "Lashkhvir" in Svan) and it's tributaries. Lower Svaneti is divided into three parts: Lashkheti, Cholouri and Lentekhi, lower Svan dialects are similarly divided into the same three groups of the same names. Lashkheti is a name for upper part of Lower Svaneti, it was ruled by Lashkhishvili family at first, then by Gelovani family, after they were expelled from Upper Svaneti by the locals in early XVI century. Choluri is in the middle of The Lower Svaneti and was controlled By Gardapkhadze family, while Lentekhi was a kingly domain and no feudal lord resided there, it was like Kiziki was for Kakhetian kings, a stronghold which provided strategical safety as well as number of skilled soldiers and workers for the king. depiction of lower Svaneti by Tinto team is good, I wouldn't wanna change anything, probably except for adding impassable terrain between Lentekhi and Latali (View on map 3) as Lower and Upper Svaneti have historically been distanced by those mountains between them.

Upper Svaneti is located on much higher Altitudes than Lower Svaneti. Between Greater Caucasus and Svaneti ranges around river Enguri and it's tributaries, nature here is stunning, but harsh and avalanches are common. This part was always the center of the duchy of Svaneti, were dukes of the region, called "Eristavs", were appointed by the kings of Georgia to rule in their name. Eristavs, all around Georgia, had high autonomy but were more of overlords for the local pops, rather than, Feudal lords, this reality changed after the break up of the kingdom of Georgia, when "Tavadi" social class and “Satavado” political entity, a semi-independent brutal feudal lordships, emerged. Despite this, Eristavi title was hereditary, only given by the king nominally. Same was true for Eristavs of Svaneti, who came down from, beginning in XI century, from Vardanidze family, but in XIV century they became disobedient to the monarchy. so the king Bagrat V used force of Meskhetian and Klarjetian warriors in 1360-ies, marched through Svaneti, shackled Vardanisdzes, stripping them of power and appointed loyal Gelovani family as new Eristavs. Since that point, Eristavs of Svaneti were loyal to the kings of Georgia and then Imereti, before early XVI century, when the title was abolished after the local Svans overthrew last Eristavi - Abesalom Gelovani. Since then, Upper Svaneti stayed as a part of kingdom of Imereti only nominally. Upper Svaneti is divided into two, separated by "Bali" ridge, the one to east, is called "Upper than Bali Svaneti" and the one to the west - "Lower than Bali Svaneti". After the abolishment of Eristavi of Svaneti title by Svans from the "Upper than Bali Svaneti", this part of the region became known as "Free Svaneti". People here organized themselves into a confederation of clans which was deprived of any centralized government, that means, no wars, no taxes and no feudal lords - a literal libertarian dream society lol, while some weaker feudal clans, "Aznaurs", were let be, their titles remained as only nominal, those clans have had no political or social power over commoners, these two classes had completely equal political rights, the only difference is that these "Aznaurs" developed into warrior class called the coolest name ever - "Vargs" and became sellswords around Georgia. "Lower than Bali Svaneti", however, became Mingrelian domain, two rival noble (Tavadi) houses remained here - house Richgviani and house Dadishkeliani, both subservient to Principality of Mingrelia. In early XVIII century Dadeshkelianis murdered whole Richgviani family in cold blood and became brutal feudal lords establishing Principality of Svaneti in "lower than Bali" region, hence stopping paying homage to Mingrelia (They tried to conquer "Free Svaneti" as well, but got their ahhs kicked by 50 or so people that lived there haha). I dumped this whole history on you, to state why I think that Ushguli location should be divided into two - Latali and Ushguli. Latali would be where 'Dadishkeliani Svaneti" was located, while Ushguli where "Free Svaneti" was. I'd be happy if there would be releasable nations of these two (If there is even such a thing as a "Releasable Nations" in "Project Caesar") or historical events that would make those two to pop up. Latali would have 4k pops, while Ushguli 3k. Both of them are mountainous and deeply forested. Stone as a raw material in upper Svaneti is good, but I'd suggest adding gold in Latali as one. Svans have historically been known for obtaining gold from river beds with goat fur.

The third Svaneti is kodori gorge one. This place, along with whole Abkhazia, was inhabited by Svan Tribes such as probably Misimians, Sanigs and Apshilae since anticity. Svans were replaced by Abkhazians gradually all around Abkhazia from V-VI-th centuries onwards, when their ancestors, Abasgoi arrived here and Kicked them back into mountains. Presence of Svans near the Black sea are testification of their presence, for example the name of the capital city "Sokhumi" is derived from Svan word for hornbeam tree -Tskhum, which is an older version of the name (the funniest thing is that the center of another separatist region of Georgia - Tskhinvali, also derives from hornbeam tree - Tskhinvali, rtskhila means hornbeam in Georgian, Tskhinvali itself - something like "hornbeam place"). Same is true for the Kodori gorge. Which is called "Dali" by Svans themselves. While I must admit that I was wrong that Svans lived here continuedly before 2008, pointed out by @giorgi1999, Abkhazians only arrived here in XVI century after their princes conquered it from Mingrelians. It seems like most of Svans left this place, because they didn't want to pay taxes to Abkhaz princes and were forced to settle down in upper Svaneti because of Abkhaz migration. The theory that Svans lived here before that is provable thanks to much evidence: Svan ethnologist and a priest - B. Nizharadze (1852-1919), mentions that, in Dali (Lata location) there are many abandoned villages, in some of them severally damaged towers still stood, for those who don't know, Svans are infamous for their towers, while Abkhaz-Adyghe people have never been known for tower constructions. Nizharadze also believes that some surnames are descended from Dali gorge: he writes: “In Chubakhevi community, in the village of Tsaleri there is a family named Gvarmiani. The Gvarmianis repeatedly state even today that their ancestors originally came from Dali’s Gorge”. One of the most famous and distinguished ethnologist and historian, Roland Topchishvili (b. 1949) in his book - "Svaneti and Its Inhabitants" states - "When did Kodori (Dali) George Svans possibly move to Enguri Gorge Svaneti and particularly which villages did they settle? Several kins state to be originally from Kvemo (Below) Bali Svaneti and settled in Zemo (Upper) Bali Svaneti according to the narratives. This migration might have occurred in the XV-XVI centuries when the central, unified, Georgian state broke up into many kingdom-principalities and weakening of the central control minimized the feudal relations in Kvemo (Below) Bali Svaneti (or the upper part of Enguri Gorge) which caused in its turn the revival of territorial tribal relations in social attitudes". So I think that Lata location would be Svan-speaking even back in XIV century. Abkhaz people themselves, who migrated here after, XV century, were forced to leave Kodori gorge (Lata) by Russians in 1860-ies and instead of them, Svans arrived here from Upper Svaneti in 1890-ies. There are practically no hints of Abkhazian toponyms anywhere in Kodori gorge, While same is not true for Svan and Mingrelian ones. Svan toponyms include - Tsebelda, Lata, Gentsvishi, Omaraishara, Chkhalta... Also the last point, 5k population for Lata is way too high I think, Even in best situation Kodori gorge could feed more than 1,5k people in middle ages.

Okay, I think I've talked enough about Svans. Lets move on to my fatherland, Lechkhumi (Tsageri location). But first, a photo of stunning Svaneti and it's towers:
svaneti.jpg


Lechkhumi is another West Georgian mountainous location (View on map 8). It's represented as "Tsageri" in "Project Caesar" current preview. I a subjectively biased towards this part of Georgia, because I'm originally from here, I'm Lechkhumian, even though both me and my father were born here in Tbilisi. So I do have some incite about it. Lechkhumi is a really small place, it's divided between three parts - Tskhenitskali gorge, Lajanuri gorge and Rioni gorge. all three have same identity today, but in the past Lajanuri and Rioni parts where called Skvimnia in Greek and Chkhvimnia in Georgian, Tskhenistskali parts were called Takveri. Takveri later became the collective name for Lechkhumi and Racha and name Chkhvimnia was expanded to Tskhenistskali gorge. Since then Lechkhumi (from Chkhvimnia) remained, geographically, all the same.

Warning! If you are interested in Lechkhuimian history, read next paragraph, if not, skip ahead!

Lechkhumi didn't have much significance before the fracturing of Georgia in XV century. It was mostly known as a treasury store and capable warrior source for much of united Georgia's history. But for the Kingdom of Imereti it had more strategical significance for many reasons. Firstly it has good location, between trade roads from North Caucasus and Svaneti, than it's good defense base because it's just north of the capital city of Kutaisi and then again, it was source of capable warriors and workers. This is why even though, in ideal situation it couldn't support it, Lechkhumi had many powerful feudal lords throughout history. For example Inasaridze and Lashkhisvili families were very powerful early on. Lashkhishvils controlled Lajanuri gorge, while Inasaridzes Rioni gorge. Gelovani family migrated from Svaneti in XVI century and remained the most steadily powerful clan before XX century. Lechkhumi was ruled by a person with a title of "Lechkhumistavi", which means a head of Lechkhumi. This title was given by Bagrationi kings before late XVII century, after which it was given by Dadiani princes of Mingrelia. Lechkhumistavi was a powerful person as it seems. For example Lechkhumistav Khosia Lashkhishvili (held the title between 1660-1671) was one of the most influential and powerful person around Georgia at the time. He supported Kartlian king Vakhtang V against the Vamek III Dadiani and organized his murder. He also overthrew the king of Imereti Alexander III with a help of his wife - Darejan and made some guy with a surname of "Chuchunashvili" king of Imereti. But after some time he overthrew Chuchunashvili, murdered queen Darejan with his own hands and Helped king Bagrat IV get his throne. It would be interesting to see him in the game in some way, I suggest event that makes him pop up I think Khosia Lashkhishvili himself, Prince Levan II Dadiani and Solomon I are the most interesting political figures of the west Georgia at those periods. After that, Lashkhisvils and Inasaridzes lost all their power as they became disloyal to both the kings and Dadians. in 1671 Lechkhumistavi title was already held by a person from a new feudal dynasty - Akhvlediani. The name of his was Khosia Akhvlediani. Akhvledians were loyal to the king that's why they were made as "Tavads" and "Lechkhumistavs", to be a stepping stone in Lechkhumi for the monarch. It seems like Akhvledians were given a title stripped from Lashkhisvils and lands stripped from Inasaridzes. At the Same time, other two noble families emerged here - Asatiani and Chikovani ones. Chikovans became "Tavads" because they literally overthrew Dadiani family and became princes of Mingrelia themselves. While Asatianis emerged because they were close to Chikovans. Since that, Lechkhumi was part of Mingrelia before it was annexed by Russia in 1867. Akhvledians were loyal to the kings, Asatians and Chikovans to the prince of Mingrelia, while Gelovans were intermediatory between these two.

Locals of Lechkhumi were originally the Svans that have slowly been Georgianized sometime after the forming of the Kingdom of Georgia (year 1008). According to historian Geronti Gasviani (1929-2012), Kartisation of Lechkhumi should've only ended around or after the break up of the kingdom of Georgia, precisely, when Georgian-speaking people, in XV century from Imereti and in XVI century from south Georgia, migrated to Lechkhumi, while most of other Georgian scholars don't agree with him, everyone acknowledges, that Lechkhumi once was Svan-speaking. What's the issue though, is whether or not Lechkhumians still spoke that language during the start date. Okay so, toponyms are not a major help here, cause we have already established that Svan toponyms are old here, but we can't know exactly when were they named. All we know that Georgian toponyms are the newer ones. The only thing that might make this issue a bit clearer is family names of locals. So family names are a major thing around Georgia, especially in Lechkhumi. Here if someone shares your surname then u are probably related. Georgian surnames even have regional varieties. For example - Dze, Shvili and Eli endings are Georgian (Kartian) ones, Ia, Ua, Ava are Mingrelian ones and Ani, Iani, Uani, Ovani are Svan ones. Well, this is true only from XIV century onwards, before that every region had surnames with same endings as Svaneti (Samegrelo still has though, cause Ia, Ua, Ava are just shortened versions of Iani, Uani and Ovani). In Lechkhumi most of surnames have Svan endings. Same is true for my surname as well, Akhvlded-iani (Akhvild was probably Svan male name). Some Lechkhumians even have family names that only can be understood though Svan language, for example, Mushkudiani means descendant of a smith. While all this is true, most of those Svan-sounding names are of people that migrated here from Svaneti between XIII-XVIII centuries, not locals. I won't go through those surname histories here, but if you are interested in the issue I would recommend reading "Lechkhumian family and personal names" by Roland Topchishvili. Those few surnames that can be traced back to Lechkhumi even before Svan migrations, are mostly Georgian sounding, for example - Inasaridze, Nemsadze, Nemsitsveridze, Kurashvili, Kruashvili, Silagadze, Sanikidze, Ugrekhelidze, Shekishvili ets. even those, Svan-sounding, surnames, like: Akhvlediani and Kvariani, that can't be traced back to Svaneti, have probably migrated to Lechkhumi from there we just don't have any proof yet. This means that by XII century Lechkhumi was already Georgianized. But I still think that in XIV century It would be still Svan majority as - firstly, Georgian speaking Lechkhumians were just Georgianized Svans, thanks to migrations, most of folks there in XIV century would have been directly from Svaneti.

Another issue is that 3k population for Lechkhumi is too low. I'll explain why. Even though Lechkhumi is mountainous, it has much milder weather than Svaneti, it can support agriculture, fishing (Lechkhumi means place of the fishes in Mingrelian), Tsageri was major center for Georgian Orthodox church, kings of Georgia used this location as a storehouse for their treasure, there is a much more room for population settlement. as I've already mentioned, all settlements Lechkhumi are built around three major rivers, all three gorges could support around 3k people each during middle ages. There were no censuses during this time there, but there are still ways to help us determine how much people would be living here through time. Historically, more people lived in Lechkhumi than in Svaneti for the reasons mentioned above. for example, much latter in XIX century, Lechkhumi uezd, which included both Svaneti and Lechkhumi, had the population of around 50k people. 17k of those folks lived in Svaneti, while 33k in Lechkhumi. The ratio was 2-1 between these two. in early XVIII century there were 2k Lechkhumians in the military force of the principality of Mingrelia. population of Lechkhumi would probably was probably even lowest in history, at the time because in Georgia population decreased dramatically since XV century. I believe, in XIII century around 8k people would live here.

I like the fact that Wine is a raw good produced here though, nice touch. This is probably the only product that comes from Lechkhumi for sale in other parts of the country. there are 3 major types of Grape that are grown here: Usakhelouri, Tsolikouri and Ojaleshi. We can conclude that wine production has always played a big role here according to historical evidence. "According to the register of Tsageri Eparchy", which was composed in XVI century, the annual agricultural income of the church from it's land and peasants included - 320 "goros" (10,240 liters) of wine, around 10 Tons of wine, which is not much but if we consider that this was only produced by 64 households (around 360 people) and Tsageri eparchy was only a small landowner there, when the most of the land and the peasant was the property of the king and 4 or so feudal houses at the time the real amount would be much higher. Here is a map of winemaking districts of Tsageri municipality (around 80% of Lechkhumian territory).
lechkhumi_wine_map_final.jpg


The only historical-geographical region of Svaneti-Takveri that is left is Racha. Racha is another Georgian-speaking region of mountainous west Georgia. It's divided into two parts: lower and upper Racha. Upper Racha also is divided into two, the Ghebi locality and the rest. Ghebi is the highest settled part of Racha. This part of Georgia (I mean Racha) is represented as Tsesi location on the game map. I think is should be divided into two according to Upper/lower Racha distinctions. Ghebi and Tsesi locations. The population of Tsesi should be around 7k and of Ghebi around 4k people. lumber would have been a raw good in Ghebi location.

So Racha was Georgianized early on because of Georgian migrations after Arab invasions. So population in Tsesi should be Georgian. But in Ghebi Georgian with Svan minority as Ghebi settlement and villages around it was controlled by Svans, until in XV century the most powerful nobles of Racha at the time, Japaridzes (who were of Svan background themselves), started the war with Svans and made them concede these parts after Japaridzes and other Racha-Lechkhumian feudal lords murdered 700 Svans in cold blood. Since then, people there gradually became Georgian-speakers. Most of Rachan surnames are also of Svan origins much like Lechkhumi, but those in Racha have Georgian forms.

Racha has never been an independent principality itself. In middle ages Racha was part of Takveri duchy, which was disbanded in XV century, when Lechkhumi became a direct domain of Bagrationi king. After that point, Racha became a duchy of its own before annexation of Kingdom of Imereti by Russia in 1810. Duchy of Racha was ruled by Eristavs of Racha, who came down from different noble families. At first Eristavs were from Charelidze family, but later from Chkheidze one. There was a chance for Racha to become Principality of its own, as Eristavs were firstly loyal to the kings, but after the weakening of the monarchy and main rivals of Eristavs - Japaridzes, Duchy of Racha became increasingly powerful, but king Solomon I ( I mentioned him before) was able to defeat Eristavs and Abashidzes as restore the power of the king and abolish slave-trade.

Overall, I like the depiction of Racha by Tinto team, the things I'd like to change is - divide Tsesi into two parts, make them culturally Georgian. That's all.

The last province - Abkhazia:
Opera Snapshot_2024-10-09_212227_earth.google.com.png

This is Abkhazia. I can write a ton about it's history, historical demographics and ethnology, but yeah I don't wanna make this thread political. We all know whom really this land belongs to - Yeah, it belong to the glorious nation of NORTH MACEDONIA ! Seriously though, I won't, wanted to but I won't. Don't wanna appear as a subjective nationalist or something in those lines here, I really don't. I'll just make a brief overview.

Abkhazia is a province in the farthest west of Georgia. It has been part of Georgia since antient times. On Tinto team's map current Abkhazia has 4 locations: Pitsunda (Bichvinta), Anacopia, Sokhumi and Lata. while I believe that borders of locations are perfectly drawn, I think that province borders should be changed. Lata should be part of a new, Svaneti/Lechkhumi location, I think I've already talked about this issue enough. Instead of it Costa should be made a part of Abkhazia, as it was a part of Abkhazian duchy, under the kingdom of Georgia, before Ubykhs (Jiks in Georgian) migrated there. I've actually talked about Abkhazia a bit when I reviewed Mingrelia and Svaneti. I can tell you that those folks didn't live past Kodori river at the time. The principality of Abkhazia was established in XV century and slowly expanded to the east. when they expanded the local Mingrelian and Svan pops usually migrated to east. I show you this phenomenon to you on the map:
Opera Snapshot_2024-10-02_014912_earth.google.com.png


so this is a root that Abkhazians took, they migrated to the mountains first than to the sea-side. here is a Georgian language text regarding the issue:

deba4852-ed7d-4e19-b1dd-ce1146d96241.jpg


Also Abkhazians were not Christians, probably only nobles, they followed their own folk religion. Then most of them converted to Islam, but most of Muslim Abkhazians left for Turkey after Caucasian wars. Some Abkhazians are Muslims to this day (around 20% of them). Some Abkhazians (around 20% of them) still practice Abkhazian native paganism, while others were ether converted to Christianity in XIX century, or are just Mingrelians assimilated into Abkhazian society. The note I presented above states that the center of an eparchy went from Bichvinta (Pitsunda) to Kutaisi, because there were no Christians left there. Ubykhs and Abazas were not Christians as well. Both practiced their folk religion at first, then Islam. Circassians were only Christians except for Ossetians in North-east Caucasus, that is only the small fraction of population, mostly it was nobles who were really Christian.

It's good seeing Abazas near black see, but the wouldn't have been living in Costa location, they lived in Bichvinta (Pitsunda) instead and from there they migrated to the north Caucasus, because they were driven out from there by Ubykhs who, on the other hand, were driven out from there lands in the north by Shapsugs (Circassian tribe). This migration started in early XIV century, Many Abazas would already lived in North Caucasus. If we are being real though, Abazas were not thing before their migration to north Caucasus. They were just two different tribes of Abkhazians. Here I'll present you two maps of the change in ethnic make up of north-west Caucasus between XIV and XVI centuries, with this one I want to illustrate migration of Abazas :

Opera Snapshot_2024-10-04_094354_earth.google.com.png


Opera Snapshot_2024-10-02_011641_earth.google.com.png


Another Issue i have with the depiction of Abkhazia is population around it. Guys, Abkhazia is and was Mountainous forested lands where people mostly lived in tribalistic lifestyle, even feudalism didn't fully form there. Peasant and Mingrelian were same words in Abkhazian as they had no concept of peasantry themselves at first. Abkhazia couldn't support a big amount of population. Abkhazia's geographical features is the reason why Georgian princes and kings were not able to fully integrate locals into ether Georgian orthodox church or social structure. There after, I think that the population in Bichvinta (Pitsunda), Sokhumi and Anacopia should be at least two times less. So that's it, it was all a should say about Abkhazia

My other suggestions:

please, change names of some locations into correct Georgian form, at least when Georgia controls them. Pitsunda - Bichvinta, Sukhumi - Sokhumi or Tskhumi. Tskhumi is medieval version of the name, that's what it was called at the time.

Other things. I know Kabardia is not in West Georgia (at list yet, :D) but, guys I think Circassians would be already mass migrating to the east, so I think that Kabardian culture should exist on the map. When Circassians united in early XIV century under the kingdom of Inal the great, Kabardia was part of it.

here is ethic map of Caucasus revised by me:
Location 2.png

I've already talked about ethnic compositions the provinces and locations around Caucasus should rather have if you are interested just read my other two critiques. I didn't mention that Adharis didn't live here in Caucasus. Adharis lived in modern day Iranian Azerbaijan rather than republic of Azerbaijan, which was mostly inhabited by Tats at the time. Completely different group. Tats are Persian-Speakers, Adharis on the other hand, had a language of their own, probably related to the ancient Median language.

So that's it, seems like after 4 weeks of work I've finally finished working on my critiques, I've spent countless hours reading sources and writing the review itself, I remember writing South Georgia critique like it was 100 years ago, even though only couple of weeks passed haha, "I was there Gandalf, 3000 years ago!". Can't lie it was amazing, I had lots of fun, mostly while reading the literature. God do I love the complexity and the history of my nation. Mountains are so amazing man, they make one small nation so diverse and interesting, even if I wasn't Georgian, I'd be still stunned by it.

I'll probably only post a sole follow up, writing down the sources. I'm too lazy to do that now. Feel free to ask questions and criticize me! Thanks for you dear attention fellow nerds!

On the ending note, here's a picture of Svan countrymen from XIX century:

fnv8fa4ofu671.jpg


Here is list of West Georgian Noble families from:


Imereti:
  • Abashidze
  • Agiashvili
  • Bagrationi (The kings)
  • Chijavadze
  • Chiladze
  • Chkheidze
  • Dgebuadze
  • Eristavi of Bari (Chkheidze)
  • Gabashvili
  • Ghoghoberidze
  • Iashvili
  • Khidirbegishvili
  • Kipiani
  • Lionidze
  • Lortkipanidze
  • Machabeli
  • Mikadze
  • Mikeladze
  • Mkheidze
  • Nizharadze
  • Palavandishvili
  • Parijaniani
  • Tsereteli
  • Tsulukidze
Racha:
  • Charelidze
  • Eristavi Of Racha
  • Garakanidze
  • Gelovani
  • Iashvili
  • Inasaridze
  • Japaridze
  • Kipiani
  • Kotridze
  • Kuchaidze
  • Lashkhishvili
  • Mikeladze
  • Mkheidze
  • Tsulukidze
Lechkhumi:
  • Akhvlediani
  • Asatiani
  • Charkviani
  • Chikovani
  • Gelovani
  • Inasaridze
  • Kipiani
  • Kruashvili
  • Kvariani
  • Lashkhishvili
  • Mandaria
  • Nemsadze
  • Palavandishvili
Svaneti:
  • Charkviani
  • Dadishkeliani
  • Devdariani
  • Gardapkhadze
  • Gelovani
  • Goshteliani
  • Ioseliani
  • Japaridze
  • Kipiani
  • Kurdiani
  • Lashkhishvili
  • Nizharadze
  • Richgviani
  • Zhorzholiani
Guria:
  • Artmeladze
  • Beridze
  • Gugunava
  • Gurieli (The Prince)
  • Eristavi of Guria (Shervashidze)
  • Jakeli
  • Kobaladze
  • Machutadze
  • Maksimenishvili
  • Makhadze
  • Manvelashvili
  • Nakashidze
  • Shalikashvili
  • Tavdgiridze
Mingrelia:
  • Amunaskiri
  • Anchabadze
  • Apakidze
  • Beridze
  • Chichua
  • Chikovani
  • Chiladze
  • Chkotua
  • Dadiani (The Prince)
  • Dgebuadze
  • Gamsakhurdia
  • Goshadze
  • Jaiani
  • Jolia
  • Kochakidze
  • Kordzaia
  • Kortodze
  • Mikadze
  • Mikeladze
  • Mkheidze
  • Paghava
  • Shelia
Abkhazia:
  • Anchabadze (Georgian) (Achba - in Abkhazian language)
  • Aredba (Abkhazian)
  • Chaabalurkhva (Abkhazian) (Sotishvili - in Georgian language)
  • Chkotua (Mingrelian)
  • Dziapsh-Ipa (Abkhazian) (Zepishvili - in Georgian language)
  • Emukhvari (Abkhazian)
  • Gechba (Abkhazian)
  • Inal-Ipa (Abkhazian) (Inalishvili - in Georgian language)
  • Marshania (Mingrelian)
  • Shervashidze (The prince, Georgian) (Chachba - in Abkhazian language)
  • Tsanba (Abkhazian)
 

Attachments

  • 523562_415850941796222_1124753981_n.jpg
    523562_415850941796222_1124753981_n.jpg
    105,7 KB · Views: 0
  • Duchy_of_Svaneti,_XIII_c.svg.png
    Duchy_of_Svaneti,_XIII_c.svg.png
    490 KB · Views: 0
  • JXijjiWWiJ4Y8.jpg
    JXijjiWWiJ4Y8.jpg
    166,4 KB · Views: 0
  • 2021071901393381319.jpg
    2021071901393381319.jpg
    22,3 KB · Views: 0
  • 1280px-Map_of_Imeretia,_Guria,_Mingrelia,_and_Abkhazia_in_1810_(Tiflis,_1902).jpg
    1280px-Map_of_Imeretia,_Guria,_Mingrelia,_and_Abkhazia_in_1810_(Tiflis,_1902).jpg
    473,9 KB · Views: 0
  • Antike_und_mittelalterliche_Länder_in_nordwestlichen_Georgien.svg.png
    Antike_und_mittelalterliche_Länder_in_nordwestlichen_Georgien.svg.png
    197,2 KB · Views: 0
  • Kingdom_of_Imereti_1535-1545.svg.png
    Kingdom_of_Imereti_1535-1545.svg.png
    296,4 KB · Views: 0
  • Samegrelo_15-18_cc_GSE_map.svg.png
    Samegrelo_15-18_cc_GSE_map.svg.png
    280,9 KB · Views: 0
  • Ossetian_expansion.svg.png
    Ossetian_expansion.svg.png
    501,6 KB · Views: 0
  • GZUHm-lXcAEFHX4.jpg
    GZUHm-lXcAEFHX4.jpg
    262,5 KB · Views: 0
  • Principality_of_Guria_(XV-XIX_centuries)-en.svg.png
    Principality_of_Guria_(XV-XIX_centuries)-en.svg.png
    319,8 KB · Views: 0
  • Opera Snapshot_2024-10-03_060939_earth.google.com.png
    Opera Snapshot_2024-10-03_060939_earth.google.com.png
    2 MB · Views: 0
  • 41598_2023_45500_Fig1_HTML.jpg
    41598_2023_45500_Fig1_HTML.jpg
    90,2 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • 8Love
  • 4Like
  • 2
Reactions:
It's Morbin' time!

Sorry, wrong forum.

For those who don't know, I’ve posted the South and East Georgia critiques already. If you wanna see them, just go couple of pages back and check them out. My "critiques" have rather been suggestions and reviews to be honest. seems like this one might be just the same not gonna lie. Without further ado, today I'll talk about the West Georgia (also known in Late medieval times as Likhs Imereti and Imereti, in early medieval times as Egrisi and Apkhazeti and in antiquity Lazica and Colchis).

Okay so, about the west Georgia. My dear fatherland. To my opinion, it's probably the most important part of the country for it's survival. I'll explain later the reasons why is that so. Two of three Kartvelian peoples originated here in the western Georgia, those two being : Zans (Mingrelians and Lazs) and Svans. Here is a cultural-geographic map of Likhs Imereti:View attachment 1199265
here you go.

The west Georgia is located between Greater and lesser Caucasus and Likhi ranges. Which gives it strategic defensive upper hand, more so than other two parts of Georgia ever had. mountain ranges are mostly covered in Woods and so is Kolkheti valley which, unlike east Georgian valleys, is not very fertile, only little chunks of it are. It is also covered in many swamps and rivers. So this is the reason why Mongols never went there and Turks only managed to subjugate it. Russians are only ones, since Byzantines, to manage incorporating this part of Georgia into their country and they didn't even use warfare, they annexed their vassal Georgian states one-by-one. Even if the conquerors managed to ever cross Likhi pass, people would abandon their settlements and go to hideouts in the woods and mountains. while the foreign armies were left to starve when they couldn't cross back to east or south Georgia, cause crosses between them would be blocked between by snow or flooded by rivers. For large group of people passing through Caucasus mountains is unimaginable, even if the warrior peoples like Svans that would kick your ahh in an instant didn't live there, U can't pass the Caucasus with an entire army, even Hannibal wouldn't manage to do that lol. All over the West Georgia there are couple a-dozen of rivers that swell up every year and are impossible to pass if locals remove the bridges. partisan warfare from locals and possible interactions with wild animals would be a major pain in ahh too, not to mention diseases passing down from flies and mosquitos. Did I forget to mention constant avalanches and landslides that are as common as rainfall here? Haha, I think now you understand what makes the west Georgia the best for survival of Georgian nation. The west and mountainous east has always been basis for Georgian survival and rebuilding, that what makes it so important.

Here I'll show the things I've talked about on the map below:View attachment 1199266
This atrocity of a map might be a little confusing but It depicts western Georgia perfectly imo. I'd like if game makes it as hard and as costly as possible to conquer this piece of land. I think Paradox team did good job about landscaping the west Georgia. BUT, WE NEED IMPASSABLE LIKHI RANGE ! Please Tinto team, Likhi range is an imperative thing to add. The reason why the west Georgia and East Georgia were called “Likhs Imereti and Likhs Amereti” is also connected to Likhi range. In medieval Georgian “Likhs Imereti” means the “the other side of Likhi”, while “Likhs Amereti” means “this side of Likhi”. Georgians have always been aware of Likhi’s strategical significance.

About impassable terrain, Georgia is verry Mountainous, so there are many places that one would have a hard time getting to. many of those are already marked by Paradox team, but some are missing. I have suggestions though. lets view it on the map:

View attachment 1199267
Pink color might be ugly here, but I chose it for better visibility. About the topic itself - there should be impassable terrain between Lata and Bedia, a mountain range is between them. Same is true for Latali (I'll talk about this location later) and Lentekhi, there is a mountain range called "Svaneti range" between them, pass should be located from Lentekhi to Ushguli. Tsageri and Samegrelo have no points where they connect to each other, there is an enormous mountain called "Askhis mta" and a mountain range between them, so I think that adding impassable terrain here would increase accuracy as well. There are marshes around Rioni river between Guria and Mingrelia, so Poti is an only spot where these two would connect to each other. I've talked about next ones already in other two critiques I made about the South and East Georgia, nevertheless, I'll repeat it here too. Akhaltsikhe and Khikhani should have a passing connecting them. There should be no connecting points between Shorapani and Tori (Akhaltsikhe). And most important, Likhi range impassable terrain must be implemented between Surami (Tsagvli) and Shorapani, Katskhi (Skande).









About province map mode here is a map of my proposals:

View attachment 1199268So I in current version of the Tinto maps West Georgia has three provinces: Abkhazia, Imereti and Samegrelo. I suggest renaming Samegrelo to either Mingrelia or Odishi. Odishi is medieval Georgian word for Samegrelo, while Mingrelia is an English form of it. I also suggest adding two more Provinces - Guria to the south and Svaneti/Takveri to the north. I'll Explain why. So to be honest, there are way too few locations the map as it stands and if u add more of them, the need for new provinces appears. Representing Guria as Mingrelia is a crime against humanity, Guria should be a completely separate province. Gurians, who are Georgian-speaking, have very strong regional identity, way different than Mingrelian one, they are descendants of Meskhetians migrating westwards after Arab invasions, There are natural boundaries of the river Rioni, swamps around it and Paliastomi lake that separates these two from each other. Guria has also been an independent principality from 1460s onwards before it's annexation by Russia in 1829. So I think that giving Guria a province of it's own is a must. About Svaneti/Takveri, well this region doesn't have a real name of it's own so I had to come up with something. This one includes three historical-geographical entities of Georgia: Svaneti, Lechkhumi and Racha. Originally all three where settled by Svan speaking Peoples while rest of the west Georgia has been populated by Zans. I think having this province as a separate one is very logical. Imereti province, in its current state, is way too overcrowded. mountainous western Georgia is different than Imereti. Svans need to have a province of their own, like this, it's more interesting and strategical way to play. I’ll go on and review each and every one of my proposed provinces one by one.

Okey so lets start with Imereti:View attachment 1199269
Imereti is a part of west Georgia that has the closest cultural ties to the east Georgia. Imeretians are Georgian-speaking people themselves, they are a product of Kartlians gradually migrating towards west Georgia after Arab invasions. Imereti has historically been divided into two geographical and four cultural parts. Geographical ones being: Upper and Lower Imereti and cultural ones: Argveti (Margvi), Persati, Okriba and Vake (Samokalako). Upper Imereti is covered in hills and woods, while lower one is mostly just valleys. Cultural Ones are along these lines too, Argveti and Persati have high altitudes, while Vake and most Okriba, on the other hand, are located on lowlands. Location map mode also follows the cultural division of Imereti. Katskhi, Shorapani and more than a half of Skande are parts of Argveti. Vartsikhe is Persati, Sajavakho is Vake and Kutaisi is Okriba. Imereti the center of west Georgia and has the best strategic location there as well. It’s guarded by mountains on the three sides: from the north Greater Caucasus and its tributary ranges, from the south by Meskheti range and from the west by Likhi range. Lower part of Imereti has traditionally been more populated and developed, the abundance of noble families, such as: Chijavadze, Chiladze, Lortkipanidze, Agiashvili, Ghoghoberidze... also strengthens this argument. So, Sajavakho here should have around 20k pops and be grasslands, Vartsikhe should be around 10k and Kutaisi 30-35k. Skande should have around 10k pops, while Katskhi and Shorapani around 5-7k each. Katskhi is another new location I think should be added. This land has Historically been ruled by Tsereteli family. Katskhi has strategically important location, as it is on crossroads between Imereti, North Georgia, Kartli and savage tribes of North Caucasus such as Alans. Shorapani has the same strategical upper hand as well, it connects west, east and south Georgia to each other. Shorapani was controlled by Abashidze family for most of Kingdom of Imereti's existence (1478-1810). Abashidzes were considered as the most influential and powerful feudal lords of Imereti. King Solomon I (1752-1784) spent the entirety of his early years fighting to weaken those strong feudal lords from Abashidze and Eristavi of Racha families and end human trafficking ring around Georgia. Other location that propose on adding is "Sajavakho". Sajavakho is a little strip of fertile land, originally it was even larger, included parts of Samegrelo, but it was shortened later and Mingrelian parts are called "Sachilao" (name comes from a large feudal lord called Javakh Chiladze, who was owner of it). Sajavajho should be flatlands and producing wheat, Kutaisi instead should be hills and producing lumber (now it's producing wheat).

Let's jump to Mingrelia: View attachment 1199270
About Samegrelo. As you can see I propose further on dividing Mingrelian locations, adding 3 more + giving Poti to Guria.

Mingrelians are members of Georgian sub-ethnic group that speaks their own Mingrelian language which is closely related other three Kartvelian languages, but is mutually intelligible with only Laz. It makes sense, as Lazs and Megrels are both Zans, they were only distanced after Meskhetians migrated from the east and separated these two. You might wonder, if that means that Georgians and Megrels are different groups or not, but no there not. It's confusing only because of English language error, for us Georgians it's not. Let me explain, so in last critique I've mentioned that Georgians are mix of three sub-ethnic groups, these three being: Karts, Svans and Zans (most Lazs don't consider themselves as Georgians though). Every one of them have their own language - Svans speak Svan language, Lazs - Laz language, Mingrelians - Mingrelian and Karts - Georgian. So that's the problem, Georgian language should of be named Kart, or Kartian language as it is in Georgian itself (Kart-uli), and word "Georgian" itself would better describe collective name for Kartvelian languages as it is in Georgian (Kartvel-uri). Kart = Georgian speaking, Kartvel = ethnic Georgian.

Okay so back to the main topic from my rant, So there are 6 locations in Samegrelo province of current version of Tinto maps, those ones being: Bedia, Anaklia, Tsalenjikha, Poti, Ozurgeti and Batumi. I think Guria should be a separate province, taking Poti, Ozurgeti and Batumi locations with it, I'll talk about Guria later. After those changes Mingrelia would have been left with only 3 locations, more should be added imo. Let's divide Poli location into two, as I did on the map, make Poti part of Guria province and Tsikhegoji entirely different Megrelian location. Tsikhegoji is located near Imereti and is mostly flatlands, I think fruits would be a good bet for a raw material there, but honestly idk. People here would be Majority Mingrelian, not minority, please change it. There would’ve been around 25k people here. Lets move on, about "Anaklia" location, I divided it into two - Zugdidi and Samurzakano locations. These two are divided by Enguri river, Mingrelian people here have historically been different from each other. Anaklia location should be renamed as Zugdidi, because Anaklia has, for most of the time, been a small settlement, while Zugdidi was the center of principality of Mingrelia. Samurzakano to west of Zugdidi is a flatland, I think there is a whole lot of woods there. About population, Bedia and Anaklia both have about 60k population both in current preview of the game. Samurzakonano is between these two and has both of their territories, Abkhazian locations also have way too much population (I'll talk about it later). so what I think should done here is - Zugdidi - 25-30k people, Samurzakano - 20-25k, Bedia 10k. Samurzakano had more people living there than entire Abkhazia before XX century. Also in both Bedia and Samurzakano population should be almost entirely Megrelian, as Abkhazian migrations to the east started much later. About Tsalenjikha and Chkondidi (Tchkondidi, i don't know if a Georgian letter "ჭ" is spelled as "Ch" or "Tch"). I think Tsalenjikha should be divided into two. Chkondidi location was suggested by one of my fellow Georgian gamers here, I agree with him, Chkondidi and territory around it has been significant location for much Megrelian history. Firstly, it was a center of one of most powerful and wealthy Georgian Orthodox church eparchies. Secondly, It has an insignificant strategical location connecting Lechckumi and therefore, entire north western Georgia to Samegrelo proper. This place was called "Salipartiano" and after feeble Lechkhumian feudal lords, from the Lower Strad of “Aznauri” class, Chikovani family, got hold of "Salipartiano" they became the most powerful nobles of west Georgia and eventually, became second Dadiani dynasty, meaning, Princes of Samegrelo themselves, overthrowing the first Dadiani dynasty that ruled it from 11th century. I think legumes should be produced here, this place is located on hills and is covered in woods. Population would be around 7-8k. About Tsalenjikha, leave everything just the same. Chkondidi and Tsikhegoji would have had some Georgian pops and Zugdidi Svans.

Next one up is Guria:View attachment 1199271
So as you guys see, I don't suggest changing Guria that much. Well, if don't count bringing it into existence. As I've already said a couple of times, I think that Guria should be a different location that Samegrelo and should incorporate three different locations: Poti, Batumi and Ozurgeti.

As I've already said Guria was an independent principality from XV century. It was still nominally part of kingdom of Imereti. Guria was ruled by Gurieli family which is a branch of Vardanisdze family. Vardanisdze (Vardanidze) family ruled three major Georgian provinces by 1337: Svaneti, Samegrelo (Dadiani first dynasty) and Guria (Gurieli). In the end, they remained only here. Guria itself is Georgian-Speaking and is separating two Zan speaking peoples from each other. Then again, Guria is a product of Meskhetians migrating westwards after Arab invasions, same is true about Achara, Shavsheti and Klarjeti.

Out of three locations I've mentioned in Guria two should be left as it is. One, Poti would get much smaller in size that would also shrink it's population to 2-3k people. Poti should also be made as a marsh and a raw material would probably be fish. Poti itself has historically been contested location between princes of Samegrelo and Guria. According to Julius von Klaproth, XIX century German ethnographer, Poti was at times part of Guria, at times part of Mingrelia, before late XVI century when it was concurred by Ottomans.

Next province is Svaneti/Takveri: View attachment 1199264
Svaneti/Takveri should be a province in mountainous north-west Georgia that incorporates 3 historical Georgian regions: Svaneti, Lechkhumi, Racha. all three are divided into different parts. I'll talk about Svaneti first.

Svans are third subgroup of Georgian nation, they've always lived in mountainous West Georgia and Abkhazia. Svans are probably the most prideful, warlike, stubborn and resilient people of all Georgia, they make code of honor and brotherhood as their main mottos of life. They fought the feudalism the longest out of all Georgian people and in the end, after some concessions here and there, they won. I highly recommend reading a book called "Free Svaneti" composed and published by Svan scholar, named Egnate Gabliani (1881-1937) in 1927, where he talks about these issues. Svan language is the hardest and most distant to other three Kartvelian languages. What were boundaries of Svaneti hasn't been defined until much later on. Today it’s divided into three parts: Upper Svaneti, Lower Svaneti and Kodorian Svaneti. These three are represented as Ushguli, Lentekhi and Lata on current Tinto maps version. I'll review every single one of them. I'll start with Lower Svaneti.

So, Lower Svaneti has the mildest nature out of these three, where landslides are much more common then avalanches, not as common as in Lechkhumi to south though. Most of lower Svaneti is located around Tskhenistskali river (which is called "Lashkhvir" in Svan) and it's tributaries. Lower Svaneti is divided into three parts: Lashkheti, Cholouri and Lentekhi, lower Svan dialects are similarly divided into same three groups of the same names. Lashkheti is a name for upper part of Lower Svaneti, it was ruled by Lashkhishvili family at first, then by Gelovani family, after they were expelled from Upper Svaneti by the locals in early XVI century. Choluri is in the middle of The Lower Svaneti and was controlled By Gardapkhadze family, while Lentekhi was a kingly domain and no feudal lord resided there, it was like Kiziki was for Kakhetian kings, a stronghold which provided strategical safety as well as number of skilled soldiers and workers for the king. depiction of lower Svaneti by Tinto team is good, I wouldn't wanna change anything, probably except for adding impassable terrain between Lentekhi and Latali (View on map 3) as Lower and Upper Svaneti have historically been distanced by those mountains between them.

Upper Svaneti is located on much higher Altitudes than Lower Svaneti. Between Greater Caucasus and Svaneti ranges around river Enguri and it's tributaries, nature here is stunning, but harsh and avalanches are common. This part was always the center of the duchy of Svaneti, were dukes of the region, called "Eristavs", were appointed by the kings of Georgia to rule in their name. Eristavs, all around Georgia, had high autonomy but were more of overlords for the local pops, rather than, Feudal lords, this reality changed after the break up of the kingdom of Georgia, when "Tavadi" social class and “Satavado” political entity, a semi-independent brutal feudal lordships, emerged. Despite this, Eristavi title was hereditary, only given by the king nominally. Same was true for Eristavs of Svaneti, who came down from, beginning in XI century, from Vardanidze family, but in XIV century they became disobedient to the monarchy. so the king Bagrat V used force of Meskhetian and Klarjetian warriors in 1360-ies, marched through Svaneti, shackled Vardanisdzes, stripping them of power and appointed loyal Gelovani family as new Eristavs. Since that point, Eristavs of Svaneti were loyal to the kings of Georgia and then Imereti, before early XVI century, when the title was abolished after the local Svans overthrew last Eristavi - Abesalom Gelovani. Since then, Upper Svaneti stayed as a part of kingdom of Imereti only nominally. Upper Svaneti is divided into two, separated by "Bali" ridge, the one to east, is called "Upper than Bali Svaneti" and the one to the west - "Lower than Bali Svaneti". After the abolishment of Eristavi of Svaneti title by Svans from the "Upper than Bali Svaneti", this part of the region became known as "Free Svaneti". People here organized themselves into a confederation of clans which was deprived of any centralized government, that means, no wars, no taxes and no feudal lords - a literal libertarian dream society lol, while some weaker feudal clans, "Aznaurs", were let be, their titles remained as only nominal, those clans have had no political or social power over commoners, these two classes had completely equal political rights, the only difference is that these "Aznaurs" developed into warrior class called the coolest name ever - "Vargs" and became sellswords around Georgia. "Lower than Bali Svaneti", however, became Mingrelian domain, two rival noble (Tavadi) houses remained here - house Richgviani and house Dadishkeliani, both subservient to Principality of Mingrelia. In early XVIII century Dadeshkelianis murdered whole Richgviani family in cold blood and became brutal feudal lords establishing Principality of Svaneti in "lower than Bali" region, hence stopping paying homage to Mingrelia (They tried to conquer "Free Svaneti" as well, but got their ahhs kicked by 50 or so people that lived there haha). I dumped this whole history on you, to state why I think that Ushguli location should be divided into two - Latali and Ushguli. Latali would be where 'Dadishkeliani Svaneti" was located, while Ushguli where "Free Svaneti" was. I'd be happy if there would be releasable nations of these two (If there is even such a thing as a "Releasable Nations" in "Project Caesar") or historical events that would make those two to pop up. Latali would have 4k pops, while Ushguli 3k. Both of them are mountainous and deeply forested. Stone as a raw material in upper Svaneti is good, but I'd suggest adding gold in Latali as one. Svans have historically been known for obtaining gold from river beds with goat fur.

The third Svaneti is kodori gorge one. This place, along with whole Abkhazia, was inhabited by Svan Tribes such as probably Misimians, Sanigs and Apshilae since anticity. Svans were replaced by Abkhazians gradually all around Abkhazia from V-VI-th centuries onwards, when their ancestors, Abasgoi arrived here and Kicked them back into mountains. Presence of Svans near the Black sea are testification of their presence, for example the name of the capital city "Sokhumi" is derived from Svan word for hornbeam tree -Tskhum, which is an older version of the name (the funniest thing is that the center of another separatist region of Georgia - Tskhinvali, also derives from hornbeam tree - Tskhinvali, rtskhila means hornbeam in Georgian, Tskhinvali itself - something like "hornbeam place"). Same is true for the Kodori gorge. Which is called "Dali" by Svans themselves. While I must admit that I was wrong that Svans lived here continuedly before 2008, pointed out by @giorgi1999, Abkhazians only arrived here in XVI century after their princes conquered it from Mingrelians. It seems like most of Svans left this place, because they didn't want to pay taxes to Abkhaz princes and were forced to settle down in upper Svaneti because of Abkhaz migration. The theory that Svans lived here before that is provable thanks to much evidence: Svan ethnologist and a priest - B. Nizharadze (1852-1919), mentions that, in Dali (Lata location) there are many abandoned villages, in some of them severally damaged towers still stood, for those who don't know, Svans are infamous for their towers, while Abkhaz-Adyghe people have never been known for tower constructions. Nizharadze also believes that some surnames are descended from Dali gorge: he writes: “In Chubakhevi community, in the village of Tsaleri there is a family named Gvarmiani. The Gvarmianis repeatedly state even today that their ancestors originally came from Dali’s Gorge”. One of the most famous and distinguished ethnologist and historian, Roland Topchishvili (b. 1949) in his book - "Svaneti and Its Inhabitants" states - "When did Kodori (Dali) George Svans possibly move to Enguri Gorge Svaneti and particularly which villages did they settle? Several kins state to be originally from Kvemo (Below) Bali Svaneti and settled in Zemo (Upper) Bali Svaneti according to the narratives. This migration might have occurred in the XV-XVI centuries when the central, unified, Georgian state broke up into many kingdom-principalities and weakening of the central control minimized the feudal relations in Kvemo (Below) Bali Svaneti (or the upper part of Enguri Gorge) which caused in its turn the revival of territorial tribal relations in social attitudes". So I think that Lata location would be Svan-speaking even back in XIV century. Abkhaz people themselves, who migrated here after, XV century, were forced to leave Kodori gorge (Lata) by Russians in 1860-ies and instead of them, Svans arrived here from Upper Svaneti in 1890-ies. There are practically no hints of Abkhazian toponyms anywhere in Kodori gorge, While same is not true for Svan and Mingrelian ones. Svan toponyms include - Tsebelda, Lata, Gentsvishi, Omaraishara, Chkhalta... Also the last point, 5k population for Lata is way too high I think, Even in best situation Kodori gorge could feed more than 1,5k people in middle ages.

Okay, I think I've talked enough about Svans. Lets move on to my fatherland, Lechkhumi (Tsageri location). But first, a photo of stunning Svaneti and it's towers:
View attachment 1199263

Lechkhumi is another West Georgian mountainous location (View on map 8). It's represented as "Tsageri" in "Project Caesar" current preview. I a subjectively biased towards this part of Georgia, because I'm originally from here, I'm Lechkhumian, even though both me and my father were born here in Tbilisi. So I do have some incite about it. Lechkhumi is a really small place, it's divided between three parts - Tskhenitskali gorge, Lajanuri gorge and Rioni gorge. all three have same identity today, but in the past Lajanuri and Rioni parts where called Skvimnia in Greek and Chkhvimnia in Georgian, Tskhenistskali parts were called Takveri. Takveri later became the collective name for Lechkhumi and Racha and name Chkhvimnia was expanded to Tskhenistskali gorge. Since then Lechkhumi (from Chkhvimnia) remained, geographically, all the same.

Warning! If you are interested in Lechkhuimian history, read next paragraph, if not, skip ahead!

Lechkumi didn't have much significance before the fracturing of Georgia in XV century. It was mostly known as a treasury store and capable warrior source for much united of Georgia's history. But for the Kingdom of Imereti it had more strategical significance for many reasons. Firstly it has good locations, between trade roads from North Caucasus and Svaneti, than it's good defense base because it's just north of the capital city of Kutaisi and then again, it was source of capable warriors and workers. This is why even though, in ideal situation it couldn't support it, Lechkhumi had many powerful feudal lords throughout history. For example Inasaridze and Lashkhisvili families were very powerful early on. Lashkhishvils controlled Lajanuri gorge, while Inasaridzes Rioni gorge. Gelovani family migrated from Svaneti in XVI century and remained the most steadily powerful clan before XX century. Lechkhumi was ruled by a person with a title of "Lechkhumistavi", which means a head of Lechkhumi. This title was given by Bagrationi kings before late XVI century, after which it was given by Dadiani princes of Mingrelia. Lechkhumistavi was a powerful person as it seems. For example Lechkhumistav Khosia Lashkhisvili (held the title between 1660-1671) was one of the most influential and powerful person around Georgia at the time. He supported Kartlian king Vakhtang V against the Vamek III Dadiani and organized the murder against him. He also overthrew the king of Imereti with a help of his wife - Darejan and some guy with a surname of "Chuchunashvili" king of Imereti. But then he overthrew Chuchunashvili, murdered queen Darejan with his own hands and Helped Bagrat IV get his throne. It would be interesting to see him in the game in some way, I suggest event that makes him pop up I think him, Levan Dadiani and Solomon I are the most interesting political figures of the west Georgia at those periods. After that Lashkhisvils and Inasaridzes lost all their power as they became disloyal to both the kings and Dadians after that. in 1671 Lechkhumistavi tytle was already held by a person from a new feudal dynasty - Akhvlediani. The name of his was Khosia Akhvlediani. Akhvledianis were loyal to the king that's why they were made as "Tavads" and "Lechkhumistavs" to be a stepping stone in Lechkhumi for the monarch. It seems like Akhvledianis were given a title stripped from Lashkhisvils and lands stripped from Inasaridzes. At the Same time, other two noble families emerged here - Asatiani and Chikovani ones. Chikovans became "Tavads" because they literally overthrew Dadiani family and became princes of Mingrelia themselves. While Asatianis emerged because they were close to Chikovans. Since than Lechkhumi was part of Mingrelia before it was annexed by Russia in 1867. Akhvledianis were loyal to the kings, Asatians and Chikovans to the prince of Mingrelia while Gelovans were intermediatory between these two.

Locals of Lechkhumi were originally the Svans that have slowly been Georgianized sometime after the forming of the Kingdom of Georgia (year 1008). According to historian Geronti Gasviani (1929-2012), Kartisation of Lechkhumi should've only ended around or after break up of the kingdom of Georgia, precisely when Georgian-speaking people in, XV century from Imereti and in XVI century from south Georgia, migrated to Lechkhumi Georgia people migrated northwards , while most of other Georgian scholars don't agree with him, everyone acknowledges, that Lechkhumi once was Svan-speaking. What's the issue though, is whether or not Lechkhumians still spoke that language during the start date. Okay so toponyms are not a major help here, cause we have already established that Svan toponyms are here old, but we can't know exactly when were they named. All we know that Georgian toponyms are the newer ones. The only thing that might make this issue a bit clearer is family names of locals. So family names are a major thing around Georgia, especially in Lechkhumi. Here if someone shares your surname then u are probably related. Georgian surnames even have regional varieties. For example - Dze, Shvili and Eli endings are Georgian (Kartian) ones, Ia, Ua, Ava are Mingrelian ones and Ani, Iani, Uani, Ovani are Svan ones. Well, this is true only from XIV century onwards, before that every region had surnames with same endings as Svaneti (Samegrelo still has though, cause Ia, Ua, Ava are just shortened versions of Iani, Uani and Ovani). In Lechkhumi most of surnames have Svan endings. Same is true for my surname as well, Akhvlded-iani (Akhvild was probably Svan male name). Some Lechkhumians even have family names that only can be understood though Svan language, for example, Mushkudiani means descendant of a smith. While all this is true, most of those Svan-sounding names are of people that migrated here from Svaneti between XIII-XVIII centuries, not locals. I won't go through those surname histories here, but if you are interested in the issue I would recommend reading "Lechkhumian family and personal names" by Roland Topchishvili. Those few surnames that can be traced back to Lechkhumi even before Svan migrations, are mostly Georgian sounding, for example - Inasaridze, Nemsadze, Nemsitsveridze, Kurashvili, Kruashvili, Silagadze, Sanikidze, Ugrekhelidze, Shekishvili ets. even those, Svan-sounding, surnames, like: Akhvlediani and Kvariani, that can't be traced back to Svaneti, have probably migrated to Lechkhumi from there we just don't have any proof yet. This means that by XII century Lechkhumi was already Georgianized. But I still think that in XIV century It would be still Svan majority as - firstly, Georgian speaking Lechkhumians were just Georgianized Svans, thanks to migrations, most of folks there in XIV century would have been directly from Svaneti.

Another issue is that 3k population for Lechkhumi is too low. I'll explain why. Even though Lechkhumi is mountainous, it has much milder weather than Svaneti, it can support agriculture, fishing (Lechkhumi means place of the fishes in Mingrelian), Tsageri was major center for Georgian Orthodox church, kings of Georgia used this location as a storehouse for their treasure, there is a much more room for population settlement. as I've already mentioned, all settlements Lechkhumi are built around three major rivers, all three gorges could support around 3k people each during middle ages. There were no censuses during this time there, but there are still ways to help us determine how much people would be living here through time. Historically, more people lived in Lechkhumi than in Svaneti for the reasons mentioned above. for example, much latter in XIX century, Lechkhumi uezd, which included both Svaneti and Lechkhumi, had the population of around 50k people. 17k of those folks lived in Svaneti, while 33k in Lechkhumi. The ratio was 2-1 between these two. in early XVIII century there were 2k Lechkhumians in the military force of the principality of Mingrelia. population of Lechkhumi would probably was probably even lowest in history, at the time because in Georgia population decreased dramatically since XV century. I believe, in XIII century around 8k people would live here.

I like the fact that Wine is a raw good produced here though, nice touch. This is probably the only product that comes from Lechkhumi for sale in other parts of the country. there are 3 major types of Grape that are grown here: Usakhelouri, Tsolikouri and Ojaleshi. We can conclude that wine production has always played a big role here according to historical evidence. "According to the register of Tsageri Eparchy", which was composed in XVI century, the annual agricultural income of the church from it's land and peasants included - 320 "goros" (10,240 liters) of wine, around 10 Tons of wine, which is not much but if we consider that this was only produced by 64 households (around 360 people) and Tsageri eparchy was only a small landowner there, when the most of the land and the peasant was the property of the king and 4 or so feudal houses at the time the real amount would be much higher. Here is a map of winemaking districts of Tsageri municipality (around 80% of Lechkhumian territory). View attachment 1199660

The only historical-geographical region of Svaneti-Takveri that is left is Racha. So Racha is another Georgian-speaking region of mountainous west Georgia. It's divided into two parts: lower and upper Racha. Upper Racha also is divided into two, the Ghebi locality and the rest. Ghebi is the highest settled part of Racha. This part of Georgia is represented as Tsesi location on the game map. I think is should be divided into two according to Upper/lower Racha distinctions. Ghebi and Tsesi locations. The population of Tsesi should be around 7k and of Ghebi around 4k people. lumber would have been a raw good in Ghebi location.

So Racha was Georgianized early on because of Georgian migrations after Arab invasions. So population in Tsesi should be Georgian. But in Ghebi Georgian with Svan minority as Ghebi settlement and villages around it was controlled by Svans until in XV century the most powerful nobles of Racha at the time, Japaridzes (who were of Svan background themselves), didn't start a war with Svans and made them concede these parts after Japaridzes and other Racha-Lechkhumian feudal lords murdered 700 Svans in cold blood. Since then people there gradually became Georgian-speakers. Most of Rachan surnames are also of Svan origins much like Lechkhumi.

Racha has never been an independent principality itself. In middle ages Racha was part of Takveri duchy, which was disbanded in XV century, when Lechkhumi became a direct domain of Bagrationi king. After that point, Racha became a duchy of its own before annexation of Kingdom of Imereti by Russia in 1810. Duchy of Racha was ruled by Eristavs of Racha, who came down from different noble families. At first Eristavs were from Charelidze family, but later from Chkheidze one. There was a chance for Racha to become Principality of its own, as Eristavs were firstly loyal to the kings, but after the weakening of the monarchy and main rivals of Eristavs - Japaridzes, Duchy of Racha became increasingly powerful, but king Solomon I ( I mentioned him before) was able to defeat Eristavs and Abashidzes as restore the power of King for some time.

Overall, I like the depiction of Racha by Tinto team, the things I'd like to change is - divide Tsesi into two parts, make them culturally Georgian. That's all.

The last province - Abkhazia: View attachment 1199844
This is Abkhazia. I can write a ton about it's history, historical demographics and ethnology, but yeah I don't wanna make this thread political. We all know whom really this land belongs to - Yeah, it belong to the glorious nation of NORTH MACEDONIA ! Seriously though, I won't, wanted but I won't. I don't wanna come out as subjective chauvinist here, I really don't. I'll just make brief overview.

Abkhazia is a province in the farthest west of Georgia. It has been part of Georgia since antient times. On Tinto map current Abkhazia map has 4 locations: Pitsunda (Bichvinta), Anacopia, Sokhumi and Lata. while I believe that borders of locations are perfectly drawn, I think that province borders should be changed. Lata should be part of a new, Svaneti/Lechkhumi location, I think I've already talked about this issue enough. Instead of it Costa should be made a part of Abkhazia, as it was a part of Abkhazian duchy, under the kingdom of Georgia, before Ubykhs (Jiks in Georgian) migrated there. I've actually talked about Abkhazia a bit when I reviewed Mingrelia and Svaneti. I can tell you that those folks didn't live past Kodori river at the time. The principality of Abkhazia was established in XV century and slowly expanded to the east. when they expanded the local Mingrelian and Svan pops usually migrated to east. I show you this phenomenon to you on the map:View attachment 1199854

so this is a root that Abkhazians took, they migrated to the mountains first than to the sea-side. here is a Georgian language text regarding the issue:

View attachment 1199856

Also Abkhazians were not Christians, they followed their own folk religion. Then most of them converted to Islam, but most of Muslim Abkhazians left for Turkey after Caucasian wars. Some Abkhazians are Muslims to this day (around 20% of them). Some Abkhazians (around 20% of them) still practice Abkhazian native paganism, while others were ether converted to Christianity in XIX century, or are just Mingrelians assimilated into Abkhazian society. The note I presented above states that the center of an eparchy went from Bichvinta (Pitsunda) to Kutaisi, because there were no Christians left there. Ubykhs and Abazas were not Christians as well. Both practiced their folk religion at first, then Islam. Circassians were only Christians except for Ossetians in North-east Caucasus, that is only the small fraction of population, mostly noble were really Christian.

It's good seeing Abazas near black see, but the wouldn't have been living in Costa location, they lived in Bichvinta (Pitsunda) instead and from there they migrated to the north Caucasus, because they were driven out from there by Ubykhs who, on the other hand, were driven out from there lands in the north by Shapsugs (Circassian tribe). This migration started in early XIV century, Many Abazas would already lived in North Caucasus. If we are being real though, Abazas were not thing before their migration to north Caucasus. They were just two different tribes of Abkhazians. Here I'll present you two maps of the change in ethnic make up of north-west Caucasus between XIV and XVI centuries, with this one I want to illustrate migration of Abazas :

View attachment 1199862

View attachment 1199863

Another Issue i have with the depiction of Abkhazia is population around it. Guys Abkhazia is and was Mountainous forested lands where people mostly lived in tribalistic lifestyle, even feudalism didn't fully form there. Peasant and Mingrelian were same words in Abkhazian as they had no concept of peasantry themselves at first. Abkhazia couldn't support a big amount of population. Abkhazia's geographical features is the reason why Georgian princes and kings were not able to fully integrate locals into ether Georgian orthodox church or social structure. There after, I think that the population in Bichvinta (Pitsunda), Sokhumi and Anacopia should be at least two times less. So that's it, it was all a should say about Abkhazia

My other suggestions:

please, change names of some locations into correct Georgian form, at least when Georgia controls them. Pitsunda - Bichvinta, Sukhumi - Sokhumi or Tskhumi. Tskhumi is medieval version of the name that's what it was called at the time.

Other things, I know Kabardia is not in West Georgia (at list yet, :D) but, guys I think Circassians would be already mass migrating to the east, so I think that Kabardian culture should exist on the map. Circassians united in early XIV century under the kingdom of Inal the great, Kabardia was part of it.

here is ethic map of Caucasus revised by me: View attachment 1199877
I've already talked about ethnic compositions the provinces and locations around Caucasus should rather have if you are interested just read my other two critiques. I didn't mention that Adharis didn't live here in Caucasus. Adharis lived in modern day Iranian Azerbaijan rather than republic of Azerbaijan, which was mostly inhabited by Tats at the time. Completely different group. Tats are Persian-Speakers, Adharis on the other hand, had a language of their own, probably related to the ancient Median language.

So that's it, seems like after 4 weeks of work I've finally finished working on my critiques, I've spent countless hours reading sources and writing the review itself, I remember writing South Georgia critique like it was 100 years ago, even though only couple of weeks passed haha, "I was there Gandalf, 3000 years ago!". Can't lie it was amazing, I had lost of fun, mostly while reading the literature. God do I love the complexity and the history of my nation. Mountains are so amazing man, they make one small nation so diverse and interesting, even I if I wasn't Georgian I'd be stunned by it.

I'll probably only post a sole follow up, writing down the sources. I'm too lazy to do that now. Feel free to ask questions and criticize me! Thanks for you dear attention fellow nerds!

On the ending note, here's a pivture of Svan country man from XIX century:

View attachment 1199888

Here is list of West Georgian Noble families from:


Imereti:
  • Abashidze
  • Agiashvili
  • Bagrationi (The kings)
  • Chijavadze
  • Chiladze
  • Chkheidze
  • Dgebuadze
  • Eristavi of Bari (Chkheidze)
  • Gabashvili
  • Ghoghoberidze
  • Iashvili
  • Khidirbegishvili
  • Kipiani
  • Lionidze
  • Lortkipanidze
  • Machabeli
  • Mikadze
  • Mikeladze
  • Mkheidze
  • Nizharadze
  • Palavandishvili
  • Tsereteli
  • Tsulukidze
Racha:
  • Charelidze
  • Eristavi Of Racha
  • Garakanidze
  • Gelovani
  • Iashvili
  • Inasaridze
  • Japaridze
  • Kipiani
  • Kotridze
  • Kuchaidze
  • Lashkhishvili
  • Mikeladze
  • Mkheidze
  • Tsulukidze
Lechkhumi:
  • Akhvlediani
  • Asatiani
  • Charkviani
  • Chikovani
  • Gelovani
  • Inasaridze
  • Kipiani
  • Kruashvili
  • Kvariani
  • Lashkhisvili
  • Mandaria
  • Nemsadze
  • Palavandishvili
Svaneti:
  • Charkviani
  • Dadishkeliani
  • Devdariani
  • Gardapkhadze
  • Gelovani
  • Goshteliani
  • Ioseliani
  • Japaridze
  • Kipiani
  • Kurdiani
  • Lashkhisvili
  • Nizharadze
  • Richgviani
  • Zhorzholiani
Guria:
  • Beridze
  • Gugunava
  • Gurieli (The Prince)
  • Eristavi of Guria (Shervashidze)
  • Jakeli
  • Machutadze
  • Maksimenishvili
  • Manvelashvili
  • Nakashidze
  • Shalikashvili
  • Tavdgiridze
Mingrelia:
  • Anchabadze
  • Apakidze
  • Beridze
  • Chichua
  • Chikovani
  • Chiladze
  • Chkotua
  • Dadiani (The Prince)
  • Dgebuadze
  • Gamsakhurdia
  • Goshadze
  • Jaiani
  • Jolia
  • Kochakidze
  • Kordzaia
  • Mikadze
  • Mikeladze
  • Mkheidze
  • Paghava
  • Shelia
Abkhazia:
  • Anchabadze (Georgian) (Achba - in Abkhazian language)
  • Aredba (Abkhazian)
  • Chaabalurkhva (Abkhazian) (Sotishvili - in Georgian language)
  • Chkotua (Mingrelian)
  • Dziapsh-Ipa (Abkhazian) (Zepishvili - in Georgian language)
  • Emukhvari (Abkhazian)
  • Gechba (Abkhazian)
  • Inal-Ipa (Abkhazian) (Inalishvili - in Georgian language)
  • Marshania (Mingrelian)
  • Shervashidze (The prince, Georgian) (Chachba - in Abkhazian language)
  • Tsanba (Abkhazian)

I kneel

mern.png
 
  • 2Like
  • 2Love
Reactions:
Let's remember though the distinction between Turkish (settled) and Turkmen (tribal) in this case. The Turkics in Azerbaijan would be overwhelmingly Turkmeni at this time.

Do you know what the AQ and QQ Turkmeni and later settled Turkish could be called?
I hope I have understood your point correctly. A key common feature of the Aq Qoyunlu, Qara Qoyunlu, and Safavid states was that the Turkoman population in Anatolia formed the backbone of their power. These states emerged and expanded in part due to the migrations and movements of these Turkoman groups during their reigns and ascensions. Thus, the shared element among these states was their significant impact on the mobility of Turkoman populations. I recall reading that there was a substantial Turkish presence in southern Azerbaijani cities like Khoy during the Seljuk period. Additionally, a significant number of dervishes, who received madrasa education and were active in Ahi orders in Anatolia, were either from southern Azerbaijan or had been educated there. Based on this and my admittedly limited knowledge of the region’s history, I assume there were also settled Turkic communities. Furthermore, I believe that the presence of a Turkoman population near Tabriz could have meaningful implications for the historical trajectories of the later AQ and QQ states. Of course, other suggestions regarding the demographic structure of the region in 1337 have been presented, and there are certainly more knowledgeable individuals in this forum. However, I thought that distinguishing between settled groups as 'Rum Turkish' or 'Ajam Turkish' and identifying the nomadic groups as 'Turkoman' might be a useful solution for integrating 15th and 16th-century population shifts and migrations in Anatolia and Iran into the game. Moreover, as far as I know, modern Azerbaijani Turkish has largely developed under the influence of Medieval Anatolian Turkish, Kipchak, and Persian languages. As I mentioned in my previous comment, if I am presenting an inconsistent or historically inaccurate perspective, please feel free to correct me.
 
I mean, it can be argued that Alania should be a SoP in 1337, so I really doubt there were any bilateral treaties or agreements between the two. I think your critique has merit, though. Most of the Georgian control over the North Caucasus is rooted in tradition and really decentralised overlordship. All we know is that Giorgi V expelled the Alans from Georgia proper and made them pay tribute.
The final nail was Timur, afaik, when it comes to the Alans.
They're attack and temporary takeover of Gori, was probably already the beginning of their migration and disintegration.
The conversion of the Northern Caucasians occured over a long period of time with the combined efforts of the Constantinopolitan and Georgian Patriarch. If I recall correctly, the church hierarchy of the middle ages stipulated the subordinance of all North Caucasian bishops to Mstkheta.
From the archeological artefacts we got, it seems that the Georgian church definitely had much more influence over the North-East Caucasus, than the rest.
There are loads of Georgian inscriptions being found there, yet I haven't encountered any info about any in the rest of the north Caucasus.
In PC there's a control equilibrium. This means that the province will naturally have less control even if it's directly integrated within the polity. In light of this, I don't think the depiction of the coast up to Nikopsia as Georgian clay would be problematic.
Coastlines "conduct" control to a certain extent, if I understood it correctly.
That might lead to Georgia having more than a meagre amount of control, which I think is as much control as it should have.
You know how David Narin attacked Trebizond and seized most of the Kartvelian bits of the region? The same occured in the 14th century only with Samtskhe doing the invading. We can conjecture that the peaceful return of the land back to Trebizond could've only occured had the land been under royal control.
Yeah, I just wish we had some administrative info from those times, and not just a source telling us a guy took over a place from another guy.
Who would you have own these locations?
Leaving them as vassals sounds good to me, only because at the start date King Giorgi V, should have had enough authority already.
But I would be totally fine if they are left independent too.
And about the IO - it's not a big deal at all. From what we've seen, basically all regions have one.
Yeah but not areas that are so small and include so few nations.
The way I see it, religion and ethnicity are so inextricably tied in this region, that the Udis of Albania would've been largely assimilated by the church by 1337. The ones practicing the Armenian rites became Armenians. The ones that adopted Islam became Persianate and subsequently Azeri.
Though who am I to say, I'm not an ethnologue. Everything written in this thread is conjecture anyway.
Idk man, if they were so assimilated already back then, there shouldn't have been any left today.
The sermons might have been in Georgian, but I think the people still spoke Udi otherwise.
 
I was more pointing out how PDX wants to depict settled Turkics and nomadic Turkics as separate cultures, as stated in the Anatolia thread. This would also mean needing two separate cultures for the settled and nomadic Turkics in Azerbaijan, and anywhere else.

Wouldn't make much sense to keep the ones in Anatolia separate otherwise.
I misunderstood. In EU4, nations were grouped. For example, Turks and Levantines were one group. If Ajam Turks, Turkomans and Anatolian Turks would defined as one group, I think the regional dynamics could be captured without making any major changes. Nomadic Turkomans played an important role in both Anatolian and Iranian history anyway. On the other hand, it cannot be said that Azerbaijanis and Anatolians were very different societies 500 years ago. Therefore, Azeris and Turks can be combined as the same society. But this would probably miss the point. Or, even though they were two separate groups, if Turkomans settled in Iran, they could become Ajam Turks, and if they settled in Anatolia, they could become Rum Turks. This is what happened in history anyway. For example, Rumlu Turkmen tribe became Azerbaijani in the following centuries. Or, before the Aq Qoyunlu state was established, AQ tribe lived in the mountains of today's Bayburt province. Also, until the 19th-20th centuries, the Turks in Eastern Anatolia and Iran were called Turks. They are still called as Turks in Iran. If Ajam, Rum and Turkomans are found together in a group called Western Turks, the problem will be solved. And maybe a Turkmen-Ajam Turk centered state centered in Tabriz could also take over all of Anatolia. This is what Ismail Safavi tried to do. And, it was very legitimate action. Many Anatolian Turkoman Tribe saw him as the true ruler and became Kizilbash.
 
Here I'll show the things I've talked about on the map below:View attachment 1199266
This atrocity of a map might be a little confusing but It depicts western Georgia perfectly imo. I'd like if game makes it as hard and as costly as possible to conquer this piece of land. I think Paradox team did good job about landscaping the west Georgia. BUT, WE NEED IMPASSABLE LIKHI RANGE ! Please Tinto team, Likhi range is an imperative thing to add. The reason why the west Georgia and East Georgia were called “Likhs Imereti and Likhs Amereti” is also connected to Likhi range. In medieval Georgian “Likhs Imereti” means the “the other side of Likhi”, while “Likhs Amereti” means “this side of Likhi”. Georgians have always been aware of Likhi’s strategical significance.
You might be joking, but I don't think calling the Abkhaz, Abaza and Ubykh "Savage Tribsmen", is very flattering.:oops:
About province map mode here is a map of my proposals:

View attachment 1199268So I in current version of the Tinto maps West Georgia has three provinces: Abkhazia, Imereti and Samegrelo. I suggest renaming Samegrelo to either Mingrelia or Odishi. Odishi is medieval Georgian word for Samegrelo, while Mingrelia is an English form of it. I also suggest adding two more Provinces - Guria to the south and Svaneti/Takveri to the north. I'll Explain why. So to be honest, there are way too few locations the map as it stands and if u add more of them, the need for new provinces appears. Representing Guria as Mingrelia is a crime against humanity, Guria should be a completely separate province. Gurians, who are Georgian-speaking, have very strong regional identity, way different than Mingrelian one, they are descendants of Meskhetians migrating westwards after Arab invasions, There are natural boundaries of the river Rioni, swamps around it and Paliastomi lake that separates these two from each other. Guria has also been an independent principality from 1460s onwards before it's annexation by Russia in 1829. So I think that giving Guria a province of it's own is a must. About Svaneti/Takveri, well this region doesn't have a real name of it's own so I had to come up with something. This one includes three historical-geographical entities of Georgia: Svaneti, Lechkhumi and Racha. Originally all three where settled by Svan speaking Peoples while rest of the west Georgia has been populated by Zans. I think having this province as a separate one is very logical. Imereti province, in its current state, is way too overcrowded. mountainous western Georgia is different than Imereti. Svans need to have a province of their own, like this, it's more interesting and strategical way to play. I’ll go on and review each and every one of my proposed provinces one by one.
I'm unsure with Lata being within Svaneti.
Poti might be too small in its pixel count to qualify for being a separate location.
The third Svaneti is kodori gorge one. This place, along with whole Abkhazia, was inhabited by Svan Tribes such as probably Misimians, Sanigs and Apshilae since anticity.
Yeah, but we don't really know how true that is, especially when it comes to the Apshilae. I'm no linguist, but that A in the beginning looks suspicious to me.
Nor do we fully know the geographic areas of these groups.
Svans were replaced by Abkhazians gradually all around Abkhazia from V-VI-th centuries onwards, when their ancestors, Abasgoi arrived here and Kicked them back into mountains.
I feel like this is more of a possibility, than even a well-argumented theory.
Presence of Svans near the Black sea are testification of their presence, for example the name of the capital city "Sokhumi" is derived from Svan word for hornbeam tree -Tskhum, which is an older version of the name
That I also know and for sure that could be proof of what you say.
But it also could just mean that many of the place names of the area ended up in Georgian via Svan.
Abkhazians only arrived here in XVI century after their princes conquered it from Mingrelians.
Same with this.
Afaik, we simply have no idea regarding the population dynamics and makeup regarding this area, around this time.
And we mostly base it on indirect evidence, like toponymics.
That's why both sides of this conflict often find it easy to claim very one-sided interpretations of the history of the region.

If I'm wrong and we got more direct evidence, via some accounts or something like that please tell me.
It seems like most of Svans left this place, because they didn't want to pay taxes to Abkhaz princes and were forced to settle down in upper Svaneti because of Abkhaz migration.
Is this your guess or did some historian also mention it with some possible proof?
The theory that Svans lived here before that is provable thanks to much evidence: Svan ethnologist and a priest - B. Nizharadze (1852-1919), mentions that, in Dali (Lata location) there are many abandoned villages, in some of them severally damaged towers still stood, for those who don't know, Svans are infamous for their towers, while Abkhaz-Adyghe people have never been known for tower constructions.
Idk man, unless we see those ruins, I don't think this can count as any sort of evidence.
Sadly, it's not like we can go and verify these claims either.
There are practically no hints of Abkhazian toponyms anywhere in Kodori gorge, While same is not true for Svan and Mingrelian ones. Svan toponyms include - Tsebelda, Lata, Gentsvishi, Omaraishara, Chkhalta...
Can you tell me how those toponyms are translated via Svan?
I personally wouldn't trust this idea, until someone, with knowledge of both Abkhaz and Svan goes and really thoroughly checks the toponyms on a deep linguistic level.
Better yet would be if both sides brought their own individual theories for the possible explanations of the toponyms and a third party would vet them.
I'm not sure if that happened yet or not.
I can tell you that those folks didn't live past Kodori river at the time. The principality of Abkhazia was established in XV century and slowly expanded to the east. when they expanded the local Mingrelian and Svan pops usually migrated to east. I show you this phenomenon to you on the map:View attachment 1199854
What are you basing this on? Like sources and other sorts of proof that supports this idea.
Peasant and Mingrelian were same words in Abkhazian as they had no concept of peasantry themselves at first.
Sounds like something that could be one of those urban legends, people in our parts are so willing to believe, without checking first.
But might also be true too.
Sounds similar to how the Ossetians would use the words for Georgian and Slave interchangeably sometimes. They practiced slavery and slave trade sometimes, often targeting Georgians.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
I feel that I have to say this, because there are too many misunderstanding about history terms.
The word "Turks" during most of the medieval times and before the dawn of nationalism, that is to say from 9th century until the late 18th century, was not a word for ethnicity, but a way of life. You could translate the word "Turk" roughly as "Nomad" during the period mentioned above, specially in Arabic and Persian text. And the word "Turkmen" was specifically mentioning those Nomadic people that have converted to Islam. This was confirmed in the book <Jami‘al—Tarikh>, which was written by the Ilkhan Vizier Rashid al-Din. In this book, you would find that many non-turkic speaking groups such as Mongols and Tanguts were included in the term "Turks", and the word Turkmen a very much religious term.
Therefore as the game started in 1337, the word Turk and Turkmen or Turcomen should have its historical definition instead of the late 19th century context.
 
Would have to be an IO in that case, which I wouldn't mind. I think they've already said that personal unions will be IOs, and personal unions are quite minor things, so giving one to Georgia shouldn't be a problem.

Currently the Ilkhanate is an IO with multiple nominal subjects.
I think it could just simply be a diplomatic relation. The same as vassalage, but without any tangible benefits beside prestige/legitimacy bonus.
 
The final nail was Timur, afaik, when it comes to the Alans.
They're attack and temporary takeover of Gori, was probably already the beginning of their migration and disintegration.
Either way, I believe the IO proposed by me best reflects the relationship between Georgia and the peoples of the North Caucasus.
From the archeological artefacts we got, it seems that the Georgian church definitely had much more influence over the North-East Caucasus, than the rest.
There are loads of Georgian inscriptions being found there, yet I haven't encountered any info about any in the rest of the north Caucasus.
My evidence in the previous post about church hierarchy was anecdotal. I don't actually have any sources stating that ALL of the region was under Georgia, but it'd make the most sense from a historical point of view. I mean, who else could conduct missionary work in the North Caucasus but Georgia (especially with the slow decline of Byzantium)?
Coastlines "conduct" control to a certain extent, if I understood it correctly.
That might lead to Georgia having more than a meagre amount of control, which I think is as much control as it should have.
I agree. Just because it's a part of the country doesn't mean it behaves the same as the capital province.
Yeah, I just wish we had some administrative info from those times, and not just a source telling us a guy took over a place from another guy.
History tends to be like that, but it is what it is. We should be grateful for even this - Finnish prehistory ends in the 13th century, you know.
Idk man, if they were so assimilated already back then, there shouldn't have been any left today.
The sermons might have been in Georgian, but I think the people still spoke Udi otherwise.
I think we've already come up with a compromise of them being Orthodox but Udi culturally.
 
Last edited:
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Either way, I believe the IO proposed by me best reflects the relationship between Georgia and the peoples of the North Caucasus.
Ok I still think this is an overkill, but if we're going all out I would suggest something like this:

Firstly we need some sort of mechanic for the disintegration of Georgia and maybe reunification as well, preferably tied into the mechanics of this IO.

If we have a strong united Georgia, these other smaller nations should be predisposed to acting almost subserviently, might as well be vassals, if the strength of Georgia is high enough. This would emulate the fact of them historically being part of the Georgian armies to a small extent.

BUT, if Georgia is weak or split up into several petty kingdoms, then the armenian/southern polities would straight up have zero effects from being in the IO.
However, north Caucasian tags, should be given the ability to raid Georgian lands and maybe even settle into them and taking them for their own.
Like how it happened with Kakhi/Saingilo.
The non-christian ones being more aggressive.
My evidence in the previous post about church hierarchy was anecdotal. I don't actually have any sources stating that ALL of the region was under Georgia, but it'd make the most sense from a historical point of view. I mean, who else could conduct missionary work in the North Caucasus but Georgia (especially with the slow decline of Byzantium)?
Afaik, oddly enough the Alans became Christian more because of the Byzantines than Georgians.
They had a direct connection to Constantinople, partially side-stepping the Georgian church, I think.
History tends to be like that, but it is what it is. We should be grateful for even this - Finnish prehistory ends in the 13th century, you know.
Well yeah, but Georgian historians often complain about the sheer lack of data they have to often somehow work around.
The early modern period did a real number on Georgia, so a lot of the documents were just lost.

And well, there wasn't much going on in Finland before those times.
While there was always something major going on around and within Georgia for the last 2000-3000 years at least.
Yet more often than not, we only got bits and pieces of the overall picture and struggle to somehow reconstruct the whole thing.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
I'm back for some Topography Analysis!
Please refer to the 'changelog' image a bit further down below.

Persia and its surroundings are a very interesting region topographically, with multitudes of mountain ranges streaking across their surface.
In combination with the generally arid climate, it is a very rugged landscape to traverse, which on first glance is unfortunately not well reflected on the topograpphy map mode presented here.

Before I continue...​

...I'd like to re-emphasize the issue of topographic granularity.
In mountainous regions such as these and Anatolia, the borders of a majority of locations are defined by the mountains and ranges surrounding them, yet these are then not represented in the game whatsoever. This results in open, connected plateaus where armies can march across the region without penalty.
I therefore implore the developers to expand upon the river crossings with topographic crossings or a similar concept.

1728589181060.png
1728589200140.png
Current Tinto design confronted with actual terrain ruggedness. The unrestrictedness of army travel seems concerning.

Topographic Analysis​


In Short:
  1. Impassables should be expanded upon in the Caucasus, Zagros and Alborz mountain ranges, reducing the amount of mountain passes.
  2. A lot more plateau provinces should be promoted to hills or mountains, as a lot of locations are far more rugged than the current map suggests
  3. A small error correction in Southern Khorasan (Deyhuk and Nayband are not mountainous at all!)
  4. Expansion of Wetlands in:
    1. Southern Mesopotamia
    2. Southern Caspian Sea coast (near Bandar in the West and Amol in the East)
    3. Southwestern Caspian Sea (Azerbaidjian)
    4. Poti and Anaklia in Georgia
    5. Southern Aral Sea: Shimbay and Qunirat (Amu Darja Delta)
    6. Kerki and Garabekewül (Amu Darja River floodplains)
All following pictures are about 3000x3000 pixels
Current Tinto DesignSuggested changes (including ridges)'Changelog' of suggested changes
TM18_TopoCurrent.png
TM18_TopoSuggested.png

Gori should imo be plateau, yet other users suggest flatlands. see discussion here
TM18_TopoChangelog.png

Terrain Ruggedness IndexDEM (0 - 4000 m) with linear color scaleDEM (0 - 4000 m) with exaggerated colors for lower topography
TM18_TRI.png
TM18_DEM_Viridis.png
TM18_DEM_Colorful.png

Wetlands​


By far the most useful dataset is the CIFOR wetland database, which is unfortunately limited up to 40 degrees north. Several wetland locations are classified as 'arid climate marshes', which I decided to ignore for now, and focused on the other types.
In second place is PEAT-ML, which focuses on peaty wetlands (largely ignoring e.g. salt marshes).
  1. Most salt marshes that light up on the map are within designated wasteland areas.
  2. Along the Southern and Southwestern Caspian coast there are plenty of wetlands.
  3. Along the Amu Darja river along Kerki and Garabekewül are broad (>10 km width) floodplains and wet meadow marshes.
  4. Southern Aral Sea coast has a delta (with a modern revival due to artificial water retention in agriculture). As I couldn't really find many studies on pre-modern wetlands, I based it off of where the river bifurcation and lakes are most prominently present. See also this paper for a bit of context.

For Southeastern Mesopotamia, it is pretty difficult to constrain exact contours for wetlands in the 1300s, nonetheless there are some pointers thanks to a geomorphological study.
After the cultural decline in the late 1st millennium CE the landscape became neglected, and canals and their maintenance deteriorated (Adamo & Al-Ansare 2020l; Ahram 2021). It was not until the 20th century that the country started to prosper again, and new barrages and dams were constructed for hydrological regulation (Abdullah et al. 2019a/b, 2020a/b). The lower marshes were widely destroyed by hydrological projects, especially in the 1990s, to facilitate agriculture, urban expansion, and oil exploration (Richardson & Hussain 2006; UNEP 2009; Jabbar et al. 2010; Al-Ansari & Knuttson 2011; Yacoub 2011a; Lonergan 2012; Jawad 2021a; Ahram 2021).

https://www.researchgate.net/public...an_overview_of_geomorphology_and_human_impact

CIFOR (orange line is limit dataset) + PEAT-ML + digitalisation of the Mesopotamia paperGeomorpological map from the paper
TM18_Wetlands.png
1728590877810.png
 
Last edited:
  • 13Like
  • 7Love
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
Southern Aral Sea coast has a delta (with a modern revival due to artificial water retention in agriculture). As I couldn't really find many studies on pre-modern wetlands, I based it off of where the river bifurcation and lakes are most prominently present. See also this paper for a bit of context.
Historical sources consistently describe the river delta and southeast and east sides of the Aral Sea as marshes and reed beds. But the actual location of the wetlands is complicated because both the course of the river and the water level of the sea shifted dramatically several times in this period, causing drying or moistening in various places as a result of the shifts. There should be wetlands where the delta is and possibly on the edge of the Aral but "where the delta is" and even "where the Aral is" is shifting and not always clear. Especially because the written sources are low in number and mainly either pre-Mongol (and therefore pre-game-time) or quite late.

At the start of the game the river flowed mainly in the west and the east was artificially irrigated, as best as I can tell, but it seems some of the east may still have been wetlands or floodland based on river overflow. This was a long winded way of saying I think the wetland location you have is probably fine I guess, since the data is very lacking and unclear, but maybe someone who knows more about wetlands than me could analyze it more clearly.

See this paper (in French, I used Google Translate for it) for some details, and map 4 especially.
 
Last edited:
  • 2Love
  • 1Like
Reactions:
I'm not sure if Khwarazm suggestions are supposed to go in this thread or the Steppes one, since its on the edge of both. I posted a bunch of suggestions in the Steppes thread, a good number of which are for Khwarazm, so I'll link that and post the overview pic and copy the text from the relevant part of the post into a spoiler here.

Khwarazm locations
khwarazm.png

The orange points are archaeological sites dated to the Middle Ages from Boroffka et al (2005b), the gray points are the namesakes of their locations from Andrianov (2016). This is the option shown without the potential invented location described in the Aral Sea section above.

Location​
Province​
Area​
Climate​
Vegetation​
Topography​
Culture​
Religion​
Raw material​
Population​
Dawqara​
Kath​
Khwarazm​
Cold Arid​
Desert​
Wetlands​
Sunni​
Livestock, horses or Wool​
4 digits?​
Narindjan​
Kath​
Khwarazm​
Cold Arid​
Desert​
Flatland​
Sunni​
10k?​
Yarbekir​
Urgench​
Khwarazm​
Cold Arid​
Desert​
Flatland​
Sunni​
Agriculture​
15k?​
Shahsenem​
Khiva​
Khwarazm​
Cold Arid​
Desert​
Flatland​
Sunni​
5-10k?​

Dawqara is based mainly on archaeological evidence (Boroffka et al 2005b); it is also on the east edge of the Kerder canal and may have been irrigated at some points; additionally the southern area is in a depression and forms marshes and lakes if the river delta is on the east side (as it was at some points through the game time but not at the start) (Yagodin 2002). I’ve given it a little corner of Shimbay just to balance the sizes a little, but I don’t think there’s a clear border there and you can kind of draw the internal borders how you want. The name is from the name of that depression, and a town in the area, though I don’t know the history of the name. This location is given a material of livestock, horses or wool because Yagodin (2002, 30, through Google Translate) says that when the area is wet it is very good territory for livestock breeding but not great for agriculture as practiced in the area, though this was probably not the case at the start of the game. Its described as becoming marshy or lakey whenever significant water was near, which is why I made it wetlands topography (Yagodin 2002). The corridor to Jand connects to this location.

Narindjan is based on evidence of irrigation canals in the area, including parts of the large-scale Gavkhore system (Andrianov 2016, 176-180) and on archaeological sites dated to the Middle Ages (Boroffka et al 2005b). It is named according to what Andrianov (2016, 176) calls a “Medieval city,” although these days it seems most associated with a specific mausoleum.

Yarbekir is based on the “Shamurat” irrigation canal, which ran for 75-80 km starting at the river and running southwest then west until reaching the Tuz-gyr plateau and the settlement and caravanserai of Yarbekir; this section of irrigation infrastructure was actually rebuilt in the Golden Horde era, so it should still have a decent population present (Andrianov 2016, 204-205).

medieval shamurat Andrianov 2016 42K.png
Map of the medieval Shamurat canal system (Andrianov 2016. 293 fig. 42K)

Shahsenem is based on the “Chermen-yab” irrigation canal, which ran for 120 km from Zamakshar (in the southwest corner of the current Khiva location) to Shahsenem (Andrianov 2016, 201-204, 209). While this canal network supported a population of 20-30,000 before the Mongol invasion, it was hit heavily by the Mongols and, unlike the previous Shamurat, not extensively rebuilt, hence the much lower population. Shahsenem itself was a notable city before the Mongols, often mentioned as the southernmost site of Khwarazm before you entered the desert (Andrianov 2016, 201; Barthold 1968,

medieval chermen-yab Andrianov 2016 42I.png
Map of the medieval Chermen-yab canal system (Andrianov 2016. 293 fig. 42I)

amu delta tsvetsinskaya 2002.png
Map of some medieval irrigation networks in southern Khwarazm (Tsvetsinskaya et al 2002, 372)

The latter three locations would all be well-served by an agricultural RGO, but if that’s not enough variety for the game some of them could be swapped around. Alternatively Xojeli could be switched to stone to clear out an agricultural RGO, as a town at the west end of the location (Barategin) was known for limestone (Yagodin 2002, 42), though the only mentions in sources are pre-Mongol.

Khwarazm Province rework

As I’ve added several locations in Khwarazm, two provinces no longer feels like enough. This adds a new Urgench province, named, as the existing two are, after the major city it contains.

Province​
Locations​
Kath​
Kath
Shimbay
Narindjan
Dawqara
Qonirat​
Urgench​
Urgench
Vezir
Xojeli
Pulzhai
Yarbekir​
Khiva​
Khiva
Nyzvar
Kyat Kala
Hazarasp
Darganata
Shahsenem​

Khwarazm population distribution

A good chunk of Khwarazm is unseen on any population map so some of this feedback is given without knowing the current state.

Urgench should be the most populated and most developed location; it had this status before the Mongols, recovered best after the Mongols, and maintained this status until at least the late 14th century when Timur’s second capture and a shift of the river away from the city dealt it a double blow. Also sizable should be Xojeli, which contained the notable town of Mizdakhan and plenty of agriculture and fishing along the river.

Khiva is too big (comparatively, at least) – it’s notable enough to mention in the sources alongside the other towns on the way down the Amu Darya, but no indication is ever given that it was noticeably larger than any of them, and certainly not bigger than Urgench. Its time in the sun came later.

Minor changes, renames, and dynamic names

Shimbay should probably not have an RGO of fish, but one of the animal-herding materials:
Archaeological data indicate that at the beginning of the 13th century there were no large or even small permanent settlements in the eastern part of the Aral Sea delta. The exception is the Khorezm fortress of Bagdat, built in the 9th-11th centuries and continuing to exist until the beginning of the 13th century and representing, like Dary-Kala, a stronghold of the Khorezmshahs on the cattle-breeding periphery. Nevertheless, according to the source, ‘They have many villages in the region.’ The presence of huge burial grounds with burials of this period on Tokkala, Krantau and Porlytau indicates a large population. The phrase from the source ‘…they have herds and animals…’ may mean that this population was a pastoralist, living in numerous separate groups in portable dwellings or in short-term frame-type buildings. (Amirov et al 2008, 143, through Google Translate)​
The center of fishing in the area prior to the Mongols was in the west where the main course of the river was (Yagodin 2002). This may well have been interrupted by the change in the river after the Mongol invasion, but the river did not return to the east but instead flowed more directly west into Sarykamysh lake.

(See the linked post in the Steppes thread for full source citations)
 
  • 1Love
  • 1Like
Reactions:
I'm back for some Topography Analysis!
Please refer to the 'changelog' image a bit further down below.

Persia and its surroundings are a very interesting region topographically, with multitudes of mountain ranges streaking across their surface.
In combination with the generally arid climate, it is a very rugged landscape to traverse, which on first glance is unfortunately not well reflected on the topograpphy map mode presented here.

Before I continue...​

...I'd like to re-emphasize the issue of topographic granularity.
In mountainous regions such as these and Anatolia, the borders of a majority of locations are defined by the mountains and ranges surrounding them, yet these are then not represented in the game whatsoever. This results in open, connected plateaus where armies can march across the region without penalty.
I therefore implore the developers to expand upon the river crossings with topographic crossings or a similar concept.

Current Tinto design confronted with actual terrain ruggedness. The unrestrictedness of army travel seems concerning.

Topographic Analysis​


In Short:
  1. Impassables should be expanded upon in the Caucasus, Zagros and Alborz mountain ranges, reducing the amount of mountain passes.
  2. A lot more plateau provinces should be promoted to hills or mountains, as a lot of locations are far more rugged than the current map suggests
  3. A small error correction in Southern Khorasan (Deyhuk and Nayband are not mountainous at all!)
  4. Expansion of Wetlands in:
    1. Southern Mesopotamia
    2. Southern Caspian Sea coast (near Bandar in the West and Amol in the East)
    3. Southwestern Caspian Sea (Azerbaidjian)
    4. Poti and Anaklia in Georgia
    5. Southern Aral Sea: Shimbay and Qunirat (Amu Darja Delta)
    6. Kerki and Garabekewül (Amu Darja River floodplains)
All following pictures are about 3000x3000 pixels
Current Tinto DesignSuggested changes (including ridges)'Changelog' of suggested changes
View attachment 1200282View attachment 1200283View attachment 1200284

Terrain Ruggedness IndexDEM (0 - 4000 m) with linear color scaleDEM (0 - 4000 m) with exaggerated colors for lower topography
View attachment 1200287View attachment 1200288View attachment 1200289

Wetlands​


By far the most useful dataset is the CIFOR wetland database, which is unfortunately limited up to 40 degrees north. Several wetland locations are classified as 'arid climate marshes', which I decided to ignore for now, and focused on the other types.
In second place is PEAT-ML, which focuses on peaty wetlands (largely ignoring e.g. salt marshes).
  1. Most salt marshes that light up on the map are within designated wasteland areas.
  2. Along the Southern and Southwestern Caspian coast there are plenty of wetlands.
  3. Along the Amu Darja river along Kerki and Garabekewül are broad (>10 km width) floodplains and wet meadow marshes.
  4. Southern Aral Sea coast has a delta (with a modern revival due to artificial water retention in agriculture). As I couldn't really find many studies on pre-modern wetlands, I based it off of where the river bifurcation and lakes are most prominently present. See also this paper for a bit of context.

For Southeastern Mesopotamia, it is pretty difficult to constrain exact contours for wetlands in the 1300s, nonetheless there are some pointers thanks to a geomorphological study.


CIFOR (orange line is limit dataset) + PEAT-ML + digitalisation of the Mesopotamia paperGeomorpological map from the paper
View attachment 1200295View attachment 1200292

I have a few remarks regarding the Caucasus.

1728682520044.png

Why did you put these impassables on some rivers?
It doesn't make much sense to me.

1728682605825.png

Turning both of these to wetlands is going too far.
The ideal solution would be to add 1-2 locations and make those wetlands and leave the others as flatlands.
Like one of the guys' showed in his post.

1728682701921.png

Gori Should in no way be a plateau.
Flatlands is correct.

1728682756933.png

The blue one is an actual plateau and should be like that in the game too.
While the red one has a lot of low lying land.
I would leave it at grasslands or hills at most.

1728682906630.png

Closing up the red ones while leaving the blue one, doesn't make much sense either.
If you're only gonna leave one, then you should leave the middle one open for sure.
But more importantly I don't think it makes much sense to close any of them.
Aside from the middle one adding uninhabited mountain passes for the other two makes the most amount of sense.

1728683134251.png

Oh and making all of these mountains is waaaaaaay overkill.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Turning both of these to wetlands is going too far.
According to the Global Lakes and Wetlands Database Poti is mostly some sort of wetlands (though much of it is only "seasonally flooded") but Anaklia is mixed at best. Anaklia has more wetlands than most surrounding areas but if you're looking for places that are a majority wetland or something it doesn't seem to meet that. Will depend on what your standards for giving out wetlands are. Maybe there are better datasets though, I'm not sure.

There could also be an argument that historically there was more but I think that would require more evidence.

poti.png
poti-main.png
Main class of wetland in each cell, only cells with >50% wetlandMain class of wetland in each cell - dryland (grey/no color) means the cell has no wetland
 
Last edited:
@giorgi1999 First off, thanks for taking the time to provide your feedback, I appreciate it!

These are my takes on your comments:
I have a few remarks regarding the Caucasus.
1728682520044.png


Why did you put these impassables on some rivers?
It doesn't make much sense to me.
I'm not sure what you mean with impassables on rivers?
I did not alter the impassables in this part. I also agree with tinto that they should be there though; it is very inhospitable territory, with even today next to no roads going through.

1728720542664.png
1728720591299.png

The purples lines are suggested ridge crossings for units to get a penalty when trying to cross them directly instead of going around. I don't intend them to be impassable.


1728682605825.png
Turning both of these to wetlands is going too far.
The ideal solution would be to add 1-2 locations and make those wetlands and leave the others as flatlands.
I agree, I was overzealous here.
I'll edit my post to only keep Poti as wetlands.


@Ekyman suggested confronting the data with the Global Lakes and Wetlands database, but that data was published in 2004(!), so not the most accurate resource (considering GIS was still an emergent discipline then). For evaluating floodplains, I also refer to the global flooding risk on 100-year timescales. https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dataset/jrc-floods-floodmapgl_rp100y-tif

screenshot of flooding risk for Poti and its neighbors.
1728721159660.png


1728682701921.png
Gori Should in no way be a plateau.
Flatlands is correct.
1728682756933.png
The blue one is an actual plateau and should be like that in the game too.
While the red one has a lot of low lying land.
I would leave it at grasslands or hills at most.
While Gori itself is on the flatlands near the river, it is elevated above 500m and situated in a higher valley. Combined with the fact that over 50% of the surface area of the Location is in the mountains, It's more than deserving of the 'plateau' indication to me.

The red circled location is a very hilly and rugged plateau, which still has a lot of mountains on its rim as well. The mountains also extend into all its neighbors (including Gori), which is why I think it could be considered mountains. Flatlands is absolutely no option here. I could live with hills, but this would remove mountains from this chain entirely, to which I don't agree.

The blue circled location is a rugged plateau, but the location shape also includes several mountains and hills. However, considering I just made my point for the mountains of red circle, I think it is fair to shift the mountains to that location and keep plateau for blue. I'll adjust it in my post.

Version of my TRI map with more granularity:
orange: plateau
burnt orange: rugged plateau
gray: hills
bright red: mountainous / very rugged hills / low mountains
burgundy: high/rugged mountains
black: impassable/peaks
1728723322356.png


1728682906630.png
Closing up the red ones while leaving the blue one, doesn't make much sense either.
If you're only gonna leave one, then you should leave the middle one open for sure.
But more importantly I don't think it makes much sense to close any of them.
Aside from the middle one adding uninhabited mountain passes for the other two makes the most amount of sense.
The leftmost one is Darial pass and is absolutely the most logical one to keep for historical reasons.

I agree the central one, Jvari pass, should be opened due to it being a silk road route. Actual military usage was only later into Imperial Russian history it seems.

However, the 2 right ones (within your red circle) are Abano pass and Datvisjari Pass. Datvisjari's road was only built in the 1970's, and both Abano and Datvisjari are only accessible between June and October with 4x4 vehicles.
This does not sounds like terrain you're easily goin to send armies across.


1728683134251.png
Oh and making all of these mountains is waaaaaaay overkill.
Based on what metric, elevation?

The trabizond region has extremely steep slopes, steeper than the more elevated mountains in the rest of the region. The inhabited coast has Oceanic to Subtropical climate IRL (and also in game). I presume oceanic climates will get mild winters most of the time in game, meaning passage won't be blocked in winter.

All towns and cities of any significance are located on the coast, which is why mountains is more than warranted in my opinion.
1728722749421.png
1728722819886.png
 
Last edited:
  • 5Like
  • 1
Reactions: