• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Tinto Maps #6 - 14th of June 2024 - Great Britain & Ireland

Hello everyone. @Pavía and the rest of the Content Design team are busy working on the feedback for the previous Tinto Maps, so I'm standing in for this week.

I'm @SaintDaveUK, some of you might have seen me here and there on the forums, but the long story short is that I work on a very secret game whose name I am contractually obligated to redact. That's right, it's ███████ ██████!

This week you get a double-whammy, mostly because it’s really hard to show Britain on its own on a screenshot. Partly to side-step the “British Isles” naming controversy, but mainly because the gameplay of them both is so different, this part of Europa is divided into 2 distinct regions: Great Britain and Ireland.

Climate​

The mild Oceanic climate (Köppen Cfb) dominates the isles. Where it cools towards the inland Pennines and the Scottish Highlands (Köppen Cfc), we represent it with the wintry and dreich Continental climate.

climate.jpg




Topography​

The isles are dominated by green and pleasant flatlands and low rolling hills, the peripheries punctuated by rocky mountains and craggy highlands.

We would like to add some more impassable locations in northern England and the Scottish borders to make manoeuvres a little more interesting and strategic, but would like suggestions from people more familiar with the Pennines.

[Edit: 16 June added the missing map]

topography.JPG


Vegetation​

The great moors, bogs, and fens are represented by Sparse vegetation, meanwhile much of the land is still wooded.

vegetation.jpg




Raw Materials​

The raw goods situation aims to reflect the economic reality of medieval Britain. Shepherding was common on every corner of the islands, a lot of the wool produced was sold to the industrial hub of the Low Countries to be manufactured into cloth, which was in turn sold back to British markets.

The further north-west we go, the less fertile the terrain, and as such the greater reliance on pastoral farming such as livestock over wheat. The western hills and valleys also expose a greater number of mineral delights, including the historic stannary mines of Devon and Cornwall.

raw_materials.jpg




Markets​

As you can see the two starting markets are London and Dublin. Aside from London we could have chosen almost any town, from Aberdeen to Bristol. We chose Dublin as it was the main trade centre in Ireland, and also because it handsomely splits the isles to the East and West of the Pennines, demonstrating the impact that terrain can have on dynamic Market attraction.

They are both shades of red because they are coloured after the market centre’s top overlord country – market control is a viable playstyle and we like to think of it as a form of map painting for countries not focused on traditional conquest routes.

market.jpg




Culture​

We have decided to go with a monolithic English culture. We could have forced the introduction of a second Northumbrian or even third Mercian culture, but typically they were not really considered separate peoples. The English, though diverse in origin and with a variety of dialects, had already begun to coalesce in the face of the Viking invasions hundreds of years before.

Scotland, conversely, is a real porridge of cultures. The Lowland Scots (who speak a dialect of Northumbrian English that later develops into the Scots language) dominate their kingdom from their wealthy burghs, and are gradually encroaching onto the pastoral lands of the Gaelic Highlanders. The Norse-Gaelic clansmen watch from the Western Isles, with some old settlements remaining around Galloway. The far north, ironically called Sutherland, retains some Norse presence.

Wales, conquered for around a century by this point, plays host to English burghers looking to make a few quid, as well as the descendants of Norman adventurer knights in the marcher lordships, but is still majority Welsh-speaking from Anglesey to Cardiff.

The Anglo-Irish (representing the spectrum from Cambro-Norman knights to the so-called ‘Old English’ settlers) live in great numbers in the south-eastern trading towns from Dublin to Cork, as well as in smaller numbers in frontier outposts.

The cosmopolitan towns across the isles are also home to people from elsewhere in Europe, most notably Flemish weavers from the Low Countries, though their numbers are too small to impact the mapmode.

The Norman ███████ dominates as the ██████████████ for both of the kingdoms and their subjects. The conquest of 1066 is no longer fresh, but the continuing bonds between the aristocratic classes of England, Scotland, and France have kept the French language alive and strong.

culture.jpg






Religion​

I decided that it's not even worth taking a screenshot of the Religion map mode. There are tiny minorities of Jewish people in some Scottish and Irish towns (they had been expelled from England), but they are so small in number they don't even register on the map mode

Other than that, it's all Catholic. But not for long.

> John Wycliffe has entered the chat.


Areas​

Based on the 4 provinces of Ireland (sorry Meath) and splitting England roughly into the larger Anglo-Saxon earldoms which have some similarity with the modern Regions (sorry Yorkshire).

areas.jpg





Provinces​

We have fixed the colours of the Provinces mapmode so you can see the individual provinces a bit more clearly. These are largely based on the historic counties, which have remained fairly constant throughout history, while merging some of those that are too small.

We’ve almost certainly offended someone.

The ancient Scottish shires are pretty messy and difficult to coalesce into neat provinces, so any suggestions for better arrangement there would be very welcome.

provinces.jpg




Locations​


You might notice that the locations in Ireland are varyingly written in both English and in Irish. This is because we have the new system up-and-running where we can name Locations by the primary culture of the country they are owned by.

This means that for example London might be called Londres if it was ruled by a Catalan country. It’s currently a WIP feature and we might add more elements, such as a game setting to base the name on dominant culture of the location instead, or to just use default (English) names.

locations.jpg




Government Types​

As with most of Europe, most of the countries are under some monarchy or another, but the Irish tuathas begin with the Tribe government type. This, among other mechanics such as [redacted] helps to give them a very unique playing style in Europe.

government.jpg


Countries​

England

England of course stands as the dominant kingdom in the isles. Despite having a lot of power resting on the barons, the country is fairly unitary even at this point, with very little practical separation between the crown’s power in somewhere like Kent versus Yorkshire. However there are notable exceptions.

The powerful Burgesses estate in the City of London enjoys ancient freedoms from royal power, while the king peers in from the Crown’s seat of power in neighbouring Westminster.

The County Palatine of Durham is not represented by a country, but buildings that give the Clergy Estate a huge amount of power in the locations it is present in. This also ties into political gameplay as a ██████████ ██████.

The newly created Duchy of Cornwall—the only duchy in England at the time—would also not be represented well by the Cornwall country, being a disparate set of manorial holdings that are ironically mostly in Devon. Cornwall of course exists as a releasable country though.

The Isle of Man is a little less certain. For now we have it as a subject of England. On paper it was a ‘kingdom’ awarded to William Montagu, the king’s favourite, however we aren’t sure if he actually wielded any real power on the isle. It changed hands between England and Scotland numerous times in this period, but in practice it appears to have been governed by a local council of barons. Any more details on exactly what was going on here in this period would be greatly appreciated.

These decisions have been made because as England heaves itself out of the feudal system, we thought it would be best if the small-fry inward-looking internal politicking is handled through the Estates and [redacted] systems, and then the diplomacy tracks are freed up for the English player to behave more outwardly against other major countries.

Wales

Though subjugated by conquest, Wales was not formally annexed into the Kingdom of England until the mid 1500s. As such the principality begins as a Dominion subject under England.

Those familiar with Welsh history will note that historically the Principality of Wales didn’t extend much beyond the old kingdom of Gywnedd. Much of the country to the southeast was in fact ruled by marcher lords, which we represent with a powerful Nobility estate in the valleys and beyond.

There is an alternative vision of Wales that I would like to gauge opinion on, and that is expanding it to include the Earldom of Chester and the marches on the English side of the modern border. If you are an Englishman familiar with modern borders this might look alarming, but these lands were also constitutionally ambiguous parts of the “Welsh Marches” until the 1500s. This will hand over to the Wales player the full responsibility of dealing with the marcher lords, allowing England to focus on bigger picture issues like beating France.

Ireland

Ireland is going through a moment of change. English royal power is centred on the Lordship of the Pale, the king’s Dominion ruling out of Dublin Castle. However, it struggles to keep a grasp on the rebellious Hiberno-Norman earls scattered around the island - some of whom remain as vassals, some of whom have managed to slip free of royal control.

The Tanistry system of succession endemic to the Gaelic Irish has its advantages, but it can also lead to chaotic feuds between rival branches. The so-called Burke Civil War has fractured the powerful Earldom of Ulster into rival Burke cousins who jealously feud over their shrinking lordships in Connaught. Native Irish princes of the north have reconquered most of their own lands from the de Burghs, but there are also two rival O’Neill cousins who style themselves King of Tyrone either side of the River Bann.

The feuding Irish lack a unifying figure, but anyone powerful enough could theoretically claim the title of High King. The former provincial kingdoms, such as Meath and Connacht, enjoy the elevated rank of Duchy, giving them a slight edge in the High Kingship selection.

Scotland

The chancer Edward Balliol continues his attempt for the Scottish throne, with England’s tacit permission. It’s hard to determine the exact lands held by Balliol in 1337, but we know his disinherited loyalists hold the castle of Perth while his English allies had seized large tracts of the lowlands from Bruce. Balliol has also bought the loyalty of the MacDonald and the other Hebridean galley lords by granting them remote land on the west coast of the mainland.

Meanwhile, Scotland’s canny regent Sir Andrew de Moray launches his decisive counterattack as his true king, David II de Bruce, waits in exile in France.

political.jpg


Dynasties​

We know about Plantagenet, Balliol, and Bruce, so I've zoomed in on Ireland to show the ruling dynasties of the various chieftains and earls.

dynasty.jpg


Population​

Excuse the seams and the greyscale mapmode. We have something better in the pipeline...

population_country.jpg
population_location.jpg




Well, thats it for now!

As always the team is eagerly awaiting your feedback and looking forward to the discussions. We’ll try to keep on top of the thread, but we have a teambuilding activity this afternoon so it might be a little more sporadic than usual!

Next week: Anatolia!
 
Last edited:
  • 218Like
  • 99Love
  • 7
  • 7
  • 1
Reactions:
Ok, so I might have gone a little overkill, but after seeing how many provinces France got in its rework I think we could do with a fair few more provinces in GB.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
For some reason the quote broke it's post 777
On Hampshire, I'm going to politely disagree .

The Southampton location going north to the Hampshire border is presumably based on the test valley rather than roads. (You can see some modern evidence of this Southamptonness with the modern constituency of north Southampton and Romsey). We shouldn't break off Basingstoke as at the time it was a village and only became a hub when it became a new town. I don't mind making sure Winchester is moved a little South west but only a pixel or two to include Winchester proper.
 
Last edited:
This probably too late in the posting but Dean should probably be called the Forest of Dean as I've lived there my whole life and I've never heard anyone refer to it without the 'the forest' bit. Even when shortened we call it 'the forest' rather than Dean. It may be a bit too verbose for a map but calling it Dean wouldn't be accurate imo.
side question, which locations would make most sense for a Royal Forest building? i only want to add the biggest 5-10 largest/most important i guess, otherwise almost every location would have one

View attachment 1149819
The Forest of Dean! It remains a royal forest and is currently the second largest, after the New Forest.
Also Dean should probably be called the Forest of Dean as I've lived there my whole life and I've never heard anyone refer to it as Dean without the forest part. When we shorten it we call it "the Forest". Even in Welsh it's Fforest y Ddena.
 
This probably too late in the posting but Dean should probably be called the Forest of Dean as I've lived there my whole life and I've never heard anyone refer to it without the 'the forest' bit. Even when shortened we call it 'the forest' rather than Dean. It may be a bit too verbose for a map but calling it Dean wouldn't be accurate imo.

The Forest of Dean! It remains a royal forest and is currently the second largest, after the New Forest.
Also Dean should probably be called the Forest of Dean as I've lived there my whole life and I've never heard anyone refer to it as Dean without the forest part. When we shorten it we call it "the Forest". Even in Welsh it's Fforest y Ddena.
I honestly hope they stick to their own rules and call locations after villages, towns, cities or castles/fortresses, with the exception of islands.
 
Last edited:
Okay, I've done a few more of these. Life is getting in the way, so it might be a bit for the rest, but I want to do them. For some reason, I find these fun to make. Also, I think they are really useful if for no other reason than it makes it easy to quickly review the final goods map.

Just a reminder that these are maps that only use the National Character Area (NCA) information from Historic England. I posted links some links in my earlier posts, but you can also google. I took the NCA map, superimposed it on the province map from Tinto, then skimmed the NCA for the goods that were in that area and put them on the map.

They do not include the information from the Agrarian History volumes, so these may be a bit different from the earlier locations/goods maps that I did. I still think they are useful. In a perfect world, I would have made something like this the first time and just incorporated everything into it, but it is too late for that.

Note that these are not comprehensive. I've got examples of goods that were prevalent in areas that were not listed in the NCA. However, these give a good idea for goods that should be under consideration for a province.

Edit: I also tried to be conscious of the when for goods, but it wasn't always listed.

On with the maps.

Southern England:
NCA Map SW England.png

Comments: The reason the clay good is struck is because that represents "china clay" whose application wasn't discovered until the 18th century. Cornwall became a major producer - like on a world level scale - of the stuff after it was discovered that it was useful. Peat was mentioned once or twice this region, but I didn't list it. I did start listing it after this map. I really think a peat good needs to be added.

Southwestern England:
NCA Map W England.png

Western England and part of central England:
NCA Map W2 England.png

Comment: The thing that struck me on this map was how industrial Rockingham Forest was according to the NCA. Maybe worth considering making that iron or stone instead of wild game. Just a thought.

Enjoy! (for the other crazy people that think these are cool)
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
Reactions:
I wonder if Travellers will be present in any way or form.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Ok, so I may have gone a little more overboard, but following the updates for France I feel like GB deserves so more provinces (will leave Ireland to other experts). Most of these have been drawn using historic county, wapentake and hundred boundaries. The current map is also quite "blobby", and as a results seems more artificial than more natural wiggly borders that have been used in other regions. For context, this will be taking GB from 176 to 225 provinces, an increase of 50 provinces. Obviously I'd expect there are probably a few more for Ireland too, but it doesnt seem to crazy when France got 141 new provinces.

I've overlaid the province boundaries in red, with black denoting wastelands.

1721072550763.png


I also propose a slightly tweaked start for Wales - the principality which is more autonomous and in a PU with England (and Welsh culture), and the Marches who are a vassal of England with English culture (or West Mercian - see below. I wouldnt include the border counties, as I understand it the marches were administered from there but control of those areas was administered centrally by the crown). England, Scotland and Balliol start as per the Tinto Talks
1721166450773.png





Detailled breakdown of locations is below, colours denote the different provinces (note that some will have to be combined to work, honestly at the moment they are just based on the IRL counties)

ENGLAND
1721072925000.png

1 - Penryn
2 - Truro
3 - Bodmin
4 - Launceston
5 - Plymouth
6 - Totnes
7 - Okehampton
8 - Barnstaple
9 - Tiverton
10 - Exeter

1721073299316.png

1 - Taunton
2 - Wells
3 - Bath
4 - Glastonbury
5 - Yeovil
6 - Dorchester
7 - Wareham
8 - Shaftesbury
9 - Trowbridge
10 - Chippenham
11 - Marlborough
12 - Salisbury

1721073946151.png

1 - Lymington
2 - Southampton
3 - Winchester
4 - Overton
5 - Portsmouth
6 - Wight
7 - Chichester
8 - Arundel
9 - Shoreham
10 - Lewes
11 - Hastings

1721074134528.png

1 - Sandwich
2 - Hythe
3 - Ashford
4 - Canterbury
5 - Chatham
6 - Tonbridge
7 - Dartford
8 - Southwark
9 - Reigate
10 - Guilford
11 - Woking

1721074426785.png

1 - London
2 - Westminster
3 - Windsor
4 - Reading
5 - Abingdon
6 - Banbury
7 - Oxford
8 - Henley
9 - Wycombe
10 - Aylesbury
11 - Buckingham

1721074578626.png

1 - St Albans
2 - Hertford
3 - Hitchin
4 - Dunstable
5 - Bedford
6 - Huntingdon
7 - Cambridge
8 - Soham
9 - Ely

1721076525906.png

1 - Waltham
2 - Prittlewell
3 - Chelmsford
4 - Dunmow
5 - Colchester
6 - Ipswich
7 - Sudbury
8 - Bury
9 - Eye
10 - Lowestoft
11 - Yarmouth
12 - Norfolk
13 - Fakenham
14 - Thetford
15 - Lynn

1721077093487.png

1 - Towcester
2 - Northampton
3 - Peterborough
4 - Rutland
5 - Leicester
6 - Bosworth
7 - Harborough
8 - Coventry
9 - Birmingham
10 - Stratford

1721077354035.png

1 - Bristol
2 - Gloucester
3 - Cirencester
4 - Tewkesbury
5 - Worcester
6 - Kidderminster
7 - Hereford
8 - Ewyas
9 - Kington
10 - Leominster

1721160726626.png

1 - Clun
2 - Oswestry
3 - Ludlow
4 - Shrewsbury
5 - Wenlock
6 - Wolverhampton
7 - Stafford
8 - Leek
9 - Lichfield
10 - Nantwich
11 - Farndon
12 - Chester
13 - Halton
14 - Macclesfield

1721078654303.png

1 - Derby
2 - Buxton
3 - Chesterfield
4 - Nottingham
5 - Retford
6 - Newark
7 - Grantham
8 - Sleaford
9 - Boston
10 - Louth
11 - Grimsby
12 - Lincoln

1721079082568.png

1 - Hull
2 - Selby
3 - York
4 - Pocklington
5 - Bridlington
6 - Scarborough
7 - Whitby
8 - Thirsk
9 - Northallerton
10 - Richmond
11 - Skipton
12 - Ripon
13 - Leeds
14 - Pontefract
15 - Doncaster
16 - Sheffield
17 - Barnsley

1721079550597.png

1 - Salford
2 - Warrington
3 - Liverpool
4 - Bolton
5 - Blackburn
6 - Preston
7 - Lancaster
8 - Barrow
9 - Kendall
10 - Appleby
11 - Penrith
12 - Egremont
13 - Carlisle

1721160630499.png

1 - Stockton
2 - Darlington
3 - Durham
4 - Newcastle
5 - Hexham
6 - Wark
7 - Morpeth
8 - Alnwick

WALES

1721158159613.png

1 - Monmouth
2 - Chepstow
3 - Cardiff
4 - Caerphilly
5 - Swansea
6 - Carmarthen
7 - Dinefwr
8 - Pembroke
9 - Fishguard
10 - Cardigan
11 - Aberystwyth

1721159477376.png

1 - Brecon
2 - Bulith
3 - Radnor
4 - Montgomery
5 - Welshpool
6 - Corwen
7 - Harlech
8 - Caernarfon
9 - Anglesey
10 - Colwyn
11 - Chirk
12 - Wrexham
13 - Flint

SCOTLAND
1721160542968.png

1 - Berwick
2 - Duns
3 - Dunbar
4 - Edinburgh
5 - Linlithgow
6 - Peebles
7 - Selkirk
8 - Kelso
9 - Hawick

1721160904227.png

1 - Annan
2 - Dumfries
3 - Kircudbright
4 - Wigtown
5 - Maybole
6 - Ayr
7 - Irvine
8 - Renfrew
9 - Glasgow
10 - Lanark

1721161412988.png

1 - Dunbarton
2 - Balfron
3 - Stirling
4 - Dumferline
5 - St Andrews
6 - Perth
7 - Aucterarder
8 - Dunblane
9 - Aberfeldy
10 - Dunkeld

1721162536885.png

1 - Dundee
2 - Forfar
3 - Dunnottar
4 - Kildrummy
5 - Aberdeen
6 - Buchan
7 - Banff
8 - Elgin

1721162909915.png

1 - Aran
2 - Tarbert
3 - Islay
4 - Inveraray
5 - Dunoon
6 - Oban
7 - Ardtornish
8 - Mull
9 - Skye

1721163379294.png

1 - Murlagan
2 - Inverlochy
3 - Ruthven
4 - Inverness
5 - Urquhart
6 - Gairloch
7 - Dingwall
8 - Ullapool
9 - Tain
10 - Dornoch
11 - Durness
12 - Thurso

Culturally, I'd propose breaking English up into Northumbrian, West Mercian, East Mercian, Wessexian and Kentish as per the different middle english dialects. I appreciate that English was a more homogenous culture, but assume this could be handled with other mechanics (assume there must be some cultural acceptance/tolerance mechanic?). Seems reasonable considering all big culture groups are getting broken up...
1721170092945.png
 
Last edited:
  • 7Love
  • 5
  • 2
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Ok, so I might have gone a little overkill, but after seeing how many provinces France got in its rework I think we could do with a fair few more provinces in GB.
Realise I was slightly trigger happy with this comment yesterday before I had typed it all out....
 
Ok, so I may have gone a little more overboard, but following the updates for France I feel like GB deserves so more provinces (will leave Ireland to other experts). Most of these have been drawn using historic county, wapentake and hundred boundaries. The current map is also quite "blobby", and as a results seems more artificial than more natural wiggly borders that have been used in other regions. For context, this will be taking GB from 176 to 225 provinces, an increase of 50 provinces. Obviously I'd expect there are probably a few more for Ireland too, but it doesnt seem to crazy when France got 141 new provinces.

I've overlaid the province boundaries in red, with black denoting wastelands.

View attachment 1163790

I also propose a slightly tweaked start for Wales - the principality which is more autonomous and in a PU with England (and Welsh culture), and the Marches who are a vassal of England with English culture (or West Mercian - see below. I wouldnt include the border counties, as I understand it the marches were administered from there but control of those areas was administered centrally by the crown). England, Scotland and Balliol start as per the Tinto Talks
View attachment 1164273




Detailled breakdown of locations is below, colours denote the different provinces (note that some will have to be combined to work, honestly at the moment they are just based on the IRL counties)

ENGLAND
View attachment 1163791
1 - Penryn
2 - Truro
3 - Bodmin
4 - Launceston
5 - Plymouth
6 - Totnes
7 - Okehampton
8 - Barnstaple
9 - Tiverton
10 - Exeter

View attachment 1163796
1 - Taunton
2 - Wells
3 - Bath
4 - Glastonbury
5 - Yeovil
6 - Dorchester
7 - Wareham
8 - Shaftesbury
9 - Trowbridge
10 - Chippenham
11 - Marlborough
12 - Salisbury

View attachment 1163812
1 - Lymington
2 - Southampton
3 - Winchester
4 - Overton
5 - Portsmouth
6 - Wight
7 - Chichester
8 - Arundel
9 - Shoreham
10 - Lewes
11 - Hastings

View attachment 1163815
1 - Sandwich
2 - Hythe
3 - Ashford
4 - Canterbury
5 - Chatham
6 - Tonbridge
7 - Dartford
8 - Southwark
9 - Reigate
10 - Guilford
11 - Woking

View attachment 1163818
1 - London
2 - Westminster
3 - Windsor
4 - Reading
5 - Abingdon
6 - Banbury
7 - Oxford
8 - Henley
9 - Wycombe
10 - Aylesbury
11 - Buckingham

View attachment 1163819
1 - St Albans
2 - Hertford
3 - Hitchin
4 - Dunstable
5 - Bedford
6 - Huntingdon
7 - Cambridge
8 - Soham
9 - Ely

View attachment 1163828
1 - Waltham
2 - Prittlewell
3 - Chelmsford
4 - Dunmow
5 - Colchester
6 - Ipswich
7 - Sudbury
8 - Bury
9 - Eye
10 - Lowestoft
11 - Yarmouth
12 - Norfolk
13 - Fakenham
14 - Thetford
15 - Lynn

View attachment 1163834
1 - Towcester
2 - Northampton
3 - Peterborough
4 - Rutland
5 - Leicester
6 - Bosworth
7 - Harborough
8 - Coventry
9 - Birmingham
10 - Stratford

View attachment 1163836
1 - Bristol
2 - Gloucester
3 - Cirencester
4 - Tewkesbury
5 - Worcester
6 - Kidderminster
7 - Hereford
8 - Ewyas
9 - Kington
10 - Leominster

View attachment 1164233
1 - Clun
2 - Oswestry
3 - Ludlow
4 - Shrewsbury
5 - Wenlock
6 - Wolverhampton
7 - Stafford
8 - Leek
9 - Lichfield
10 - Nantwich
11 - Farndon
12 - Chester
13 - Halton
14 - Macclesfield

View attachment 1163847
1 - Derby
2 - Buxton
3 - Chesterfield
4 - Nottingham
5 - Retford
6 - Newark
7 - Grantham
8 - Sleaford
9 - Boston
10 - Louth
11 - Grimsby
12 - Lincoln

View attachment 1163849
1 - Hull
2 - Selby
3 - York
4 - Pocklington
5 - Bridlington
6 - Scarborough
7 - Whitby
8 - Thirsk
9 - Northallerton
10 - Richmond
11 - Skipton
12 - Ripon
13 - Leeds
14 - Pontefract
15 - Doncaster
16 - Sheffield
17 - Barnsley

View attachment 1163853
1 - Salford
2 - Warrington
3 - Liverpool
4 - Bolton
5 - Blackburn
6 - Preston
7 - Lancaster
8 - Barrow
9 - Kendall
10 - Appleby
11 - Penrith
12 - Egremont
13 - Carlisle

View attachment 1164232
1 - Stockton
2 - Darlington
3 - Durham
4 - Newcastle
5 - Hexham
6 - Wark
7 - Morpeth
8 - Alnwick

WALES

View attachment 1164217
1 - Monmouth
2 - Chepstow
3 - Cardiff
4 - Caerphilly
5 - Swansea
6 - Carmarthen
7 - Dinefwr
8 - Pembroke
9 - Fishguard
10 - Cardigan
11 - Aberystwyth

View attachment 1164224
1 - Brecon
2 - Bulith
3 - Radnor
4 - Montgomery
5 - Welshpool
6 - Corwen
7 - Harlech
8 - Caernarfon
9 - Anglesey
10 - Colwyn
11 - Chirk
12 - Wrexham
13 - Flint

SCOTLAND
View attachment 1164230
1 - Berwick
2 - Duns
3 - Dunbar
4 - Edinburgh
5 - Linlithgow
6 - Peebles
7 - Selkirk
8 - Kelso
9 - Hawick

View attachment 1164234
1 - Annan
2 - Dumfries
3 - Kircudbright
4 - Wigtown
5 - Maybole
6 - Ayr
7 - Irvine
8 - Renfrew
9 - Glasgow
10 - Lanark

View attachment 1164243
1 - Dunbarton
2 - Balfron
3 - Stirling
4 - Dumferline
5 - St Andrews
6 - Perth
7 - Aucterarder
8 - Dunblane
9 - Aberfeldy
10 - Dunkeld

View attachment 1164254
1 - Dundee
2 - Forfar
3 - Dunnottar
4 - Kildrummy
5 - Aberdeen
6 - Buchan
7 - Banff
8 - Elgin

View attachment 1164259
1 - Aran
2 - Tarbert
3 - Islay
4 - Inveraray
5 - Dunoon
6 - Oban
7 - Ardtornish
8 - Mull
9 - Skye

View attachment 1164264
1 - Murlagan
2 - Inverlochy
3 - Ruthven
4 - Inverness
5 - Urquhart
6 - Gairloch
7 - Dingwall
8 - Ullapool
9 - Tain
10 - Dornoch
11 - Durness
12 - Thurso

Culturally, I'd propose breaking English up into Northumbrian, West Mercian, East Mercian, Wessexian and Kentish as per the different middle english dialects. I appreciate that English was a more homogenous culture, but assume this could be handled with other mechanics (assume there must be some cultural acceptance/tolerance mechanic?). Seems reasonable considering all big culture groups are getting broken up...
View attachment 1164272

Preface: I am talking about England only. I haven't looked at Scotland at all.

Having spent way too much time looking at maps of England, I think it looks perfect in the southern half. It even roughly fits the geographic boundaries of many regions from what I remember.

The northern half looks less good. I put a line on the map above which I think the locations are too big.

1721166450773.png

I'd like to see that region go up by another 10-15 locations. That would make it more closely match the southern half and better fit with the geographic regions in the north.

With the map as it is, you have a bunch of locations that cover multiple relatively large geographic regions. For example, Wark covers Redesdale Valley, Tyne Valley, then extends down and covers a good portion of the northern Pennines. Personally, I don't like that. So, I cut it off so that it covers the two northern valleys that have relatively similar geographies, then put the part of the northern Pennines under another location. I made similar choices throughout the north. Here is my map of the northern counties.

Northern Counties locations (1).png

I don't know if you agree with that or not, but it is my two cents. I'd divide up a fair number of the northern locations so that you have three locations where there are currently two. That would allow the locations to better fit with the geographic regions. That also better fits with the goods system, where the good that makes the most sense for a location is the good that aligns with the geographic region. If locations are big and cover multiple important geographic regions, then you can't represent the region very well.

The breakdown you used fitting with geographic regions appears to have happened organically in the south, but not as much in the north because it was less heavily populated. The north had bigger locations to adjust for the lower population, which is why the locations covered multiple geographic regions. If you add maybe 10 or so locations in the north, then you can correct for that difference.

Considering it is an alternate history, the north could become heavily populated, in which case the extra large locations do not make sense. If that had happened, then the north would likely have roughly 10 more hundreds, wapentake, etc. And my guess is that those additional locations would likely be around geographic boundaries. So, we are just making a reasonable guess where the boundaries would be in that hypothetical situation. That is how I think about it, anyway.
 
Last edited:
  • 1Like
Reactions:
We now have 3 proposals for revised locations in Scotland, so I thought it would be worth having them together in a single post so they can be compared to the original paradox locations. There are areas of disagreement between the proposals, but I think they all provide needed location density as well as more natural looking location borders.

Original Locations
paradox locations.png


hellfirematt's Map (see also lWhytel's province and area maps)
hellfirematt_20scotland.png


mattd_'s Map (Apologies if I've made any mistakes adding location names)
mattdscotland.png


My Map (see also Slupie's post with options for Scottish vassal setups based on this map)
ScotlandFInal2Resized.png


I also thought it would be useful to make a list of location names in Gaelic, which could be used for Highland/Gaelic culture countries if dynamic location names is implemented. I’ve tried to include all the proposed locations from the various maps, but I might have missed a few. Compiled mostly using Gaelic Place-Names of Scotland and Wikipedia. I can’t speak Gaelic, so I can’t be sure that they are all accurate.
Aberdeen​
Obar Dheathain​
Aberfeldy​
Obar Pheallaidh​
Aird​
An Àird​
Annan​
Inbhir Anainn​
Applecross​
A' Chomraich​
Arbroath​
Obar Bhrothaig​
Ardtornish​
Àird Tòirinis​
Arran​
Eilean Arainn​
Assynt​
Asainn​
Atholl​
Athall​
Aucterarder​
Uachdar Àrdair​
Ayr​
Inbhir Àir​
Badenoch​
Bàideanach​
Balfron​
Both Fron​
Banff​
Banbh​
Berwick​
Bearaig​
Bothwell​
Both Chluaidh​
Breadalbane​
Bràghaid Albann​
Buchan​
Bùchainn​
Clackmannan​
Clach Mhanann​
Comrie​
Cuimridh​
Cowal​
Comhghall​
Cromarty​
Cromba​
Cumnock​
Cumnag​
Cupar​
Cùbar​
Dingwall​
Inbhir Pheofharain​
Dornoch​
Dòrnach​
Dumbarton​
Dùn Breatann​
Dumfries​
Dùn Phris​
Dunbar​
Dùn Bàrr​
Dunblane​
Dùn Bhlàthain​
Dundee​
Dùn Dè​
Dunfermline​
Dùn Phàrlain​
Dunnottar​
Dùn Fhoithear​
Duns​
?​
Durness​
Diùranais​
Edinburgh​
Dùn Èideann​
Elgin​
Ailgin​
Etive​
Èite​
Forfar​
Baile Fharfair​
Gairloch​
Geàrrloch​
Garmoran​
Garbh Chriochan​
Glasgow​
Glaschu​
Gowrie​
Gobharaidh​
Harris​
Na Hearadh​
Hawick​
Hamhaig​
Helmsdale​
Bun Ilidh​
Inveraray​
Inbhir Aora​
Inverlael​
Inbhir Làthail​
Inverlochy​
Inbhir Lòchaidh​
Inverness​
Inbhir Nis​
Irvine​
Irbhinn​
Islay​
Ìle​
Jedburgh​
Deadard​
Jura​
Diùra​
Kelso​
?​
Kenmure​
?​
Kildrummy​
Ceann Drumaidh​
Kincardine​
Ceann Chàrdainn​
Kintrye​
Cinn Tìre​
Kirkcaldy​
Cair Chaladain​
Kirkcudbright​
Cille Chuithbeirt​
Lanark​
Lannraig​
Lewis​
Leòdhas​
Linlithgow​
Gleann Iucha​
Lochaber​
Loch Abar​
Lorne​
Latharna​
Mar​
Mhàrr​
Maybole​
?​
Menteith​
Srath Thèadhaich​
Montrose​
Mon Rois​
Mortlach​
Mòrthlach​
Mull​
Muile​
Murlagan​
Mhurlagain​
Nairn​
Inbhir Narann​
Oban​
An t-Òban​
Peebles​
Na Pùballan​
Perth​
Peairt​
Renfrew​
Rinn Friù​
Roxburgh​
Rosbrog​
Ruthven​
Ruadhainn​
Sanquar​
Seanchair​
Scone​
Sgàin​
Selkirk​
?​
Skye​
An t-Eilean Sgitheanach​
St. Andrews​
Cill Rìmhinn​
Stirling​
Sruighlea​
Stranraer​
An t-Sròn Reamhar​
Strathearn​
?​
Strathbogie​
Srath Bhalgaidh​
Strathdearn​
Srath Èireann​
Stonehaven​
Cala na Creige​
Tain​
Baile Dhubhthaich​
Thurso​
Inbhir Theòrsa​
Tongue​
Tunga​
Uist​
Uibhist​
Ullapool​
Ullapul​
Wick​
Inbhir Ùige​
Wigtown​
Baile na h-Ùige​
 
  • 4Like
  • 1Love
  • 1
Reactions:
I saw in more recent map threads that the goal is to name locations after towns or castles where possible. If true, here are some options for Scotland in the above maps:
Aird: Urquhart is the obvious pick for a territory west of Loch Ness.
Arran: Brodick.
Assynt: Was the name of the castle the lordship was centred on, so if used there'd be no need to change it.
Badenoch: Kingussie is still the main settlement in Badenoch, and nearby Ruthven is where the earlier Comyn earls had their seat of power.
Breadalbane: Killin.
Garmoran: Tioram was the main castle in the area, though depending on how you draw the borders it may be in the Ardtornish province instead. So in a pinch the town of Arisaig would do.
Gowrie: Blairgowrie or Kirkmichael.
Harris: Rodel was the capital of Harris before it was moved to Tarbert in 'modern' times.
Islay: Finlaggan was the initial centre of power of the Lords of the Isles, though was destroyed in the 16th Century. Dunyvaig was an important naval base, but was destroyed in 1677.
Jura: Craighouse is an option.
Kintyre: Tarbert, at the extreme northern point bordering Knapdale, was the main centre of Kintyre.
Lewis: Stornoway is the most obvious choice here.
Lochaber: Inverlochy is the obvious pick here, as just about anything else is far too modern.
Lorne: I think Oban is too modern, since it's importance only began in 18th Century. Nearby Dunollie was the centre of provincial power in the region.
Mar: Kildrummy.
Menteith: Dunblane.
Mull: Aros is the obvious pick if we're dealing with earlier times, but was pretty much abandoned by the end of the 17th Century. Duart is another option, being the main residence of the MacLeans.
Skye: Portree?
Strathbogie: Huntly.
Strathearn: Comrie.
Uist: I don't know, but maybe one of the main settlements on one of the islands - Lochboisdale. Lochmaddy, or Balivanich?

There are two towns where I also think there are better name options:
Aberfeldy: A little anachronistic. I think either Dunkeld (city in the south of Atholl which was the seat of a diocese) or Blair / Blair Atholl (which was the seat of the Earls/Dukes) would be a better pick.
Oban: See Lorne.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions:
Preface: I am talking about England only. I haven't looked at Scotland at all.

Having spent way too much time looking at maps of England, I think it looks perfect in the southern half. It even roughly fits the geographic boundaries of many regions from what I remember.

The northern half looks less good. I put a line on the map above which I think the locations are too big.


I'd like to see that region go up by another 10-15 locations. That would make it more closely match the southern half and better fit with the geographic regions in the north.

With the map as it is, you have a bunch of locations that cover multiple relatively large geographic regions. For example, Wark covers Redesdale Valley, Tyne Valley, then extends down and covers a good portion of the northern Pennines. Personally, I don't like that. So, I cut it off so that it covers the two northern valleys that have relatively similar geographies, then put the part of the northern Pennines under another location. I made similar choices throughout the north. Here is my map of the northern counties.


I don't know if you agree with that or not, but it is my two cents. I'd divide up a fair number of the northern locations so that you have three locations where there are currently two. That would allow the locations to better fit with the geographic regions. That also better fits with the goods system, where the good that makes the most sense for a location is the good that aligns with the geographic region. If locations are big and cover multiple important geographic regions, then you can't represent the region very well.

The breakdown you used fitting with geographic regions appears to have happened organically in the south, but not as much in the north because it was less heavily populated. The north had bigger locations to adjust for the lower population, which is why the locations covered multiple geographic regions. If you add maybe 10 or so locations in the north, then you can correct for that difference.

Considering it is an alternate history, the north could become heavily populated, in which case the extra large locations do not make sense. If that had happened, then the north would likely have roughly 10 more hundreds, wapentake, etc. And my guess is that those additional locations would likely be around geographic boundaries. So, we are just making a reasonable guess where the boundaries would be in that hypothetical situation. That is how I think about it, anyway.
I do sort of agree, but also think its worth keeping some variety in province density. Part of the problem is that most of the borders I had shown are based off various historical boundaries, and because those areas had less people there were just fewer divisions. Have tried to follow topography changes to create some of the new provinces that dont have any further divisions (Yorkshire and Durham)

I have given it some thought though and added a few more provinces (yellow = new provinces, red = border changes, blue = impacted provinces, green = new wastelands for the Moors).
1721229339964.png

1 - Lydney
2 - Swaffham
3 - Rasen
4 - Beverley
5 - Halifax
6 - Settle
7 - Aysgarth
8 - Barnard
9 - Wigton
10 - Elsdon

That results in the following revised maps:

Countries
1721209477567.png

Culture
1721209433645.png
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
  • 2
  • 1Love
Reactions:
I saw in more recent map threads that the goal is to name locations after towns or castles where possible. If true, here are some options for Scotland in the above maps:
Aird: Urquhart is the obvious pick for a territory west of Loch Ness.
Arran: Brodick.
Assynt: Was the name of the castle the lordship was centred on, so if used there'd be no need to change it.
Badenoch: Kingussie is still the main settlement in Badenoch, and nearby Ruthven is where the earlier Comyn earls had their seat of power.
Breadalbane: Killin.
Garmoran: Tioram was the main castle in the area, though depending on how you draw the borders it may be in the Ardtornish province instead. So in a pinch the town of Arisaig would do.
Gowrie: Blairgowrie or Kirkmichael.
Harris: Rodel was the capital of Harris before it was moved to Tarbert in 'modern' times.
Islay: Finlaggan was the initial centre of power of the Lords of the Isles, though was destroyed in the 16th Century. Dunyvaig was an important naval base, but was destroyed in 1677.
Jura: Craighouse is an option.
Kintyre: Tarbert, at the extreme northern point bordering Knapdale, was the main centre of Kintyre.
Lewis: Stornoway is the most obvious choice here.
Lochaber: Inverlochy is the obvious pick here, as just about anything else is far too modern.
Lorne: I think Oban is too modern, since it's importance only began in 18th Century. Nearby Dunollie was the centre of provincial power in the region.
Mar: Kildrummy.
Menteith: Dunblane.
Mull: Aros is the obvious pick if we're dealing with earlier times, but was pretty much abandoned by the end of the 17th Century. Duart is another option, being the main residence of the MacLeans.
Skye: Portree?
Strathbogie: Huntly.
Strathearn: Comrie.
Uist: I don't know, but maybe one of the main settlements on one of the islands - Lochboisdale. Lochmaddy, or Balivanich?

There are two towns where I also think there are better name options:
Aberfeldy: A little anachronistic. I think either Dunkeld (city in the south of Atholl which was the seat of a diocese) or Blair / Blair Atholl (which was the seat of the Earls/Dukes) would be a better pick.
Oban: See Lorne.
I believe they have said they are happy naming Islands after the Island they are on, but agreed - the provinces named after the clans/peninsulas should change
 
  • 2
Reactions:
I do sort of agree, but also think its worth keeping some variety in province density. Part of the problem is that most of the borders I had shown are based off various historical boundaries, and because those areas had less people there were just fewer divisions. Have tried to follow topography changes to create some of the new provinces that dont have any further divisions (Yorkshire and Durham)

I have given it some thought though and added a few more provinces (yellow = new provinces, red = border changes, blue = impacted provinces, green = new wastelands for the Moors).
View attachment 1164455
1 - Lydney
2 - Swaffham
3 - Rasen
4 - Beverley
5 - Halifax
6 - Settle
7 - Aysgarth
8 - Barnard
9 - Wigton
10 - Elsdon

That results in the following revised maps:

Countries
View attachment 1164457
Culture
View attachment 1164456

Thank you! I think it looks a fair bit better. :)

I can still see a few problems from a goods perspective, but that is based specifically on my work that you wouldn't know. For example, I liked having Keswick in the Cumbria high fells as kind of a dedicated "high fells" location to represent the mining there. In the above map, the coastal area from Cockermouth looks like it covers the Keswick region. That forces you to choose whether to represent Cockermouth with the agrarian coastal good - wool - or give it copper, which I have as the high fells good. I don't like being forced to make that choice.

That is why I like this breakdown from a geographic perspective better:
(lines are very approximate)

High fells.png

That's just an example. I'm not saying to keep working on it. Just that I still like some aspects of my breakdown.

It is an interesting debate. Which should have primacy when drawing location lines? Political boundaries or geographic boundaries? I am not saying there is a right answer to that. I leaned into the latter because it fit with my specific goal, which was to pick goods. The better a location fits with geographic boundaries, then the easier it is to pick goods since it is obvious what the good is supposed to represent.

That said, geographic boundaries aren't always obvious. In the above image, I drew one location covering the Eden Valley. I did that because I was ignoring what happens around the edge of the map. Depending on what you want to do with the northern Pennines, you might draw multiple locations covering the valley and neighboring hills. Of course, if you do that, then you are right back to having to choose whether the location good is from the valley or the uplands. In my opinion, you want to avoid that as much as you can, but that is easier said than done.

Anyway, what I am trying to say is that no map is going to be perfect. Everyone is going to draw theirs a bit different.
 
Quick "half-assed" update on Wales.

I have decided to punt on Wales until after the Tinto Map is updated. That is because of a combination of a) there are potentially a lot of Wales locations to do (more on that in a second), b) I have run out of gas, c) I couldn't find as good a source on the NCAs, and d) the Agrarian History doesn't go into as much depth on Wales. Long story short, the Wales locations require a roll up the sleeves and dig into website approach that is super time-consuming and I am not interested in doing that right now.

I did come up with some map options. Before I get into the options, my two main sources were a Wales variation on the NCAs and a topographical map of Wales. Here they are:


With that out of the way, there are two main options for Wales because of the highland/mountain regions. You either divide up the highland/mountain regions into the neighboring locations or you give the highland/mountain regions their own location. I mocked up both. I did put some impassable terrain into the divided up version. Someone who knows more can say whether that is appropriate or not. If inappropriate, just ignore it.

FYI - The highland/mountain locations are 6, 21, and 30 from the NCLA map in the spoiler above.

Version 1 - Divided up:

Version 2 - Highland/Mountain locations (yes, I didn't name the highland/mountain locations):

Next, the Agrarian History book does have a map that breaks up the regions into mixed husbandry vs pastoral. I'll link the map when I have time. For now, here is the breakdown.

Mixed-husbandry:
Anglesey
Wrexham
Denbigh
Conwy
Llyn
Cardigan
Fishguard
Pembroke
Carmarthan
Llandielo
Swansea
Caerphilly (borderline)
Cardiff
Newport
Monmouth
Llangollen
Montgomery
Brecknock

Pastoral:
Caernarfon
Harlech
Llanegryn
Aberystwyth
New Quay
Merthyr
Caerphilly (borderline)
Plus the highland/mountain locations, if those are used.

Hopefully, that is useful. I'm not opposed to looking at Wales, but it will have to wait until I've taken a lengthy break.

I am going to try and bang out the North Counties tomorrow, then that will be it until after Paradox does an update.

This one may be long, so sorry in advance, and is meant primarily as constructive critisism rather than a dig so please dont take it as one! Regarding any forms of locations or impassables based off of NCA's, I work with National Character Area Maps, and they aren't really used for the purposes I think you've implied. NCA's are primarily to help ascertain the character of the landscape from a ecological perspective in which the areas more accurately represent harmonious ecosystems (Hence why Natural Resources Wales made the NCA) in conjunction with a cultural ecosystem which reflects the human history of the area in built form.

For example, the Dyfi NCA (22) on that presented map incorporates land from either side of the Dyfi estuary and includes places such as Tywyn, Ynyslas, Aberdyfi and Machynlleth, areas which have historically had very similar ecological spheres and utilised materials around them similarly (notably slate roofing and victorian era housing) as well as having shaped the land around themselves in similar ways, such as the canalisation/land reclamation of the Borth Spit and likewise the land reclamation of the Dysynni river estuary, both of which have left Peat Bogs/marshland in their wake.

Likewise the valleys are merged into one homogenous unit on our NCA as they represent the glacial valley region (obviously) that produced a vibrant coal mining industry, which in turn replicated throughout the valleys region a built form which was characterised by collieries and ribbon developments producing late 19th century terraced houses.

The 'impassables' you have listed as a result of possibly misinterpreting these NCA's are actually just NCA zone's 21 (Cambrian Mountains) and 6 (Snowdonia), and ignore the historically long standing internal boundaries which formed for a reason and contains no location of any strategic value nor core to a wider region, any settlements found within are subservient to another which provides the foundations of their economies. These NCAs are purely a recognition for planners and other individuals who utilise these maps to understand what the character of the landscape is like so as to make an informed decision on a developments viability.
Its the peaks and ridges of mountains which went on to form the historical boundaries between counties and lordships or locations and settlements moreso than vast expanses accumulating into geographic regions of their own merit.

Zone 21 purely resembles the Cambrian mountain range and desert of Wales, which is a vast area of sparsely populated areas characterised by deep glacial valleys, lakes and moraines which are littered in Peat bogs, vast expanses of moorland and littered with pockets of water pools, the human aspect is represented by the numerous logging developments ongoing which add to the visual aspect of the landscape though not adding much ecologically. Likewise zone 6, Eryri, is similarly charectarised by deep glacial valleys, but is heavily grounded in its slate mining industries such as Blaenau Ffestiniog, Dinorwig and Bethesda.

If Impassables were to be added, they should follow historically significant frontiers which halted armies in their shadows such as the Desert of Wales/Cambrian mountains, the Clwyd Range, the Black mountains, the Berwyn mountain range depending on feasibility of granuality. Potentially the Brecon Beacons too, though there were passes utilised through the beacons for centuries, since the Romans at least, whether or not they were utilised for mass military transportation, I dont know, whether they could also be added for gameplay reasons, I don't know in all reality.

1721241690993.png


I have a few impassable suggestions ready to go based off of the updated version of the map I had suggested which incorporate the aforementioned potential impassables but I think feedback inclusion may have essentially stopped by now after 50 pages and the upcoming GB&IE feedback dev diary hahahah.
I 100% get that you couldn't find resources on Wales tbh, don't worry, they can be hard af to find :oops: The topographic map is okay but it doesn't really highlight Wales' peaks nor mountain ridges/ranges as well as it should, which is unfortunate if you want to make impassables based off of them.

Just a few other nitpicks on naming and other locations, again, purely constructive criticism, not a dig at all:
  1. Its Llandeilo, not Llandielo, its Llŷn and not Llyn
    (seems pedantic but Llyn just means lake, both are pronounced differently, one is Ll-een, one is Ll-ihn, the roof is what emphasises the difference, similar with Ynys Môn).
  2. Caerphilly isn't borderline in image 1, it just wouldn't be in the location assigned to it.
  3. I'm also unsure as to why you'd name a location Llanegryn when the real life settlement has a population of 303 now. Pennal would make sense as the most important location if a location like the one you have depicted were to emerge, notably the location from where the Pennal letter was drafted and sent to the King of France by Owain Glyndŵr which helped formalise their alliance and the seat of a sub-lordship for quite some time.
 
  • 4Love
  • 2Like
Reactions:
@WelshStalker No worries, the developers are going to publish feedback on Poland/Baltics/Silesia/Lithuania first. They'll probably still read feedback in this thread. ;)
 
This one may be long, so sorry in advance, and is meant primarily as constructive critisism rather than a dig so please dont take it as one! Regarding any forms of locations or impassables based off of NCA's, I work with National Character Area Maps, and they aren't really used for the purposes I think you've implied. NCA's are primarily to help ascertain the character of the landscape from a ecological perspective in which the areas more accurately represent harmonious ecosystems (Hence why Natural Resources Wales made the NCA) in conjunction with a cultural ecosystem which reflects the human history of the area in built form.

For example, the Dyfi NCA (22) on that presented map incorporates land from either side of the Dyfi estuary and includes places such as Tywyn, Ynyslas, Aberdyfi and Machynlleth, areas which have historically had very similar ecological spheres and utilised materials around them similarly (notably slate roofing and victorian era housing) as well as having shaped the land around themselves in similar ways, such as the canalisation/land reclamation of the Borth Spit and likewise the land reclamation of the Dysynni river estuary, both of which have left Peat Bogs/marshland in their wake.

Likewise the valleys are merged into one homogenous unit on our NCA as they represent the glacial valley region (obviously) that produced a vibrant coal mining industry, which in turn replicated throughout the valleys region a built form which was characterised by collieries and ribbon developments producing late 19th century terraced houses.

The 'impassables' you have listed as a result of possibly misinterpreting these NCA's are actually just NCA zone's 21 (Cambrian Mountains) and 6 (Snowdonia), and ignore the historically long standing internal boundaries which formed for a reason and contains no location of any strategic value nor core to a wider region, any settlements found within are subservient to another which provides the foundations of their economies. These NCAs are purely a recognition for planners and other individuals who utilise these maps to understand what the character of the landscape is like so as to make an informed decision on a developments viability.
Its the peaks and ridges of mountains which went on to form the historical boundaries between counties and lordships or locations and settlements moreso than vast expanses accumulating into geographic regions of their own merit.

Zone 21 purely resembles the Cambrian mountain range and desert of Wales, which is a vast area of sparsely populated areas characterised by deep glacial valleys, lakes and moraines which are littered in Peat bogs, vast expanses of moorland and littered with pockets of water pools, the human aspect is represented by the numerous logging developments ongoing which add to the visual aspect of the landscape though not adding much ecologically. Likewise zone 6, Eryri, is similarly charectarised by deep glacial valleys, but is heavily grounded in its slate mining industries such as Blaenau Ffestiniog, Dinorwig and Bethesda.

If Impassables were to be added, they should follow historically significant frontiers which halted armies in their shadows such as the Desert of Wales/Cambrian mountains, the Clwyd Range, the Black mountains, the Berwyn mountain range depending on feasibility of granuality. Potentially the Brecon Beacons too, though there were passes utilised through the beacons for centuries, since the Romans at least, whether or not they were utilised for mass military transportation, I dont know, whether they could also be added for gameplay reasons, I don't know in all reality.

View attachment 1164643

I have a few impassable suggestions ready to go based off of the updated version of the map I had suggested which incorporate the aforementioned potential impassables but I think feedback inclusion may have essentially stopped by now after 50 pages and the upcoming GB&IE feedback dev diary hahahah.
I 100% get that you couldn't find resources on Wales tbh, don't worry, they can be hard af to find :oops: The topographic map is okay but it doesn't really highlight Wales' peaks nor mountain ridges/ranges as well as it should, which is unfortunate if you want to make impassables based off of them.

Just a few other nitpicks on naming and other locations, again, purely constructive criticism, not a dig at all:
  1. Its Llandeilo, not Llandielo, its Llŷn and not Llyn
    (seems pedantic but Llyn just means lake, both are pronounced differently, one is Ll-een, one is Ll-ihn, the roof is what emphasises the difference, similar with Ynys Môn).
  2. Caerphilly isn't borderline in image 1, it just wouldn't be in the location assigned to it.
  3. I'm also unsure as to why you'd name a location Llanegryn when the real life settlement has a population of 303 now. Pennal would make sense as the most important location if a location like the one you have depicted were to emerge, notably the location from where the Pennal letter was drafted and sent to the King of France by Owain Glyndŵr which helped formalise their alliance and the seat of a sub-lordship for quite some time.

The goal is to come up with the best location map possible. If you've got a better map, then I welcome it. My ego isn't tied up in the maps that I produce. It is to try and help.

I do think that my process produced a reasonable location map. Here are the basics:

1) I started off by reading the NCA to get some idea of what the geography of the region was like. Was it a lowland valley? Was it uplands moors? Was it fertile? Did people live there? Could people live there? Did it contain valuable goods that should be modelled? Basically, what type of place is this and was it worthy of representation? Keep in mind that I have no local knowledge. I am not from England or Wales. I live in California.

2) Once I have an idea of what a place was like, I then look at the topographical map to try and match the description with the topography/geography. I try to identify the extent of the described region. If the region is a lowland valley, then I look for the area on the topographical map that appears to fit that description. This gives me a rough idea of what should go into a location (or locations).

3) Next, I consider the typical size of a location. I've done a ton of these maps at this point, so I've got a rough idea of how big locations should be. I try to fit the region into the location. If the region is too big and the circumstances make sense, then I use multiple locations.

I think if you consider that process, it is logical. That does not mean it is perfect. Someone from the area or who has heavily researched the area is going to be able to draw a better map. I spent a day (about 12 hours) going through the 40-ish NCAs for Wales. That doesn't replace first hand experience or expert knowledge. No question. And I have no problem with someone who has that knowledge making corrections or explaining why the map is wrong from that experience/knowledge. The goal is to come up with the best map. If me posting a map convinces someone with superior knowledge to come out and critique it to make it better, then that is great! We just got one step closer to the goal. I think my map was a step better than Paradox's, so it was progress regardless of whether it was perfection.

As far as names of towns or places, I again did the best that I could. I googled town after town after town to try and find those that seemed like they were historically significant. I don't have any source other than a present day map with the cities and towns and the information from a google search. If I picked something, then there was a valid reason for the choice at the time. If there is a more significant town, then great! Again, the goal is the best map. Present the better town, let's update the map, then it is one more step closer in getting the best map down.

I think of it as a collaborative process. We are working together. So, suggest away. Produce your own version of a map, if you haven't already. Edit mine to suggest where you think more sensible boundaries should be. As long as we keep making improvements, then we are on the right path.

I hope that helps.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
I thought I'd do a little update with some further suggestions and minor changes within Wales but also the border regions for better gameplay and flavour.

First, in talking with some over these forums and in PMs, I feel there's enough justification to add 4 more locations to better split up Wales and make the area more uniform in location size. These areas would be Conwy, Ruthin, Welshpool and Crickhowell. (You may notice some slight border changes too as well as locations for Chester, I'll explain later). However I'm aware this may start bringing Wales to too many locations, on the other hand, these changes would bring Wales on par with the location density in the province of Leinster in Ireland, these changes would also make the location sizes within Wales fairly similar to each other and bring some air of evenness to it.

4 New Locations: Conwy, Ruthin, Welshpool and Crickhowell.
View attachment 1152357

1. Conwy - Split from Caernarfon
Conwy was a hugely important location in Wales at the time as well as the rest of the island, playing a critical role in Glyndwrs war of Independence, having been captured by only 2 men at the start of the war in 1401, the noblemen Rhys ap Tudur and his brother Gwilym (related to the Tudors who used the anglicized form of the family name who were also Glyndwrs cousins) who pretended to be carpenters seeking to repair the gate, only to kill the watchmen and let Glyndwr's army in (Would make for a brilliant event to pop up for the Welsh player during the war of Independence).

During the Wars of the Roses, though not the sight of actual fighting, served as a logistical hub for battles undertaken in the Marches. The Castle was also heavily damaged during the civil wars as well as, initially being held by Royalists, the castle and location was then taken by Parliamentarians in August 1646.


2. Ruthin - Split from Llangollen
Long one, sorry.
Ruthin is very important during this time period, though only a small lordship, the single lord of this demesne managed to incite the Welsh War of Independence led by Glyndwr almost singlehandedly, with the war starting out initially as personal rivalry between Glyndwr and Reynold Grey, 3rd Baron Grey of Ruthin, who having seized some of Glyndwr's estates in the neighbouring principality, utilised his support and leverage with the new King Henry IV as a member of his Kings council to plead his case, which was previously found in favour of Glyndwr under Richard II.

Following this, whilst the legal litigation surrounding the disputed lands continued, a war in Scotland broke out. Grey was charged with gathering the levies in the Northern Marches, but purposefully neglected to inform Glyndwr of the raising of the levies. Glyndwr was thus late to the summons and branded a traitor and his lands confiscated until he could prove his loyalty. Glyndwr took up arms on the 16th of September 1400 as a result, wherein he was proclaimed Prince of Wales by his followers, proceeding to burn down De Grey's landholdings and castles, followed up by attacks on Denbigh, Rhuddlan, Flint, Hawarden, Holt, Oswestry and Welshpool in quick succession before being beaten at the battle of Lake Vyrnwy north of Welshpool/Y Trallwng on the 24th by Hugh Burnell.
View attachment 1152364

Following this, De Grey staged a false reconciliation meeting with Glyndwr at his estate in Glandyfrdwy. Supposedly insinuating to Glyndwr that he would only bring a retinue of 30 men, DeGrey hid a force in the nearby forest, only for this to be noticed by Glyndwr and his men, who rightly deemed the event to be a trap. Though surrounded, Glyndwr escaped and laid low for months, gathering men in secret throughout the North of Wales before launching the primary phase of the war of independence during the 1401 campaign. Glyndwr would later capture the Lordship of Ruthin later in 1402, capturing Baron DeGrey in the process and ransoming him off for 10,000 Marks, approximately £5,062,717 today adjusted for inflation.

The borders I've shown here are the lordship of Ruthin as well as the westernmost portion of the marcher lordship of Bromfield and Yale, on the same side of the Clwydian mountain range as Ruthin. Though it would be preferable to keep the borders of the marches as historical as possible, this would allow for more even location sizes as well as the possibility for impassable terrains along the Clwyd range.


3. Welshpool - Split from Machynlleth
Rather than Machynlleth which, though nationally important at the time, as can be seen by Glyndwr holding his Parliament here, Welshpool was actually the seat of power in the Kingdom Powys and the later Lordship of Powys. Following the fall of Mathrafal in 1212 during the many wars intended to annex Wales, Welshpool became the seat of power for the House of Mathrafal, who would retain nominal power via the rump lordship of Powys carved out of the former Kingdom of Powys, fielding loyalty to the English crown. Glyndwr would later go on to ransack the town, leading to a truce with the Marcher Lordship. A new Welshpool location would also allow for more dynamic impassables in the region.


4. Crickhowell - Split from Brecon
The area referred to as Crickhowell here would actually have made up the Lordship of Blaenllyfni as well as some appendages of the Lordship of Brecon in the North West, though held by the same family, the lordships were separate. Power was held in Blaenllyfni castle until the start date itself, wherein an inquisition by jury found the castle defences to be ruinous following the Despencer wars, thus, the seat of power in the lordship was transfered to Crickhowell, which would later go on to play major roles in Welsh history (After the Mortimers were beaten during the war of independence however, I am not 100% sure, but Crickhowell may well have returned to the hands of the Lordship of Brecon sometime after 1405). Notably, this new location would further increase the power of the Mortimer family, as well as allow for a more unified landholding presented ingame as well as allow for the Stafford Holdings to be shown.


Who owns what now? (Before and After):
View attachment 1152372View attachment 1152373

Orange = Stafford (Lordship of Gwynllwg, location = Caldicot)
Light Blue = De Grey (Lordship of Ruthin, location = Ruthin)

With the Mortimer realm expanded in mid Wales, its possible to take their location of Caldicot and give it to the Staffords, who owned the neighbouring and larger lordship of Gwynllwg (Now Newport) highlighted in Orange. Likewise, the Arundel realm is somewhat shrunk but better represented now, with the DeGrey's of Ruthin controlling the location and lordship of Ruthin (potentially now enabling events related to Glyndwr's war of independence).

There were two mistakes in Pembrokeshire, namely, Narberth was owned and controlled by the Mortimer family at the time. Secondly, the lordship of Pembrokeshire should only own territory south of the Landsker line. What is now Preseli Pembrokeshire (North) comprised of two lordships at the time, Cemaes and Pebidiog, however without splitting down too much, by merging the two into one location, the area should fall into the hands of the Audley family who currently control Cantref Bychan in Brown and controlled the lordship of Cemaes.

Some minor border changes can be noted too, mainly with the border region between Wales and England to better represent the actual line of the border, but most notably is the Dyfi Estuary, this estuary should properly be represented ingame, as no army could ford the estuary, rather, if travelling from Gwynedd to Ceredigion or vice versa, armies were necessitated to march into Powys first, near Machynlleth to circumnavigate the estuary (See the map below for better visualisation, Powys in Yellow, Principality regions uncoloured).

View attachment 1152375

The Dyfi Estuary, with Gwynedd in the North, Powys in the East and Ceredigion in the South.

Changes in The Kingdom of England?
I am in no way as versed in English counties as I am in Welsh counties, however, I feel these locations which are adherent to the Domesday hundreds as well as the Domesday counties would improve location size, shape as well as density within the border regions. Any comments or discussions related to it are very welcome however!

View attachment 1152485
Black = Previously Mentioned. Blue = Chester, locations shown next.

1. Shrewsbury
2. Wellington
(Now part of Telford, used to be the primary location here, even had a hundred named after it)
3. Ludlow
4. Bridgenorth
5. Wigmore
6. Hereford
7. Ewyas
8. St Braviels
or Westbury
(Not Dean, St Braviels was likely the most important location at the time, favourite hunting lodge of many Kings as well as the primary arrow making settlement in England).
9. Malvern
(Malvern may be a bit too long, it could be argued that it may need to be separated in two).
10. Kidderminster
11. Worcester
12. Gloucester
13. Winchcombe
14. Cirencester
15. Berkeley
16. Bristol


Changes in the County Palatine of Chester?
View attachment 1152486
Black = Previously Mentioned.

1. Willaston
2. Chester
3. Rushton
4. Bucklow
5. Macclesfield
6. Middlewich
7. Acton

The boundaries of these suggested locations adhere to a certain extent to the borders of one or more hundreds from the 1086 domesday book, the borders of which were maintained for centuries in most instances one way or the other. These locations also allow for a plethora of different options also, including the accurate borders of English counties (Image 1), Glyndwr's Wales as per the Tripartite agreement (Image 2.) as well as to shaping the wars of the roses better (Image 3, House of York in Blue, same as Mortimers before and House of Lancaster in Red).

View attachment 1152491View attachment 1152492View attachment 1152493

I finally had a chance to look at this. It looks great! If I had seen this before I came up with my map, I wouldn't have bothered. That would have saved me a day of work!

My only concern is that there are some locations that are on the smallish side compared to the size used in England. Leominster and Kington are pretty good representations of small locations in England. There are maybe a half-dozen locations that are smaller than that standard in the Wales part of the map (I didn't look that closely at the England portion). In many of those cases, you could just borrow from the neighboring location to adjust for that. The only place where that might be a challenge is in the southwest where there are four small locations.

That said, maybe the standard is different after the update. And you are right that Ireland is on a different standard! Ireland has some micro-locations. Cork is like half the size of the smallest English location.

I like having more locations because it makes it easier to represent the varied good economy of places. The reason that I broke up some of the larger locations in Wales (Carnarvon and Harlech, for example) was not just because of NCAs, but rather because I thought more locations would be a good thing to make it easier to have the various goods in Wales. You need locations for fish, wheat, livestock, wool, coal, iron, and probably a few other things too. It just makes it easier to squeeze all that in when you have more locations. Carnarvon and Harlech were on the larger side, so splitting them up seemed reasonable.

To come up with an example, lets say the economy in Carnarvon had two goods that made sense. By splitting it, you can represent both goods! My assumption is that in an alternate history, maybe Wales would be more populated, another town would develop on the Llyn (i spent a half hour trying to figure out how to put the ^ above the y, but gave up - the directions from a google search repeatedly were wrong) peninsula, then the additional location would make sense. Same goes for Harlech. Hopefully, that makes sense.

Anyway, great job! I know these are a lot of work!
 
Last edited: